[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

All the other previous modes of production were brought about over the course of centuries. The replacement of slavery by feudalism and feudal decentralization of the disintegrated ancient slave empires took centuries to complete. Slavery was not overthrown by slave rebellions, but by local magistrates using legal codes to turn poor freemen and ex slaves into coloni which were the prototypes of serfs. Slave revolts and servile wars shook the ruling classes, but they were put down quickly and did not establish a new order. Then the re-centralizing and industrializing force of capitalism also took centuries to emerge, requiring political/economic developments that began during feudalism and carried on: The rise of merchants and mariners in breakaway republics, the colonization and genocide of the new world, the enclosure of commons in England, the bourgeois revolution in France, the prototypical corporate structures and joint stock companies created by the Dutch colonizers, and finally the industrial revolution in England. Just like slavery was not overthrown by slaves, Feudalism was not overthrown by peasants. In fact in some bourgeois revolutions, like France, peasants often played a counter-revolutionary role. All these changes were largely brought about by slow systemic changes out of the total control of any one class but involving all classes fighting over the steering wheel. The idea of a "revolutionary class" is almost in some ways the reproduction of the great man theory of history at a class level. History is driven by systems, not protagonists, collective or individual. Lower class political upheaval, when it happened, was often either directed (with varying success) by middle strata or crushed by ruling strata. Bourgeois transitions were top-down affairs in Prussia and Japan, though ambiguously so. The vast majority of slave revolts and peasant revolts failed, but there is a vulgarized idea that a world proletarian revolution is going to establish a new mode of production in a single cataclysmic event rather than the new mode of production emerging slowly from systemic changes beyond anyone's control as in all previous transitions between modes of production. There's only so much one can ignore the evidence of actual history in favor of treating any one class as the historical protagonist. There are modes of production, and they do change, but it is less certain whether "revolutions" inherently "cause" modes of production to transition. Such revolutions as they are popularly conceived: Violent uprisings by the most downtrodden, are usually localized and rare events (which often fail either immediately, like with the Paris Commune and Wat Tyler's Rebellion, or after a while, as with the October Revolution). Revolutions are just one catalyst among many, rather than a universal causal template for why modes of productions transition. Which state, if any, has already accepted this as the truth and acts accordingly?

File: 1756247346673-0.pdf (776.97 KB, 180x255, Georgi-Konstantinov.pdf)

File: 1756247346673-1.png (222.52 KB, 723x706, GK.PNG)


File: 1756248028882.png (54.09 KB, 1058x233, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2447997
That Bakunin quote on the cover of that PDF is very similar to:

>“No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society."


<Karl Marx, from the preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)

File: 1756248100120.png (290.33 KB, 787x746, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2447997
Yandex did not help me much with that 2nd image

>>2448020
>>2448020
The real alternative before Robotron Revolution which humanity faces: Super Dictatorship or Social Revolution


Rough translation:
I first encountered the idea of the R.R. (Robotic Revolution) and its influence on the Social Revolution half a century ago, when I came across an anecdote, as well as a brilliant thought by the father of cybernetics—the American mathematician Norbert Wiener, which I quote on the following pages—and his final interview before his death, all touching on the automation of labor processes.

(The upcoming appearance of factories with robots instead of workers had been talked about even decades ago in our country, when “our” ideologues of the bygone era, following the Soviet ones, spun yarns in front of the Zhivkov regime and promised to solve all the problems of “socialism” with the help of so-called Automated Control Systems—“ACS.” What came out of this grand-scale charlatanism and the “organic” incompatibility between cybernetics and dictatorship is now obvious to all, but back then, any hint at the antagonism between them was treated as the most dangerous heresy.)

My initial reflections (around 1963/64), as I said, were in an embryonic or anecdotal state, but gradually, through subsequent explorations, conversations, and discussions, the theme of the cardinal role and all-encompassing significance of the R.R. became clearer and intertwined with that of the Social Revolution, which has interested me and to which I have devoted myself since my earliest youth.

Without making any claims to authorship or originality in working on the problem, I would welcome and join any systematic effort or research into the hypothesis concerning the relationship between the R.R. and the S.R. (Social Revolution).

