WHY DO PEOPLE HERE CALL EVERY FUCKING THING THAT THEY DISAGREE WITH “LIBERAL” AS LONG AS IT ISNT CONSERVATIVE!?!?!?. . According to what people have said this site Stalin, Cuba, Hasan Piker, Xi Jinping, Zohran Mamdani, and Cuba are all Liberal. THATS FUC

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1756485650112.png (1.02 MB, 1080x1080, IMG_9983.png)

Tomdatinker 29-08-25 16:40:51 No.704727

WHY DO PEOPLE HERE CALL EVERY FUCKING THING THAT THEY DISAGREE WITH “LIBERAL” AS LONG AS IT ISNT CONSERVATIVE!?!?!?

According to what people have said this site Stalin, Cuba, Hasan Piker, Xi Jinping, Zohran Mamdani, and Cuba are all Liberal. THATS FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!11 Disagree with them on what you want but there is a difference between being on the left but just not as extreme and being a liberal. Although Stalin is probably the craziest out of all of these how in the hell would he be a liberal? He literally did collectivism he was the ultimate tankie.

Anonymous 29-08-25 17:01:39 No.704735

~~>>704730~~
>Marxist-Leninist
I didn't know Stalin, Cuba and Xi Jinping were invariant. Where are their ICP membership papers?

Anonymous 29-08-25 17:18:00 No.704737

File: 1756487879765.jpg (37.6 KB, 474x321, beautiful chihuahua no.651….jpg)

>Karl Marx
liberal

>Kraz Mazov
liberal

>Che Guevara
liberal

i'm the only real communist

Tomdatinker 29-08-25 17:23:14 No.704738

~~>>704730~~
Marxism-Leninism isn’t liberalism, liberalism is a capitalist ideology

Anonymous 29-08-25 17:31:39 No.704740

~~>>704730~~
>most rational state
<self-coups itself to reestablish capitalism

Anonymous 29-08-25 20:54:58 No.704778

~~>>704730~~
>Stalin was not crazy, he had a profound intellect and created the most rational State of his time.
A state so rational that it collapsed in on itself as soon as he died. If a state is dependent on the existence of one man to continue functioning, it's about as far from "rational" as you can get.

Anonymous 29-08-25 20:58:08 No.704780

File: 1756501088410.png (294.66 KB, 498x368, ClipboardImage.png)

>>704778

Anonymous 29-08-25 21:13:16 No.704787

>>704780
Gem

Glownonymous 29-08-25 21:48:41 No.704811

>>704727
>WHY DO PEOPLE HERE CALL EVERY FUCKING THING THAT THEY DISAGREE WITH “LIBERAL” AS LONG AS IT ISNT CONSERVATIVE!?!?!?
Because this website is a honeypot run by Russian glowies with no true interest in Leftism but keep it running because they recognize that Liberalism is the only stabilizing force inside the United States thus they will support anything that attacks Liberalism including (and especially) Fascism

Anonymous 29-08-25 22:15:30 No.704819

File: 1756505729213-0.png (201.44 KB, 2048x2048, snazzy pony grace.png)

File: 1756505729213-1.jpg (27.29 KB, 442x507, photo_2024-08-06_08-20-54.jpg)

>>704727
Unless you are the most high church zealot traditional catholic or eastern orthodox, you are pretty much all considered liberals.
I am a liberal by comparison.
Question is, would you rather be a liberal or a christian? this is how it is set in terms of historiography.

Anonymous 29-08-25 22:23:16 No.704827

~~>>704815~~
>Stalin Socialist Super State survived invasion by imperialist powers, Nazi genocide, and total economic isolation.
Only to implode on its own. Do you think that maybe there's a lesson to be learned?

>Wrong. The State didn't collapse in one year
You're right, it collapsed in 38. Forgive my ignorance oh wise one.

Anonymous 29-08-25 22:26:52 No.704830

File: 1756506410833-0.jpg (38.33 KB, 643x758, gigachad catholic.jpg)

File: 1756506410833-1.jpg (41.26 KB, 600x989, gigachad freemason.jpg)

File: 1756506410833-2.png (785.32 KB, 3762x4096, pol compass.png)

From all my years being in the far right / traditionalist circles, Who is a Liberal? question basically boils down to Trad Catholicism vs Liberalism from the French Revolution and onward.
Personally, I see it as pretty arbitrary and another instance of namecalling in the political arena to no effect, that the word Liberal is almost meaningless since nearly everyone is called Liberal, but the only people you cannot call Liberalism (again, in the way this scheme is potrayed) would be the advocates of High Church Catholicism.

Glownonymous 29-08-25 22:30:41 No.704832

File: 1756506640976.gif (479.53 KB, 493x342, 1315009815396.gif)

>>704727
<duhhhhhhhhhhhhh why are communists calling people who are proper citizens of bourgeois society whose demands are petit-bourgeois interclassist bullshit "liberals" buhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i dont understand ermmmmm i thought communism is about picking the correct government policy under capitalism???????? :((((

Anonymous 29-08-25 23:06:28 No.704847

>>704727
OP is a liberal

Anonymous 29-08-25 23:08:06 No.704849

~~>>704839~~
one of the main things that killed the ussr is that the soviets couldn't adapt marxism-leninism in, for examples, all the republics within the russian ssr, so some russian republics were poor while others were rich. possibly this mal-adaption could have also happened in the other states of the ussr as well, and not just inside the russian ssr's republics

Anonymous 29-08-25 23:09:47 No.704851

>>704849
>possibly this mal-adaption could have also happened in the other states of the ussr as well, and not just inside the russian ssr's republics
ahem, I mean countries. the ussr was a union of countries

Anonymous 30-08-25 08:56:53 No.704954

It's funny, liberal.

Anonymous 30-08-25 16:01:42 No.705014

~~>>704839~~
Wrong. Stupid. The lesson to be learned is that hinging everything on a Great Man is ultimately unsustainable, since that man isn't going to stick around forever.

Also, Dogma is for chumps, as all of the AES states demonstrate.

Anonymous 30-08-25 16:27:55 No.705021

>>704778
Stalin died in 1950. Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

American education.

Anonymous 30-08-25 16:33:27 No.705026

>>704811
>le honeypot
What?

Anonymous 30-08-25 16:56:34 No.705038

>>705021
1953, actually. And 38 years is not a long time in the grand scheme of history.

Anonymous 30-08-25 17:02:08 No.705045

>>705038
>the grand scheme of history
pure ideology

Anonymous 30-08-25 17:14:13 No.705050

~~>>704730~~
>Stalin was a Marxist-Leninist
lmao

Anonymous 30-08-25 17:18:34 No.705053

>>705038
This
In any era of human history, a few decades is like a week

Anonymous 30-08-25 17:18:34 No.705054

>>705050
what in the world is this bait

Anonymous 30-08-25 17:20:32 No.705059

>>705054
Stalin was a tsarist and moralist, he made some nonsense essays about dialectics and proceeded to not use them.

Anonymous 30-08-25 22:47:54 No.705172

>>705045
What does that mean?

>>705059
The truth of the matter is that "Marxism-Leninism" is about as useful a term as "Nietzcheanism" or "Hegelianism". You're referring to something so broad that it's really not that meaningful outside of an academic context.

Unique IPs: 16