This mod has been consistently banning people unfairly, excessively, while only providing vague reasons for it.
For me, I always get bans only from him on bogus nonesense, which gets immediately revoked, when other mods look at it. Seeing picrel, I'm not the only one, who has complained about this.
It's aggravating getting all my posts in a thread, including the effort ones, deleted. Even after unbanning, they remain gone.
This guy is clearly unqualified for moderation, since he abuses his power constantly to silence people he doesn't personally like.
Please, PLEASE do something finally! 🙏
>>31625Wvobbly is harmless, m8.
I suggest you listen to me and calm down.
>>31626>Harmlesswvobbly bans people from all boards, including /meta/! This is not harmless, when you can't even elaborate on unfair bans anymore! The disbute thing only allows for a very limited amount of words to explain oneself. It's made worse that wvobbly bans for months and even years for at best minor things. And as I said, deleted effort posts, which are meant to educate board tourists. wvobbly deletes everything, not just regular shitflinging.
Get this under control NOW! This is unacceptable!
>>31627I do not get anything under control. I do the opposite I sow chaos. Burn down the whole forest to make way for something better. Make a wasteland and call it peace.
AAAAAHHHHHHH
>>31628What the fuck is wrong with you? Seriously?
It's not fucking funny, to come on /leftypol/ and see that you're banned from everything for a gorillion years, based on nothing concrete.
>>31630If this is your attitude towards major issues, it's no wonder this board is dying.
I've been here since the 8chan days. Sad…
>>31632They are also very sneaky about this.
Some libanon complains in a thread about how this site has alledgedly become bad because people celebrate x-thing, they don't like. Obviously, many reply with trolling and some with actual elaborate explanations for why x-thing is celebrated. Conveniently, only the good-faith posts get deleted, while the trolling remains, giving the impression that the thread has truly gone to shit.
The bannings are very clearly motivated by liberal politics on the part of wvobbly and possibly others too.
Instance number 5841801000466151# of communist orgs failing to prevent liberal infiltration into their spaces, letting them become mods and even leadership to sabotage the whole project.
>>31640If you want a major issue I will give you a major fucking issue!
Let's problematize this ok
>over a long time periodOk, put things in perspective. There are 3 threads. 3 threads over the span of several years, one of them seemingly your own.
Motherfucker. Are you serious? Are you trying to be funny? Do you not have the littlest bit of awareness?
You have any idea what goes on here day to day, week to week? Rhetorical question, no you haven't. Don't reply to it.
>>31641Those are just the threads, which specifically name wvobbly. Additionally, since he tends to essentially permaban from all boards regularly, it's safe to assume there is a large number of unreported cases, because they literally can't post on /meta/ to mention this. Who knows how many this may affect. Maybe that's one of the reasons why the activity on this board has been declining; locking people out for bullshit reasons.
I've made multiple threads explaining why it's stupid to ban from all boards immediately. You should at the very least ensure that wvobbly doesn't do that anymore and leaves at least /meta/ open. Then, this allows you to better observe how big this issue actually is.
>>31646I'm trying to explain to you that you are sabotaging yourself by ridding yourself of the ability to properly analyse the status of this board. Is this so hard to understand?
It's a small common sense demand. This has nothing to do babysitting. This is basic quality control! For fuck's sake…
>>31647Oh my god. You are trying to communicate.
Ok, I am trying to communicate to you a couple things:
1) You are overreacting, you are emotional
2) Wvobbly is not out of control. I am out of control. I don't give a single fuck
3) Fuck common sense I didn't study philosophy for seven fucking years, etc.
4) Fuck you
>>31649>You are overreacting, you are emotionalOkay, tell me what I should do, when I get a ban from wvobbly for 5 years from all boards for a vague reason like "pol, schizophrenia" what have you, while not even a post is cited, which alledgedly caused the ban?
What am I supposed to do, when I disbute the ban, but wvobbly is still on shift and denies the appeal, effectively locking me out of /leftypol/ permanently?
Do you get what I mean now? I hope this puts into perspective, why I am "emotional" about this.
>I am out of control.What does that even mean???
>I don't give a single fuckThat's bad, because it's your literal job to 'gives fucks' as a mod.
>Fuck common sense I didn't study philosophy for seven fucking years, etc.Elaborate, why you attitute is superior in ensuring the quality of this site then. Why is ignoring a problem a philosophically sound decision? Especially when the board is in decline.
>>31653>change tacticsTo what? As a regular user this is the only way to address the issue. I have no power, you mods have all the power.
Ban evading is not a good idea, because then it would give a justified reason to permaban, even though the initial ban was unfair.
Look, just leave /meta/ open when banning people, and then you may see for yourself whether or not wvobbly is abusing his power. That's all I want.
Most /pol/ raiders don't bother reading the rules, let alone going to the trouble of appealing a ban through /meta/
>>31657Good.
But I will regularly check if you're actually enforcing this. If I see wvobbly arbitrarily banning people from all boards in the logs again, I'll be here.
>>31661Well, yes actually.
Your mom is mature. Walked right into that one.
>>31664zinger after zinger
hour after hour
what's one man gonna do
with all that power
>>31667DDG doesn't spit out anything.
Interesting
>>31706>look for an answer on /meta/ only to have some condescending janny show up and mock you for it (that's if anyone even responds to your concern). Yeah, what the fuck is their problem? Allergic to constructive criticism? Why even bother with /meta/ then?
I even tried to be polite in this thread (at least for my standards) to not provoke a hostile response, yet I get this shit.
Mods, small advice: If you continue to run this site badly, decreasing the userbase, the less people are going to be here that you can live out your power fantasy over. Eventually, there will be no one left and you'll have nothing to gain a quick dopamine kick out of. Just a thought…
>>31718die mad about it
master blaster runs barter town
Unique IPs: 10