DARK LULA EDITIONCamaradas, é hora de preparar para a
LUTA DE CLASSES. E lembrem-se: o Nordeste é o nosso verdadeiro país.
Previous thread:
>>1240814 >>566829MUH DIIIIIIIIICK
HEY LULA HIRE ME FOR THE CHECKA AND I'LL USE FACE RECOGNITION SOFTWARE ON ALL THOSE VIDEOS TO PUT LITERALLY EVERY REACTOID UNDER SURVEILLANCE
>>566850It started going down all the way back during Temer's term, and the weird thing is, no one seems to know why.
The one thing which actually got better during Bozo's term is something he definitely didn't do.
>>566866By eliminate crime you mean if everyone wasn't in poverty you believe crime would cease to exist?
This is extremely idealistic if that's what you mean. Or you mean it would just go down?
>>566877>unequalitypoverty is a form of inequality
pobreza é uma forma de desigualdade
>>566881>Or you mean it would just go down?it would go down. people don't need to steal to eat if they have what they need.
desceria. as pessoas não têm que roubar para comer se tiverem o que precisam.
>>566933DILE LULAAAAAAA
ASA AL MACACO DE BOZO
>>566938One of these days i'm going to Colômbia because you people seem a lot of fun.
USA_Israel_flags_burning.mp4
>>566926The thing is, Lula already was in power and he was the most docile cucked lefty ever. So before hiding his power level, he has to
actually have grown a power level in the meantime. It's extremely unlikely obviously, but if he does anything even remotely like it I'll literally kneel and worship him.
HEY LULA I'M AVIALBALE FOR CHEKA WORK AT VERY MODEST RATES
>>566942>>566944Que delíca porraaaaa.
A diferença pros gringos chorando quando o Trump rodou é nula.
>>566979https://1500chan.org/It'll show you a fake 404 page when you first visit, so you'll have to enter the following:
>Anônimo>Eu sei usar acentuação e pontuação.Or just use the user script:
https://salmaochan.org/pastebin/view/7f1e9570Haven't figured out 27chan yet.
>>566990>>567000>>567006You
WILL get a big booty gf under Lula's government, and you
WILL enjoy it.
>>567045There's also Arce and AMLO, who imo have been pretty decent prezs.
Not saying Lula will _necessarily_ be like them, but hey, there's a possibilty, i guess.
>>567093if he has a spine, he will use his popular support to organize protests in favor of his points.
If he goes "Muh Democracy" he will achieve nothing.
>>567087Toda a palhaça de narrativa que o bozo cultivou nos últimos quatros anos falando de:
>Ainn o Lula roubou mas nós tínhamos a maioria esmagadora dos votos, logo vencemosDescreve exatamente o que ele fez.
Filho da puta, o cara é um projetor humano.
Qual é a reação do bozo?
>>567093his party is a bribery party
>Em frente ao condomínio de Bolsonaro, eleitores do presidente rezam e choram após resultado http://glo.bo/3U3vXqQ8 pics of bolsonarist subhumans crying in front of Bozo's condo in Rio. I tried downloading the gallery pics to upload here but they're webp.
>>567114He already did in 7 September 2021. And almost did it again the following year. He has tried literally dozens of half-baked coup schemes and fraus and failed at all of them.
>>567133Isso só vai ter em 2023.
Se o Congresso não passar PEC proibindo antes, né?
>>567164It reminds me of boric. He got same treatment. Usa news outlets wrote very nice articles about what a good guy he is and usa has never sanctioned him while he votes with usa at un
Lula getting same treatment. He's putting forward as a shining hero of democracy in western media all over with all kinds of celebrities endorsing him
>>567160Politics in particular countries are becoming internationalized. Bolsonaro getting isolated from D.C. partly because of hostility to Biden and the Democrats specifically seems like part of a wider pattern where U.S. destabilization is also making U.S. partisanship internationalized. On the other side of the coin, the Saudis' hostility to Biden seems partly driven by a preference for GOP rule. And E.U. hostility to Trump can be read the same way retrospect, considering they are willingly destroying their economies under Biden's orders.
