Anonymous 2021-08-05 (Thu) 01:47:02 No. 18796
>>18782 It always bothered me how
In The Pale Moonlight was resolved. I know it's considered one of the best DS9 episodes, but it's literally Sisko doing an American-style false flag and justifying it to himself in the end. This is especially concerning because this in the context of it being revealed that the first Iraq War was based on a staged false-flag.
Anonymous 2021-08-31 (Tue) 21:18:46 No. 19345
>>18055 Based as fuck. I love that Trek had so many numerous acknowledgements of the USSR
Anonymous 2021-08-31 (Tue) 21:19:15 No. 19346
>>17466 >Chakat universe books The main site is mostly dead though
Anonymous 2021-09-05 (Sun) 14:47:20 No. 19460
>>19458 I guess, but good luck pulling that off.
Anonymous 2021-09-05 (Sun) 20:58:26 No. 19467
>>2207 >DS9 >Peak Star Trek. Has plenty of high-concept sci-fi, but handled by actual characters, against a backdrop of regional galactic politics that can develop instead of previous shows being almost completely isolated episodes. I will maintain to my dying day that "Duet" is *the* finest episode of television ever filmed.
Plus, DS9 has an episode where a Ferengi earnestly and sincerely quotes Marx. That was a fun scene.
>I second this >>1870 for the order but note that you definitely can skip around TNG, which has some fucking cringeworthy early episodes before they figured out what they were doing with the series.I'd argue it was less "figuring out" and more "waiting for Roddenberry to stop vetoing good ideas". It's no coincidence that the end of his micromanaging due to poor health, and the dramatic increase in script quality, both happened at the same time between seasons 2 and 3. I've often felt like seasons 3 and 4 were of such quality because they were made up of 4 whole seasons worth of good ideas, compressed down into 2.
Anonymous 2021-09-09 (Thu) 00:28:50 No. 19564
>>14889 DS9 purposefully changed things because they didn't want it to be a utopian society anymore.
Anonymous 2021-09-09 (Thu) 14:03:11 No. 19577
>>14889 Why didn't they just replicate a baseball card ?
Anonymous 2021-09-13 (Mon) 11:09:54 No. 19625
>>19577 >Why didn't they just replicate a baseball card ? You see, Data, humans appreciate things that are genuine, for sentimental reasons.
Anonymous 2021-09-13 (Mon) 13:08:23 No. 19626
>>19625 >genuine what's the difference ?
don't replicators make atomic scale accurate replicas ?
People in the star trek future will still care about rarity, when they haven't used markets and money for centuries ? Capitalists say that their value system is transcendental, on an ideological level however we know that value perception is related to economic structure. If you lived in a society based on a economy that functionally has no scarcity because you can make perfect replicas of everything you could ever need there is no point in perceiving the original of something as different than a perfect copy.
>sentimental reasons.The concept of the original is only valid in our world because we can't make perfect copies, and if we loose an original we lose information, so it's not a sentimentality for us to care about preserving artifacts, but it will be in a future with replicators.
Anonymous 2021-09-13 (Mon) 21:18:45 No. 19628
>>19626 >don't replicators make atomic scale accurate replicas ? Are you actually autistic? It's possible to recreate any Van Goch painting if you are a crafty artist in the detail, still not gonna be the same.
>People in the star trek future will still care about rarity, when they haven't used markets and money for centuries ? Capitalists say that their value system is transcendental, on an ideological level however we know that value perception is related to economic structure. If you lived in a society based on a economy that functionally has no scarcity because you can make perfect replicas of everything you could ever need there is no point in perceiving the original of something as different than a perfect copy. Fucking lol. Artworks even in capitalism can easily be reproduced, but the art commodity is fundamentally different because it requires the creation by an artist which makes it an absolute monopoly.
