[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1753947215467.png (127.28 KB, 393x360, 1753946187764765.png)

 

>ban porn
>people cant jack off so the unwashed masses are no longer content with their shit lives
>ban social media
>people now have to go outside and will realize how awful capitalism is
>Revolution happens

>>693800
Really?

why the f would they ban social media

I‘m so happy that I saved all of my favorite porn. I could have never foreseen this dystopian outcome.

>>693820
there were warning signs like a few year back when porntube deleted a lot of videos and people who had saved bookmarks in google chrome were having a meltdown, these fags were the ones who were laughing at people downloading videos for being boomers

>>693800
Why didn't this happen before the 2000s then?

>>693800
I always love ignorant assumptions like OP.
You think taking away porn and social media is gonna make people change?
You do realize that we have booze and TV and even magazines.

People will move on to different vices.
And people complain about capitalism too much nowadays

>le masses haven woken because of le bread and circus
is everyone here a sheltered middle classer who lives in a bubble and never interacts with proletarian organs or what

>>693874
What proletarian organ?

>>693877
My penis

>>693877
The heart.

>>693827
>And people complain about capitalism too much nowadays
Never change Newgene, but don't forget you are posting on an anti-capitalist leftist board. It's like going to a porn website and complaining that they are only videos of people having sex.

>>693892
lol theres worlds of difference between critically analyzing capitalism, and social commentary and abstracting anything and everything bad that happens to individuals

>>693892
There's nothing anti-capitalist about this board
Lots of encouragement to NEET, lots of jealousy over people having relationships and successful careers, lots of desiring killing of business owners while wanting work-free pay.
Lots of simping and hatred for the opposite sex as well

The only thing anti capitalist about Leftypol is that most of you are not thriving in capitalism.
You don't hate capitalism you hate the more favored players of capitalism.

Whenever someone mentions labor programs or something like that, most you get in a tizzy

>>693874
Unfortunately so. Maybe not middle class but they're too idealistic

>>693956
neeting and becoming a drain on the bourgeois state is praxis though

>>694051
>just join the middle class bro, its that easy!

>>694055
>neets are middle class
are you retarded? you might already be middle class

>>694062
please tell me someone who can live off comfortably without working and not face homelessness is NOT middle class?

>>694067
i thought class had nothing to do with how "comfortable" you lived, and everything to do with your relationship to the means of production?

>>694051
How is it praxis? Youre only draining the proletariat.
Praxis would be to have homeless people do community service for free housing.

>>694062
You're joking right?

>>694069
how exactly do you "drain" the proletariat by being a neet?
>>694071
what exactly do you think someone who neither works nor owns the means of production is?

>>694072
Bourgeois aren't caring for the NEETs.
It's the proles who do.

>>693800
>people cant jack off
Do people really need porn to jack off?

>>694622
No, but it makes it easier


Not being able to jack off without porn is a skill issue

>>694629
Having lust inducing images in front of you just makes masturbation a faster activity. You get to the point quicker. Although if I were to see someone in real life that I find really attractive I could finish quicker if the mental image stays with me. But that usually only happens within hours of seeing them or if I see the person regularly and I don't go out much so I don't see too many women I'm attracted to. So porn fills that role since it's still easily accessible

>>694633
How does an image induce lust?

>>694641
I used to think I was asexual maybe I just have a low sex drive but I don't think I am one now. Maybe I'm just repressing my sex drive and using porn and imagination to fulfill that desire to avoid potential bad consequences from real life escapades. You may be asexual or just a troll I don't know unless you're female in which case I don't think you'll ever understand

>get nuked
ok what now


>>694642
>I used to think I was asexual maybe I just have a low sex drive but I don't think I am one now. Maybe I'm just repressing my sex drive and using porn and imagination to fulfill that desire to avoid potential bad consequences from real life escapades

This.

