GTA VI TRAILER 2 JUST DROPPED!!!!!
I really love the atmosphere, the fact that you get to play as a modern roidhead white-trash criminal, and despite that I am in no way exited for the game, because it is just going to be another braindead follow-the-objective-marker third person shooter.
What the gameplay gonna be like though?
GTA + RDR2 have been trending in a really stupid direction.
>>42374A roided hot anglo and his stacey latinx girlfriend…
Sounds like this game was made for 4chudcel coomers
>>42379goddamit you've beaten me to this, ngl i like it
looks like it's only a year until white boy latina summer begins
bunda
>>42379it's literally just some modern bonnie n clyde type shit
>>42378RDR2 was good tho
I feel really old now. I'm older than the rockstar protags
>>42382>RDR2 was good tho It had really bad mission design and was constantly at war with itself over whether it wanted to be cinematic or simulationist.
>>42374The male protagonist is so freaking hot I'd totally suck his cock
First time rockstar actually does a hot protagonist
>>42387Hot and ready, that's what it means
>>42393Your meant to be jealous by a guy like that. Not only does he get the girl, in real life he'd probably have other girls as well while waiting for jail bird girl to get out and yet she'd still remain loyal to him. Plus he's attractive and seemingly handy so he's the ultimate male. On top of the even that even the men want him as
>>42391 demonstrates. I assume this anon is male but even if he wasn't I still think plenty of men, especially gay ones would want him. So yeah the ultimate male who has the pick of the litter so to say
>>42394Also forgot to mention the obvious which is that he's a tough guy who can handle his business as they say. Plus he's a white guy or at least a light skinned hispanic I assume which ups his attractions level
RDR2:
>for suckers for spaghetti western
GTA6:
>for suckers of being terminally online memers
this trailer feels a decade late, consists of reenacting viral content and has no gameplay. yeah, shits gonna suck, isn't it
>>42398Was there any hope that it wouldnt? I mean what talent could Rockstar possibly retain after over a decade of nothing but GTA Online and RDR.
It seems like they are putting a lot of focus on the romance which makes me think they are going to try to get more women to play the game. It makes sense given how expensive the game is that they want to broaden the appeal as much as possible. I wonder what else that choice might affect.
>>42399true enough.
>>42400see post before. i highly doubt rockstar has the creative capacity left to put on a good romantic story. from the trailer, they lack the creative capacity to write any character/story, instead going for memberberries and memes.
GTA6 will be the joke former entries of the series were telling.
>>42401my guess it's that GTA 6 will be good but just like bethesda games you can feel how dated the mechanics are.
>>42400the crazy part is that I always thought gta was a game for teenagers but it turns out it is quite popular among the 25-to-45 demographic. now that I think about it, it tracks with the fact that the protagonists have been getting older. this is a weird take but I think girlboss characters appeal more to men than to women, like "if I was a woman …" type thing
>>42394Yeah I'm a gay guy lmfao
>>42397Niko was kinda uggo in my opinion, Claude was cute but cursed by ancient graphics I think he would be quite a stud in VI graphics tho
>>42405>"anti-cop" is badx is just 2019 twitter in-reverse
>>42404>Niko was kinda uggo in my opiniontrue i like him mostly for his down to earth lines, as for physical attractivness, dude is literally a former child soldier/war criminal and an illegal migrant, and his hands shake when holding guns due to his soda and burgerss only diet. of course he won't look like Chris Evans
>>42374>>42405I miss when the male protagonists looked more like white trash (just more Hollywood version of it) in the beta leak then now.
I also would've liked full redneckXlatino, it seems like a more funnier dynamic
the male protag seems to be more blander now
>>42405they also started noticing that gta vi will be a satire of america. shocking as it may be.
>>42410u wot m8? didn't they notice this litsening to radio stations in gta san andreas and gta4? isn't weazel news literally just fox news? i'm sure they make fun of liberals too did they not know the game series became a huge satire with a story attached to it by gta3?
there was a cartoon series from gta4 tv that i'm surprised wasn't dig out of the grave to be used as proof rockstar went dei sweet baby all the buzzwords before sweet baby was a thing
>>42407Niko was also the nicest protagonists of all gta games I've played which is surprising considering his background
>>42411Sometimes it's not about the things themselves changing, but the way people perceive them.
