[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
Not reporting is bourgeois
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1747573391676.gif (1.04 MB, 230x255, 1738188317851r.gif)

 

ITT post your most redpilled opinions
constitution < race

i unironically agree the nazis were socialists, utopian socialists working for the interests of the ruling class like a different brand of anarchism

>>666315
i think the idea that fascism is anarchist praxis is pretty common among culture critic types

>>666315
I believe this too

Capital is the actual subject of history, not any class of humans, proletarians least of all

>>666315
>Nazis were Utopian Socialists
WHAT UTOPIAN SOCIALISM? THEY DIDN'T EVEN DO LAND REFORM. THEY'RE LITERALLY TO THE RIGHT OF THE OWENITES.

You can't allow women to have much. You give them an inch they take a mile

>>666314
My most redpilled opinion is that you need to go outside more

File: 1747583144092.jpg (503.26 KB, 1480x833, Luther95theses.jpg)

>>666322
so capital was an immanence in caveman times?
my perspective is more historicist; that modernity is a rupture in the ordinary tract of history. its this particularity which allows capital to manifest. however, capital needs labour - do you suggest that capital can operate without humanity?
>>666315
marx describes "reactionary socialists" in the manifesto.

File: 1747583386859.gif (897.1 KB, 286x498, true-true-away.gif)

E-celebs, specifically irl streamers should be drawn and quartered. The first person to run on a platform to fuck e-celebs in their asses by redistributing their ill-gotten wealth would win by a landslide, they are just so annoying, seriously.

>>666350
Way less bad than actual bourgs

>>666348
>marx describes "reactionary socialists" in the manifesto.
if you actually read the manifesto you'd realize the Nazis don't fall into any of those categories

>>666353
They are the propaganda arm of the capitalists, they brainwash little children to worship wealth and internet fame.

>>666315
>like a different brand of anarchism
Reaction, they are different brands of reactions

File: 1747584569146.jpg (82.86 KB, 1200x630, Hitler-to-crop-for-Range-1.jpg)

>>666354
idk. the last part marx writes about german socialism sounds reminiscent:
<"It proclaimed the German nation to be the model nation, and the German petty Philistine to be the typical man. To every villainous meanness of this model man, it gave a hidden, higher, Socialistic interpretation, the exact contrary of its real character. It went to the extreme length of directly opposing the “brutally destructive” tendency of Communism, and of proclaiming its supreme and impartial contempt of all class struggles. With very few exceptions, all the so-called Socialist and Communist publications that now (1847) circulate in Germany belong to the domain of this foul and enervating literature."
an anti-communist socialism seeking to end class struggle?

File: 1747584739864.jpg (121.7 KB, 900x600, marx-engels-slideshow.jpg)

>>666315
here are the categories of reactionary socialism:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch03.htm
>feudal socialism
<aristocracies against bourgeois society, who appeal to the proletariat. also, in this category is "christian" or clerical socialism.
>petty bourgeous socialism
<sismondi was the head of this school, which appealed to petty bourgeois concerns. it sees big business as destructive to society, so is both reactionary and utopian
>german or "true socialism
<conceiving of the french revolution as an attribution of "practical reason" and "will". this socialism is humanistic and abstract. this sought to preserve the petty bourgeois and philistines, while denying class struggle in place of national unity.

-Socialists can't organize if they lead sedentary lifestyles of pure hedonism and consumption

-Renaissance and Pre-modernist art is still infinitely better than contemporary art

-I think sexual dimorphism is a tangible facet at play in a society

-Racial solidarity is a huge factor to ensuring a collectivized culture

-I willingly denied confessions from other women on the basis of my race (im black) because I would feel bad for their parents if they brought me home.

File: 1747585744134.png (62.31 KB, 666x598, ClipboardImage.png)

>>666314
>gigafly gif

selfish little bump

selfless bump

>>666314
My shitty opinion > spooky legal text about when state is going to commit violence > pseudoscience by mouth breathing rightoids

File: 1747652624485.jpeg (9.39 KB, 331x152, image.jpeg)

innovationism is a doctrine of queer liberation

bourgeois techbro order, although historically progressive, has been worse in every cultural and artistic aspect when compared to previous ruling classes

>>666845
>has been worse in every cultural and artistic aspect
Agreed. We need to ban cameras or art will literally end and we will just have photographyslop instead of paintings that only aristocracy can afford.

