[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1757465085963.jpeg (41.53 KB, 810x900, IMG_0496.jpeg)

 

Is Wikipedia a reliable resource?

Is it, I always heard conservatives complain about their Gaza and Climate Change coverage so I always assume that it was accurate but I have heard people on the left complain about its reliability too on different issues such as Soviet famines and stuff so I was wondering what your thoughts are.

A lot of the complainers on the left are retards with their own conspiracy theories (there was no famine in ukraine, stalin was killed by jewish doctors, the cia blew up chernobyl etc etc) who are mad. But still some articles especially about big historical events are biased and use outdated/wrong sources (eg: using Conquest to push the genocide narrative for the holomodor although the historical consensus doesn't support that) it's worse for recent events because the majority of the sources are from the bourgeois media and didn't get a scientific analysis that can be used.
Most of the science articles and other neutral topics are fine, you just need to check the sources and maybe the talk page once in a while.
And for all the shit wikipedia gets it's still one of the only big websites that is a net positive and didn't turn out into a bloodsucking megacorp platform


Unique IPs: 2

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]