Brazil is also morphing into a weird two-party state, except there are two "real" parties and a swarm of smaller rental parties that get bribed and bought off to make a governing majority. But it does track that over time, each of these factions would also be more or less friendly with a U.S. party. During the 2016 anti-Dilma protests, it was not uncommon to see signs of "Trump, win the election and come help us." Back then it was seen as goofy minority thing among the larger protests, but now it is the default conservative position, so much so that Tucker fucking Carlson dropped by to move things along.
The world is growing more interconnected. Gonna be fun.
>>567192Provide an example, I've been reading the threads.
The CIA did warn bolsonaro. Biden congratulate Lula the moment he won. The usa papers and outlets are writing articles about what an amazing man Lula is everywhere and tons of mainstream celebrities endorsed him
What is incorrect here? It is the same treatment boric got, not a threat to Washington
>>567198Esa publicacion la hizo:
1) Un brasileiro blanquito rico que piensa que los EEUU es la cima de la civilizacion humana
2) Un brasilerio moreno o negro acomplejado que piensa como #1
3) Un racista gringo
Todos merecen un escopezato por la nuca
>>567198Most Brazilians on the English-language Internet are part of their rich and privately educated upper class. They live in big mansions with maids and butlers, and hold strange reactionary beliefs about racial hierarchies and are sympathetic to fascist tendencies while being more often than not creepy religious fundamentalists. They look down on their fellow citizens and would sell out their own country and all its riches to foreign multinationals and the neoliberal status quo while still calling themselves patriotic. They are members of their oligarchy and are afraid that someone is about to redistribute 'their' wealth that are the result of their greedy thievery and centuries of exploitation of indigenous people groups They are a kleptocratic class of parasites that has to be utterly purged and annihilated in a violent uprising if any state in South America is to achieve social progress.
I love this copypasta because it's applicable to any country in Lat Am
>>1245859Well the thing is, the power of the U.S. is in some relative decline and doesn't have as much ability to push Brazil around like in the past. The U.S. can't go on being the godfather telling other countries what to do.
>>567218Interesting point too.
>>1245859>>567199God I fucking hate "communists" like these.
Hey, dumbasses, we have a population the size of Venezuela that's starving, half of our population has food insecurity, half works for minimum wage without any sort of benefits, and I could go on forever. There are people starving right NOW yet nothing short of a revolution works for you. Can't you get through your thick skulls and into your smooth brains that electing Lula means at least a half decent chance that these people will see a better day instead of the complete apocalypse that would be electing Bolsonaro again?
Lula isn't a socialist but someone in his place would never be one, that's not the fucking point of elections. You elect the one that'll cause the least amount of damage while you organize to bring about whatever future you think is better for your country. Holy shit I am so fucking tired of gringo "communists" and their retarded takes that completely ignore material reality, not that you'd know since you don't fucking live here. Shut up already.
>>567234>>567218The EU and USA condemned or an election recently and EU is going to withhold billions of dollars from Hungary from it.
They did none of this now with Lula. Just congratulated him and western papers say what a good guy he is all over that are controlled by usa operatives.
The usa still sees a fake politician wife of a prisoner as president of Belarus and sanctions the crap out of country.
Could it be that they were fine with bolsonaro losing?
>>567263>we burgers, who understands nothing about the administration of literally any other government around the worldDude do you have some submissive fetish? There is plenty of people here from many countries who have knowledge on many admins. Believing that because a person is born in Chile now they will instantly know more than a person in usa but default of location is third worldism idiocy.
You sound like the people who say people of color need to speak first in groups and bullshit like that. Either a person knows things or not, their identity and location don't matter
>>567285 (me)
Also the only people who do seem upset that Bolsonaro lost are rightards in the U.S. who are not in power right now, the Israelis, and Juan Guaido. I can't think of any others. Oh, and Lyndon LaRouche cultists and rightoids in Brazil who might even be bigger lunatics than the ones in Burgerland.
>>567289Yeah but everyone who has been whining ITT doesn't seem to know about Brazil or Chile's history either. You're simply applying things that happened in other countries and times to the brazilian reality.
>There is plenty of people here from many countries who have knowledge on many admins.You're taking this obscure forum too seriously, thats the issue. Most people here likes to criticize and hasn't organized any worker in their life, so its obvious that your opinion holds less weight
>>567342Haven't said a single thing that is fascist.
