[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1757191701216.png (28.42 KB, 368x223, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Just wondering what everyone's takes are, personally I believe that state atheism is a necessity and anything short of that is a failure. I've seen some communists online be religious and I truly don't understand how that would work. I don't mean a vague notion of a god, I mean like actual religion following a set of ideas. It doesn't make sense to me so I want to hear you guys' thoughts.
61 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

>>2464643
this guy just seems to believe in a mythical origin of christianity, a whole different thing

>>2464642
yes and if you read paul, he appears to be describing something quite different from the gospel story, and it even has elements of "gnosticism". so i would say the gospels as a canonical myth begins around 70 A.D. while what existed before was disorganised mystery cults.
>>2464643
what would be the non-islamist answer?

>>2464649
yes and that's because christianity changed significantly not after paul, or even the gospels themselves, but instead changed in the 2nd century, this is based on the fact that any christian text dated to the 1st century is actually pretty different from what paul was saying in the bible, and Mark isn't actually that different from paul, it is different yes, but it is also in many ways just inserting a jesus into the past to make the points of christians then, you can look into this reification of paul and there's pretty strong evidence for it, it only started to actually change significantly with matthew, then luke, acts and john, this is because christianity nearly died by the start of the second century, and underwent significant changes in the mid 2nd century, look at the forged letters of paul for example, many of them are odd in just many ways that they add stuff that doesn't make sense, or actively contradicts his own statements in other letters

>>2464653
yes and the most significant fact is that theres no *physical* resurrection in mark but there is in matthew. of course the latest gospel, john (110 CE) is most indulgent in its descriptions, such as claiming Christ is λόγος, simultaneously hellenising the content. this could all make sense as developmental theology, but when its treated as history, it falls apart.

>>2464657
it's also just obviously mythological nature, if there is anything of historical value in the gospels, it cannot be distinguished from the obvious reifications of paul (and probably other texts as well), it's also only in the second century that a jesus who really did live, really did have disciples and so on (which neither paul, nor clement, nor peter, nor hebrews seems to be aware of at all! truly a remarkable change) is taken to be literally true, even in mark it seems to just be a typical historicization of a myth, common to mystery religions of the time, whereas the "true" belief was one of a jesus who descends from the firmament, is given a body, is captured by samael/belial, crucified and then is deified

A government has to work with its conditions, including its citizens' beliefs until it can transform them.

Overt anti-theism is tactless. To force it rapidly just because we're an materialist movement is idealism.
However, we must also avoid simply ignoring religion and let it continue unimpeded.

Same with liberalism!

>>2464924
great 19th century thinking, most people in the developed nations are not religious, and this is rapidly growing even in the developing nations too

The Marxist approach should be atheist. However recognizing Islam as the religion of the proletariat is accurate. people should caution people away from keeping Jewish identity and Christian ethics can be followed in times of peace.

>>2464941
incoherent statement, anti-theism is the correct position on every issue

>>2464998
he won't recognize this because he's thinking like it's 1891

>>2465005
static thinking, people refuse to recognize that in 2025, no religion at all is far stronger than it's ever been and is becoming a plurality with the largest religions in most states

>>2464938
>>2465006
A fuck ton of people follow Whiteness/American Civil Religion as a religion. Not really sure how to deal with the situation.

People who say humans are naturally religious are really saying that they can't imagine what it is like to not be religious even if the evidence is that lots of people are atheist.

Religion has to be treated with respect because it is important to lots of the people we represent and work with. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be slowly phased out.

>>2465780
Apparently first atheists on earth, one of the hundred schools called calculationists, unless the Indian rationalists predate them as the first atheists; should look up the current archeological date – thought ghost stories were false but useful

They were the first to state in surviving text that it was correct to rebel against unjust rule, a conclusion only reached by western inhabitants of the European peninsula only even realised in the 17th century after they recieved it from Native American philosophers

>>2465804
Where is the lie?

if the religion aint updateable like fiction is then its useless and reactionary

>>2463713
I agree with you that state atheism is absolutely necessary. But it would be very difficult if not impossible to actively suppress religious thought in the early decades of a transitional society. Maybe you can substitute a materialist 'spiritualism' based around psychedelic notions of universal experience or something, combined with soft suppression measures (anti-idealist propaganda, revocation of tax-exempt statuses, etc). If you're steadily improving material conditions as well, maybe religion will eventually fade into irrelevance.