The core of this hypothesis is an attempt at a theoretical proof of the end of modern civilization. This “proof” is almost mathematical. Mathematical, because it is based on an axiom. Axioms, as we know, are statements that are not proven but are accepted as fundamental postulates (see mathematical theory), from which all other theorems, lemmas, etc., are derived—the building blocks of mathematical disciplines (e.g., the geometries of Euclid, Lobachevsky, or Riemann).

My “axiomatic system” contains only one axiom, which can be called the Wiener Axiom. It is inspired by the thoughts of the father of cybernetics and can be formulated as follows:

There are no theoretical or practical barriers to the total automation of all labor processes in the sphere of production and services.

With the help of Wiener’s Axiom, it is possible to theoretically prove the end of all categories of capitalism: property, capital, profit, commodity, profitability, financial capital, money, etc.

The beginning of the proof starts with the end of human labor in general—and wage labor in particular. “End” in the sense of its contraction, of its approaching a boundary beyond which humanity can no longer exist within the framework of the “market economy” and commodity relations, and the hypothetical functioning of capitalist society beyond that point becomes meaningless even for the capitalists themselves, since they find meaning in extracting profit.

Wage labor “disappears” as a result of the penetration of computers, robots, and other achievements of the Robotic Revolution into services, industry, agriculture, science, and the arts—including the “art of ruling over people” and other state “affairs.”

With the help of Wiener’s Axiom (and the possible addition of further axioms that are non-contradictory to it), it is theoretically possible to prove not only the end but also the necessity of the destruction of the state—this second or first pillar of class civilizations (including capitalist civilization). The third pillar—religion—has been agonizing for quite some time, but God still twitches… and stinks. We do not deal here with Him, His priests, and their organization—the Church—since their disappearance “at the end of history” is directly dependent on the end of the state and capital. The same goes for the priestly role of mass media and their servicing… toilet journalists.

An attempt to prove the end of the hierarchy and pyramid structure of the state (with its constituent institutions), i.e., the end of the military-police organization of society and its bureaucratic apparatus—whose Ultima Ratio remains the repressive apparatus—was made in the aforementioned pamphlet “R.R. and the End of the State,” which used some of the numerous examples supporting the “Wiener Axiom” found in books such as:

“The Third Wave” by Alvin Toffler,

“The Big Bang of Organizations” by Hervé Sérieyx,

“The End of Work” by Jeremy Rifkin, and others.

At the same time, it is a critique of their reformism and a development of the topic toward the Social Revolution and Anarchy.

The numerous repetitions in the articles of this collection are largely due to my repeated attempts to explain elementary and obvious consequences of the “Axiom,” which at the time were indigestible not only for intelligent bourgeois and the last “non-prostituted Marxists” (of the Trotskyist variety), but even for many of our anarchists, who could not free themselves from the traditional perspective and conservatism of the classical labor-based concept of society and revolution.

I hope that the “practice” of the R.R. and its avalanche-like conquests in all spheres of human labor will be far more convincing than “the gray wasteland of theory.”

The repetitions in the collection should be avoided, and the systematization of the materials improved, while the evidential power of the claims should be strengthened with the help of the continuously growing examples and illustrations in a collective work dedicated to the general and special theory of the social revolution, of which this hypothesis is a part. Those working on the topic will be aided by the increasingly abundant materials, whether in daily and periodical press, or in popular or specialized literature, dealing with one or another aspect or consequence of the R.R. (scientific-technological revolution). Such materials used to be rarer than “white swallows,” and in our country, they were simply banned, because, as the guru Joseph Dzhugashvili—“Stalin”—taught:

“Cybernetics and genetics were… bourgeois sciences.”
At that time, his disciples still believed that “Marxism-Leninism is the final word in science,” while their secret police were slowly roasting heretics over a low flame…

I believe the interdependence, the connection, and the “transmissions” between the R.R. and the Social Revolution can be best understood through the following:

DEFINITION OF A REVOLUTIONARY SITUATION

“No social formation ever perishes before all the productive forces for which it has room have been developed; and new, higher relations of production never appear before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society.”
— KARL MARX

“The ruling class can no longer govern, and the oppressed class no longer wants to live under the old conditions.”
— VLADIMIR LENIN

