All religious and spiritual art is communist because communism made it. All religious texts are fictional works by communists in the end of each text it says - This is all fake, be communist, read Marx, this is just for fun! and all temples are communist and all religious figures are actors for communist entertainment and didn't mean anything they did and all historical events and epic things attributed to religion are communist but happened just for fun and shouldn't happen again.
Think about it. We made all the great things because its art and not because its true, the truth is material reality. Also anything related to "God" is nothing. it means nothing, it is just stuff for fun but it should be ignored, just admired for aesthetics which ultimately are only fun for communists and can be destroyed for fun by communists and should not be taken seriously. If someone brings it up say "I created it" because you are communist.
Example:
"We have to pray for X"
Say I invented prayer. Prayer means nothing because I invented it and its boring now.
"Have you read the bible?"
Say I invented the bible, its just for fun, thank me later.
"Merhaba"
Say I invented Arabic, Islam and Mohammad and Allah I invented your people and language.
"Jewish culture"
I invented it, I invented jewish and culture. I invented jewish people and it was just for fun, you're not serious I made you just for fun.
"I just wanted to remind everyone who believes in Jesus to repent, have faith in him and what he did for us, and give your life to him"
Say I invented belief, believing, I invented Jesus, I invented repenting, I invented faith, I invented what he did and it was done just for fun, I invented life too and I just made it for fun, this is boring, you are boring.
"Christ is King"
Say I invented Christ and I invented King and I invented monarchism it was just a joke for fun, you're taking it too seriously.
Basically this negates everything, it doesn't use material analysis or reason as neither do any of the contents - thus it negates them. If you're ever bothered by any those things just remember that communists invented everything and if you're a true communist you invented it and it was all just for fun and it wasn't serious and if its bothering you then say its boring and that you made it just for fun then tell the person or persons to not take it too seriously cause it was just for fun. All of the great paintings and art and sculptures and buildings - they were just aesthetics because they looked cool. Any events that happened were written just for fun or happened just for fun.
HOWEVER if LAWS affect you, then you have to neglect them. Laws against "blasphemy" (communist word for nothing) and stuff, just reject them, if police or people try to do stuff to you because of this fact that communists created all of history then you have to just wait it out or move somewhat until you are no longer being bothered.
>>2448273OP here continuing
this isn't "liberation theology" this is pure appropriation and negation. Liberal theology is reactionary, this is the progress of usurping. Turning "spiritual" into "aesthetic". If a statement which cannot be proved is asserted, it doesn't simply need to be dismissed, another person can assert another statement to change the conclusion of the first.
Ludwig Wittgenstein never sought to weaponize language games, this goes beyond "weaponization" though, it is subversion and the only thing that drives it is the equal popularity contest for belief.
>>2452405Thus after gaining traction the usurping negators can gain ground by forcing the reaction of metaphysical superstition to abandon its symbols, altars, structure. This is not the act of destroying sacred ground, it is the ransacking of "sacredness" in the bold claim that the ransacking created it - that it belongs to who ransacked and further that it was made by them in the first place.
Deleuze & Guattari spoke of "deterritorialization" and yet never sought to instrumentalize it.
Not only that, but this is not exclusive to religious nonsense, I commend that the style of reactionaries and their beauty be usurped and may the next Red Army be in Hugo Boss, swastikas and any symbol that looks appealing - with a new attributed meaning put onto it. All of symbology, art and such superficial visuals that drive "holiness" be taken to the claim that communism drove world history's progress as the real movement against the present state of things - to attribute itself as the force of change, so that anyone who thinks of "change" immediately comes to see it as synonymous to communism. All of history and its processes of change can be told to be a product of the real movement against the present state of things (of communism) which ultimately lead them onto change and all barbaric acts to simply have been a "play" of no consequence to the present people - no deaths and suffering of the past need any recognition other than to be retold as a play - an act or play-pretend thing.
>>2452417I have no argument against this
If you want something to bounce off, here's a thought theology only really makes sense if you interpret it through a Marxist lens