The scary thing about the “Cultural Marxism” conspiracy theory
We all know that the Cultural Marxism conspiracy which is a bullshit theory that Feminism, DEI, And the LGBTQ movement are all Communist movements (Which even if true how is that a bad thing?) even though Marx never wrote about stuff like that and we that the theory is derived from “Jewish Bolshevism” which is a Nazi theory saying that Communism is Jewish so it’s bad Ind Jews are communists so they are bad. And as scary as it is that isn’t the scary thing I was referring to was the fact that this theory pretty much prevailed, of course conservatives no longer say “Cultural Marxism” but they always say something else like “Identity Socialism” and they always describe the theory when describing “Wokeness.” The only way to kill this theory is for the working class to learn what Marxism is so they no longer think it’s a bad thing.
>>705548>Marx never wrote about stuff like that
<Anybody who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without the feminine ferment. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex (the ugly ones included).Marx to Kugelmann In Hanover 1968
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1868/letters/68_12_12-abs.htm
<In the approach to woman as the spoil and hand-maid of communal lust is expressed the infinite degradation in which man exists for himself, for the secret of this approach has its unambiguous, decisive, plain and undisguised expression in the relation of man to woman and in the manner in which the direct and natural species-relationship is conceived. The direct, natural, and necessary relation of person to person is the relation of man to woman. In this natural species-relationship man’s relation to nature is immediately his relation to man, just as his relation to man is immediately his relation to nature – his own natural destination. In this relationship, therefore, is sensuously manifested, reduced to an observable fact, the extent to which the human essence has become nature to man, or to which nature to him has become the human essence of man. From this relationship one can therefore judge man’s whole level of development. From the character of this relationship follows how much man as a species-being, as man, has come to be himself and to comprehend himself; the relation of man to woman is the most natural relation of human being to human being. It therefore reveals the extent to which man’s natural behaviour has become human, or the extent to which the human essence in him has become a natural essence – the extent to which his human nature has come to be natural to him. This relationship also reveals the extent to which man’s need has become a human need; the extent to which, therefore, the other person as a person has become for him a need – the extent to which he in his individual existence is at the same time a social being.Paris Manuscripts - Private Property and Communism
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htmYou will now wear a pink fist lapel pin.