[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / booru ]

/hobby/ - Hobby

"Our hands pass down the skills of the last generation to the next"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

New Announcement: IRC<=>Matrix bridge #leftypol on Rizon
Please give feedback on proposals, new every Monday : /meta/
/edu/ want your help building a library! >>>/edu/7066
New /roulette/ topic: /draw/ - Original Art


 No.2529[View All]

Is Steven Universe liberal? I think it is because it propagates the notion that you can solve issues in society by talk no jutsu.
264 posts and 66 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.19821

>>19817
Jenny is not an actual 5 year old human.

 No.19824

>>19821
underage is still pedo to be fair

>>19820
nou

 No.19825

File: 1632547268679.png (508.91 KB, 1083x1982, ClipboardImage.png)

>>19824
>nou
You are very obvious
NTA but
>underage is still pedo
I mean it's a teenage ROBOT drawn in stylized 2D, people having the for that unironically are more porn addicted rather than pedos.

 No.19826

>>19825
>NTA but
NTA but you're mother

 No.19827

>>19826
>you're mother
>you're
Kek

NTA means Not That Anon, silly.

 No.19828

>>19827
More like Not to Add On You're Mother's Bang List

 No.19829

>>19825
>But's it stylized 2D of a 15 year old, so it's ok
>most of them are just porn addicted, i swear it's not like they would jerk off to anything as usual or be pedos at the same time
Aka jailbait, it's still bad.

 No.19830

>>19829
>it's ok
I didn't say that, I just said it's a different kind of mental illness. Quit projecting your fantasies.
>>19828
>2008 "Ur Mama" humor
Kek

 No.19832

>>19830
>Quit projecting your fantasies.
No, it's even canon that she is 15

>a different kind of mental illness

From my time in /co/, it seems to be same illness or at least both at the same time there

 No.19835

>>19832
> it's even canon that she is 15
I mean the "sexualization" of her, most people didn't see the show for porn, and it isn't blatantly sexual either.
>it seems to be same illness or at least both at the same time there
possibly.

 No.19836

>>19835
>most people didn't see the show for porn
Just like how most people don't see ben 10 or any other show with underage characters and go jerk off to them, that doesn't really changed the age. It's still jailbait

>and it isn't blatantly sexual either.

Unless you're talking about the show. then that's dumb

 No.19837

>>19836
A character from a CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait. Jailbait'd be if she had a sexual body design, and not literal geometric shapes.
>Unless you're talking about the show. then that's dumb
Yeah I'm talking about the show?

 No.19839

>>19837
>CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait.
But making of porn of them or jerking to them is, even when you never seen the show

 No.19840

>>19839
And if that is totally outside the context of the show then why does it matter?

 No.19842

>>19839
Yeah no shit, but that isn't the argument I made!?
>>19840
Because it's fucked up?

 No.19844

>>19837
>and not literal geometric shapes.
>but it's 2d
/co/fags and pornfags still would jerk to the geometric shapes
and it became something different when put them together or them as a reference ie some times a part of drawing

>>19840
>outside the context of the show
it isn't, i never even said it was, if drawing of someone who is a kid then it's a draw of a kid


>>19842
>Yeah no shit, but that isn't the argument I made!?
Nether was, "A character from a CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait."
I was about porn, but it cam be debated if x show was had x fetish by the writes or animators

 No.19845

File: 1632557498380.png (2.72 MB, 1366x2048, ClipboardImage.png)

>>19805
And I laughed when people said Steven Universe was an extended fanfic.

 No.19846

>>19844
>/co/fags and pornfags still would jerk to the geometric shapes
ok and?
>was about porn, but it cam be debated if x show was had x fetish by the writes or animators
the animators could and have done this in cartoons of the present and past, but XJ-9 doesn't have this much.

 No.19847

>>etc
>>19840
>>19842
>>19844
>>19846
shut the fuck up already you useless rejects.

 No.19848

>>19845
Given that it's massive numbers of references after references, not inaccurate, lel.

 No.19849

>>19847
cry more prude, people are having fun.

 No.19851

>>19846
>ok and?
That's the point

>>19849
You had a completely different opinion and attitude from before baiter

 No.19852

>>19845
>pic
oh no

 No.19853

>>19851
You're bloody schizophrenic, how am I a baiter? The original point of contention is "muh gem > xj-9" and that had 0 to do with porn.

>>19852
It is a good edit

 No.19855

File: 1632560515408.png (825.17 KB, 1400x1000, jwpwpp6zb4551.png)

>>19845
>That pic and all of this sudden Jenny talk

Last post i am making as not to further derail the original topic of this thread in this communist bamboo sharpening forum but oh man do i have a soft spot for this character and the threads about that show that used to exist in /co/. Good times.