“A civilization is ripe for death when it has created and developed within itself all the theoretical and practical elements that must destroy it.”
— MIKHAIL BAKUNIN

https://www.anarchy.bg/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/%D0%A0%D0%A0-%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F.pdf

R.R. as the Material Basis of the Anarcho-Communist Society

THE ROBOTRONIC REVOLUTION AND THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION

The dawn of the twenty-first century opened an era of global crisis and spiritual decay. At the same time, it is a time of unprecedented maturation of all the objective conditions for a social transformation. The daily and widespread scientific and technological discoveries, their application in all areas of life, and the uncontrollable changes they immediately provoke, lead to the following conclusion:

Just as the first industrial revolution eliminated the structures and relations of feudal society, changing classes, mentalities, ideas, and desires, so too does R.R. undermine the social, economic, and political relations and forms of today’s society.

The R.R. factor creates the material conditions and outlines a new world with new social and international relations. At the same time, R.R. is the most solid material foundation and necessary condition of the social revolution. The two condition each other, which will provoke a revolutionary dynamic in the development of today’s society that no dictatorship, class interest, social or national barrier, religious-ideological prejudice or “worldly wisdom” will be able to withstand.

Whoever does not notice the revolutionary essence and role of this process for the future of humankind in general, and for anarchism in particular, has missed an entire era. Whoever refuses or is unable (due to ideological sclerosis or intellectual constipation) to analyze the phenomena, tendencies, and transformations associated with it—and its reflection on the PROGRAM, ORGANIZATION, TACTICS, METHODS, AND MEANS OF THE REVOLUTIONARY STRUGGLE—is doomed to repeat boring banalities, search for the future in the past, and resent the youth who do not greet utopian musings, “contributions,” ideological lessons, and recipes from self-appointed “teachers and benefactors” or semi-literate charlatans with naive enthusiasm.

By robothronic revolution, we mean the avalanche of scientific discoveries, the creation of new theories and branches of science such as nuclear physics, synthetic chemistry, electronics, informatics, cybernetics, bionics, genetics, and their practical and technical applications. This revolution began in the post-war decades of the Second World War with the discovery of new energies, synthesis of new materials, and the creation of new technologies. Among all these discoveries, two stand out: COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS. Their combination leads to the automation of production (industrial and agricultural), services, and even part of scientific and creative activities.

All this creates a new, previously unknown mode of production in which the workforce will be gradually, but inevitably, excluded. At the same time, all spheres of social life and relations will be revolutionized. A measure of the speed of this revolutionary process is the fact that the volume of scientific and technical information doubles within short time spans in various fields of science, economy, or military production.

New generations of computers and robots are entering industry, agriculture, commerce and supply, transport, banking and statistics, services (including medicine and education), laboratories, and the sciences. Thus, more and more labor processes—physical, engineering, intellectual—are being automated, and isolated automation in individual sectors becomes IMPOSSIBLE. Once started in one enterprise, it pulls all others in the sector along with it. Because anyone who does not automate in capitalist society is doomed to uncompetitiveness, to quicker or slower decline and inevitable bankruptcy. The same applies to competition among sectoral capitals within a national market and economy, as well as among “national” capitals in the global market.

Thus, competition draws all enterprises, all capital, and ultimately all states into the whirlpool of automation. Borders between countries and blocks with “different” systems open to R.R. Those who try to build walls and barbed wire in front of it will die first. And when all “open up” — they will die together.

The automation we witness is only the beginning of the process. In the laboratories of major firms and universities, work is actively being done to create self-learning automatons that can remember and analyze their own “experience.” This, along with machine recognition of images, colors, sounds, and other signals from the external environment, leads directly to the creation of a generation of machines with “artificial intelligence.” Altogether, this leads to the realization of Norbert Wiener’s “prophecy” about the closed circle of automation and the sequential removal of humans from all spheres of production, services, statistics, and monotonous, repetitive, mind-numbing physical and mental tasks.

