/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Most bourgeois nations are going for the two state solution, if there is any solution to come then that seems to be the most likely one. Would this contempt with bourgeoisie peace not be problematic though? The Palestinian state to come would still likely be largely a puppet government of Israel as the authority has been for decades, so the movement of Palestinian national liberation ends up getting a de-facto "free Palestine" to calm the unrest and is told to go work on developing Palestine since Israel is no longer its problem, no farther demand terms met.

Will it stop the war? That largely depends on rebel organizations, they can always fabricate another Oct 7-like event to resume activities, but if they want to subjugate (or are made to as a plea deal) it will be unlikely. So what will the "freed Palestine" (under Israel's watchful eye) be worth at that point? I don't recon much, you'll just have to demand a regular - non national liberation communist uprising like elsewhere and at that point it becomes futile to ignore agitation within Israel since Palestine would affectively be a puppet extension of it.

The sentiment so far has been that of anti-colonialism in large the demand for the total destruction of Israel and its largely nationalist inhabitants rather than humoring the idea of a communist movement within the civil extent of complicity in Israel - once again akin to how broadly self-proclaimed communist movements agitate within the western world.

So what happens to the sentiment of purging the inhabitants ridden with false consciousness? It basically becomes take or leave it. MLM sentiment has always been that the inhabitants of the first world are incapable of carrying a revolution and that it must be imposed by the third world. What of the ML non-Maoist fractions though? If they don't reject the notion of a revolution or the potential of communist movements originating within the first world then it doesn't make much sense to humor the idea of a communist movement within Israel lest they play on the sentimentality of its specific crimes rather than the broader wars and murders of the US, NATO and the allies to claim that Israel specifically is a fascist / national socialist state thus reject the very same pro-Zionist position Stalin partook due to the principles of democratic centralism in spite and say that it must be a territory to belong to a wholly different bourgeoisie nation before revolutionary potential can be harbored, this position though would not make sense since it would imply that Nazi Germany itself could not have turned into the GDR had there not been the western bourgeoisie governments to pave the way - when the red army itself bled for it. Not to mention that singling out Israel as fascist / national socialist or generally unworkable within is a position which only understands fascism / national socialism as a sort of liberal bourgeoisie democracy that simply commits violence - this is at contradiction with the lesser-evil position but it is broadly ignored and the attention is shifted onto the aggressor which of course is the US and NATO rather than the fact that it is often aggression or competition against another bourgeoisie liberal state. Regardless it is not much of an analysis of fascism / national socialism but it isn't incorrect - its just that the same metric can be applied to all of the western nations since they all can openly harbor racist and chauvinist views whilst participating in wars but the ML parties and organizations still participate in agitation within their realms - whilst explicitly rejecting a select few. It is nonsense.