Porn thread #2
Before posting or consuming porn in this thread, please post a selfie so we can verify that you are not underage in compliance with the UK's Online Safety Act.
>>695943i didn't check those sites, im not familiar with them, so i might look. also just as a heads up, idk if your the same anon who made the other posts that were removed, but as stupid as it is, "feral" porn is against the rules and mods can
very frivolous in their interpretation of the rules.
>>695693>>695694>>695695I think he means "early porn introduction," which is supposedly some pedo grooming technique. I think he's saying it because its Rule 34 of a cartoon. He might even have a point if it was a currently running cartoon instead of a fairly obscure cartoon from two decades ago.
Fun fact: babies that were born when My Life as a Teenage Robot was first aired have turned 22! Babies that were born when it ended its original run will be turning 20 in September.
>>695946some of my posts were removed for expressing my controversial attractions (aka paraphilias) or for bait posting
> feral" porn is against the rules and mods can very frivolous in their interpretation of the rules.i realized that when i first entered leftypol again after 4 months but the mods seem lenient on people posting loli so i thought i would do the same thing with feral. im definitely gonna try and be much more cautious though
>>695964oh i heard this argument before, its nonsense of course. i never actually watched this show, but i
love robot girls so much.
>>695680>>695694the animation here is excellent, absolutely fantastic. even the sounds design is incredible, all the sparks and zap sounds really add to the sex.
>>695981the mods are especially inconsistent with loli, i've posted art that was not loli or in some cases not even pornographic and gotten perma'd without warning for it. its seems they operate on a "i know it when i see it" basis, but none of the mods actually agree on what it is. i now try to keep my porn posting on the tor node in case one of tha volunteers had a bad day or something and decides to nuke everything.
>>696095so it should be a romeo and juliet law and not a total age of consent law.
in any case, does not apply for shit that don't exist.
>>696182Nobody is inherently sexual, the social act of sexualization is what creates the concept. It's a ubiquitous act, but the point remains. Fully asexual people exist, for example, and there is nothing inherently sexual about them in literally any way. Yet society imparts it's own views.
In short, your actions have consequences.
>>696233>1st gifnow I have to post the famous animation
>mutually and enthusiastically consensual but thats not your jam now is it?
question, what push you to make a fetish, that most will find vile and repulsive, your identity on a leftist political website?
>>696624I'm pretty sure that anon's point is that people's view about sexuality rapidly varies across societies due to difference in material reality. This is what "x is socially constructed means"
Leftoids will go around throwing the word socially constructed but then sperg out if you disagree with their specific moral views about what society should be like uygha words have meanings
>>696792uh
yes, what stupid question.
>>696792>I lean towards yes, even if I generally wouldn't pursue someone in that age bracket because of the massive gulf in maturity between someone in high school and someone who has even a year's worth of college or professional work under their belt. There is no massive maturity gap between high school and college. It only feels that way due to sociolegal constructs. College students have way more legal rights.
>People are right to say that, with that difference in maturity, informed consent on the part of the high schooler just isn't possible, at least for a romantic relationship.Consent is possible. It's just that they're infantilised.
By that logic you may as well say consent is impossible with disabled or elderly folk
>>697007>There is no massive maturity gap between high school and collegeMaybe not between 16 and 18, or 18 and 20, but there is absolutely a massive maturity gap between a 16 year old and a 22/23 year old graduating college. It's not just a matter of changing responsibilities and legal rights either. In that gap people naturally gain coping and self-regulation skills that high schoolers simply don't have. High school-age kids, past and present, famously don't plan for the future or self-regulate well. This is why I specifically said "romantic relationship" rather than "relationship" more generally.
Here's my hot take: rather than a hard age of consent, these things should be judged on a case-by-case basis according to assessments of physical and mental harm. Young people should be allowed to explore their sexuality with people who have the experience to demonstrate healthy and equitable sexual experiences. What needs to be prevented is abuse of those differences in experience to force or trick kids into long-term responsibilities they can't possibly be ready for (such as parenthood), physically harm the child (such as through penetration of a pre-pubescent girl), or both. I think this model would only be capable of working in a socialist or communist society, as the basis for certain forms of exploitation (particularly pornographic) wouldn't be a factor and the community could play a larger role in maintaining accountable and healthy relationships. When there is suspicion of abuse the community should be able to intervene on the side of the young person, considering they are less in a position to know that something is abuse due to the aforementioned lack of experience.
>By that logic you may as well say consent is impossible with disabled or elderly folkIn a lot of cases yeah, consent is impossible for disabled or elderly people. Not every person, since disability and age affects everyone differently, but people with the mind of a 4th grader or dementia simply can't consent in any meaningful way.
>>697079>It's not just a matter of changing responsibilities and legal rights either. In that gap people naturally gain coping and self-regulation skills that high schoolers simply don't have. High school-age kids, past and present, famously don't plan for the future or self-regulate well. This is why I specifically said "romantic relationship" rather than "relationship" more generally. Really?