>>694067
>>694069
Maybe you live in a country with no workers' rights, but where I live there is something called "the dole", or unemployment benefits you get once you get unemployed under certain conditions, if you have worked more than 6 months for example.
When you work, a part of your salary go to finance such funds. Once you are unemployed, you can get this money for a limited amount of time. In my country, the funds have an surplus every year because my government is restricting more and more the conditions under which you can get this insurance, to make sure people work more for the bourgeoisie.
Also when you get the dole, you obviously don't eat at a restaurant everyday. You live frugally, cook simple meals, drink water instead of soda, etc. because you have to, but if you value free time, it's an okay trade-off.

Workers and socialists fought hard to get such a system a century ago or so. Some people died for this. So please abstain from shitting on the few workers' rights that remains in this hellish neoliberal world.
Work for work's sake is a disgusting Protestant aberration and slave morality. Work has always been reserved for the lower uneducated classes until the advent of modernity. Glorifying wage labor is glorifying the exploitation of the proletariat.
People will shit on NEETs then conveniently ignore all the tax breaks and gibs capitalists are benefiting from. It's okay to get gibs when you are rich, but when you are poor, it's bad and you should become homeless or work at a dead end job to prove you have the right to exist for some obscure moral reason. This is an absolutely reactionary way of thinking. This is a way to divide the proletariat over scraps while the bourgeoisie make more money in a month then you will do in your entire lifetime, their "work" consisting of sending emails and giving orders to subordinates.

Sadly, due to perversions like the Stakhanovite movement, a lot of people seem to believe communism is all about glorifying labor. It's not, the goal of communism is the self-abolition of the proletariat as a class. That implies the abolition of wage slavery in the long-term. That implies people having more free time.
Shitting on NEETs is completely aligned with the dominant liberal ideology in favor of capital. It's promoting misery for workers, by logically increasing the competition among them in the end. Everyone should have the choice to work or stop working for a while to rest after a period of employment, especially when there is not enough jobs for everyone like in my country.
But some people will glorify their own misery and ask for some more in a effort to bring down others to their own level. It's crabs in a bucket mentality, under the pretense of being "reasonable". I'm sorry, but I will enjoy the unemployment money I financed with my own salary for years while I can and there is nothing you can do about it.

>>694684
>People will shit on NEETs then conveniently ignore all the tax breaks and gibs capitalists are benefiting from. It's okay to get gibs when you are rich, but when you are poor, it's bad and you should become homeless or work at a dead end job to prove you have the right to exist for some obscure moral reason. This is an absolutely reactionary way of thinking. This is a way to divide the proletariat over scraps while the bourgeoisie make more money in a month then you will do in your entire lifetime, their "work" consisting of sending emails and giving orders to subordinates.

Everyone complains about porkies.
Also the reason why people hate NEETs is because they don't give back to their fellow proles.

"Work for works same is disgusting"?
Sure but then why aren't you the same way when it ck.es to education?

A lot of it seems centered around idle busywork and a replacement for the church as a morality system.

>>694690
>Everyone complains about porkies.
Newgene, you are on a communist website. Do you understand the implications of this? Do you think we should praise entrepreneurs being job creators, or something? If you want that, you can go on reddit or 4chan, you don't have to stay here.
>Also the reason why people hate NEETs is because they don't give back to their fellow proles.
What do you mean by this? "Don't give back" what? I know some unemployed people who are involved into non-profit organizations that benefits their local community, they have the time to do that because they don't work.
You talk about very vague moral things. You don't understand that capitalism isn't moral. Working more doesn't make you more moral, you are just being exploited.

>Sure but then why aren't you the same way when it ck.es to education?

Because education makes you literate, makes you able to interpret what happens in the world more in depth. Not all education is extremely useful, but learning to read, count, do basic mathematical operations, speak correctly and so on is required for modern day to day life.
What do you gain from cleaning toilets everyday? What are you learning from it?

Every time someone disagrees with you, you deflect. It's always "but what about [x]?". I'm not talking about education, I'm talking about wage labor. Stop doing this. It's annoying. I predict you will again say "but people on /leftypol/ believe [x]" as if we were an hivemind, even we all disagree on numerous subjects all the time. No, I believe what I said, what is written in my post, that's all.


Unique IPs: 21

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]