/siberia/ - Off-topic

99% of women find submissive men disgusting. society is gaslighting young men into becoming completely unattractive

being submissive and "safe" as a man is cringe and will cast you as either a permavirgin cause you're gross and obvious and pathetic to most women, or land you settling for the fattest smelliest reddit pussy
unless you're submissive but also a hot in a twink kinda way and can handle some candle wax poured on you
nothing wrong with bush though, most of this isn't """woke""" a lot of neonazi rightoids fall for this shit as well but then they're lectured by some fat neckbeard who never got laid either

I personally see it more as people increasingly being ingrained into more sedentary lifestyles including shitty diets and mass-media atomization all being the driving force of male emasculation. They're inexplicably tied to the perverse social manifestations of the capitalist system but libs are incapable of seeing beyond that and ostensibly tie it into the gradual progression of humankind and fighting against muh toxic masculinity.

Theory seems reasonable enough, but
>Likewise for "woke" fetishes - "where's the bush", those that can be plausibly hand waved as jokes, etc.
Only applies in irony poisoned spaces, which requires the group have an overall puritanical view of kink in the first place. Dispell that and people will just be openly into piss and centaurs and such with eachother without assuming eachother are joking.

Also well maintained pubes just are inherently erotic, having a similar effect that piercings have where they add extra stimulation to erogenous zones, and it's weird that "entirely bald" was an uncontested beauty standard for like half a century and that this somehow persisted for a while on as the porn industry made it's way to the internet when keeping it varied for novelty would be more profitable.

>their's

why do native english speakers make these mistakes so often?

>>677464
ctrl+f'd that and didn't find what you're pointing at. That said, "their's" feels correct enough even if not correct by the book. Like "their own" but in a different place in the sentence.

>>677475
it's in the comic

made for bbc

This might describe some specific online places, but everywhere else being submissive as man isnt "safe horny", exact opposite, its a sign of a weird pervert.

>>677475
Yeah why wouldn't it be their's? It's weird like I just noticed this the other day from the spellcheck on firefox. I already knew the possessive form of it doesn't have an apostrophe becaust 'it's' is a contraction of it is, but why not their's?

While on the topic, fuck how fucked up the spellcheck is in firefox and other spellcheck apps. So many times I straight up use real words spelled correctly, normal dictionary words, and they don't have them in their spellcheck dictionary. WTF?

>>677464
>why do native english speakers make these mistakes so often?
Because we learned writing from speaking. As long as what we write is equivalent to a correct way to say it, what difference does their, there, an apostrophe here or there matter? If you put the characters into a text to speech, the result would be exactly the same. A lot of these spelling and punctuation details are completely superfluous.

>>677362
Does the guy fuck his mom?

>>677505
yeah I don't think that's a woke fetish OP

>>677502
I like to turn off spell check and take the "fuck it we ball" approach. Lets me make up words like a medieval poet and makes me more careful when proofreading.

>>677464
Consequences of Jelly fish losing.
Now literacy has gone down 😭

>>677511
Look I don't care if it's woke or not. I just want to know did he fuck his mom? And if he did are their panels showing it? Maybe a threesome with the other chick? That'd be so hot

>>677502
uygha its "there's"
their implies possession, as in "that is their car"

>>677362
Can I have sex with you?
>>677369
Can I have sex with you?
>>677379
Can I have sex with you?
>>677380
Can I have sex with you?
>>677460
Can I have sex with you?
>>677464
Can I have sex with you?
>>677475
Can I have sex with you?
>>677490
Can I have sex with you?
>>677491
Can I have sex with you?
>>677499
Can I have sex with you?
>>677502
Can I have sex with you?
>>677505
Can I have sex with you?
>>677511
Can I have sex with you?
>>677513
Can I have sex with you?
>>677514
Can I have sex with you?
>>677520
Can I have sex with you?
>>677521
Can I have sex with you?
>>677558
Can I have sex with you?

sèxo

>>677561
why are glowanons like this

>>677561
sorry im chad only

>>677561
u gave me a (You) so yes ❤

a WHAT theory?

>>677362
It's not exactly a mystery. The internet is capable of turning women into incel gooners too. Maybe they think it's less pathetic than the male counterpart because they're women, but they would be mistaken.

>>677830
The real trvke is abrahamics lost their soft power so they need to rely on bot swarms on tiktok and twitter to keep the lump of soot that is puritan cringe culture burning. Gooning is dead, masturbation and horniness are maundane.

Why do people pathologise men for having a mommy kink but encourage women to have a daddy kink?
And why are people so morally obsessed about sexuality on here?
Jesus Christ, not everyone wants/needs to express themselves the "classic/standard" way.

Sometimes "safe horny" isn't so bad.

>>677380
>Muh emasculation.
Why do you always wanna make everything about masculinity crisis?

Safe horny isn't the problem. The problem is psychosexual misandry.

>>677499
This.
Sexually submissive behavior as a man is seen as mental illness. Unless you're drop dead gorgeous.

Feminists will deny this and say men need to be submissive but we all know feminists cannot commit to one idea all the way through.

>>677460
>Also well maintained pubes just are inherently erotic, having a similar effect that piercings have where they add extra stimulation to erogenous zones, and it's weird that "entirely bald" was an uncontested beauty standard for like half a century and that this somehow persisted for a while on as the porn industry made it's way to the internet when keeping it varied for novelty would be more profitable.

Why do people always think bald pubes is always corporate pressure for aesthetic? I shave my pubes bald and I love it.
The hairs always get caught in the fabric lining on my underwear.
Also, they can fall out.

>>677369
Wrong. It's not submissive men who are seen as disgusting. It's ugly men who wanna be submissive.
Especially those auto-misandrists that make up this board.

But yes, society gaslights young men far too much but for other things, such as war and violence. They morally harras young men into conflict to prove their worth and then accuse them of being narcissistic savages when they do.

>>677854
>And why are people so morally obsessed about sexuality on here?
you ask these questions as if you do not know
what kind of pseudo-socratic method bullshit, brother