>>42411Rockstar was always le gay woke dei company, they literally made the first queer protagonist in gaming history (jimmy from bully)
>>42442
should they?
romantic love isn't real, but young people consume romantic media and then think it is, and get frustrated when irl relations don't work like that. as funny as it sounds, san andreas for example had a more realistic perspective on interpersonal relations, always oscillating between the pathetic and the transactional
>>42445Another W for San Andreas
>>42442
I just played camp buddy lmfao
Jason is such a thirst trap for the gays and I bet Lucia is too is for the straight guys, genuinely the hottest protagonists rockstar ever made
>>42448as a straight guy I can tell you the guy is hotter
>>42445>romantic love isn't real, but young people consume romantic media and then think it is, and get frustrated when irl relations don't work like that>as funny as it sounds, san andreas for example had a more realistic perspective on interpersonal relations, always oscillating between the pathetic and the transactionalTrvkular launch detected.
>>42445>romantic love isn't real,been happily married for over a decade. sorry it didn't work out for you bud. anyway for all you know the game's "twist" could be they have to kill each other and you pick which one to play as after the breakup. Which is kinda how GTA V worked with the 3 protagonists in a Mexican standoff at the end.
>>42452Oh shit, I think I played that.
>>42386Story was good, missions were OK, free roaming and hunting was GOAT. so overall it was good
>>42397patrick something from deviant art… brown? I remember his shit from the early 00s. he's a good artist
>>42466meant to say early 10s
>>42464
I always try to play as a chick if I have to create a character
>>42470To stare at when I'm playing. Although I don't play many video games anymore. And now that I think about I only really did that in saints row 3. I created buff and thick latina/French sounding chick. I thought she was hot and the game was alright
>>42468>>42471I only play as hot muscular dudes to stare at them too lmfao
>>42472if you're a guy try hitting the gym, you'll get hot muscles on your body you can stare at for twenty four hours
>>42473I'm too depressed to do that atm sadly but yes I always wanted to have a hot body, I absolutely love the male physique
Spurred by this trailer I finally decided to give GTA5 a try. Plays exactly like I expected it to - bad gunplay and insane level of railroading. In a first mission I punched a car and got game over screen, because I wasnt supposed to punch a car, becACUSE FUCK YOU I DONT CARE IT DOESNT DISRUPT THE SCRIPTING OR CONTINUITY THERE WAS NO OBJECTIVE MARKER TELLING YOU TO PUNCH A CAR STOP DOING THINGS THAT ARENT EXPLICITELY TOLD TO YOU STAY IN YOUR FUCKING SKINNER BOX
The narrative suffers from the same issue as GTA4, or Sleeping Dogs, or any other game of this kind that attempts for a serious story, it fundamentaly clashes with utterly unserious gameplay. You cant attempt exploration of themes trauma, violence, revenge and redemption while ragdollising 25 people driving your cousing to the bowling alley.
>>42477You're probably correct but it's still a video game so who cares
>>42478Well, me, for it is no fun to play.
>>42405something tells me they wouldn't like gta4 tv channels
>>42512
Latinas can't resist that BHC
>>42477try hitting the correct buttons next time
>>42547I might buy the game just to stare at lucias fat ass if it ever comes out that is
>>42548thats half the reason games like laracroft and nier automata had players standing in place just to glance at character busom, why is female ass more mesmerizing than man booty brah
>>42549Because it's so shaped
>>42374Nah, not necessary, it's just going to be a reskinned GTA V with a better graphics, I don't see how current tech offers any advantage other than ray tracing
>>42445Romantic love is only possible between two selfless people otherwise one will take and other only give
>>42442
rec me a few uygha
>>42563I… actually kinda prefer this sort of hysteria. It was fun.
>>42563That is what right wingers are always like. The more they win, the more unhinged they become, because more detachment from reality is required to avoid recognition of what their "victory" actually looks like.
