Which one's better? OMEMO seems to be gaining more use than OTR. But leftist activists still use OTR. OMEMO users will claim OTR is outdated, but its PROVEN and TRUSTED.
I got setups for both for anyone who wants to chat with either.
honest question why do all chat clients, be it for matrix, xmpp, irc, whatever, literally every single one sucks and is either bloated or impractical
the "minimalist" ones are the worst, they usually only work for one protocol and have the most retarded user interface possible, why do I do if I have to talk to different people on different protocols? now I have to install 5 minimalist programs, each with their own garbage ncurses interface, their own bullshit hotkeys, their own autistic commands and their own config files
>>23182those are bad too. the browser-based one have essentially the same problems and they are so complex that it defeats the point of encryption because the client is probably compromised, but the codebases are so massive and complex that I have no way of auditing them (and even if I did - I would never be sure)
I might eventually write my own. I already use my own matrix client (although I'm not really happy with it) and it was only ~4kloc in c++
OMEMO is ubiquitous in the XMPP sphere and seems to work well. I haven't heard of any break of it. the biggest problem with it is that it's JSON, which is an abomination in a protocol like XMPP which is XML based
>>23174use Pidgin if you want a client that supports all the thing. but bear in mind libpurple has had oodles of 0days over the years
OMEMO, obviously
OTR is severely outdated
I even use OMEMO for 1-on-1 DMs
>>23174>>23201Gajim is decent
>>23217+1 on Gajim
Snikket is OK also