It's wild that both Pakistan and India were allowed to get nukes. Literal shithole jeet "states" that can barely even govern themselves or pave their streets are nuclear capable. The West, along with China and the USSR should've worked together to curb stomp the Jeet states for getting nukes. Fuck. I'd take a nuclear armed Iran and KSA over the Jeetistans.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>678064>The USSR helped India with nuclear capabilities, and Pakistan made their nukes with implicit permission from the West who allied with Pakistan during the Cold War. (And Pakistan dead ass helped North Korea with their nuclear program I'm aware of this reality. That doesn't make it just.
>Anyhow the Subcontinent's nuclear program is a very fascinating thing to me because it is proof that having a functional government is not as easy as putting smart people on elite level, which there are many in India and Pakistan (otherwise they would not be able to create, much less maintain those nukes)Stop bringing up interesting points in my Jeet slander thread, thanks
>>678070Cuz the army control the nukes not the civilian government
In fact the Pakistani army is the actual government. Not a single civilian PM in Pakistani history has ever completed their term without a military intervention
>>678067You wouldn't because the Africans are never going to develop nukes (Boers don't count).
The Belgians built the Congolese a small nuclear reactor for research purposes in Kinshasa and after independence they - predictably - broke it and had to shut it down. In fact iirc there is still a bunch of highly radioactive material sitting unsecured in the building because the government doesn't pay for proper security or disposal.
>>678080this thread is gonna derail into jeet hatred again but i might as well share some knowldge i have
the ISI's competence in helping pakistan get le bomb comes from the massive smuggling routes they made to get their hands on the documents and technology, they made too many shell companies in the gulf emirates and in west germany, set up Illicit procurment routes via their Abdul qader khan network.
the ISI used front companies to buy dual-use technology (e.g., high-precision valves, vacuum pumps) from Germany, Japan, and Switzerland, often mislabeling shipments on route to pakistan. they collected the needed knowledge and sent it all the way from america, germany, the netherland, and from china and north korea, the two latter i'm not sure if they stole it or the chinese handed it to them.
india on the other hand aqcuired le bomb by simply not giving a shit about threats from western powers, nehru told everyone trust me bro this is peaceful nuclear energy it is not used to make bombs
>>678093india is not the same as iran or north korea, too big to sanction all westerners can do is threaten it, and even if they get the bomb they can be easily swayed to the western side to use it on china, or aren't really intrested in using it on any western power for defence or otherwise, now compare that to iran or libya, or egypt, these three are a big threat to the imperial core if they get their nooks, and to israel, libya and iraq had to abandon their programs after so many mossad assassinations of their scientists and coups like in morroco (the failed 1971 coup there was by a rebelling general who wanted to make not only a nuke, but turn morroco to the eastern block)
mena and african nations have their ass blasted at every second they think of nationalizing the economy let alone nukes because everyone knows the nukes coul possibly be pointed at the west or israel. that's more than threats
>>678083>I do believe that some more robust African states like Nigeria for example can have a viable nuclear program if they're willing to sacrifice an entire national budget into itUnlikely. They just don't have the domestic talent for it. A sizable proportion of Nigeria is overrun by a group that opposes education as a concept. That tells you everything.
Any African country which seriously wants develop nukes would have to rely on foreign expertise and material. This would be extremely expensive and no developed nation wants to risk the blowback of giving a country which experiences regular regime changes, civil wars and border conflicts nuclear weapons.
>>678094>India Superpower 2020. You will fuck all the white women and enlighten the world to the many benefits of not showering.The same jeets you're talking about will soon ruin your country with mass-immigration and you deserve it. It's time you pay up for supporting comprador regimes.
>>678096>Does the west force your people to shit in the streets, gangrape their neighbors and worship cow shitLook into our current fascist, cowdung-worshipping, rapist-enabling leader's past. He's a western puppet through and through. And I hate most jeets too, I only identify with the 10-15% of the sensible ones who have to suffer because of the retardation the west has created. You all think you're so clever going around creating conflicts that you would never have to face the blowback for. How's that working out? The ruling class you have collaborated with for centuries has chosen to dump your money into forever wars and import cheap labour to undercut you. You're getting a taste of what it's like to live with unclean ethnic narcissists and toadies that would've died off long ago had your people not screwed us over.
>>678138The lack of retaliation is tacit permission
>>678140Lmao
>>678141you are insane if you think any country would just attack Pakistan or India just because they built nukes
go back to /pol/ you retard
Unique IPs: 15