>>42570win? the fuck did they win? a participation award in unhinged complaining and pwning? there's no victory with right wing complaining, even if they get their way they have to whine about something
>>42563how the hell did this happen? i remember in gta4 there were two types of concervatives, the ones who complain it was anti-christian and introduced violence, and the other part, the majority of online rightwingers, the ones happy it was le offensive and gritty and let you shoot cops in a hospital, unlike feminist pussified tumblr games, those same people made shit like gamergate i think, so how do you go from gritty games are rightwing, to they are actually left and woke and anti-cop?
>>42547that's fat????
bro is too broken by images of fat acceptance billboards he now call anything that's not petite or anorexic fat
>>42408Claude is just Clint Eastwood with 90s raver hair
>>42660
give me screenshot of said peterson doing that and i'll mspaint it for you lol
>>42588>how the hell did this happen? western culture is a binary machine that reproduces itself every so often, never reaching a logical conclusion because it's averse of synthesis, it's always reactionary
It's kind of crazy how little I want to play GTA1124714024910 6
>>42589chvds have always called perfectly healthy looking women fat. it's part of their urge to shame women for not fucking them. or to bully them into having low self esteem. or something.
>>42701I never really saw the appeal tbqh. It's an "open world" yes, but what can you
really do except for the gansta roleplay, engaging in reckless driving and playing dressup. I'd take my heavily modded morrowind over it any day.
>>42374I wanna suck Jason's cock so badly
>>42762maybe i'm a simpleton but the parts of cyberpunk 2077 i enjoyed the most was driving around under the cool neon lights, so i'm lowkey looking forward to gta vi.
Did they say anything about the radio songs yet
>>42762Back in the day you had random job minigames that took advantage of the open world, stuff like that. Now there's basically fuckall. RDR 2 felt like it was missing this as well. Like you have discrete missions where you do stuff like rustle livestock but there's no free roam "radiant" style quests that just let you do those kinds of things organically. Even the bounties in that game were a step down from RDR1 in that regard because they leaned too much into scripted content.
>>42786>driving around under the cool neon lightsNow this i get. Cyberpunk is my second favorite mood.
>>42800>there's no free roam "radiant" style questsIt sounds strange to be missing this kind of auto-generated busywork, but i guess they just aren't putting in the work anymore to make the world feel alive, let alone handcrafting small, intriguing sidequests. Funny even this kind of aaa converges towards the proverbial corridor in the form of a couple of cinematic questlines.
They're still doing the ultra-realism thing? With this computer market? With the current culture around stylization?
Like I know it was in dev for a long time and yet it feels antiquated before release.
>>42808A lot of incoming games atm feel like modding assets repositories tbh
not even moddable games themselves because that ship sailed already and they didn't knew how to get the most out of it
another great investment by the capitalist class
When is this game going to fucking come out? It's been too long. Luckily I don't really play video games anymore. If this had come out like 5 years ago I would've bought it. Maybe I'll watch a streamer play it when it finally come out.
>>42374damn i didn't see this trailer until now lol, i feel like the main guys delivery is kind of trash? whats up with that? they made him some boring chad-face block of wood?
>>47176 just noticed that it looks a lot like Vice City's cover art
>>47178 they're probably gonna give him depth and stuff
>>42808>With the current culture around stylization??
>>47177november 17 afaik only for consoles, for PC it's expected somewhere around 2028, but i'm lowkey expecting some twist where it never releases on PC because of current market conditions
>>42808I think realistic style is the smart choice. What I do think is lame is that every single GTA game since 4 has been set in the current era it's released. I don't know why nobody is interested in doing anything set in an past era anymore. Would've been way cooler IMO, but I'm probably alone in that, people just want references all the current slop from their lives. Man you think they'd just reskin the map and sell it as an expansion pack.
>GTA V but now it's 90sI'd like to see them do 60s or 70s, that'd be cool.
>>471821: GTAV and VII are literally the two single games in the franchise that take place in their current year.
2: GTAVI will take place in Vice City, and there's already a game that takes place in Vice City that takes place in another decade, and it's called GTA Vice City.
3: there are lots of modern AAA games that take place in other decades or centuries… Probably most of them.
>>47182i mean TBH since every GTA now takes like 10 years to come out, they do all basically take place in a different 'era'.
