There is no such thing as being "unintentionally racist". If you were not making a racist statement it is utterly irrelevant whether it can be misconstrued or not. Racism is an ideology, not some invocation of forbidden words like it's the Necronomicon, like seriously if there's zero racist intent what practical purpose does doing this shit even serve above the level of Beavis and Butthead laughing because somebody said "duty"?
>>671925 (me)
wait did I misread OP? are you condemning liberals screeching over language in of itself or are you condemning language in of itself (like a liberal)?
>>672373 (me)
Just as an example, if someone said „uyghurs smell like shit“ and they genuinely had no ill intent saying that, would that be okay according to you?
>>671931>racism is not an "ideology"dont call others retards and then utter this shit lol
if it isnt an ideology then racism is science and objective?
>>672363>>672408>>672354>>671931>>671945this is the most brainless, superficial kiddie geopolitics. "because racism" isnt a materialist analysis
radlibs have turned a trauma aesthetic into "analysis". oppression exists, but marxism requires structure, not sentiment
>>672414racism as an ideology emerged in the 17th century. societies rome probably wasnt the multicultural diamond of the west, but people discriminated based on different things, not the artificial construct of "race." skin color is not race btw
>ideology is also a system>a system perpetuated by ideaslol why are libs so utterly retarded
>>672419you retards are pointing to the way race mediates capitals concessions and confusing that mediation for the foundation of class itself
>>672422>racism as an ideology emerged in the 17th century. societies rome probably wasnt the multicultural diamond of the west, but people discriminated based on different things, not the artificial construct of "race." skin color is not race btwWhat do you think have you proven with that? I said racism can also be an ideology, so there was no point in giving me your flawed history lesson about a subject I am more educated in than you. Additionally, racism being a system entails more than the involvement of ideas, which warrants classifying it as not just a ideas. You are making an idealist argument with such a reduction. Ideology is also not just ideas, so your equivocation is even doubly retarded.
>you retards are pointing to the way race mediates capitals concessions and confusing that mediation for the foundation of class itselfYou are hallucinating your boogyman strawman again.
I tell actual genuine racists to fuck off because they're annoying, but arguing that we should treat certain proletarians as class enemies based on presumed political behavior is idealist, moralist gatekeeping. Only the petit-bourgeois stand anything to gain from engaging in racist behavior because it helps them get rid of their competition.
>>672414>>672426>>672428Saying "it's a system" but then offering no framework beyond race, land, and identity confirms you’re still working in a racialized moral register, not a material one.
>>671931>le eternal political formThis is not marxism but western idealism. Marxists analyze how class expresses itself through race and sex without transforming those expressions into sovereign political categories.
Reminder there is no "female proletariat" or "black proletariat" as distinct political subjects. There is only the proletariat, fractured by capital and mystified by thinkers like you who sell fragmentation as dialectics.
>>672408>DEIUSAID is literally an instrument of burger imperialism. You are a liberal. We say radlib to refer to liberals such as yourself who've confused form and substance of emancipation. This is the tendency of the Lassallean opportunists, or in modern parlance, wreckers. You are a wrecker.
Hope that helps.
Unique IPs: 22