>>2508946>1. Does anyone here actually agree that the Stalinist system of a tightly controlled party answering to one man is good in the modern world?There are people who do, but they are irrelevant.
>2. Does anyone think its a good idea for one country to control an international organization that should encompass everyone from Japaan to Easter Island?I think most people would prefer it to be an international party that isn't dominated by one nation, so no, I don't think so.
>3. Do you think that democracy should actually represent the workers, and not the aristocrats who have every trick in the book such as wealth, fame and money to boost their election chances over the common person?Everyone here who agrees with democracy/the state agrees with this, although what that means is disputed. Some would argue that a communist party-controlled state is the only way to safeguard a workers' state.