>>2503528Antisocial behavior typically stems from the capitalist economic system as a byproduct of the superstructure, which affects the population's culture under bourgeois hegemony. Currently, the financialization of the economy under neoliberalism can be observed, with privatization, deregulation, debt, and the short-termism of capitalism in its current state affecting the masses in their antisocial behavior.
The proletariat must become the new ruling class with the dictatorship of the proletariat to socialize the economy, abolish private property, the anarchy of production, and social classes. With this, all reactionaries, capitalists, landowners, speculators, counterrevolutionaries, liberals, and agents for the maintenance of the bourgeois state can be re-educated, expropriated, and, if necessary, punished for refusing to accept the dictatorship of the proletariat and political domination under the proletariat.
The rest of the masses in a socialist society will not have the ability to project false consciousness without capitalist propaganda and the stress of unmet needs to project a false response of prejudice. Remember that there will still be the problem of imperialists sabotaging, spying, and grooming collaborators who will be combated and punished as long as there is no global socialist hegemony and the imperialist-capitalist threat, along with other unfulfilled conditions, so that the socialist state can wither away.
The state exists for one class to oppress another; everything else is a fantasy due to the irreconcilable contradictions of a class society when private property comes into existence.
Let's take the Communist Manifesto's own program to demonstrate my point instead of clinging to individualistic sentimentality:
<The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degrees, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organized as the ruling class; and to increase the total of productive forces as quickly as possible.
<Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionizing the mode of production.
<These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
<Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
<1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.<2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.<3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.<4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.<5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.<6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.<7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.<8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.<9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equal distribution of the population over the country.<10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
<When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.
<In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.
<Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848)https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm