/siberia/ - Off-topic

This is a somewhat ok critique.
But, if privatisation is independent of capitalism, does that mean we can have capitalism without privatisation and vice versa?

>>701377
I never said that privatization is independent of capitalism, China has some form of capitalism in its economy just like how every country on the planet has some form of socialism by having a socialized military.

>>701380
Yea.
As a kid though, I would hear conservatives complain about how schools were socialist/communist.
In terms of their curriculum of course.

Yet, all the time I've been in school, I've never heard of any teacher or student who talked about communism/socialism positively.

>sanction Israel or how they have reeducation camps
Commodity aid to palestine is good. Reeducaction is good.
>If anything when they use capitalism
There is no capitalism in Communist China.
>But in conclusion China is a transitional socialist state. Communism has never happened before
There is no transition to Communism because socialism is Communism. The Thirteenth National Party Congress explained what stage China is in: the primary stage of socialism. Socialism itself is the first stage of communism, and China is in the primary stage of socialism — therefore China is Communist.
>China is a traditional socialist state using socialism to achieve communism and socialism allows some form of privatization because communism can’t be rushed into which is why the Great Leap Forward was a failure.
Wrong. Communism can be rushed. The Great Leap Forward was a resounding success. Socialism is the first phase of Communism so China has already achieved Communism.

>>701383
I was referring to the Muslim reeducation camps where they forced an ethnicity to undergo cultural erasure. Also the Great Leap Forward was a failure and killed a ton of people, obviously liberals exaggerate the real numbers and conflating the Great Leap Forward with the Holocaust is a very stupid and dangerous thing that they do but the failure of the Great Leap Forward is something that should be learned from rather than denied. And your right about it being the first phase but I was referring to the final phase not being achieved.

What are these awful soy pepes you keep posting

>>701385
>I was referring to the Muslim reeducation camps where they forced an ethnicity to undergo cultural erasure.
Fake news
>Great Leap Forward was a failure and killed a ton of people, obviously liberals exaggerate the real numbers and conflating the Great Leap Forward with the Holocaust is a very stupid and dangerous thing that they do but the failure of the Great Leap Forward is something that should be learned from rather than denied.
Wrong. The Great Leap Forward was totally positive. Everyone that died deserved it. In the development process of China’s socialist construction, because of the sabotage and interference of the revisionist line pushed by the Liu Shao-ch’i and Lin Piao clique, a certain “hesitation” once appeared for some time in some sectors. This was a manifestation of class struggle and the struggle between the two lines in the process of socialist construction. It is a struggle between progress and retrogression. Judging from the whole process and from the whole situation since the establishment of the Republic, China’s national economy has been developing by leaps and bounds since the Great Leap Forward under the guidance of the dominant Marxist line formulated by Chairman Mao. From 1949 to 1970, China’s total value of agricultural production increased by 1.5 times. The total value of industrial production increased by more than 18 times. Along with the development of industrial and agricultural production, China’s communications and transportation, commerce, money and finance, and cultural and educational enterprises have also rapidly advanced. The level of material and cultural life of the people has also been raised substantially. These indisputable facts cannot be denied by anyone. The anti-industrial Lin Piao clique vainly attempted to negate the brilliant achievements obtained by the Chinese people under the illumination of the General Line by slanderously saying that “the national economy stagnanted.” This merely further exposed their position as agents of imperialism, revisionism, and reaction, their hatred for socialism, and their wolfish ambition to restore capitalism. The brilliance of the Party’s basic line for the whole historical stage of socialism and the General Line for socialist construction illuminates China's big strides forward. The great socialist motherland is prospering and progressing. What the imperialists failed to do, Communist China has achieved.

>>701385
Undoing cia wahabbi fundamentalist brainrot imported from saudi arabia is not "cultural erasure", it's cultural restoration.

The us government knows that westerners are racist and uneducated, so they can pull this slwight of hand over and over again: smuggle synthetic destabilizing culture into a country, then claim " erasure" or "genocide" when people fight back.