These processes reveal unlimited possibilities for progress, abundance, and the expansion of human potential and confront the “First World” (and eventually all of humanity) with the necessity for new principles, criteria, and goals of social and economic organization, distribution and consumption, interpersonal and international relations. But the birth of this new society presupposes the death and burial of the current one, with its political, economic, and class rulers. Naturally, they will try to erect various types of barriers against R.R., to restrain automation within limits tolerable to them—beyond which today’s structures and relations lose any “raison d’être.” The ruling classes will strive to place this revolutionary process—and the social history of humanity—under their control. But this is unlikely to be possible, even with attempts to establish a global dictatorship or a modern planetary Roman Empire attempting to replace competition with worldwide monopoly and “game” regulation by decree; to preserve the hierarchy of social layers, personal and group privileges—from the world capital to the last province on every continent; to eternalize inequality and impose slavery, even when pyramids and palaces can be built without slaves and in quantities… sufficient for all who want them.

In the new context, alongside the undermining of all foundations of today’s world, with the degradation of the intellectual and political energy of its leaders, in contrast to the unlimited possibilities that R.R. opens for humankind, roams the mirage of planetary domination, of halting social development, and creating a super-Orwellian nightmare. Until now, this ruling “ideal” has always been shattered by competition and the uneven development of the world. These two processes have, throughout six millennia of political history, created new centers of power and appetites over all regions of the globe, new zones of economic and military vacuum, new victories and defeats—thus sweeping away the dreams and ambitions of successive rulers, exploiters, and substitutes for gods trying to conquer the world.

Competition between today’s political, financial, and “military-industrial complexes” of the U.S., Europe, Japan, and Russia to control “vacuums,” the emergence of new competitors (such as China, India, Brazil, and others), the entire unstable balance of power between these centers of influence, their greed, ambitions for dominance and profit—make control over R.R. impossible, whose level of development is, among other things, a measure of military strength for each of these industrial-militarist dinosaurs locked in a death struggle.

This competition accelerates the transformation of today’s workers into tomorrow’s unemployed. Thus, staying within the framework of the capitalist socio-economic, political, and international system, we are heading toward a world where the number of unemployed in overdeveloped countries will reach a critical mass of the active population. (It is difficult to determine the exact threshold that will lead to a social explosion, especially since this phenomenon is not isolated but unfolds in parallel with a series of counteracting and delaying—or assisting and accelerating—factors, forces, and processes, each of which deserves separate study.)

Such a majority of the active population—a high percentage even today among the youth of Europe—cast out from real economic, technical, scientific, and cultural processes, provokes poorly masked terror among the rulers, who continue to chase competitiveness and profitability, while their programs and plans, subordinated to these goals, annually generate millions of unemployed and “superfluous people,” forming the new “dangerous classes.”

What solution to this dilemma can the various owners of plots of power and wealth find, those who want at all costs to preserve the world of power and property?

If we exclude the “final solution,” once practiced in the furnaces of Nazi concentration camps and Stalin's GULAG, or the deranged ideas of some frightened “paper tigers” of nuclear war, it seems that not many options remain for the “masters of the day” to handle the millions of “superfluous” they themselves have created: either a growing number of unemployed “lumpens,” or lumpens fictionally employed in bureaucracy, the police, the army, and all kinds of parasitic institutions, professions, and callings.

Over time, these two categories of “lumpens” can only increase their relative weight among the active population. Under state capitalism, the declassed “superfluous” were harnessed into the yoke of an ever-growing petty bureaucracy. Along with other “achievements,” government offices became incubators of dead souls—in each office “cell” (often no larger than a prison cell), around some semblance of a desk sat several “employees,” occupied with filling the bottomless barrels of bureaucracy and pouring out their not entirely powerless malice on the heads of “neighbors” dragged into the “offices” by a flood of paperwork.

Parasites exist not only in the world of “real socialism.” Under private capitalism, the current equivalent of this pseudo-employment are the unemployed, parasitic professions, and the entire underworld of the big cities. And because the “superfluous” are becoming more and more numerous, the liberal adepts of “freedom” are frantically searching for a solution… and they find one. Judging by statistics from the American economy (where “jobs are created”), a massive percentage of newly created positions are for servants, valets, waiters, cooks, guards, personal drivers, doormen, and the like. Statisticians are amazed to find that the increase in such labor is accompanied by its devaluation. Thus, even the initial thrust of R.R. is accompanied by a rise in the number of servants. (In Japan, ads appear for dog walkers who help puppies urinate). These are the “prospects” today’s liberal masters of the “free world” offer to the “superfluous” and declassed youth in the robothronic era! And these are the forms in which they try to revive the civilizations of slavery and serfdom swept away by barbarians or the young bourgeoisie. These, finally, are the contours of Reagan’s “conservative revolution.”

