🗽UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅
<Lucky Larry Edition(Charlie K Edition already existed and filled up)
Thread for the hellish discussion related to
the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the father of fascism, the enabler of ethnostates, the treatlerite tyrant, the protector of pedophiles, the exporter of ecocide, the captain of capitalism, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka™
🏈 💵 🌭 🍔
🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md📺 Live News 📺(sponsored by USAID)
• CNN:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/cnn-news-usa.html• MSNBC:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/msnbc.html• FOX:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/fox-news-channel.html• Bloomberg:
https://www.bloomberg.com/live/us✊Live Protest Streams✊https://woke.net/Epstein's Client List DOES NOT EXISThttps://epsteinsblackbook.com/Track Zionazishttps://www.trackaipac.com/Previous Thread:
>>2470382Remember to filter mass tor baiters, feds, and trollsNot reporting is bourgeoisViolators will be launched from trebuchet 581 posts and 178 image replies omitted.>>2473787yes, i scoff at the idea that spectacle brained burgers, like you, would be able to go through what the palestinian resistance went through.
the fact you think otherwise just proves how delusional and moronic you are.
>>2472570>Not all the floors were finance, there were cleaner/maintenance staff, emergency personnel, Jeffrey Epstein had lots of working class people at his Zionist finance imperialist rape temple, just like his friends had in the World Trade Center globalist trafficking temple
>>2473805> To right-wing men, we are private property. To left-wing men, we are public propertyPMC Marxist breadtubers: "We need to smash the Stalinist state so we can have deregulated decolonized pagan sex temples where sex is freely given"
Jeffrey Epstein: (similar PMC utopia but its private)
>>2472965>WE GOT EM<WE DON'T GOT EMThird time's the charm?
>>2473133>You heard grandpa. This is your final warning.Quick, more zeal! The Trump administration might be incompetent and cannot protect high-profile MAGA influencers from getting assassinated by random members of the public or finding the suspect(s)… but you dear leftists haven't expected us ACTING UNHINGED AND GODDAMNED CRAZY
>>2473582tl;dr
>>2473684>do you retards asserting this have more evidence and information than the rest of us? anything beyond "bro bro he was about to turn against israel they definitely killed him for it!!!" even if it was a false flag op what the fuck makes you so convinced it was mossad?They don't give a fuck if it's true or not, they want to manipulate angry Charlie Kirk fans (who also like Israel) to be anti-Israel and insert that into the narrative. This is probably a waste of time, but it's especially pointless on leftypol because you don't need to persuade leftypol to be against Zionism.
>>2473808It should be completely possible to critique a reactionary woman's spiel without needing to reduce her to a sex object in the process. If you're willing to devote yourself to the project of challenging class hierarchy then you should also be able to challenge and recognize the relationship to power in the gender hierarchy.
your joke is funny, but I just read 6 or so communist men (i'm assuming given where we are) be completely unable to restrain themselves from reducing the reactionary woman to a sex object while giggling like juveniles
>>2473796Do you realize how small a drop in the bucket military aid to Israel is? 4 billion a year in a trillion dollar military budget. And yes it literally does make the commodities cheaper. Keeping Egypt and the Levant either pacified or fractured and fighting each other is the key to holding onto Gulf oil and in the past Iranian oil too. This is written about pretty explicitly in a lot of national security planning documents. There was even a real consideration of invading Saudi Arabia in order to secure the oil during the 70s. To argue that the American bourgeoisie has no natural interest in the middle east you are arguing that literally the most important commodity on the planet, the one practically production, distribution and consumption depends on, is irrelevant because of Mossad spooks or because it's more taboo to criticize the Jewish lobby or something. Idealist retardation.
The ZOG>imperialism take on US support for Zionism also would not meet the definition of a comprador bourgeoisie anyway.
>>2473845I think you're just white knighting someone that doesn't need or want your protection. Saying "I want to have sex with shoeonhead" is not reducing her to a sex object any more than she already does to herself.
It's like insisting you have to criticize Melania Trump for her "beliefs" instead of rightfully calling her a bimbo trophy wife that shouldn't be taken seriously. These people are not serious political commentators. They aren't trying to change anyone's views, and you aren't going to change their views or anyone else's views by "critiquing" them. They're just minor celebrities using politics as a catalyst to appeal to lonely men for money. This isn't really a controversial take and I'm not sure why it's expected that to be a Leftist you have to be 100% serious and treat every argument like a philosophical debate among rational actors. Because that's exactly what the Right is preying on. They expect you to hold yourself to a "higher standard" even while they go for the lowest possible low hanging fruit and constantly act in bad faith to try to sow seeds of conflict. Shoeonhead is no different here, here entire shtick is "I'm a hot girl berniebro and I pander to Leftist economic policy while still sympathizing with the White Incel Underclass please pay attention to me White Incel boys teehee" like why the fuck would you waste your breath doing anything other than calling her a bimbo sex object and then dismissing her entirely? She's not a serious person bro, taking her seriously is a mistake.
>>2473865when someone says "male loneliness epidemic" you understand that they are talking about men in general but when someone says "hey maybe stop being misogynist, even if the target is raectionary" you assume that person is
>white knighting for someonetiresome nonsense.
>>2473814>the language of psychology and “psychological thinking” has shouldered actual politics asidea byproduct of general psychiatry/psychology-speak seeping into conversations as easy-to-understand but profoundly reactionary and misleading labels to slap onto your opponents
when faced with criticism and not prepared or willing to deal with it, the lib says "um that sounds like anxiety, have you tried therapy" and the hitlerite (remember Aktion T4) says "take your meds schizo" as an easy and socially acceptable (and even encouraged, since you care so so much about mental health issues uwu) way to abjectify them, shut down your opponent completely
remember the scratching a liberal proverb
>>2473872Mao is correct here, and I'm happy to have this discussion with anyone who seriously thinks the Left has a misogyny problem because it probably certainly does; but wanting to have sex with Shoeonhead doesn't invalidate or validate anything she's saying. It's just completely ignoring her words because they are meaningless to her, and directly addressing the thing she actually cares about in her marketing: her appearance.
>>2473875I don't think it's inherently misogynist to say you want to have sex with a woman whose career is built on sex appeal tho.
Do you consider it misogynist to say you want to eat baked goods from your local grandma-owned bakery? It's just treating people based on how they choose to present themselves. This is literally a core tenet of modern feminism: that women should be able to choose whether to be sex objects or not, no? If the lady wants to be a sex object what's the issue with treating her as such?
>>2473891>I don't think it's inherently misogynist to say you want to have sex with a woman whose career is built on sex appeal tho.… I think you're trying to put an innocent spin on it
>Do you consider it misogynist to say you want to eat baked goods from your local grandma-owned bakery? not the same thing
>It's just treating people based on how they choose to present themselves. not really
>This is literally a core tenet of modern feminism: that women should be able to choose whether to be sex objects or not, no? feminists have a lot of infighting about this actually
>If the lady wants to be a sex object what's the issue with treating her as such?i don't think the more communist-leaning women (inb4 they aren't communists because I said so) don't agree with this line of reasoning.
"Seize her means of reproduction" is a literally different than "I think she's hot." btw
It's more like a "teehee just kidding … unless?" declaration of desire to rape. It's a lot like trump saying grab 'em by the pussy or when libs called clarence thomas the N word after he ruled against abortion. It's like, OK, attack him for what he did, not his race or whatever.
>>2473845>teehee just kidding … unless?" declaration of desire to rapeI like to imagine it.
>when libs called clarence thomas the N word after he ruled against abortionYou seriously have a problem with that? what a weakling.
Unique IPs: 23