/ML/ Machine-Learning general

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1756414625701.png (571.1 KB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

/ML/ Machine-Learning general Anonymous 28-08-25 20:57:06 No.31062

Machine Learning general. So anybody here actually do any ML programming? I just installed PyTorch yesterday and actually started training some shit. It was pretty easy to get working. But… I am a dumb dumb, so I am going to go back and learn all the basics I think, because I have delusions that maybe I'll be able to do something interesting with it, but I know unless I'm really knowledgeable about it, the probability is less than zero.

I know that thread about bitching about ML is the most popular thread on /tech/ but I thought we should have a separate thread for people actually programming it.

Anonymous 28-08-25 21:10:57 No.31063

All Machine Learning Concepts Explained in 22 Minutes

Anonymous 28-08-25 22:41:03 No.31066

don't do the andrew ng deeplearning coursera crap it's a scam, that's basically all i've attempted to do

Anonymous 29-08-25 04:53:43 No.31067

I'd recommend you write a basic Multi Layer Perceptron from scratch before even looking at things like PyTorch

Anonymous 29-08-25 06:12:05 No.31071

File: 1756447925351.pdf (3.46 MB, 197x255, Essentials.pdf)

Anonymous 29-08-25 07:25:09 No.31072

>>31067
Why?

Anonymous 29-08-25 07:27:43 No.31073

>>31071
Thanks for the book. Looks interesting.

Anonymous 29-08-25 07:42:26 No.31074

>>31072
Because it's not so easy to get working

Anonymous 29-08-25 07:45:35 No.31075

>>31074
Why would it be easier to get something working from scratch? I got it working and training in a few hours.

Anonymous 29-08-25 07:53:16 No.31076

>>31075
>I'd recommend you write a basic Multi Layer Perceptron from scratch before even looking at things like PyTorch
<Why
>Because it's not so easy to get working
<Why would it be easier to get something working from scratch? I got it working and training in a few hours.
Ok you got it working, do you understand how it all works any better than you understood this exchange?

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:17:24 No.31077

>>31076
>Ok you got it working, do you understand how it all works any better than you understood this exchange?
Snarky. Yeah you quoted the whole exchange and now you are changing what your reason is, yet still not even directly stating it.

>I think it is better to build your understanding by making a "Multi Layer Perceptron from scratch" before using PyTorch
Ok. You could just say that. Also maybe you should give your reasoning.

What's with tech people and having serious personality issues? I think that's what's driven me off is I picture turning into one of you.

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:21:09 No.31078

>>31077
Stop wasting my time

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:26:17 No.31079

>>31078
Bitch your time isn't worth shit. No one asked you to post in this thread.

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:27:16 No.31080

>>31079
Yes you did, stop wasting my time and write a simple one from scratch

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:30:09 No.31081

>>31080
Have you written one?

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:32:30 No.31082

>>31081
Yes, and I'm happy to walk you through it if you make the attempt

What I'm not going to bother with is childish insults from you

Anonymous 29-08-25 08:54:02 No.31083

I'm not suggesting you do anything heavy duty

Try making a network with 2 inputs, 2 outputs and one hidden layer of 3 "neurons" and train it on a xor function, then do the same with 2 hidden layers

Anonymous 29-08-25 09:28:14 No.31084

So OP I've noticed that you suddenly stopped replying here and now there's someone posting cope all over various threads

That you?

Unique IPs: 7