>>47182>I'd like to see them do 60s or 70s, that'd be cool.rockstar already did LA Noire, dummy. They did 80s, 90s, 40s, if you count the 2D games, then also 60s, and if you count RDR, then 1900s, that's half the 19th century already lol
>>47183>GTAV and VIIGTA 7? Are you from the future? Actually most of them take place in the year they were released.
>and there's already a game that takes place in Vice City that takes place in another decade, and it's called GTA Vice City.Yeah and they could do it again. 2020 Miami and 2010s Los Angeles just don't seem that different aesthetically.
>>47184Yeah, but this decade and the previous two are so sauceless they're not even really stylistically distinct like previous decades were.
Could've been even more bold and do a city they've never tackled before. I guess they've done most of the good choices but there is still Chicago.
Is there even any info about new features in this game vs V besides enhanced twerking dynamics or something? Ok I'll look it up.
>Realistic Weapon System: You are no longer a walking armory; you can only carry a few weapons at a time. The rest of your arsenal must be stored in the trunk of your car, requiring preparation before committing crimes
That's kind of a cool idea, but it's not exactly original. I think most shooters don't let you hold multiple long guns and stuff. It would be even cooler if you can't even bring the long guns everywhere.
>Deep Social Media: A heavy emphasis is placed on viral culture. In-game social media apps allow you to record and share your criminal exploits, which influences a region-based reputation and follower system.
Lol brainrot GTA.
>>47187>Lol brainrot GTA.mneh, if other players can see your recordings and rate you or whatever, then it's just the beefed up version of sekiro's ghost things, i don't think it will get that much use but it's cool to see.
>>42379>this game was made for 4chudcel coomershttps://www.thegamer.com/rockstar-president-sam-houser-former-gta-lead-leslie-benzies-mentioned-epstein-files/>>47187>In-game social media apps allow you to record and share your criminal exploits, which influences a region-based reputation and follower system.Eddington (2025)
>>47187According to the leaks, the main improvement is that the AI is going to be much more sophisticated than before. Probably even better than the AI from RDR2, which is still on a league of its own when it comes to real time interactivity.
>>428083D GTAs have always kinda been pushing the realistic cinematic angle. Like they had a whole ass plot with fully voiced cutscenes in the earlier ones which was itself pretty unusual.
>>47197Why do I have live in this reality? Why can't I live in the sexy cartoon world instead? WHY?!!?
>>47198even in cartoon world they would ignore you and let other dudes run a train on them
>>47201Well hopefully I'd just be an ugly bastard type with a massive cock. That may be a slight improvement than what reality is for me.
>>47196You sure its the chuds? Tatted bimbo doesnt seem like their dream tradwife.
>>47208subtle gem most will not see
>>47187>>47191i would accept going back to GTA SA graphics and physics if they actually made the missions fun instead of cutscenes on rails
>>47179their covert art always looks like that. squares , logo, girl, helicopter, random characters included
>>42807>but i don't like the game promoting latino-gringo couplesagainst racemixxing to own the chuds
>BUT ITS A FUCKIN WHITE KKKOLONIZERlook man, it's gonna happen as long as de jure segregation is abolished, cope
rockstar pisses me off because the pc release is going to take another 6 months to a year for no reason at all. that's really the only thing that makes me mad about this shit company
>>47232it's so they can sell the game twice, solid strategy
>>47232they fear voices38
>>47241it is apparently $80 for the standard edition. $100 for the special edition.
>>47241Shouldn't it be like 140? Turok 1 was like 70 bucks in the late 90s.
>>42374>>42382the whole "bonnie and clyde" thing they're going for with this one kinda makes me think about Catalina and Claude from GTA III. It was a really shallow story but GTA III starts with your girlfriend Catalina betraying you and leaving you for dead. The entire story is just you trying to get revenge on her and everyone else kind of serving as a stepping stone or obstacle in that path.
Then later on San Andreas came out and CJ does missions with Catalina briefly while stranded in a rural area, only for her to run off with Claude.
Catalina was kind of this psychopathic and sadistic character with no redeeming qualities, and Claude was a blank slate with no personality, so the 8 years they were together between 1992 and 2000 is a blur as far as the GTA lore goes. But I remember thinking as a kid that they would eventually fill that in. I was wrong of course because they abandoned the original 3D universe and started fresh with GTA IV. Ostensibly V and VI take place in the same universe as IV, but with VI centering around a couple doing Bonnie and Clyde shit it's almost like my idea came true, but in another way.