>>666868
this is what digital artists unironically believe

>>666350
drawn and quatering is a bit too much imho but I agree for the most part. I just assume youtubers, vloggers, streamers and other e-celebs are all terrible people (with an above average chance of being a groomer or sex pest of somekind) until proven otherwise and its payed off dividends. I would personally run on a mass audit campaign and sick the full force of the IRS on these people. I think online celebrity as a career attracts the worse kind of people that have a chronic need for attention along with little to no guiding principles or scrupules besides "become big youtuber". Its for people who not only have petty boug aspirations but for whatever reason genuinely feel a need to put themselves into social media panopticon for attention to do so. Some burgerflipper at mcdonalds contributes more to society by preparing food and keeping the kitchen clean than a someone whose main source of income is leveraging parasocial bonds to get people to buy crap they don't need. I would wager 20-30 dollar USD that in the future alot of these e-celebs will be looked at the same way we look at those old ciggarette commercials that used to target child audiences.

>>666845
I mean is this really a chuddy take? I feel like "neoliberalism bad" is a take any sensible user here has.

File: 1747673007435.gif (2.85 MB, 200x234, terry davis.gif)

I don't like this thread.
>EVERY THING I DONT LIKE IS A PSYOP

Capitalism is still historically progressive and will remain historically progressive for centuries if it continues to exist. Too bad being historically progressive doesn't get us any closer to communism.

>>666314
Real fascism has never been tried/

>>666903
what exactly is "progress" in this case?

>>666868
thats not what im saying here, what im saying is that capitalism tends to produce infinitely more cultural slop than any prior society.
this isnt even me saying that modern day art is bad, just that the commodification of art leads to a lot more trash being made in an attempt to make easy money

>>666918
>the commodification of art
there is no difference between art and its commodification.

>>666315
socialism literally means social ownership
that is the purest possible definition
the nazis engaged in privatization
ergo they were not socialists
it's that simple

>>666928
so the soviet union was not socialist?

>>666929
No.

A Matriarchy will be more brutal to men than a Patriarchy is to women since males have no (or very low) intrinsic (reproductive) value. If not a few elite will breed and exist, the rest will be just beasts of burden.

>>666929
The USSR degenerated after Stalin took over.

>>666978
robert graves believes that humanity originally had a matriarchy which would sacrifice males to the moon

>>666928
How pure? Can we market it somehow? I have a source that can get 58-61% pure. Could you purify it further? Maybe we could use it somehow.

>>666978
that is a null take because youre talking about something that has no chance of actually happening

>>666978
>since males have no (or very low) intrinsic (reproductive) value

Why do people always say this?
Yet, they forget that female reproductive value is also fragile.

jannies dont rape me for this

Under an ideal socialist society, all of us are MEN. Even the women and children. No more of this bourgeois morality "wanting to feel comfortable with my identity" lib/pseudo-anarkiddie hyperprogressive brainworm gruel that we've been fed in order to make men comfortable in their own chastity. As soon as a vanguard is set up we're ALL having mandatory gym schedules, whey is going to be added into baby powder, and there WILL be more buff men in our propaganda. The only body dysmorphia will be from looking at a gigachad and thinking "I NEED TO put in the work to be more like him". No more sedentary lifestyles ruining the endocrine balance of our men and our women, no more hyperprocessed slop in our diets, no more meaningless kafka bureaucracy making it harder for parents to attend to their children, no more glorification of emasculation/complacency with the system and no more hikikomori internet degeneration that would've made our socialist forefathers weep in shame. We're getting our shit together once capitalism is overthrown.

>>667092
>whey is going to be added into baby powder
Scratch that. Frankly it's all going to come from milk DIRECTLY sourced from cows. No more of this immune system deprecation aswell.

>>667092
>under communism everyone will be just like me
this is such a weird cope leftoids tend to have

File: 1747698114220.png (43.52 KB, 400x350, ClipboardImage.png)

>>667096
Under communism, everyone will be better than me.

>>666356
>Think of the children

So does every other public figure. Adults in general brainwash children into idealism for control

women shouldnt have to wear makeup and it only started to get popular during the hollywood psyop shit of the early 1900s completely distorting beauty standards


Unique IPs: 31
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /