[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1741007652572.jpeg (25.79 KB, 797x618, bmpo9ki9kt3d1.jpeg)

 

Im at crossroads between joining - or applying for- a catholic seminary, OR, becoming a (non-militant, but firmly (non?) believing Atheist) . It may sound extreme or stupid but consider this: IF God exists, he exists absolutely and all his attributes are true (remember im working within a catholic framework), this means hell is absolutely true, as is heaven; as I genuinely dislike sex, I won't get married ever–why not go full the mile and be a priest? or at least Brother, Canon,etc? seems rational.
OTOH if Atheism is true ,and I eventually find out in the future, I would-have wasted decades of my life, so better to take on the strongest atheist arguments now, see if I can tank them -or not- and go from there.
tl;dr: Give the best books about Atheism, from scientific POV such as Darwinism, Cosmology, geological time; or philosophy and social sciences (history of Ideas, archeology, sociology and studies on mental health, or, even brain scan\ neurology\ biological clinical science about belief)

Hegel.

There are a lot of contradictions in christian doctrine (think cosmology and the existence of evil), that when properly addressed reduce it towards a semantic non-sequitur, i.e. saying material reality "is god" is meaningless. As i understand it though, catholicism and orthodoxy derive their legitimacy from their legacy as religious communities. Here i say their growing irrelevance and age-old use as a tool to justify the status quo undermines this legitimacy, the proof is in the pudding so to speak.

Also read >>23788 Feuerbach and Marx to get the best of philosophical atheism. tl;dr Religion reflects society and ubiquitous criticism of it back as a sedating spirituality https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/index.htm

>>23793
>this is why every atheist is also a moralist
Good and evil are christian as well as specifically catholic categories, therefore the problem of evil is an internal logical contradiction endemic to their doctrine. Look at https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05649a.htm for a taste of the mental gymnastics involved.

>>23795
You're being obtuse here. Obviously in some form the categories of good and evil existed long before christianity, most notably in zartoshti and manicha.
>being present in christian doctrine means it can't be in anything else
<what no set theory does to a mf
Flood detected; Post discarded.Flood detected; Post discarded.Flood detected; Post discarded.Flood detected; Post discarded.

>>23797
>>23796
Christianity has become so genericised that criticising it means you criticise the fiber of moral conscience.
And yet, Christians complain about being hated by the world?

>(someone like adam green is guilty of this, while richard spencer seems to be becoming more nuanced)

Adam Green?
Know More News?


Unique IPs: 4

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]