What do people on this site think about Hasan Piker? I think he’s pretty cool but I think the Anarchists and Anti-Revisionists here probably don’t like him all that much.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1755220812294.jpeg (77.64 KB, 1080x1080, IMG_9419.jpeg)

Anonymous 15-08-25 01:20:12 No.698997

What do people on this site think about Hasan Piker? I think he’s pretty cool but I think the Anarchists and Anti-Revisionists here probably don’t like him all that much.

Anonymous 15-08-25 01:52:07 No.699004

I think he's a pervert and doesn't understand fascism, philosophy, or history. But he doesn't spend his days punching left so I don't care to oppose him outside of an anonymous imageboard.

Anonymous 15-08-25 02:21:43 No.699014

>what do you think about some amerifat e-grifter
idc

Anonymous 15-08-25 02:42:32 No.699018

File: 1755225752197.jpg (57.59 KB, 600x800, beetlejuice shrunken head.jpg)

I like him, although he has said some dumb stuff a few times and is terrible at debating

>>699014
How is it grifting to promote something that goes against your class interests?

>>699004
>doesn't understand fascism, philosophy, or history
Could you be more specific?

Anonymous 15-08-25 02:51:28 No.699021

>>699018
>how is this streaming e-celeb not a grifter

Anonymous 15-08-25 02:55:29 No.699023

left wing equivalent of ben shapiro
>decent for pipelining people away from center or just general apathy
>kind of a pseud tbh
>hated by hardliners of the movement but also centrists with no convictions at all
>first and foremost an e-celeb that feeds on viewer attention time

Glownonymous 15-08-25 02:58:52 No.699025

>>698997
>>699018
Not even Hasan himself pretends to be a communist, retards.

Anonymous 15-08-25 03:14:23 No.699030

>>698997
albania anon chiming in!

i absolutely adore his content.
i do think hasan went overkill milking ethan k despite the historical (i guess, if you grew up online) and prolonged crashout he has been on

he is generally a good influence on his audience and actually puts thought into the type of content he is curating and presenting to his viewers

anti-revisionist stamp of approval!

just from me as an individual anyway

Anonymous 15-08-25 03:15:15 No.699031

>>699030
actually, historical is perhaps too strong a word.. it does seem significant though?

Anonymous 15-08-25 03:17:13 No.699032

>>699004
>he's a pervert
because he went to a brothel once years ago? this is not even a real critique you're just thoughtlessly regurgitating twitter fandom bullshit

Anonymous 15-08-25 04:11:28 No.699041

>>699032
Because he consistently defends prostitution as something great and defensible.

Anonymous 15-08-25 04:38:54 No.699045

He fine overall, getting some of the Zoomers into more radical-ish politics. Left of Dems but probably not communists. Kind of wish he was more like Nick Fuentes/ Rush Limbaugh in directing his audience to pressure the Dems leftwards. At best, he just directs them to labor actions, electoral campaigns.
TLDR: Fine. Too busy trying to be an e-celeb than a movement figure.

Anonymous 15-08-25 04:39:15 No.699047

>>699041
weird, i've watched probably hundreds of hours of his content and have only really ever heard him speak about sex work

Anonymous 15-08-25 04:49:24 No.699052

>>699045
lol dont give fuentes all the credit hes just some midwit lowbie

i mean sure he is credited with coining a term but from what i can tell it is used in an overwhelmingly derogatory manner nowadays, if at all
at least since his grift started going limp

but back to the matter at hand, i think that it is pretty clear when you peel back the himbo exterior that he is trying to influence internet culture as a whole and thereby influence politics at large downstream, years from now

Anonymous 15-08-25 05:21:43 No.699057

>>699045
>radical-ish politics
more evidence that "radical" is a meaningless and useless label

>Left of Dems
speaking of meaningless and useless labels!

Anonymous 15-08-25 05:48:19 No.699063

He's good looking and therefore I despise him.

Anonymous 15-08-25 17:50:08 No.699250

>>699021
Didn't answer the question. Again: he's advocating for something that makes him less money. He'd make much more money as a reactionary e-celeb. This is the opposite of grifting.

>>699023
>first and foremost an e-celeb that feeds on viewer attention time

Okay, and? There's nothing wrong with making money from radicalizing young people. There's nothing about "feeding on viewer attention" that fundamentally creates a conflict of interest.

>>699025
He's called himself a socialist many times. He has even debated in favor of socialism against capitalists.

Anonymous 15-08-25 17:57:45 No.699254

>>698997
Handsome but boring as hell. Proof that politics if more about political will than it is about "optics".

Anonymous 15-08-25 18:32:01 No.699267

>>698997
I think he is hot and I wanna suck his hairy cock

Glownonymous 15-08-25 18:41:24 No.699269

>>698997
He's hot but I don't watch him because he has a whiny voice and argues with idiot chatters 24/7

Anonymous 15-08-25 19:12:35 No.699275

>>699250
I don't think its a "bad" thing per se, just a class interest to keep in mind when analyzing there takes and comparing them to other pundits. Like how a news anchor may decry online pundits as fake news while an online pundit may decry news anchors as mainstream shills since there's a limited amount of of viewer attention time

Anonymous 15-08-25 20:06:26 No.699289

>>699250
>There's nothing about "feeding on viewer attention" that fundamentally creates a conflict of interest.
this

Glowing rapefiend 15-08-25 20:09:01 No.699290

>>699041
every time i hear about this hasan guy, he sounds more and more based.

Anonymous 15-08-25 23:08:03 No.699381

I'm an anarchist and he has pretty bad ideas about economics and sounds often enough like socdem but I appreciate his news and drama coverage

Anonymous 15-08-25 23:08:54 No.699382

>>699290
Do you think he's hot? Or do you like only twinks?

Glowing rapefiend 15-08-25 23:14:21 No.699387

>>699382
i don't think hes bad looking but he's pretty hairy, i prefer girls

Anonymous 15-08-25 23:19:13 No.699392

>>699387
I'm like the opposite, not attracted to women at all but drool over hairy buff men