What I've said is that where you are born doesn't inherently give you more or less knowledge on geopolitics. The time you put into learning about it, reading, participating and observing does. So telling yourself that a person born in x is suddenly knowledgeable when could be a total complete jackass cause you respect that place and another place you don't like that person suddenly knows nothing is nonsense third worldism.
This shouldn't be a controversial statement in any form. You can have a total political idiot in Peru, a guy who is well read Marxist in Canada. A genius politically in Mexico and a idiot who doesn't know anything in UK. Location doesn't matter
>>567320It's just politics. Do you seriously think Biden wasn't going to pretend to like Lula? The funny part is that it was the Democrats who went all in to get rid of Lula. It was the Obama administration that helped coup Dilma which put Boso into power in the first place. The problem was, they thought they were paving the way for their neoliberal PSDB pals, who know how to use the right fork and knife and talk about peace, love and progress while doing about the same thing Bozo did. Instead, the fire they lit burned the "centrist" structure down and the crazies inherited the ashes.
Now, unless they want a seriously volatile nation that juuust might align with Putin, Hungary and other sore spots for U.S. diplomacy, having the sane people back in charge is the better option … at least for a while.
It's just politics. As long as capital flows, goods get to ports, foreign investment continues apace, and financial elites get what they basically want, Biden doesn't care if Lula or Bozo gets in. Now if Lula tried to socialize large chunks of the economy and spooked the business sector, then all the human rights/Lula is the next Castro shit will come right back into play. But I suspect Lula isn't going to shake shit up like that. So, yeah, he gets the standard congrats boilerplate.
>>567379>It sounds like you read some angry burger right wing post on stupidpol and now want to spread your gospel of why "right-populist figure #15746 is actually the revolutionary socialist candidate No i haven't said this anywhere. Bolsonaro is shit. What I've said is that Lula by all indications was approved by usa and they didn't have a problem with him winning as he isn't a socialist, won't rock the boat and Biden/eu feuded a lot with bolsonaro.
Lula is a liberal figure like boric. This doesn't need to be a i want Lula to win or i want Bolsonaro to win as trying to pin it as. It's being realistic of what Lula is
>>567409the ultra communist has come online,
get lost westoid
VIVA LULA
>>567421>For an ultra???
Millions coming out of poverty is a result of something being done. What was done?
Millions out of poverty\= socialism. How is this controversial.
>>567431thats not the point i was making - you say you can "make a background for someone", and its their ideology that matters
this is idealism, your questions have been answered
whats the diff between one person and another lifting millions out of poverty? It's where the power to do this came from, and what that leader's history is.
>>567409Then you agree with me, since i said there IS a ideology that functions and do things. And the main point was that your comparison is retarded.
What org or party of your country do you support or participate in? Are they having success? If not, they're not valuable of anything in your logic… except if you consider having "communist" in their name more relevant than improving people's lives
>>567452It seems you don't even care about socialism. You just look at the end result. If i grabbed a fascist and somehow pulled millions out of poverty for time being you'd call this socialist? No.
That's a result. The action taken is what is socialism.
>>567461if a person came from the working class, was supported by the working class, called themselves a fascist, and then helped the working class would i support this? YES (their only error would be in theory - that means they might make mistakes due to mistaken analysis, but their heart is in the right place)
but it would never happen, because you don't get fascist leadership ever coming from the working class, being supported by the working class as their primary base of support, or even really helping the working class
What i'm saying is class and base of support are more important than professed ideals. I'm not the person who said he lifted millions out of poverty btw.
>>567467So this is your working definition of what socialism is. When you interpret them to help the working class? Where did you gather this definition?
And the background is just a story to a person either working class or a millionaire both can be complete dipshits. You can find countless stories of politicians with the came from nothing story and they are pieces of garbage.
>>567180It's so weird, diplomacy is becoming a party policy but said parties are becoming international.
Maybe the international ruling class isn't as united as it seems.
>>567511>Biden plunges the American Empire deeper into decline.why would anyone cry about this
this is based
>>567473you can't contest anything specific? The only beef I see against me is that I should support labels and professed ideals over material factors.
>>567475No that's my whole point, it's not about defining socialism but analyzing social phenomenon. I'm not looking at the world like "is this socialism or not socialism?". Socialism emerged from peasant utopians and bourgeois intellectuals - by no means do i support socialism in general. The important piece is the class aspect. Fascist worldviews/theories are generally idealist forms of socialism (which paper over class divisions, giving justification to their brutal repression of workers).