With these and many other similar measures and “reforms” of their economic and social policy, the rulers seek to create a “new” social fabric and foundation for their rule and pseudo-release valves TO AVOID THE CHAIN AND UNCONTROLLABLE REACTION OF SOCIAL EXPLOSIONS. Thus, it BECOMES OBVIOUS TO ALL the MEANINGLESSNESS OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM in which, as a result of robothronic development, the social, economic, and political relations of inequality, exploitation, and subjugation are emptied of content and become anachronisms, while the rulers of the world wish to preserve them at any cost.

The erosion and collapse of the patched-up (and “reformed” to be preserved) “social order” is A MATTER OF TIME. No one, not even God, has succeeded in stopping the flow of time! AGAINST THE ROBOTRONIC BOMBS with which the foundations of today’s social, state, and economic structures and relations are being charged, there is—and seemingly can be—no “strategic defense.”

Capitalism may only be the antechamber of the robothronic revolution, but it cannot complete it. This completion presupposes the removal of all barriers—social, political, monetary, cultural, and moral—that today's society erects in order to preserve itself, blocking the freedom of creativity and initiative of millions of people in every country.

Tomorrow’s society needs free creators, people of initiative, of bold ideas and projects. It needs human freedom, not limited by power, selfish interests, or dogma. And there can be no freedom—neither individual nor collective—no free human personalities can emerge from an amorphous and nameless mass without eliminating the rule of the few over the many (or the many over the even more), without crushing the will to dominate others and to parasitize at their expense, without destroying ownership, profiteering, and monopoly—private or state—over any sector, branch, or people!

The free and harmonious development of everyone and all requires the uprooting of every manifestation of greed, power-lust, and egocentrism, of the striving for luxury, privilege, fame, vanity, etc. It requires the revocation of the “right” to use one’s “neighbor” as a servant, informant, prostitute, secretary, etc. This development requires overcoming the fragmentation of humanity and the uneven development of its parts, outgrowing caste, national, and racial narrow-mindedness, which, like atavism, may continue to manifest long after all military-police, economic, social, cultural, and moral foundations of power have become DEAD AND INCINERATED!

https://www.anarchy.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%8A%D1%82-%D0%B2-21-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA.pdf

Note: >>2447997 is a leaflet version of the publication above. The complete publication as of 27.08.25 does not appear to have a complete translation readily available.

>>2447977
I think its pretty obvious that industrialization leads to bourgeois revolution and that monopoly consolidation engenders the capacity for proletarian revolution as the rate of profit incentivizes capitalists to squeeze the working class and that the communist mode of production emerges from proletarian revolution and dictatorship and rational economic planning combined with a sufficient increase in productive forces that will create the material foundation for systemic change in the mode of distribution as it comes to align with productive capacity.

>>2447977
This misses that the socialization of production is not solely driven by the competition of the bourgeoisie but also driven by the proles fighting against the counteracting factors to the falling rate of profit. The capitalists would never innovate new ways to exploit us if the workers did not organize against exploitation or fight for national liberation. The capitalists will invest in the material conditions for socialism but only as driven by the class struggle of the workers.

It's kind of like how a fuck-ton of military technology and the internet were invented to compete with the USSR and to suppress national liberation movements. We cannot rely on faith in techno-utopianism, we must struggle to build the productive forces.

>simply wait for the conditions of progress to impose themselves on us
Armchair revolutionary bros we are the trve vanguard

>>2447977
Your post reminded me of a poster on a certain other forum that argued, to much derision, that the PMC would be the ones to overthrow capitalism. Why? Because slaves didn't overthrow slavery, serfs didn't overthrow feudalism, and so there's no reason to suspect that the proles will overthrow capitalism. PMCs are the managing class that will rebel against bourgeois stupidity. Or something like that. You know, the old Marx quote about how capitalism abolishes even the capitalists, they're reduced to scamming each other and clipping coupons, or whsatever the quote was.

