The revolutionary analysis of decadent bourgeois culture has revealed certain pornographic tendencies to be highly progressive. We are speaking, of course, about so-called "interracial cuckold porn." This porn consists of a scenario in which a bourgeois male ameriKKKA labor aristocrat is forced to watch his female property (wife) be raped (liberated) by a Black, ghetto, Lumpenproletarian.
How is this progressive, you may ask? To be sure, interracial cuckold porn promotes hyper-sexualized racial stereotypes about African men, and even seems to encourage rape as a positive phenomenon enjoyed by women. However, a genuine Marxist analysis looks deeper.
Interracial cuckold porn is, in fact, entirely revolutionary. Cuckold porn is revolutionary because it attacks white male patriarchal capitalist supremacism at its psycho-sexual roots. Cuckold porn psychologically prepares the white bourgeois male for his own destruction and expropriation at the hands of Maoist Third Worldist liberation forces. Just as the white labor aristocratic bourgeoisie of the First World should bow and surrender its property to the revolutionary Third World proletariat, so the cuckolded white male should kneel and watch his female property (wife) be ravaged by Big Black Cock, which is her own secret desire for liberation.
The white master who raped and enslaved colonial peoples for centuries is now – in the age of Maoist Third Worldism – himself raped and enslaved. This is the progressive revolutionary message spread by popular artists like Candy Monroe and "Black Dicks White Chicks."
Maoist Third Worldists realize that such revolutionary opinions as ours may frighten and alarm petit bourgeois-minded labor aristocrats watching this in ameriKKKa. The feelings and sentimental sensibilities of such counterrevolutionaries are not our concern.
>>2511496>and even seems to encourage rape as a positive phenomenon enjoyed by women.How so?
>>2511496>newfags haven't seen the original videosad shit
>and even seems to encourage rape as a positive phenomenon enjoyed by women
uygha, do you know how many women have a rape fetish?
>>2511537If we are posting old third worldist videos ITT does anyone have the one that had footage from Iraq, Vietnam, and the Chinese revolution along with pictures of American/western colonial atrocities set to this gabber track? Went hard
I like to have sex with enormous fat black women what does this mean for the white male bourgeoisie?
>>2511569Nothing because only white women count
>another tourist who has to spam his sexual fetish everywhere and call it politicalgo back to
>>>/siberia/ People here are dumb because they can't tell a somethingawful copypasta from actual maoist writing.
Maoists were doing the woke pronoun stuff decades before anyone else, they wouldn't condone pornography in any way
Comrade, your formulation contains a glimmer of dialectical insight but remains entrapped within the decadent coils of bourgeois pornographic ideology. You correctly perceive that the cuckold scenario functions as an allegory for the disintegration of white patriarchal mastery under late imperialism. Yet your analysis halts at the level of surface inversion, mistaking mere humiliation for genuine negation.
We must proceed dialectically. The white petty-bourgeois male who kneels before the Black phallus imagines he is witnessing his own symbolic dispossession—but in reality, he is consuming this spectacle through the circuits of capital. He does not lose his property; he purchases its loss as entertainment. Thus the “revolution” remains staged within the pornographic marketplace, a simulation of class suicide safely mediated by credit card. The bourgeois subject experiences a momentary fantasy of annihilation, only to re-emerge, restored and reinforced, as a paying customer.
True revolutionary erotics cannot exist in the commodity form. The liberation of desire demands not the reversal of domination but its abolition—the withering away of the pornographic relation itself. Until sexual production is collectivized and wrested from the profit motive, even the most “transgressive” imagery will remain a fetish of the market, a dialectical mirage of freedom.
Therefore, comrades: the task is not to celebrate the cuckold but to expropriate the pornographer. Only when Eros is liberated from exchange value will the body cease to be a battlefield of classes and become the terrain of genuine human communion.