Like I said, it's not about helping the working class, but a variety of factors, ultimately to determine how connected to the working class a movement is. What's important is the proletariat's activity to benefit themselves. So if Lula came from being proletarian (different btw from "coming from nothing" - lots of these backstories are of lumpen, peasants, or just lies), and was brought to prominence by working class organizations, and also is helping the working class - what's wrong here? I'll agree that we won't get sneaky communism from above. But it's a positive development anyways, we're moving in the right direction (even if, to be maximally cynical, we assume Lula is just controlled opposition to undercut actual socialist worker self-organization - even then, i'll say "the bourgeoisie's hand has been forced and they act against themselves while acting against us - the situation sheds light on the working class's power
still). All I expect from Lula is national capital being prioritized over international, along with some reforms and rejection of the prior leadership. This alone is fine, and allows for the further development of forces of production and betterment of people's lives. Locally it could massively undercut the left, i'll admit. Globally for the whole proletariat, it's undoubtedly progressive. Foreign capital will under-develop the means of production in order to not face market competition (or overproduction). Engaging in protection of national capital also entails pacifying the working class, meaning some redistribution. Raising standards of living is a win for the working class that's hard to overturn (and it's only possible when capital flees - where would brazilian capital flee to? It has a limited scope for imperialism.
So yea i think this is a W for the working class. Of course go be unsatisfied, continue with the unions and communist groups or w/e it is that you do. The fight isn't over, but this is still a gain for the working class. It's better than bolsonaro who wouldn't have had the same impact of giving the working class some room to breathe and a better position to organize and continue struggling within.
Anyways feel free to tell me I'm wrong because I misunderstand the situation, but not to repeat that you think only theoretical positions matter, and analyzing the material context and impacts of a political movement or leader is somehow fantastical and misleading.
>>567540You have a victim complex
Someone calling Lula a liberal is somehow a personal insult to you and you even refer to yourself with slurs about it.
>>567424which one in particular for why a fashoid helped poor people, genuinely curious
is it because he wants the vote bank next time, or will advancing the poors will make them more exploitable in the next, advanced stage of outsourcing and what not, more skilled labor
>>567596The Micro parties all did endorse Lula from what i know.
PDT/Ciro IS somewhat to the 'left' of PT/Lula i guess.
The issue is Ciro decided his entire one issue he would base his entire campaign on this time was crying about Carwash/muh corrupt/evil Lula exactly like Bozo was.
Both PDT have suffered from this tailism to the right and PT/Lula.
>>567346Looks based but iirc the Colombian and Chilean guys really put the
SUCK in succdem and are basically barely better then like the U.K. labour party or some shit except on foreign policy.
Also a Peruvian friend told me the supposed commie they elected there went full the revolution betrayed mode on them and basically abandoned all of his promises.
But asides from that.
Would anyone even truly notice if those last three blue countries just got annexed and stopped existing?
>>567469>>Zionist lost>>Zionist lost>>Zionist lost>>Zionist lostLmao Nazbol gets it [joke]
>Argentina > BrazilBrazil has commie parties in its ruling coalition though?
>>567601From the little i know, Castillo reconciled with Peru Libre, the marxist party that brought him to govt and who broke with him at some point. But he was never a commie
>Would anyone even truly notice if those last three blue countries just got annexed and stopped existing?Ecuador and Uruguay had Correa and Mujica respectively, both very influential figures in the pink tide, i'd say Correa is one of the most based ones. Nobody cares about Paraguay though, not even sure if a left exists over there
>>567520>Usa falling apart is goodalways have been
this is what leftcaths have been praying for to Mary
O choro e desalento no 1500 está uma delícia.
>>567625Ele é covarde demais para isso.