If maturity is not a matter of "changing responsibilities" then why are college age people better at self regulation then when they have more responsibility than high school kids??
If anything, this idea that maturity comes naturally with age is a spook.
It only works if we assume that life is exactly like the white suburban stereotype of the human life cycle.
The real reason is because our society infantilises teens.
They're barred from even making their own lunches
Back in the old days before adolescence was official, we would see more high school aged kids better able for self regulation
Right now, people in their thirties have a hard time
>>697079>Here's my hot take: rather than a hard age of consent, these things should be judged on a case-by-case basis according to assessments of physical and mental harm. Young people should be allowed to explore their sexuality with people who have the experience to demonstrate healthy and equitable sexual experiences. What needs to be prevented is abuse of those differences in experience to force or trick kids into long-term responsibilities they can't possibly be ready for (such as parenthood), physically harm the child (such as through penetration of a pre-pubescent girl), or both.> I think this model would only be capable of working in a socialist or communist society, as the basis for certain forms of exploitation (particularly pornographic) wouldn't be a factor and the community could play a larger role in maintaining accountable and healthy relationships. When there is suspicion of abuse the community should be able to intervene on the side of the young person, considering they are less in a position to know that something is abuse due to the aforementioned lack of experience.What needs to happen is that adults need to stop patronizing the youth
We need to stop sheltering them from every slight vulgarity. We also need to realize that schooling alone is not a good way to raise children
Major part of why young people have the notorious "failure to launch" syndrome is due to sociolegal infantilism.
Parents and teachers are to blame.
Alot of teachers are intolerant of children having any sort of solitude or individuality.
Teachers also talk to students in a therapy-speak dialect.
Parents also guilty of discouraging/banning kids from hanging out with friends or choosing "unfruitful" electives.
Parents also don't teach kids about finances, sex, basic car maintenance,etc.
>>697103>>697114>why are college age people better at self regulation then when they have more responsibility than high school kids??Did you have a stroke writing this?
>If anything, this idea that maturity comes naturally with age is a spook.>We need to stop sheltering them from every slight vulgarity.>our society infantilises teens.>adults need to stop patronizing the youthI'm not saying maturity comes "naturally". Maturity is a combination of socially taught skills and behavioral self-correction through life experience. There is an inescapable factor of time there. Something that must be learned can't be assumed to exist in a person past a certain point in their youth. That point where someone might be called "mature" depends on the person and their formative life experiences. A 17 year old who has had to take care of themself and their siblings for years may be able to demonstrate a higher level of maturity than a 25 year old trust fund baby. But in either case that maturity is determined by skills and experiences acquired (or not acquired)
over time.
Infantilization isn't a good thing, but the idea that a major problem in our society is that we aren't hard enough on our kids, or protect them too much, has always been a reactionary one. A long-term trend in all societies, Western or otherwise, has been towards providing more and more structured and intentional upbringing for youth. 14 year olds needing to essentially become a young adult in feudal society was a product of economic necessity and more often than not killed and harmed them. It wasn't some naturally better "non-infantilizing" lifestyle that made them strong. It was a brutal life that was more likely to lead them to an early grave. The same is true within living memory. 16 year olds sneaking off to fight in World Wars wasn't a noble thing, it was suicidal, and those who fought in the countless resistance movements in the global south from the 50s to today are tragedies. It's not infantilization to say they should never have been put in those situations, when there's a reality that knowledge of the brutality of these things and their dangers isn't instinctual. It's taught or learned, and every society has to collectively determine what is acceptable for children to learn through direct experience and what should be taught through instruction.
Something we agree on is that teenagers should be able to learn about sexual acts through safe and equitable experiences, rather than needing to hide their activities for fear of punishment. They don't need to be shielded from these things, but instead guided through them and allowed to experience them however they like, be it with peers or a trusted older partner. Where caution is understandable now and in the future is ensuring that children are not manipulated or harmed by adults they think they can trust. It's one thing for a teen to learn safe intimacy from an older partner, it's another thing entirely for that partner to abuse that implicit trust to mislead that teen about (for example) the consequences of pregnancy, presenting it as "no big deal" or as "fun". That's where the difference in knowledge and maturity is important to acknowledge, and strong sex education through instruction, not experience, is important.
>>697106>That would kinda invalidate your first paragraph about the"maturity gap" you mentionedNo. If any of you people had an iota of reading comprehension you'd notice that I differentiate between sexual and romantic relationships. A teen is not prepared mentally to take on a long-term romantic relationship, but learning about sex through sexual relationships (when practiced with strong social accountability on the part of the older partner) doesn't carry the same weight.
>>697108>You're saying this when middle/high school kids are already being harassed to choose their college courses and have to take standardised tests?I don't think it's right to foist those kinds of decisions on high schoolers either. There's a lot that a socialist or communist society could and would improve about the way we transition from childhood to adulthood.