>>2463713
You fucking clowns, I know the supernatural and spiritual is real, and I think your vain attempts to try to conquer forces beyond your understanding is hilariously futile. But try, keep on going, it’s all part of the process - or maybe you’ll find yourselves in a never ending cycles. Oh, the ussr surely did conquer God didn’t it? And what happened, the shadow of what it tried to suppress created the monster that is modern day Russian religious nationalism. Well done.

>>2483799
And don’t you realise that in your viscously obsessively compulsion towards atheism and anti-theism, that you are actually making yourselves sluts, onaholes and whores for spiritual forces that will use and abuse you without you even realising.

But there is no point in arguing, the spiritual forces that be will act and the wheel will churn as you triumphantly delight in your ignorance and fantasies of rationalistic conquest, have fun. There is a path of liberation and creation with the divine if you care to take it, as you realise that you are not seperate from God and any idea of being such is just an illusion, but that’s up to you….

The only force that is powerful enough to eradicate religion from a society is totalitarianism. Unless you want to live under totalitarianism, you're going to have to make peace with the fact that some people like to believe in fairytales.

>>2464026
And further investigation finds the supernatural to be real.

File: 1758130668189.png (425.13 KB, 2500x1500, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2483810
Communism is inherently "totalitarian", did you never even bother reading Bordiga? Lenin? Marx? Engels? You're a disgrace to the armchair flag, bastard. The dictatorship of the proletariat is inherently totalitarian.

>>2483828
And you think that’s a good thing? Something which serves the liberation of the people? Go suck your own dick

>>2483829
Moralizing, there is no "good" or "bad", only what must be done. To quote even your own kin - We anarchists do not want to emancipate the people; we want the people to emancipate themselves. Errico Malatesta. It will only be possible when the workers are ready for it.

>>2464635
> professes monotheism
Nta, but I never read it that way. He seems to be really big into Apollo and favors him over the other Gods, but I don’t think he’s monotheistic.

>>2483831
> Moralizing, there is no "good" or "bad", only what must be done.
Go fuck yourself with this deceptive nonsense, this line of thinking is used to justify dictators playing out their power fantasies on people’s lives all for the ‘sake of the cause’

If there is no ‘good’ or ‘evil’ then why bother with trying to get people to emancipate themselves at all? Surely, none of this will ever affect you in your lifetime, so might as well be self serving and only care about yourself. Vile hypocrite. You are the exact type of person to get lynched by the people who you claim to represent, you and your poisonous narcissistic ilk. It’s not about socialism for you, it’s about playing out an edgy rebellious identity, it’s about playing with lives of people as if they were dolls as a medium for you to fulfill your fantasy of a ‘perfect society’ like pol pot - go fuck yourself. Predator.

File: 1758132712444.png (305.98 KB, 640x680, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2483837
Me? A dictator? Like in adventurism? I'm not gonna do anything. You go do it.

File: 1758132913647.mp4 (5.47 MB, 1078x624, GAS GAS GAS PEASANTS.mp4)

>If there is no ‘good’ or ‘evil’ then why bother with trying to get people to emancipate themselves at all? Surely, none of this will ever affect you in your lifetime, so might as well be self serving and only care about yourself. Vile hypocrite. You are the exact type of person to get lynched by the people who you claim to represent, you and your poisonous narcissistic ilk. It’s not about socialism for you, it’s about playing out an edgy rebellious identity, it’s about playing with lives of people as if they were dolls as a medium for you to fulfill your fantasy of a ‘perfect society’ like pol pot - go fuck yourself.