>The concept of the original is only valid in our world because we can't make perfect copies, and if we loose an original we lose information, so it's not a sentimentality for us to care about preserving artifacts, but it will be in a future with replicators. We pretty much fucking can make perfect copies (just not with replicators) yet people still appreciate the original. Any smith today can produce you a sword far better in every aspect than an actual sword from the middle ages but the latter is still what's appreciated in collections and museums.
Anonymous 2021-09-22 (Wed) 16:11:14 No. 19771
Will DS9 be as inspirational as TNG was? By inspirational, I mean, hope for the future, being the best possible version of yourself. I know it's supposed to be a lot darker but I find it hard to believe that people prefer DS9 over TNG if DS9 is just Zack Snyder's Star Trek.
Anonymous 2021-09-22 (Wed) 16:19:11 No. 19772
>>19771 DS-9 is not as futuristic IMO and is a bit less ideal, but still had good messages and ideas.
Anonymous 2021-09-30 (Thu) 16:21:17 No. 20064
>>19628 atomic precision replicators would allow you to copy paste objects like computer files, that's different than just making really accurate replicas. It's like going from analog to digital, it was big deal for data and it will be an even bigger deal when that happens for other objects.
>>19771 TNG is better, but DS9 is still good
Anonymous 2021-11-06 (Sat) 05:31:43 No. 21063
>>21060 Ah damn I came here to post this. Nice.
>>19513 Based and Spess Ket pilled. see earlier thread posts on it.
Anonymous 2021-11-20 (Sat) 14:59:55 No. 21363
>>21362 just an ok episode with psychological themes, Sisko has to figure out what the real reality is. It was a nice fan service for showing the main cast without the monster make up.
Anonymous 2021-11-20 (Sat) 15:01:42 No. 21364
New Discovery season started btw.
Anonymous 2021-11-20 (Sat) 16:07:42 No. 21366
>>21364 The last one put me to sleep, it was full of holes and inconsistencies and the "resolution" to this big bang shit or whatever disabled the warp drive was completely insignificant. Honestly feel sorry for the lead actress, she really tries to act her heart out but her character is so unlikeable and she probably botched her career with this.
>>21362 As an episode, it was nice fan service. For it's message, it's a bit too much bleeding heart liberal for me. The problem with DS9 is that they didn't know how to wrap it up in season 7, so they keep making references to how the entire Star Trek universe is actually just in the head of a writer, but went nowhere with it.
In general DS9 had amazing potential to be one of the best shows of all time if it were done with a HBO or Amazon budget and dedicated writers that go for full serialization. Imagine DS9 being executed like The Expanse. They were sadly ahead of its time.
Anonymous 2021-11-20 (Sat) 16:09:21 No. 21367
>>21363 Marc Alaimo must be the only person who looks a bit ugly IRL but looks weirdly enticing under a Cardassian make up. Not gay btw.
Anonymous 2021-11-20 (Sat) 18:37:02 No. 21376
>>21366 >For it's message, it's a bit too much bleeding heart liberal for me Really? There were far more liberal episodes than this one. The one where the message was basically Great Man theory, in the same season, was an example.
Anonymous 2021-11-21 (Sun) 17:06:36 No. 21406
>>21375 He was the first Cardassian to be shown on stream, in TNG. It would have been cool if they revealed in DS9 that this guy actually was Dukat and just gave the Federation a fake name.
>>21376 Idk, it really does not have another message other than "racism bad". But there even was a Stalin reference in the episode now that I remember it.
>>21377 Yep, socialist states never did soemthing on that scale even when they crushed rebellions. To make matters worse, he also did it due to personal honor because he felt betrayed, not even for the cause itself. To lie the Romulans into a war with a false flag was also pretty bad, especially considering that episode aired after it was revealed that the Nayirah testimony that led to the first Iraq War was fake.
The problem with Sisko is that the writers back then didn't know how to write a grey character in television. In one episode he is literally space Jesus with an almost inhuman amount of rightousness and valor (like Picard), and then he does fucked shit like this within a heartbeat. This leaves not a very rounded out impression, but they got the right actor for this, because Brooks comes over as a bit crazy too if you ask me.