Since RDR2 had fairly good writing and story, at least compared to the stuff they were making back in the PS2 era, I feel like these characters will be more interesting and compelling than Catalina and Claude were, but at the same time I feel like the story will end with them betraying each other and the player having to pick which one they want to play as after the story ends. GTA V did something like that, though of course there was a feel good option where you could keep all 3 protagonists.
That is my prediction, it will end in betrayal.
>>47295>I feel like the story will end with them betraying each otherAlmost cerainly will not, the romantic Bonnie and Clyde angle is punshed in the marketing, they are not going to attempt to subvert it.
>>47301I still don't believe this, no way they are doing some shit like locking in game stores
>>47300but the 3 protags betray each other at the end of gta v and the gang falls apart at the end of rdr 2, it's entirely plausible
>>47303But rockstar cucked out and made everyone betraying each other optional. I could believe that they will have it where there's an option for them to betray each other but probably won't be mandatory
>>47304>>47303There is certainly going to be "good" ending in which they end up together. Maybe its going to be like decision whether to escape and abandon your partner, or both of you going to prison or something like that. But there is no way in hell Rockstar will give player option to murder their girlfriend.
>>47305>Maybe its going to be like decision whether to escape and abandon your partner, or both of you going to prison or something like that. But there is no way in hell Rockstar will give player option to murder their girlfriend.the game literally ends in the game theory prisoner dilemma lol
>>47307If I can't murder by girlfriend then what's the point?
>>47307how is that supposed to work in a single player game?
>>47309it looks at who you have played as the most and you make the choice for them while the game makes the choice for the other character based on like relationship or karma or whatever.
>>47301>>47302the sad thing is that i think the special edition is vastly outselling which shows despie all the people complaninig rockstar won fleecing their fans.
>>47698A 2% drop is literally nothing, it will probably be back again in a few days
>>47310Would be pretty hilarious if they have it be the revenge of "Niko, let's go bowling!" and your girlfriend kills you if you don't do enough couples activities lol
>>47697it will be an extremely successful game and you know it, why even cope with this, people will pay the hefty premium for a game license and won't even care they need to wait 30 hours for the game to download with their shitty poverty internet
>>47705What if the leaker does leak the PC version tho
>>47706the guy is leaking gta vi facts on a drip-feed, so it looks more like hype building to me. it's kinda funny how his threat is literally "i will release more gameplay" like yeah dude please do NOT leak any more ads
>>47715Has Rockstar actually went on record saying that GTA VI has been in development for 12 years? AFAIK they have been updating GTA Online for years
>>47715I mean idk what anyone really expected. Rockstar have made it pretty clear what direction they're going in with the massive downgrade in engine quality, physics etc from GTA IV to GTA V, to make it cheaper and work better online. We could have had actual revolutionary improvements to gaming, but dumb retards said "the driving is too hard, and physics are silly" and instead we have the trash we have nowadays where cars are on-rails and physics are all simplified crap.
>>47715They had to model realistic dog testicles or something
>>47718those were already in the last game im pretty sure lol.
>>47708If Rockstar was happy with the leaks they wouldn't have fucking Mossad and Microsoft hunting the hacker.
>>47748HL2 also leaked so that's good company am I right… except the HL2 buils was like a rough beta.
>>47758Well that was pretty retarded
>>47759He probably either realized he couuldn't cash out or he knows he's had poor OPSEC and is basically done for so has decided to make it about principles and whatnot to at least build public sympathy.
The Leek motif is a nice touch though, reminds me of lulzsec days.
He'll drop the dev build eventually and it will be glorious. Finally all gaymers will be freed from the hassle of the rape device known as the Rockstar Games Launcher. Based Hacker freeing millions of people from DRM.
>>47771I just wonder how close the leaked build is to the final release one
the hack is fake. its a viral marketing campaign.
>>47774this is the new norm in the age verification era innit.
>>47771>He'll drop the dev build eventually and it will be glorious. i'll bet you money this won't happen.
>>47747they're hunting the footage re-uploaders lol
>>42393Learn something if the writing is good enough you crybaby instead of getting jelly.