>>697380to be fair the frenchies got to town with it, and the girls had so much personality, boys had cults in my school dedicated to each girl, team alex till i day long live brown girls
maybe people complain about fanservices because of how easy it raises the show's popularity without any plot, by baiting gooners with neurons, it's easier to show booba and slap the MC for entering a room without knocking, and then do it two hundred more times than to write actual personality with so many fetishes
>>697377damn i dont remember upskirt, tentacles, shower, breast enlargement. i should rewatch it.
>>697379he really looks like melted cheese
>>697383that is true, i mean there's probably less well known french animations with worse attempts at "fanservice" that weren't localised or just none remembered. but i find most people whining about "fanservice" as of late aren't nearly concerned about quality as much as anything that could possibly be misconstrued as vaguely "sexual"
>>697342please dont do this. Its not safe.
Only use dildos with flared bases and never ordinary objects.
>>697918i love dark skinned elves in fantasy
>>698063you know its not like the hentai are preventing irl porn from being posted right? you can have both
>>698137post elves YOU think ar edark then. nerd.
>>698171idk, but it might just be like that cause it hard t odraw hands. also alot of artist stylize girl hands by making them smaller than they actually would be, so it is more noticable when they don't
>>695680>>695694>>696021>adding human features to a robotfake clangfaggotry detected. also XJ-9 is
fivemore seriously this is impressive
>>697255>I'm not saying maturity comes "naturally". Maturity is a combination of socially taught skills and behavioral self-correction through life experience. There is an inescapable factor of time there. Something that must be learned can't be assumed to exist in a person past a certain point in their youth. That point where someone might be called "mature" depends on the person and their formative life experiences. A 17 year old who has had to take care of themself and their siblings for years may be able to demonstrate a higher level of maturity than a 25 year old trust fund baby. But in either case that maturity is determined by skills and experiences acquired (or not acquired) over time. And you admit that we start our young too late.
>Infantilization isn't a good thing, but the idea that a major problem in our society is that we aren't hard enough on our kids, or protect them too much, has always been a reactionary one. A long-term trend in all societies, Western or otherwise, has been towards providing more and more structured and intentional upbringing for youth. 14 year olds needing to essentially become a young adult in feudal society was a product of economic necessity and more often than not killed and harmed them. It wasn't some naturally better "non-infantilizing" lifestyle that made them strong. >It was a brutal life that was more likely to lead them to an early grave. The same is true within living memory. 16 year olds sneaking off to fight in World Wars wasn't a noble thing, it was suicidal, and those who fought in the countless resistance movements in the global south from the 50s to today are tragedies. It's not infantilization to say they should never have been put in those situations, when there's a reality that knowledge of the brutality of these things and their dangers isn't instinctual. It's taught or learned, and every society has to collectively determine what is acceptable for children to learn through direct experience and what should be taught through instruction.That's not necessarily true.
That's a common narrative sold that teens were only backup adults in hard times.
Again, it doesn't really make sense.
There were in higher class societies where people started their careers at age fifteen and had long term romantic commitments and not always through arranged marriage.
Im saying that your idea that teens are incapable of romantic commitments is due to sociological treatment. We treat them still like kids.
And if anything, our structure for young people is worlsly-avoidant to the T.
We punish them for showing interest in non-academic affairs.
>No. If any of you people had an iota of reading comprehension you'd notice that I differentiate between sexual and romantic relationships. A teen is not prepared mentally to take on a long-term romantic relationship, but learning about sex through sexual relationships (when practiced with strong social accountability on the part of the older partner) doesn't carry the same weightIm well aware the difference between sex and romance.
I know that romantic drive is more common than sex drive.
What I know is that no matter what your sexual orientation or preferences are, everyone wants to be loved romantically.
People would leave behind sex for love.
People will leave behind adoration for love.
People will leave behind religion for love.
>>697255>I don't think it's right to foist those kinds of decisions on high schoolers either. There's a lot that a socialist or communist society could and would improve about the way we transition from childhood to adulthood.I beg to differ on the first sentence somewhat.
High schoolers should be given freedom of choice when it comes to post secondary life.
The problem is, adults treat kids all the same based on age rather than individual personality.
It's especially bad with schools.
They especially force mandatory electives in kids to pass high school.
Yet there's no life skills training.
>>699850It changed in late 2019
>>699784That's part of it
>>699907>>699915hell yeah
>>699920fuck da mods
>>699921thats a real sexy bush
>>700246Not all the images are for me, but I think some of them are kind of hot.
Also, if girls can masturbate to fucking books, dudes can jerk off to drawings. You don't need to be ashamed of it.
>>700266that anon is probably "cartoons are for kids" brained and cannot comprehend them having any other value, even when they're literally pornographic.
anyways, picrel is literally me
>>700266Girls jerk off to drawings too
And guys do jerk off to words as well
>>700341Why not?
We have visual novel games and hentai doujinshi
Unique IPs: 90