No.27178
apparently there's a filter for "un-fathomably based" though that prevents you from posting, which is retarded and makes me like the devs significantly less.
No.27179
>>27178I also have noticed mysterious filters that prevented my posts before
No.27180
>>27179It's extraordinarily stupid, especially since it doesn't actually explain why it's not letting me post and I have to play Russian roulette with my edits until the thread goes through. Sometimes the mods here are so stupid I kind of want to murder them a little bit
No.27181
One of the things I couldn't post due to the filter was reaction picture of The Rock raising his eyebrow
No.27182
>>27180I think the message is that peopoe who use those kind of expressions arent welcomed here. Sentiment I agree with.
No.27183
>>27182It's an innocuous meme expression. What "type of people", in your mind, could you possibly associate with it?
No.27184
what does un-fathomably based filter to I've never seen it
testing testing
unfathomably based
No.27185
>>27184Was it just schizophrenia?
"unfathomable based".
No.27186
It also doesnt require cookies last time I checked
Based devs indeed
No.27187
almost all imageboards are completely functional without javascript except for a couple of ones who tried to "innovate" (making exactly the same shit but completely reliant on javascript)
No.27189
I've used this site in w3m before and the only issues I ran into was the webp thumbnails can't convert to sixels and reporting seems to need js. Even works in lynx.
No.27190
you know they did not write it
No.27191
>>271874chan won’t let you use the catalog and you also can’t post because of the captcha (unless you have a pass but nobody has one let’s be honest)
No.27192
>>27184>>27185Idk, I tried to post the thread and it kept telling me “Flood detected” until I changed “unfathomably” to “absurdly”. Wordfilter seems like the most sensible explanation.
>>27190I mean, obviously they use vichan or whatever as a base, but I imagine at least some of the code is theirs?
No.27194
>>27193Based. Client-side scripting is a disease and never should have taken off the way it did.
If you want your website to be dynamic, make YOUR machines run the code, not mine.
No.27196
>>27178TBF that was probably one of the mods, not the devs.
The lead dev recently quit because of how much the site is being over-moderated and janny hostility to users
>>>/meta/26085 No.27197
>>27196why does that thread look like that
No.27198
>>27196Fair, I knew it was unreasonable to blame the devs when I posted it, I was just annoyed
No.27199
>>27196There's no such filter.
No.27200
>>27199So it just coincidentally told me "Flood detected; post discarded" four times in a row until I edited that specific part of my thread? Sure thing, totally-not-gaslighting mod.
No.27201
>>27200what do you think flood detection consists of idiot
No.27202
>>27201It told me flood detected the very first time I tried to post the thread, and I hadn't posted anything in ages, retard
No.27203
>>27202show me the part of the code where wordfilters can trigger the flood detection error
No.27204
>>27203Show me the part of the code where trying to post a thread once can trigger the flood detection error
No.27205
>>27204…? the burden isnt on me
No.27206
>>27205You're the one who apparently thinks it's impossible to write a piece of code that displays a flood detection error when you trigger a wordfilter.
Also, if you're so smart, what error is SUPPOSED to display when a banned word is detected?
No.27207
>>27206>You're the one who apparently thinks it's impossible to write a piece of code that displays a flood detection error when you trigger a wordfilter.uhh then can you show me the part of leftypols software that does that like i already asked before
No.27208
>>27207You're the one claiming it WASN'T a wordfilter, with no proof, and calling me an idiot even though it was obviously a wordfilter. So maybe stop being a little bitch and post YOUR proof you fucking moron
No.27209
Retarded discussion. Whatever triggered the flood detected isn't triggered by that word. It likely was the flood system fucking up and then not unfucking for a while.
No.27210
Alright I rescind all my previous complaints. I was off my meds and all angry, but I took a couple Xanax and chilled the fuck out so now I realize I was being ridiculous. Apologies.
No.27211
>>27210Uhh okay you are forgiven lol. Thank you for not shitting up the rest of the site. Glad this was cleared up.
No.27212
Bloody hell
No.27500
There have been/are always people on the staff and dev team who understand the value in anti-JS and Tor.
But like someone already said, we didn't write most of vichan
this is a good thing, it's shit, even its former maintainer begs people not to use it, and most popular IB softwares intentionally don't require JS. We did take small efforts to make sure features we added worked without JS, although that's about all.
>>27189>and reporting seems to need jsIt doesn't, did you get an error message? This can happen when the post is already deleted/moved. vichan is very unpolished like that.
Unique IPs: 12