>>47809chill brah, it's going to be a highly curated video that shows nothing substantial. meanwhile leekbro has already shown us everything we really need to see. it's RDR2 but GTAV.
>>47810So is RDR officially a tech demo series like Star Fox and Final Fantasy?
>>47811it's more like GTA is the tech demo series, which itself spun off RDR, since they're both made with the same engine and feature the same/similar mechanics, and so they're like clones of one another with a different aesthetic, so RDR2 is just the latest version, because GTAV was release 13 years ago, whereas RDR2 was released more recently in comparison.
>>47810I thought it was today, it's actually tomorrow… I even made popcorn and everytanh :C
>>47812 i agree
>>47786they made pinkertons the villain in RDR2 only to get their own pinkertons
>>47735that's literally just fortnite lol
>>47837so r u gonna bost the footage here or nah cuz like
I'm not gonna log into internetflicks just to see this.
>>47837This is too expensive for my body
>>47840congrats chihuahua poster, you're in the big leagues
yeah so car stealers six looks kinda mid senpai. I'll prolly still play it bit I'm not biting at the chomp for it.
>Set in Vice City
>Set in modern day and guaranteed to be full satire we've already seen a million times
FUCKING BORRRRRRRIIIIINNNNNGGGGGGG
>>47841 i don't even have a ps5, i don't know why i'm so excited for this game i won't be able to play for like 2 years
💖💖💖💖💖💖
💖
>>47842 💖 here's my autograph:
chihuahua💖💖💖💖💖💖
💩💩💩💩💩💩
💩
>>47843 💩
💩
>>47844 💩
💩💩💩💩💩💩 nah, it's going to be fire
It looks really meh, the voice acting is also weird. Driving is literally just copy pasted GTA 5
im not getting a ps5 and i dont think ill ever be able to upgrade my pc again so i wont be playing it
>>47786Getting harassed by thugs sent by Rockstar oddly feels like a corny Rockstar plot itself
>>47848the dialogue is god awful, sam and dan houser leaving 6 years ago took its toll. atleast 5 and 4 had their fun dialogue, but the dialogue here is way more shallow than previous games.
>>47853so you play as an "illegal immigrant" that is also a highly dangerous criminal?
but also you get to kill ICE agents?
what can i do but laugh
so the cyberleek guy was peddling some shitcoin and just as rockstar releases official gameplay previews, he vanishes and also rug pulls people who for some reason bought the fucking meme coin? lol rockstar is really testing how fucking stupid and gullible some gamers are.
I genuinely hope there are ways to torture Florida wiggers besides just killing them, like a Postal in florida.
if i have a lasso so i can drag those raped diasporoids to be eaten by the local wildlife, i'll probably find a way to hang every pocho, drown every gusano and burn to death every disgusting wigger.
>>47858gusanos are cringe and reactionary
wiggers are revolutionary, especially juggalos
>>47844I just want an October Revolution game with the RDR 2 engine
I just want an Elder Scrolls style fantasy with the RDR 2 engine
is that too much to ask (yes)
>Lusotropicalism the game
>>47852Tbh they likely intentionally picked filler conversations to avoid story spoilers in a gameplay trailer. But that’s pretty unique to VI that R* haven’t really divulged in what the story is at all, beyond Jason and Lucia involved in a failed job that now means they’re chased all over Leonida, which isn’t a story since criminals generally are on the run.
For the GTA IV trailers they revealed essentially Niko’s background, why he is in Liberty City, how that results in him working for crime lords and even shows a scene from the ending.
For GTA V all three protagonists got trailers and again we find out who the characters are, what they want and why they’re a crew.
All we’ve gotten for GTA VI is just Lucia and Jason are a couple, they have sex while asking each other about trust, Lucia was in prison but got out early for some reason, Jason bitch slaps shopkeepers for some old dude in lieu of paying rent… Either this means the story is absolute dynamite or it’s just non-existent.
>>47865gta Netflix trailer
>>47853>Having a virtual latina immigrant gf will unironically de-radicalize millions of young gamer chuds.on the contrary they will just want to deport the men and keep all the ladies
>>47870So one group of brown chuds deporting another group of brown chuds?
