No one who has used the word "fetishize" to mean "sexualize" or "to have a sexual fetish for" has an opinion worth listening to.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Optionsh,56'j4☒#o<2`MG_JD[\|PxA$%L^cR.Xy}8)HuV!0
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment	4vp☸sZ⚮/ROd-+5K}iGzF#XAmj7♴SV\0⚣h&u
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1760816408671.jpg (574.63 KB, 1569x2001, freedom of speech.jpg)

Anonymous 18-10-25 19:40:09 No.718076

No one who has used the word "fetishize" to mean "sexualize" or "to have a sexual fetish for" has an opinion worth listening to.

Anonymous 18-10-25 19:59:08 No.718080

File: 1760817547476.png (1.27 MB, 1413x2000, elevator ayn rand.png)

My fetish is people misusing the word fetish in certain contexts.

Anonymous 18-10-25 20:40:45 No.718085

True

Glownonymous 21-10-25 21:55:58 No.719017

Why do people use the word sexualize like its a bad thing

Glownonymous 21-10-25 23:21:35 No.719044

i like when objectification is brought up when the subject matter is literal objects (fictional media)

Anonymous 22-10-25 04:58:52 No.719134

>>719017
It isn't.

>>719044
It's disingenuously bringing up activist language for "man bad, woman good" discourse. Ironically, it's feminist language for very pro-patriarchy discourse too.

Anonymous 22-10-25 05:03:48 No.719138

>>719017
Depends on the things, it's weird to sexualise children for exemple, but most of the time it's harmless, even if the redditor types who constantly make sex jokes about everything are very annoying

Anonymous 22-10-25 06:33:46 No.719155

>>719044
The Chris Chan view of fiction

Unique IPs: 7