[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / twitter / tiktok ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Discussions, querries, feedback and complaints about the site and its administration.
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)


File: 1735839816726.jpg (109.23 KB, 1179x932, dasha.jpg)

 

>Incel posts are banned site wide (i.e. incel talking points and making 9999 threads complaining about women, saying all women are bourgeoise/sluts/etc.) - per modocracy vote passed on 2025-01-02
This is way too vague.

For instance is stating that the state of dating under capitalism is fucked (which it is) an incel talking point? How about lamenting the difficulty of being a guy on dating apps? Is criticism of feminism still allowed (something which has always been present on /leftypol/)?

I'm concerned this motion was passed on vibes alone and will be applied inconsistently and arbitrarily depending on what individual mods consider an incel to be and the views they imagine them to have. The word 'incel' is essentially meaningless at this point (so often used as a liberal slur akin to the likes of "tankie") that you need to give a specific definition of your interpretation of the word. When half of the site meet the basic criteria of being an incel - that is being a sexually inactive male who wants to have sex with a woman but struggles to do so - the details really do start to matter.

Pretty sure the rule is supposed to cut down on obnoxious, fruitless, and hateful posts. Tbh "incel" posts are just a type of idpol and would fall under that rule but it's enough of an issue that having its own specific rule is probably warranted.

But it's nowhere near as bad as it used to be. "State mandated gf" used to be a common argument. It's probably good to have a rule like this in place to be proactive so it doesn't get out of hand again.

>>38521
>cut down on obnoxious, fruitless, and hateful posts
That describes >99% of all posts on this website.

>is stating that the state of dating under capitalism is fucked (which it is) an incel talking point?
no
>How about lamenting the difficulty of […] dating apps?
If dating apps worked they would all be ghost towns. Dating apps are designed to keep ruturn users in a loop for as long as possible.
>…of being a guy on…
Yes, incel thinktanks pray on your lack of communication with non-men, inserting the idea that it's asymmetrical.
The solution is to not use dating apps.
>Is criticism of feminism still allowed
If you're capable of making dialouges that break the boilerplate and not just being a debate addict spouting talking points.
>I'm concerned this motion was passed on vibes alone and will be applied inconsistently and arbitrarily depending on what individual mods consider an incel to be and the views they imagine them to have.
NAJ but all rules on all websites are vibes based and vary on mod opinion, yeah. They'll come to a general consenus once the rule is in practice and with that they'll get consistent about it.

here's hoping this includes simps (and the other varieties of incel)

Idk where else to post it so I'll bump this thread: the incel thread on /edu/ is a dumpster fire, kill everyone there ty

Where did /leftycel/ go anyways? I just assumed they went to the /r9k/ board on net.


Unique IPs: 6

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / twitter / tiktok ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]