Anonymous 2021-11-21 (Sun) 17:07:19 No. 21407
>>21406 Ever shown on screen*
My fucking god, e-celebery has to rot my brain
Anonymous 2021-11-22 (Mon) 16:11:48 No. 21421
>>21420 Is Lower Decks genuinely funny or is it just a zoomer's attempt at bashing and strawmanning old Trek?
Anonymous 2021-11-22 (Mon) 16:46:59 No. 21423
>>21420 >>21421 It's Rick and Morty Zoomr humor that does the tired "cartoon parody (but not really)" trope.
See Embed related
Anonymous 2021-11-27 (Sat) 09:56:56 No. 21561
>>21375 God he even looks smug irl.
Anonymous 2021-11-27 (Sat) 19:31:28 No. 21572
>>21560 the voices sounds almost like the real ones, very nice
Anonymous 2021-11-30 (Tue) 16:42:03 No. 21602
>>21362 Those episodes felt forced and out of nowhere
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 18:30:35 No. 21823
This thread made me start watching TNG. Don't watch shit on websites with names like watch-series, use Pirate Bay like a sensible person.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 22:00:43 No. 21828
>>21823 Why? I like it convenient.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 07:38:04 No. 21838
When's a good time to start watching DS9? I'm on season 5 of TNG as of now.
>>21823 >piratebay If your looking for tv shows or movies, use rarbg. L337X also replaced piratebay as the go to general torrent site, piratebay isn't as vetted as L337X is.
>>21828 Quality is better when you torrent, also you don't get bombarded with shitty captcha or porn ads as much.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 08:51:47 No. 21839
>>21838 After season six I think. DS9 starts right after the evacuation of Bajor by the Cardassians.
>Quality is better when you torrent, also you don't get bombarded with shitty captcha or porn ads as much. Yesmovies is always in HD and almost no ads, although I'm not sure if they have Star Trek.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 16:50:03 No. 21843
>>21838 >When's a good time to start watching DS9? I'm on season 5 of TNG as of now. Might as well watch it after. The tonal difference is severe and I feel like it'll work better if you watch it after the finale.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 17:02:17 No. 21844
>>21843 Agreed. Also DS9 takes a while to figure out the characters etc.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 19:46:32 No. 21845
Better yet: don't watch DS9 at all and just watch Babylon 5.
Anonymous 2021-12-24 (Fri) 16:24:31 No. 22017
>>22015 How did you like the series overall?
Anonymous 2021-12-24 (Fri) 17:49:57 No. 22021
>>22017 I loved it and it was genuinely what I expected for an experiment where Star Trek is pushed to the limit. There's a lot of flaws here and there, some reactionary elements I didn't like, but it makes up for it with the high peaks that surpasses TNG at times. It balances out like that. DS9 and TNG should be about the same, with DS9 being marginally better for me at some parts.
However, I got really disappointed at the ending. I've had such high expectations since Sacrifice of Angels, which might possibly be the best climactic episode in the series. I didn't really feel a sense of catharsis as I did with All Good Things or Sacrifice of Angels. Gul Dukat's development after Waltz was literally the most retarded thing I've ever seen. I know a lot of people seem to like the finale of DS9 but I really wanted more. It had a lot of good moments but overall I wish it ended differently.
Anonymous 2021-12-30 (Thu) 18:32:24 No. 22116
>>22101 "Critics" and viewers do seem to like this show. I have no idea why, it's awful and it's plotlines are neither interesting nor Star Trek-ish. At least with The Last Jedi I thought a lot of people disliked it.
But wanna know something? The new Picard show is worse. There is no way STD can ever reach levels of debacle "ST: Picard" was.
Anonymous 2022-01-01 (Sat) 00:41:07 No. 22152
>>22116 >Star Trek-ish. The Orville is startrekish, if you haven't, watch that
Unique IPs: 35