Moffin', erikhoudini, Iron Felix, King Lear… Are they even real or part of our imagination? How did we attain such level of cringe? Where did we go wrong?
>>667784they are cringe but the only one I really hate is Moffin'.
I wanna vomit every time I read his shitty takes.
>>667783Gay misandrist unironically
Still unrefuted
>>667786>Cant filter avatarfags though, thems crafty fuckersTrue, but that's part of the imageboard thing, isn't it? Being crafty. Like being crafty in poker. Things like bluffing or trying to read an opponent's tells, or making false tells. All would be considered cheating, , or at least not playing in the spirit of the game, in other games.
But anonymous flags on anonymous imageboards seem to go against the normal thing in social media of flags in bio.
Myself, I dont understand the gay Nazi flag poster. Their posts don't seem neonazi.
I like using the syndicalist flag for posts about metaphysics.(because in meatspace, union activism is all I do politically, but political life isn't all of your life.)
Sometimes wonder if anarcha-feminist flagger is female.
Is it too ambitious to think it's a spanner in the social media influencer /clout works, when things emerge on anonymous imageboards ,and no one really knows who it is ,or if they are what they say they are.
>>669173Two reasons maybe:
<Tripcodes signify you "care" about your identity, therefore identifying yourself only by name, flag or avatarposting is more "ironic".<Many namefags are illiterate newfags.Nowadays you won't find many tripfags apart from geriatric oldfags in /jp/-adjacent communities, blankfags and unironic attention whores.
Latest Houdinist praxis:
Look, so let's break down why Houdini Magazine took the stance on freeing Tay-K, that it took, why I decided that this was a good play. One, it's controversial. Tay-K probably killed some people. He's got 55 years in prison. It's a controversial person. But he's also a celebrity, a talented artist. It's a well-known name, so you can attach the back issues of prison enslavement to a well-known name that's going to get attention in the media. That's why I used Tay-K as the example. Trump just freed NBA young boy, pardoned Larry Hoover, he pardoned Kodak Black. Why couldn't he pardon Tay-K? It's in the news. It's part of the spectacle right now. Let's strike while the iron's hot. A lot of leftists just do not understand how to do propaganda, how to sloganeer, how to operate with that mindset. Purity over everything to the point of counterrevolutionary dogma.
So there are a lot of people who just don't get that and will not understand why certain things are pushed for propaganda reasons. They probably don't even know who Youngboy is.
Two, it's a principled stance that's backed by theory, and it's backed by black radical thought. It's backed by material analysis, but it's still controversial, especially to people on the left. I'm being drugged in these comments. Someone even went as far as to say that prison abolition has nothing to do with socialism, or that I am a bleeding heart liberal for this sort of thing. Meanwhile, I can pull up texts from a variety of sources, none of them white, which doesn't escape me, to back up my claim. The face of leftism is a white dude from Austin, Texas who makes $90,000 a year working as a human resources officer or some other bullshit job. That's literally the face of what leftism is. It's not cool. It's cornball. If we want to tap into the culture and tap into the fucking controversy and tap into the spectacle, you've got to fucking take risky positions. And this is a really good one to take, because even if he did the action, I don't necessarily believe that 55 years in prison is restorative justice that makes the thing that he did right. What it is, though, is guaranteeing that the state has another slave for 55 years. I mean, that's facts. So of course the state has an ideological interest in wrapping up the punishment for the crime as 'justice', because they benefit from exploiting the labor of the prisoner. But is it actually restorative justice? No. So it doesn't really matter if he did it. Its deeper than that.
Furthermore, we know that this is a court system that is fundamentally biased against black people in general. So how can you have these leftists who are saying, "yeah, he deserves 55 years. It doesn't matter that he's black. If this was a socialist state, he would have gotten the same amount of time." And those people are getting the upvotes, and they're the "correct ones". But I quote Angela Davis and I'm an idealist. That's the face of the left, man. And if it's got to be me to throw a fucking match in that a little bit, try to shake things up, then it'll be me doing it. That's fine. Because I know that I'm right. I know that I'm taking the most based position. And that's all I ever do. I just stay based.
I've just been thinking a lot about the fact that I'm from Louisiana, and by and large, multiple thinkers, multiple sources, multiple people have discussed the Delta South in the context of, like, a neo-colony, right? And so my mind goes to this idea of these – some of these people who are attacking me, if it was a Palestinian artist who had been tried in an Israeli court and arrested and was sentenced to 55 years in an Israeli prison, these people would immediately, without hesitation, go, that's – something's not right. But they don't recognize that this is – that's essentially what's happening here every day. And I find that to be interesting. We've got to make that logical jump. We've got to make that leap.