>>567672The Dominican president is right wing. That chart is retarded
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_AbinaderU.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was among those in attendance at Abinader's swearing-in ceremony.[11] Under Luis Abinader's leadership, the Dominican Republic is set to form stronger economic and diplomatic ties with the United States.[14] Under his administration, the Dominican Republic became one of the countries that, along with the US, voted to maintain the arms embargo on Iran.[15]
He is close to the Lima Group, which brings together conservative governments in the Americas to isolate Venezuela and contribute to the fall of its government.[16]
On 24 February 2022, Abinader released a statement denouncing Russia's invasion of Ukraine.[17]
>>567677Abinader successfully ran for President in the 2020 election.[9] Rudy Giuliani and John Huvane once again advised Abinader in the campaign as security consultants.[7][10]
Rudy fucking giuliani
>>567679This Dominican president is also building a massive wall to keep Haitians out and Wikipedia calls him left apparently in that dumbass chart lmao
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/feb/25/dominican-republic-starts-work-on-border-wall-with-haitihttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/21/dominican-republic-begins-building-border-wall-with-haitiAbinader successfully ran for President in the 2020 election.[9] Rudy Giuliani and John Huvane once again advised Abinader in the campaign as security consultants.[7][10]
>>567725bro he managed to fail at both staging a coup and winning elections despite having literally
everything on his side, what makes you think he has the chops to start, let alone win, a civil war
This is what a (allegedly Brazilian) magacommunist on Twitter had to say about Lula's wins, thoughts?
>I'll preface this by saying that either candidate would be a win for multipolarity AND the CIA in some kind of way. Lula is not the anti-imperialist idol the left has wet dreams over; likewise, Bolsonaro does not meaningfully represent the Brazilian nation—but more on that later.
>In terms of giving expression to the real movement of the people, both candidates have things going for them; they dispute the same sectors of society —disenfranchised, empoverished Brazilians who lost their industry jobs in the 2015 crisis — with seemingly opposing rhetoric.
>Brazil just doesn't have a large enough amount of educated PMC urbanites to justify Lula's polularity, nor has it enough "reactionary right-wing fascists" to justify Bolsonaro's. If both have managed to become popular, then both have something of meaning to be looked at.
>That is to say: if both of them have garnered 60 million votes each (in a country of 200 million), then they both must have appealed to the People in some way, and both seek to represent the People in some way. Now I'll break down the reasons for their popularity, historically:
>Lula and Dilma's economic policy, as far as managing resources goes, was going on the right direction. The country seemed to be reverting the 1990s trend of deindustrialization, and oil was nationalised. The government funded long-needed infrastructure projects through a State-owned development bank.
>These initiatives, however, were carried out over the fragile basis of revenues from primary exports — iron ore, meat, soy, etc. Worse yet, these public projects served as syphons for public funds to go into private wallets, with politicians such as Sergio Cabral (one of the more infamous ones) and companies like Odebrecht raking in billions.
>With the amount that was stolen, these public projects had to cut every corner, with some being unfinished. Brazilians would start to see corruption as the biggest evil.
>The tragic thing for Lula is that, while he himself didn't partake in any of the stealing, at least any that could be proven in court, he made close political allies out of all the worst offenders. It would be naïve to say that all that stealing didn't happen /under his watch/.
>Given the size of the theft and the scope of the political alignments of those involved, Brazilians grew disenfranchised and outraged at the WHOLE of the political system (based). The movement which was best able to give expression to this sentiment was Bolsonaro's.
>Not only that, he also did more to address issues that the Workers Party (PT) had been, up to that point, neglecting. Bolsonaro's "tough on crime" attitude was/is very popular, and he picked the winning side on the culture war. They surpassed the left on almost every level.
>Still, and this is where Bolsonaro differs from Trump (and why there's no "Brazilian Trump"), it stands true that Bolsonaro isn't behind any kind of current or former industrial proletariat. No striving for more development, better industry, etc.
>Politically, he represents no will for an unleashing of any productive forces except the backwards extractive economy and the parasitical service sector. Brazilian cities have been swarmed with Uber drivers and delivery app bikers over the last 6 years. There's no plan for them.
>His movement does not embody a positive vision for Brazil's future, only a negative one (free from crime, free from corruption, free from the left) — without providing the means, or a pathway, for draining the swamp.
>Ironically, Bolsonaro, once in power, has become what his base despises — corrupt, laid back, and hooking his family and friends up with stable office jobs. Yet his popularity is untarnished. He still gives ideological expression to real demands in a more meaningful way than PT.
>As movements, both petismo and bolsonarismo, now having proved to be equally as popular, act as if their surface level differences are insurmountable. The real reconciliation for the Brazilian people is yet to come, and, as I see it right now, won't emerge from neither.