However. the armies that overthrew feudalism did consist of a lot of peasants and farmers. They were led and financed by the bourgeois but they did the dying.

>>2448018
That quote reminds me how Lenin thought electricity would be the fuel for socialism. Cockshott thinks it's the computers of the 1980s which were good enough for cyber communsim. Others might think it's robotics or fusion.

>>2448194
Why are they throwing trillions at AI then?

I'm sorry but communism is a conscious movement of the vanguard of the working class. It has nothing to do with spontaneity.

>>2448088
>I think its pretty obvious that industrialization leads to bourgeois revolution
On the contrary, English, American, and French bourgeois revolutions preceeded industrialization.
>>2448194
>the socialization of production is not solely driven by the competition of the bourgeoisie but also driven by the proles fighting against the counteracting factors to the falling rate of profit. The capitalists would never innovate new ways to exploit us if the workers did not organize against exploitation or fight for national liberation. The capitalists will invest in the material conditions for socialism but only as driven by the class struggle of the workers.
This does not contradict OP but actually makes quite a similar point.
>>2448226
>a poster on a certain other forum that argued, to much derision, that the PMC would be the ones to overthrow capitalism. Why? Because slaves didn't overthrow slavery, serfs didn't overthrow feudalism, and so there's no reason to suspect that the proles will overthrow capitalism. PMCs are the managing class that will rebel against bourgeois stupidity. Or something like that.
The Managerial Revolution written by James Burnham in 1941 argues a similar point
>>2448391
>communism is a conscious movement of the vanguard of the working class
so you say. yet others say it is what comes after socialism, when there is no longer a proletariat or bourgeoisie, and people contribute according to ability, and receive according to need.

>>2448570
>so you say. yet others say
Its the whole process.

>>2448647
I know you're doing the whole "real movement" vs. "state of affairs" distinction but in practice people do really talk about communism as a sort of final "mode of production" where certain conditions hold, such as the end of class society, exploitation of surplus labor for profit, and the wages system.

>>2448260
Desperation,
People can argue on the theory all they want, but the rate of profit still falls

For example the increased profits from capital deepening improving productivity only exists in relation to the lost profits from competitors who don't invest in capital works

The only way for them to compete is to also increase productivity, and then down it goes again

>>2449053
no im not doing that i know people really do talk about it that way because its both the end point(stateless, moneyless, classless) and the process of achieving it(real movement).

File: 1756325210312.png (346.29 KB, 728x546, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2447977
> All these changes were largely brought about by slow systemic changes out of the total control of any one class but involving all classes fighting over the steering wheel. The idea of a "revolutionary class" is almost in some ways the reproduction of the great man theory of history at a class level. History is driven by systems, not protagonists, collective or individual.
>Which state, if any, has already accepted this as the truth and acts accordingly?


THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA!

>>2447977
I think that's what Lenin was going for when he said that imperialism with it's monopolies is the most advanced form of capitalism: I suppose his idea was that capitalism would do the entire buildup of those changes you describe up to point, and then the revolution would just wrestle the control out of them, with not much change in the immediate organization of society

File: 1756340210765.png (201.23 KB, 407x406, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2449061
>The only way for them to compete is to also increase productivity, and then down it goes again

>>2449580
yeah i agree thats why the belt and road is such a big deal. even if china ends up turning full revisionist they build a world wide amazon one day delivery connected by high speed rail and powered by nuclear all it takes is the international working class seizing it and your 90% of the way to world communism

>>2448260
>Why are they throwing trillions at AI?
We live in the post-Obama era where the low interest rates which allowed this soulless parasite class of Silicon Valley vampire to gain hegemony. Now that there is the threat of raised interest rates, maybe they want to all cash out? Its like they're turning the planet into a private equity corporate raid

>>2448260
American military Keynesianism, they want to use AI
for weapons targeting, also propaganda. America needs increasing investments in military might and psyops to fight the resistance of workers in the periphery and the beginnings of resistance in the imperial core.

>>2448231
It's shit that nuclear fission is suppressed by big oil but I think it's more stuff like domestic labor and housing. IMO denser cities and less urban sprawl are a prerequisite for a socialist economy. This explains why America is so reactionary IMO.

>>2451430
the world was never a good place to live but damn dude. shit's so bleak.


Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]