I THOUGHT YOU WANTED TO FIX THE BIRTH RATE. . Does Trump realize that pregnant women getting fevers is actually bad for the birth rate? Of course not because Fascists can’t think straight, if they could they then Hitler wouldn’t have invaded Russia durin

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1758636830995.jpeg (155.28 KB, 434x585, IMG_3695.jpeg)

Anonymous 23-09-25 14:13:51 No.711947

I THOUGHT YOU WANTED TO FIX THE BIRTH RATE

Does Trump realize that pregnant women getting fevers is actually bad for the birth rate? Of course not because Fascists can’t think straight, if they could they then Hitler wouldn’t have invaded Russia during the winter. The only upside to Trump is that he is accelerating the American Decline as China becomes and more successful. So all you have to do is move to another country and watch America fuck itself to death.

Anonymous 23-09-25 14:15:57 No.711948

You should treat whatever is coming out of a fascist‘s mouth as noise. You are wasting precious brain power if you even humorously try to dissect it.

Anonymous 23-09-25 15:07:48 No.711959

Anonymous 30-09-25 04:24:22 No.713370

File: 1759206262098.jpeg (74.1 KB, 1280x1001, model-breeders-win.jpeg)

Natural selection will raise birth rates on its own long term.

https://akarlin.com/breeders-revenge/

>As I pointed out in the previous post in this series, there were huge economic incentives to have large families before the Malthusian transition. Since the economically rational thing to do was to have lots and lots of children, there much have been little, if any, selection for fertility per se. If anything, sooner the converse. Families that had more children than they could support suffered higher death rates for their lack of discipline. Meanwhile, the genetic competitiveness that committed and affluent “breeders” gained was limited by the fact that overall cultural norms were highly pro-natal, which limited their ability to eke out a relative advantage. Moreover, since higher autism score tends to be correlated with both greater economic success and lower desired fertility, these rich genotypic breeders must have been quite rare anyway. Hence, in the pre-industrial Malthusian world, there would have been an equilibrium in which breeders only ever constituted a small share of the population.

>When these Malthusian constraints fell away at around the time of the Industrial Revolution, along with the loosening of traditionalist pro-natality mores (have as many children as you can support and no more), the evolutionary underpinnings of the old equilibrium likewise crumbled away. However, since in most populations breeders are not yet a high percentage of the population, at first – i.e. the first century or so – this only had very modest effects, because there were very few breeders at t=0.

>Hence, cultural and social influences played much greater roles in determining fertility in First World nations during the 20th century, and at least in Africa, will probably continue to do so for the next century.

>But this will not be true after another one or two centuries.

>Fertility preferences, like all aspects of personality, are heritable – and thus ultracompetitive in a world where the old Malthusian constraints have been relaxed.

Anonymous 30-09-25 14:25:54 No.713431

>wouldn’t have invaded Russia during the winter
You are very stupid. That didn't happen.

Anonymous 30-09-25 14:46:32 No.713434

>>713431
to be fair most of hitlers guys thought the war would be over in weeks. they were really incompetent

Anonymous 02-10-25 02:22:13 No.713808

>>711959
heh

Anonymous 02-10-25 09:00:17 No.713832

>>713434
facism breeds incompetence because the leader is always right, there is no mechanism to correct course, and people who try will be labeled internal enemies. they also beleif in the power of will and mind over matter.
i see this all the time in small business.

Unique IPs: 8