File: 1758133036384-0.png (1.04 MB, 636x931, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1758133036384-1.png (1.31 MB, 768x1092, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1758133036384-2.png (504.45 KB, 640x611, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2483837
>If there is no ‘good’ or ‘evil’ then why bother with trying to get people to emancipate themselves at all? Surely, none of this will ever affect you in your lifetime, so might as well be self serving and only care about yourself. Vile hypocrite. You are the exact type of person to get lynched by the people who you claim to represent, you and your poisonous narcissistic ilk. It’s not about socialism for you, it’s about playing out an edgy rebellious identity, it’s about playing with lives of people as if they were dolls as a medium for you to fulfill your fantasy of a ‘perfect society’ like pol pot - go fuck yourself.

>>2483854
So in order to make yourself as an individual sacred you die in a war?

>>2483858
And you have to put lotion on your face and raise a sword to the sky so it can get struck by lighting to get the blessing of Perun.

I'd say reject religion but in a Max Stirner kinda way, not an Atheism kinda way.

File: 1758133897272.png (145.93 KB, 420x420, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2483865
>I'd say reject religion but in a Max Stirner kinda way, not an Atheism kinda way.

Wrong. Read lenin. You are a fascist reddit neckbeard who degenerates the science of Marxism-Leninism into kulturekampf
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm

https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/1968350314865824043


“Did you tell Trump his name is in the Epstein files?”

Patel: “I’ve never spoken to Trump about it.”

“Did you tell the Attorney General?”

Patel: crashes

Swalwell: “We’ll take your evasiveness as a consciousness of guilt.”

>>2483828
I'm appropriating the armchair and there's not a god damn thing you can do about it.

>>2483888
You think I haven't done the same? If you don't LARP accordingly you will be called out.

Isn't the fundamental flaw of religion that it invokes the supernatural which we do not have proof of and consequently does not exist?

I kinda wish there was proof of the supernatural that is undeniable just to see how people react.

Anons, what would you do if reality started acting weird and supernatural stuff started happening?
Easy mode: let's go with christian eschatology for starters.

>Ill answer first

If everything goes according to my religion, I have a ready set of questions to ask God because he has some explaining to do.

>>2483919
There is, keep practicing and you get results

>>2483919
>Isn't the fundamental flaw of religion that it invokes the supernatural which we do not have proof of and consequently does not exist?
Metaphysical superstition, the exact type of thing that will get you on a Maoist struggle session, had you been in the real Maoist period, not the neo-islamist minority rights Maoist, the real chauvnist anti-religion Maoist China.

>>2483942
>>2483942
Hex them all to death

File: 1758139711164.jpeg (22.83 KB, 576x384, IMG_9183.jpeg)

>This strikes fear in the heart of the Apollonian materialist

>>2483942
>Metaphysical superstition
What are you talking about? And what does Lmaoism have to do with what I wrote?

File: 1758144004132.jpg (100.1 KB, 1024x768, zeus.jpg)

If God is forgiven for all the evils in the world, why Monotheists say Zeus and the other pagan gods had to be erased because they were evil?

State atheism is just another kind of theocracy. Marxism is stupid.

>>2484009
They aren’t evil, what’s evil are these things serving their own ends and not recognising them as one part of a whole - that’s idolatry. Idolatry is essentially when something is self-serving, thus even holding a false conception of God is idolatrous, and Protestants have an idolatrous relationship with the Bible. The Jews evolved from polytheism, to monolatry, to henotheism, and to monotheism. Even in its current state, the books of the Old Testament still portray a henotheistic sentiment, with YHVH being portrayed as the leader of a divine council. Even the so called ‘satanic verses’ of Islam really aren’t so ‘satanic’ at all, pagan gods were being described as being blessed in their own way under Allah by Muhammad - not so far off from what some OT verses would imply.

>>2484009
Nondualism and the non personal god solve all these basic questions. Good can only exist in relation to bad/evil. The real conflict that exists between god and creation is between the truth and untruth or part truth. God is the immutable truth or reality that exists apart from creation and creation is a fabrication(creation and fabrication, notice the similarities?)

Arguing about religion is as useful as a theology major.

Complete waste of time.

wrong thread im retarded sorry lol


Unique IPs: 26

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]