>>47871imagine once they realize they can't deport the no sabos/gusanos
>>47878Also for many not so young men
>>47878Maybe I should get this game… will it run on GNU/Linux?
>>47880I got a non-pirated copy of RDR2 to run on Linux with Proton… but only the offline campaign. Never got online to run…
>>47881(I only mention this because GTA VI uses the same engine as RDR 2… albeit with several years of development)
>>47878I thought the same thing, right when he was saying it, that her casual Latina combo is fine as it is, lmao.
>>47860It's funny because in the time that Rockstar has been crafting realistic testicle physics for GTA VI they could have dedicated one or two of their side studios to work on new or existing IP. At the very least, they could have release a smaller scale GTA side game or two like they did with VCS and LCS.
>>47884I would have liked Bully 2 tbh
>>47885Bully 2 or Manhunt 3 would have been great.
>>47884Rockstar has 2000 employees,the only AAA company that make smaller projects on the side on top of their big one is Ubisoft with 16000 employees
I hate that these trailers and media hype and kind of working on me, because I know for a fact the gameplay is going to be crap.
>>47878i am actually at a loss as to what rockstars goal was with their reveal. it all feels so random and off, poorly curated.
this scene for example. what am i supposed to take away from it? is it ragebait for chuds? is it to show how 'realistic' the game is supposed to be? is it to show what the relationship between the protags is like? whatever it may be - i don't feel this to be worthy of being in your long awaited reveal of a title that was in the works for well over a decade.
>>47891most normie people in a relationship will see this and think "wow litterally me" and buy the game. The turbo online, chuds, hikikomori will already buy the game anyway, it's not meant to cater to them.
>>47891Your take-away is that Rockstar did a bold creative decision to make the focus of the main story a romance, an element that was almost totally absent from earlier GTA games but very popular with virtually all GTA (roleplay) communities, especially among its female userbase. As a socialist applying materialist analysis here you should recognize this as a move by a profit-oriented business to expand its customer demographic to include and attract women, beyond its core male demographic.
>>47891>this scene for example. what am i supposed to take away from it? it's supposed to ground the characters as being in a relationship, by making them do couple stuff? what the fuck are you talking about, jessie. so maybe you don't like that they fuck and you don't, but at least you can recognize a scene that's functionally important for characterization, right? or do you autists not watch movies, and it's all anime gatcha games.
>>47890the netflix trailer made me go from 0 hype to negative hype
Lmao just heard a guy say he bought a netflix subscription to see the trailer
>>47898I might re-subscribe to Netflix if they gave me a free copy of or code for GTA VI. I don't even really want to play the game or really play games much anymore but it is my favorite series.
>>47894did you even read my post, before you went into your meltdown?
>>47894nta but you have reading comprehension issues
>important for characterizationit isn't. when a writer spends 100 pages of the novel establishing that the couple is a couple, that's just filler. if you want to act pretentious and cultured, you're supposed to put that in the same bucket as descriptions and adjectives: slop
I remember thinking back then when I was playing gta v for the first time that most of it felt predictable, cliche, kitsch
idk, it feels like the franchise is out of juice. the only way to enjoy this is to point at the screen while screaming
<I UNDERSTAND THAT REFERENCE
<IT IS THE RECENT THING I SAW ON THE NEWS!!!
the only lowkey funny thing is that it's the first gta targeting women, so the female protagonist is the median american young woman, but the guy is an emotionally mature, non-toxic, and pretty (I'm gay btw), white hunk
>>47902>I'm gay btwThat explain why you think she is "median american young woman".
>>47903so you think the vast majority of american young women are uglier than her?
>>47901>it isn't. when a writer spends 100 pages of the novel establishing that the couple is a couple, that's just filler.have you heard about "show, don't tell", it's a 20 second video establishing a character dynamic, it's perfect for establishing tone expectations ahead of release. you guys are just neurotic because you feel left out of the marketing. which what does it matter, i already feel alienated because there's no pc release
>>47900i did
like i seriously dont get it, GTA is one of the most normoid franchises in video games, right up there with FIFA, why are you surprised when they are establishing the relationship is going to be a strong element through previews. it's all over the marketing lol.
>>47905you mean the cia psyop?
