/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Reject evolutionism (the free market)
Embrace creationism (central planning)
The correct communist position is God created humans to create communism. Darwinist drivel has no place among communists.

>>2466744
>Reject evolutionism (the free market)
>Embrace creationism (central planning)
bait devised in a lab

>>2466744
cant god create communism himself?

>>2466763
it's not about the destination, but about the journey, maaaaaaaaaaaaaan
>>2466777
>Evolution isn’t some gradual process
literally is though
>like in your gay Pokémon games
in pokemon it's literally more instantaneous than it is in real life. are you dumb?
> it’s periods of stability even stagnation followed by periods of explosive change literally learn what a mutation is
that's still a gradual process, but with spikes and dips in its intensity. you are stupid.

>>2466763
Of course he can. But he wants us, his children, to have fun building it. You want God to put digested food into your intestines so you don't have to? Lame. Get to work building communism fed.

>>2466777
Evolutionism is a spook created by inbred retards like "Professor" Dave Explains. There is no evidence that more complex life forms emerge from primitive ones. No amount of fake "peeeeee reviOOOOed" bought studies by Big Atheism are going to change that. Lysenko was also laughed at but he turned out to be right.

Anybody who disagrees with me is a homunculus and will be smacked by the nearest available community watchman.

>>2466821
we will kill you

>>2466786
>>Evolution isn’t some gradual process
>literally is though

funny thing here, naziposter might be referring to puncuated equilibrium which is an entirely legitimate theory in biological evolution where natural selection is not so much a slow shift as it is continual genetic diversification which provides the 'raw material' for relatively brief periods of rapid selection via particularly dramatic mechanisms. now relatively brief still means thousands to tens of thousands of years on a geological and biogical timescale, and dramatic mechanisms of selection would be over a similar timescale. so something like acidification of the oceans over thousands of years selecting for a particular subset of more acid tolerant + ecologically generalist crustaceans out of a far wider population of species that slowly diversified to fill various niches. or something like subsets of small mammals in the mesozoic that adapted a niche in burrowing to compete with/stay safe from dinosaurs, which could have been an effective adaptation in itself which didnt need to change for literally a hundred million years. but in the mesozoic extinction event that burrowing makes them better suited for thousands of years of hostile climate conditions, and when things clear up again theres endless open niches for them to fill in the absense of dinosaurs and you see a massive diversification of mammals in a brief period.

its a perfectly legitimate theory and most evolutionary biologists accept it to at least some extent or another at least as one significant factor, its a consistent and easy way to account for long 'stagnation' in the fossil record followed by brief bursts of change and diversification.

the kicker here tho is that its a naziposter trying to use this as evidence of human racial differences being accountable through natural selection, when the guy who pioneered this theory of punctuated equilibrium was stephen jay gould, who you might know from his extensive writings and debates demonstrating why race science is bullshit and all the attempts to legitimize it have always been bad faith methodogical manipulation. see pdf related

>>2466838
>>2466867
btw entire section of this book dealing with exactly how skull measurements 1. have no statistically relevant relationship to anything that can even dubiously called intelligence 2. have been outright misrepresented and mischaracterized by advocates of racialism, sometimes through outright fabrication of statistics

mods please do not lock or delete this thread, let naziposter sit in the trap he made for himself and explain how it is he intends to defend race science by citing an evolutionary theory developed by a scientist who presented probably the best collection of arguments and data for why race science has always been bankrupt /pol/lacks manipulating data in bad faith

>>2466818
>all the physical differences you see

Exactly - all the physical differences you see - skin color, eye color, hair color/texture, facial structure, and all these other superficial characteristics which, from a human perspective may seem like huge fundamental differences, but when it comes to actual genetics the differences are quite insignificant. The difference between a black person and a white person is no more meaningful than the difference between a brunette and a redhead.

>>2466875
christcucks don't deserve special treatment, especially when they post such dry bait