>Lula won't be able to deliver what he's promising. He won in 2022 based on the vision of "Making Brazil 2002 again". But he will never bring back the specific internal and external conditions that brought us the economic boom of the 2000s.
>It will be Lula's inevitable failure to deliver that will bring forth the sublation of these two movements. In the coming years, Bolsonaro will either rebrand, shift the vibe and become the next popular leader, or he will be discarded by history.
>I see the Workers Party as a defunct one. Lula's victory is a necessary step in burying our decaying republic. His failure will expose the inaptitudes of our state just as much as Biden's catastrophic administration is showing Americans where the deep state really stands.
>Given Bolsonaro's personal stupidity (he's way closer to a Biden than a Putin at that), I doubt of his capacity to lead Brazil's next historical phase. My prediction is that he'll be slowly phased out for someone else who can more accurately capture the sentiment of the masses.
>But what do I know. I'm glad to be proven wrong. As for PT, I also think this is their final act, and that their movement will also be splintered and phased out in the long term.
>>567735Honestly, it's completely up to Lula. As far as I can tell, the electoral left has deliberately chosen to keep people demobilized and rely solely on vooooting back in 2021 when they had the opportunity to ramp up mobilization in the wake of the COVID Senate enquiry, which means that he now lives or dies (perhaps literally so) on simple polliticking, backroom deals and the like. So if he doesn't finally grow some balls and play that game for keeps, he
will get couped again at some point because he won't have street presence to save him.
>>567773*possíveis ministérios
Aldo Rebello é triste demais em nome de Jesus
>>567778Até onde eu sei ele era simpatizante do Bozo, mas estou aberto a me provarem o contrário. Acho que esse chute da CNN aí passou muito longe viu.
>>567782Será?
>>567783A CNN foi bolsonarista em
off até bem recentememente. Os rumores que ela divulgar muito provalvemente tem intenção de manipular.
>>56778602, the son responsible for Bozo's internet presence, and, supposedly, his main puppeteer, also broke internet contact with Michelle and with 03, and probably with others.
>>567783>Será?Confia.
Pelo menos o André vai receber uma posição no ministério, o Gala é mais Faria Lima.
>>567817erá obvio né, Lula sempre foi o candidato do
Sexo nesse caso ele é quase um Fidel
>>567819Reacionarios que fazem cosplay de comunista, apoiam tudo que é conservador disendo que é verdadeiramente proletario e coisas como ser um atedente de caixa não.
PCO é sano perto desses caras.
>>567845gozado que esses fan de miliciano vagabundos do caralho tava totalmente Ok com esses preços, ai o pedofilo deles perde e misteriosamente é culpa do Lula.
essa visão de liberaloide me enoja.
>>567851a dipica demencia das politicas de direita, quando é a direita pode ser o lixo que quiser, quando é a esquerda o paiz tem que virar Startrek no mesmo dia.
O joao carvalho tinha falado disso uma vez quando falava da USSR e a endustrializaçao (Não me lembro do video e questão) onde ele fala exatamente isso, a direita poe um estandarte impossivel de se realizar em tudo que a esquerda faz, e quando não é realizado comesão a falar que falharam e outras merdas.
é tao recorrente que podemos definir o direitismo como Mentir, Ser hipocrita e criar delirios pra ficar batendo.
>>567855Isso afeta até as falas de quem é de esquerda. Se você vai defender o seu ponto em público eles te pedem uma tese com todas as fontes e anos de experiência. Se for um lixo qualquer de direita basta inventar qualquer merda que o pessoal aceita.
Vide: O debate entre Elias e a Renata.
>>567860verdade, e isso tem que acabar se qualquer tipo de esquerda quer progredir.
a questão é, o que empodera essa logica, e como acabar ou melhor, revirar isso contra a direita ?
>>567869Concordo com teu post, mas no fim eles são tão peões como o resto.
Tem que ir atrás de quem financia.
>>567871eu concordo, crar uma doutrina para debate moralista contra o liberalismo pra poder desqualificar eles nos olhos do povo é nescessario.
sabe quem vem a mente nisso ?. o Brizola.