>>47905>show don't tell<the most cliché, sexist, regurgitated to death scene of a couple being late with the female asking what to wear to them immediatly dismiss the male's answer and choose something completely differentground breaking stuff.
>>47905You don't understand, they put woman in video games, they targeted gamers, gamers!
>>47908Media literacy much? The cliché of the scene is the purpose, it is the whole entire point. It establishes the relationship dynamic as the anchor point of the entire story and juxtaposes it with the couple's extreme lifestyle. It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thing there is in the story(until it isn't or the player decides that during the game).
But hey, if a classic love story that features a scenes millions of people can emphasize with then maybe this game isn't for you?
Here is some avant-guardist ballet that might be more up your sleeve.
>>47910>cliche>genuine>relatableretarded shit that doesn't exist in real life, doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple), reinforces hetero-normative stereotypes. look the gymnastics you have to do to justify something that you admit is a cheap media cliche that you have seen a thousand times before
btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get real
as I said, the only way of enjoying this is pointing at the screen while screaming
<I GET THAT, IT IS REFERENCING THE OTHER MEDIA >>47910>It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thingwritten by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.
anyone who has experienced such a situation can only be annoyed by this scene because it wastes the male protags time as well my time as a player. sadly rockstar didn't include a QTE 'triangle = dress 1', 'square = dress 2' for ultimate immersion.
>>47915>>47916Butthurt LGBTQian.
>>47908>ground breaking stuff.where did i imply it's groundbreaking? rather the opposite, it's very conventional and thus effective. you don't disagree with the execution, you just disagree with the vision.
>>47907eggsactly
>>47904yeah? also the vast majority of american men are uglier than male protag. i think the guy is hotter than probably all GTA protags, now that I think about it, except arguably CJ.
>>47922fucker i literally disagree with the execution.
>visionfucker, this is slop to be peddled to millions of people, there is no fucking vision.
>>47931>fucker i literally disagree with the execution. what do you disagree with? you called it cliché, i said that is what makes it effective.
>there is no fucking vision.i'd say that's a disagreement right there
>>47915>retarded shit that doesn't exist in real lifeLol, you just expose yourself as being utterly alienated from mainstream heteronormie society and not knowing what the fuck you are talking about.
>btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get realYes, I get this a lot from illiterate people who don't read books and never encounter big words outside of the aislop they generate themselves. Everything I have said is completely coherent and correct. If you can't offer a rebuttal you attack the form. Classic coping strategy.
>>47916>written by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.Wow, the projection is crazy. Being asked what to wear by your girlfriend before a social function is not 'just' a media trope. I am in a happy 3 year heteronormative with my gf, we were invited to a laid-back millennial wedding that caused a brief and similar discussion, the only difference being that she sent me the pictures of the dresses via text. There was for example some discussion on whether the cream-colored dress was too close to the color white and thus not appropriate for the wedding.
>>47921Could be. This person is basically just a projecting incel (using whiteknighting this casually is an indicator) who thinks everything is a media trope or someone who has spent too much time getting their brainrot on catboy discord servers and now doesn't know how heteronormie society operates. However plenty of LGBT individuals enjoy romance stories, including heteronormative ones, so this is just alienating you and your little circle here.
>>47931>there is no fucking vision.You better be joking, this is a huge break from the earlier games and this is now being clearly communicated. You can disagree with the 'vision' but denying that it exists is just crazy. None of the earlier games featured a story element that create this degree of tension throughout the game.
>>47916>doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple)Now we didn't. This might come as a shock to you but there is a huge difference between being a couple and actually being in love. The dynamic could have been completely different, like a pimp-hoe thing. From the trailer we now know that there is going to be a genuine love story which will be the major point of tension in the main story because obviously decisions of the player will influence the outcome of it.
>>47941>>47942>everyone who mocks my imaginary GF simulator is an incel, a chud and never kissed a girl>a person wasting his partner's time by asking for his opinion to dismiss it outright is symbolic for the deep and true love they feel for each other>this is groundbreaking, ney, VISIONARY. the billion dollar stock exchange traded entertainment company is revolutionizing gamingyou guys are caricatures
>>47943>you guys are caricaturesprobably because you are making up strawmen because you are incapable of comprehending simple concepts
Unique IPs: 145