>>686921>The NM guy got told this over and over, even which posts specifically and how to stitch them together. No responseI might've missed this or it was a private exchange but never saw this. Any nM thread was always low count thread and never any suggestions. Maybe vague "I have an idea". But I do agree that he dropped the ball with the initial premise of "threads -> articles", which made it interesting.
>That's the person whose "fault" it is. Well it's hard to run when it feels like it isn't being engaged. He has access to view count so he knows how much people read it. My assumption is not a lot. And again, he would ask the user base for stuff and they didn't seem to reciprocate. At least from what I saw. Though if he did miss his chance with y'all, it would be a shame
>All of these people already air their views elsewhereWell 2 are youtubers, so the video essay definitely has a different approach than a written, so it could be an interesting thing to see. And as for Paul Cockshott, it was to point to get more established folk to engage with leftypol. Such as with the AMA as of recent. The magazine was always a way to take the ideas from here and present it to the world. So I think it's fine if the world interacts with it
>thought of this shit getting made into articles by somebody who doesn't know betterHate him or love him, I think he would know twice about these shit for brains. It's not like they tend articulate well. But I will say, I feel like he did get too self serious over time. The early stuff, while some informative, wasn't always serious. He made a whole article about someone writing erotica
https://web.archive.org/web/20230401161103/https://newmultitude.org/a-commie-joins-an-erotica-writing-group/About the economics of runescape. There were thing he could've pulled that weren't as informative but allowed for the psyche of leftypol. So I will give credence to leftypol. It wasn't entirley your fault.