Enough bitching and moaning, here is your answer! A cure for the incel epidemic that won't cost women any freedom (infact, for it to work certain freedoms will have to be secured for women which aren't already, in the States anyway). First, we set out from the assumption that the black pill and hypergamy are generally true. No, exceptions don't invalidate the rule.
Lets cut to it: Operation Pink Boom! Basically we need to adjust our population for hypergamy. Currently male and female populations are about equal, but the dating market is anything but. For every boy in the population there needs to be multiple girls. As our population is already dwindling, it would be better and more ethical to just increase the number of women than remove men.
This needs to be brought about as organically as possible, probably mostly through financial incentives and social engineering. If you have a girl, the government helps you a ton. Subsidies, stimulus checks, etc. For having a boy, not so much. "If you have a girl, you're helping society, you're doing your part." "You're having a boy? Uh… why?" That's the message to spread, in whatever way influences women to have girls. This can be sold as feminist and girlboss.
Oh yeah, for this to work abortion has to be legal and as accessible as possible nationwide. In this way, the religious right would be one of the biggest obstacles to this. And, remember, this is not eugenics. We don't want the government to coerce women, just gently incentivize them to making the correct choice: have a girl or several.
Other "solutions": Mean, Nasty, and Re+arded
Sharia law? State mandated gfs? Arranged marriages? DEI pussy? This is not the way. Restricting women's rights just won't work. The cat is out of the bag, Pandora's box is open. Why cause women to be bitter? The memory of their previous freedom will only brew resentment. The whole shift would be traumatic. Why not create a future where the average man would actually be desired instead of begrudgingly accepted and hated? It would genuinely be easier to achieve. All we gotta do is get the numbers right without robbing women of agency.
These other "solutions" wish to shame women's sexuality. "No! You shouldn't be hypergamous! You shouldn't want Chad! You should want to have sex with me instead!" It's all so slavely. Why not accept women for who they are, hypergamy and all? In these future generations the message could be, "Go on ladies, chase your Chad! Give it all you got!" At the end of the day, it's all a numbers game and reality would set in soon for these women. The Chads of these generations would be getting tsunamis of female attention. Too much to handle even. They would end up developing new standards, subconsciously out of sheer necessity. The competition among women would become too fierce. The chopped hoes would have to looksmatch. With these new demographics, any man who is functional in society would have options.
Single Mothers and Violent Males: Two Issues, One Stone?
The stats are in: boys raised without a father figure are very prone to violent crime. With girls, a father figure makes almost no difference. Single mothers will exist. I see no way around this. But maybe they could be incentivized (and allowed) to make choices that benefit society. YNs? Not anymore.
And what about the women who end up alone?
It is known: modern women are just better at building communities than modern men. These women wouldn't be nearly as lonely as the left-behind men of today. They would have their friends, their careers, their families, their communities. Who needs a man anyway, right? I've been seeing women online talking more and more about wanting female-only spaces. Why not give it to them? It might not even need to be mandated, it's just society now. Imagine you're on the subway and it's almost only women in the cart. The rare men are with their girlfriend. Gyms, restaurants, libraries: almost no men in sight.
This could also be of interest to radfems who want pornography gone. We can try appealing to our traces of puritanism or wagging fingers and telling men it's wrong and mysognistic, but that hasn't worked so far. We could try just banning it, but we know lonely men will find a way. Isn't it obvious, the way to defeat pornography is to make it obsolete. Remember, the rat in isolation overdoses, the rat in good company doesn't care for morphine. In a few generations, the coomers of today, and what they consoom, could be a historical curiosity. I'd dare say in this new world nudism could become mainstream (in given areas anyway) without creeps ruining it for everyone. Ask yourself, which is worse for society, which is more dangerous: a reserve of single men or women? You know the answer.
Well you moaners and groaners? You got your answer. What you do with it is your prerogative. May the people of the future not know your agony. Change da world… my final message. Goodb ye.
TL;DR: We need way more girls than boys and to adjust for hypergamy, and we need to get there as organically as possible to not poison the dynamic. This would have a bunch of positive effects for the interests of men, women, and society at large.