[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1757608888925.jpg (94.02 KB, 720x907, 1757466540707913.jpg)

 

Look, you're either a materialist, or an idealist. Anti-ship is idealist and Pro-ship is materialist. End of discussion.

both of those are autistic, actually

i have no clue what either of those terms mean despite seeing them several times

can't you douchbags talk about anything else

>>708626
Anti-ship = Fictions that make me uncomfortable should be banned, and the people who make them persecuted
Pro-ship = How about we don't do that….

File: 1757633525578.png (79.58 KB, 1600x718, ClipboardImage.png)

>>708698
I never really got the dogma that believing that reality is comprised of material processes (and even implying that of those material processes is entirely independent of observation, to which most contemporary advances in previously-conceived materialist natural sciences disprove) makes you automatically exempt from believing in right and wrong, it implies a logical contradiction but there simply is none. The perceived impermanence and material basis of ideas can make you, the individual, believe it's rightful to think in some way thats deviant to the norm, but then you'd want those same others to support that deviance in order themselves to be righteous, for them to secure your right in order to do so instead of expel you from society in order to satiate their own self-interest. It just doesn't make sense, we're still using the right&wrong paradigm regarding whatever we think but we just use other words in order to mask it.

>>708626
It's just retard kids on the internet arguing about whether drawing/writing smut of media slop characters that involves "problematic" elements is fine or not.

The "proship" side is kinda better since not caring about this shit in the first place is basically equivalent to their position, but they're still le cringe for wasting their time and writing walls of text in response to the anti-shippers' walls of text.

>>708626
Pro ship : supports using aquatic ways of transportation in order to go trough bodies of waters
anti ship : opposed to using aquatic ways of transportation in order to go trough bodies of water

File: 1757888988779.jpeg (95.68 KB, 735x730, uu4lzf4d6wof1.jpeg)

The fact of the matter is, in combating censorship, you will absolutely have to defend shit you find repugnant, gross, and reprehensible.

In the case of lolicon, I genuinely don't think the people always arguing about it have actually seen any of it. Dude, that stuff is honestly the most boring shit I have ever seen. Most of it is literally just Ugly Bastard NTR with a slightly smaller female figure. I hate defending it, not because it's a widespread problem or dangerous, but because I'm bored of it. It's boring.


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]