>>567746>Culture warThis guy is too americanized to make a lucid analysis
Also it's all wrong
>run the most expensive electoral campaign in human history>still losehttps://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-63419897Pictured are the most crassly cynical vote-buying schemes Bozo passed this year in his attempt to get re-elected, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. It doesn't include plausibly deniable expenditures, nor the Homeric amounts which was just plain diverted towards this end – he created a Congressional vote-buying pork barrell scheme which added up to 65 billion put together, and God knows how much of this came back, after laundering, to finance this campaign. And then there's the legal and illegal private funds which went into this futile effort.
Add all of these up, and it's definitely higher than the current record-holder, Biden's $11.4b burgerbux. If Paulo Guedes hadn't deliberately fucked our exchange rate over, it could be as much a 3x as Biden's record.
>>567887>Biden's $11.4b burgerbux.Oops, it's actually 14.4b
Still, Bozo probably surpassed it.
>>567900Nem me fale. Estou aproveitando ao máximo.
>>567902Inflação.
>>567911Cara, é basicamente isso, não só a bancada internacional como os próprios aliados dele já levantaram a bandeira branca de abaixar a bola, talvez exceção da ala mais devota dele (acho que seriamos bom começarmos a tratar isso como realmente é, uma RELIGIÃO (que é ideologia, mas é bom fazer a distinção pra ter impacto, né), sinalizando que seria melhor ele ficar de boa
Vamo lembrar também que ele é um covarde de merda que se esconde sempre que percebe que não ta tendo o apoio que esperava, video o lance de privatizar o SUS DURANTE A PANDEMIA, então é de se esperar q ele se mantenha como o gatinho acuado que ele está demonstrando ser
>>567666Augusto Nunes e Fuiza também supostamente foram demitidos.
Mas é aquela coisa, mesmo que isso não seja pura invenção, pode ser igual à "demissão" do supremestiço Adrilles. Ou da cubana que Taubaté, que foi "censurada pelo patê" semana passada mas já está de volta.
O Guga Noblat disse que ele mesmo foi demitido, mas explicitamente por não defender a emissora nesse chororô falso sobre censura. Os bolseiros, claro, já estão dizendo "nós avisamos que a censura ia chegar até você", e não sei dizer se não percebem a nuance ou se são só mal-caráter mesmo.
>>567951Same reason Trump does: because facts literally don't matter anymore. It's all about narrative, image, spin, what-have-you.
And he's not multi-polarist at all. I doubt he can even spell the word.
>>567966in Red= Civilized
in Yellow= Needs to be Civilized
>>567966The red is for regions where Lula won, the darker the red, more votes he recieved against Bolsonaro
in yellow is the same, but with bolsonaro
Hope it helped
>>567994Gringo é o povo mais alienado do historia, não é de esperar pois são vitima da maior maquina de propaganda da historia.
o problema é que como uma infecção, eles leva pros otros.
>>568001o pior é chegar com a grande análise totalmente inédita de que Lula não é socialista
é de botar o Marx pra chorar com tamanha inteligência
>>567966>RedReal Patriots
>YellowGusanos
>>568002I'd say Brazil is, in a general sense, closer to the South of the USA than to Venezuela because of the process of colonization.
Also, this dichotomy isn't really followed outside of São Paulo.
In Rio Grande do Sul, the south is more left-wing while the north is more right-wing. In the Northeast, Bolsonaro has more votes in the big cities than the countryside, while he still can't get a majority among the urban population. In Santa Catarina, where I live and that is one of the most conservative states, the few towns Lula won are in the western countryside while the big cities were all pro-Bolsonaro.
>>568023E a mídia já varreu pra debaixo do tapete.
O PT não fez regulação de mídia e se fodeu por isso. Agora, regulação é muito pouco, vai ter que peitar mesmo pra não tomar golpe.
>>568021Devem ter tido milhões de esquemas de todos os tipos.
>>568033Finalmente tá entendendo pra que serve a "Direita", pra dar experiencia quando mata.
no Minecraft é claro.
>>568012Finalmente né porra. E que rasgue esse país todo de ferrovias.
Also, imagem curiosa.
>>568058Left-wing death squads
A man can only dream
>>568081Because there was a mini coup during the elections. The police stopped thousands trying to vote in nordeste (the region with the most Lula chads in brazil). And this was only one of the dozen attempts in these 4 years of bolsonaro.
T. Brasileiro que não subestima o poder do fascismo.
Unique IPs: 166