I just want to draw everyone's attention to how absurdly based leftypol's developers are for making the site completely functional without running Javascript.
A site that's usable without JS is the absolute gold standard for knowing that the devs actually like and respect the users.
Thank you based devs
>>27184Was it just schizophrenia?
"unfathomable based".
>>27184>>27185Idk, I tried to post the thread and it kept telling me “Flood detected” until I changed “unfathomably” to “absurdly”. Wordfilter seems like the most sensible explanation.
>>27190I mean, obviously they use vichan or whatever as a base, but I imagine at least some of the code is theirs?
>>27193Based. Client-side scripting is a disease and never should have taken off the way it did.
If you want your website to be dynamic, make YOUR machines run the code, not mine.
>>27178TBF that was probably one of the mods, not the devs.
The lead dev recently quit because of how much the site is being over-moderated and janny hostility to users
>>>/meta/26085 >>27205You're the one who apparently thinks it's impossible to write a piece of code that displays a flood detection error when you trigger a wordfilter.
Also, if you're so smart, what error is SUPPOSED to display when a banned word is detected?
There have been/are always people on the staff and dev team who understand the value in anti-JS and Tor.
But like someone already said, we didn't write most of vichan
this is a good thing, it's shit, even its former maintainer begs people not to use it, and most popular IB softwares intentionally don't require JS. We did take small efforts to make sure features we added worked without JS, although that's about all.
>>27189>and reporting seems to need jsIt doesn't, did you get an error message? This can happen when the post is already deleted/moved. vichan is very unpolished like that.
Unique IPs: 12