One Piece is leftist
345 posts and 102 image replies omitted.>>9121Also considering these copies are not limited by size, mini-feish giantess fetish and foot-fetish are also covered
>>23700 Also why was this spoilered!? The image isn't outright NSFW with no shown genitalia or even nips unlike pic rel!
>>23967I answered the question already. If you mean in terms of "do they have cartoons with cartoon physics in their world" Not really, no TV = no cartoons.
If you mean the concept of cartoon physics (even if perhaps named differently) not really either, a lot of shit that ought to kill people IRL, or be seriously fucked up deformities of the limbs, body or face are fairly normal for characters in One Piece, ordinary looking people are harder to find than weird ones. Hell most of the Devil Fruit powers are bullshit too, going way off-base from their name.
>>20940Reflecting on this post I realize that the Hana Hana no Mi is probably the ultimate sexual Devil Fruit.
Bondage? Check
Giantess? Check
Multi-genitalia? Check
Handjob? Check
Any body-part fetish (feet, armpit, belly, etc.)? Check
Tentacles (sorta)? Check
There's possibility for Mini-girl too (if she can make herself giant, why not the opposite?) and considering her
devil transformation there is possibility to manipulate her physical 'assets' similar to Jewelry Bonney.
What NSFW uses for Akuma no Mi can y'all think of?
Furries would love Zoan fruits Or hell even out-of-the-box uses of Devil Fruits that Oda hasn't explored - such as the Hobi Hobi no Mi being capable of essentially erasing a monarchy and its followers by simply erasing their existence.
Can any of you think of a fanfic Devil Fruit to rival the Hana Hana no Mi (while sticking to canon rules for fruits power limitations?)
>>1732I wonder if oda just had those ideas inheritly as a child
Like making the world better, and then that crystilied into a coherent actual idiology in his work.
>>26063artists rarely
conciously make ideological statements in their art. always when commentators say that "x art is y ideology or politics" they're just telling you what they projected onto the art. which is fine and can be worth listening to.
>>26064I wouldn't say that One Piece is particularly concrete in its politics but it's pretty fucking explicit and consciously done. Unambiguously heroic characters like Luffy or Whitebeard repeatedly give speeches that it's hard to imagine aren't just Oda's opinions, considering the context in which they occur, as the capstone to a particular arc where it culminates and sums up the themes he was building. Artists aren't
necessarily intentional propagandists, but they're not stupid. And the most basic point One Piece is trying to get across is the importance of believing in something greater than yourself. It's hard to see how it's not Oda's intention to inspire people and give them at least some kind of framework for grappling with politics.
>>1732The nika thing destroys the themes though
It makes so human/character actions are not their own but fate
Which destroy a political interpretation of it
>>27921crap.
Was alright before timeskip
Everything shit since then
Luffy being some mythical Sun God is the worst. Oda is repeating Kishimoto's mistakes
>>28192one piece is boring sloppy garbage
One piece fans are all retards
Unique IPs: 37