>>19853
Sometimes a person just really wants to argue about something

 No.19856

>>19855
NTA xj9 is a LQ waifu and has nothing on gem clown pussy or even xj-9's milf shortstack mom is hotter despite being 2nd worse girl

>Sometimes a person just really wants to argue about something

Which is why you have to go back

 No.19857

File: 1632562578311.png (978.22 KB, 1998x2257, c2lwvyh5s4241.png)

>>19853
>The original point of contention is "muh gem > xj-9"
Yes, spinel >/clang/ overrated jailbait waifu, which then you went off topic, strawman and now admitted you baited like the /co/fag you are, for your shit waifu because you got butthurt and didn't want to admit you been jerking off to jailbait porn in /co/.

>pic

You're proof that "XJ-9 doesn't have this much." isn't the case.

This is why anon have bad faith on here

 No.19869

>>19829
>>But's it stylized 2D of a 15 year old, so it's ok
its a robot made out of geometrical shapes, and even if its jailbait so what

 No.19871

Ooops sorry I just said it's "pedo" as a joke, didn't mean to unleash this shitstorm
I don't care if some people have Jenny as their waifu or whatever, and it makes sense since a lot of them fell in love with her when they were still young

 No.19873

>>19857
>Yes, spinel >/clang/ overrated jailbait waifu
Cope more gemcel
>you went off topic
LOL how?
>straw man
no u unironically
>admitted you baited
???????
>/co/fag
Said by me never
>shit waifu
I stated otherwise, but okay hon
>butthurt
LOL sure
>"XJ-9 doesn't have this much." isn't the case
Ok schizo, nice boogieman
>muh pedos
Wrong board bud, that'd be /GET/

>>19871
Anon, shitstorms keep chans alive, so thanks, and good point about it.
>>19855
Based, I didn't lurk /co/ much but I did enjoy the show way back when it fist aired and the character is kinda memorable.

>>19856
NTA
>LQ waifu
<making this about 'le sex' and 'vaifu'
cringe
>muh gms is better
They're 1 step off from being literal shit, cope more.
>you have to go back
You go back, schizo.

 No.19878

>>19869
>and even if its jailbait so what
>even if it's pedo porn so what
pls go /co/fag

>>19873
>Anon, shitstorms keep chans alive, so thanks, and good point about it.
No it really doesn't and that's not what even anon said.
>cringe
>schizo
try harder

>>19871
>Ooops sorry I just said it's "pedo" as a joke
if true, it all stated because post saying "nah anon was ok, to be fair" when it came to the post and then the xj9fag made bad faith bait for the rest of the time

>Jenny as their waifu or whatever

"It wouldn't be that", if anon didn't made bait all day or night for anon's shit waifu and make the same points that's already been said by all lolifags

 No.19884

>>19878
>No it really doesn't
<yes they do, chans thrive on conflict and arguments, that's the point of the forums.
>cringe schizo
You are, cope more.
NTA
>xj9fag
<everyone posting the character is the same person
kek
>bait
still have yet to demonstrate any bait at all.
>ssame points
The entire thread in the past 2 days have been pointing out that there is no specific in-show fetishization of the character and nobody brought it up until you started blasting ass about 'jailbait'. YOU are bad faith.

 No.19886

>>19884
>YOU are bad faith.
nou

>you started blasting ass about 'jailbait

nah and nou

 No.19887

File: 1632639071706.png (152.83 KB, 1000x773, ClipboardImage.png)

>>19857
>>19878
>>19851
>>19847
>>19844
>>19813
FYI for any further posters in this thread - this is either a troll or a terminally ill /sug/fag that projects their shameful porn of Spinel onto those discussing XJ-9. Do not read, Do not Respond to further posts, only Hide or Report.

 No.19888

File: 1632639218212.jpg (63.71 KB, 800x530, pull away shitpost.jpg)

>19886

 No.19889

File: 1632639706680.png (243.33 KB, 680x709, aaf.png)

>>19878
>>even if it's pedo porn so what
if its pedo to fap to cubes which do not in their composite form a morphological human then i dont care

 No.19890

>>19888
Yes. :^)

>>19889
>if its pedo to fap to cubes
but its' not, like at all anon

>morphological 15 teen in porn then i dont care

gay

 No.19891

File: 1632640497993.jpg (27.27 KB, 563x601, d98.jpg)

>>19887
very rude owo
i just want to say >>19824 then anon went off-topic about shapes and into the it only 2d augment out of nowhere

 No.19913

>>19890
she doesn’t look anymore like a 15 yo than the su characters you fap to. androids don’t even age either

 No.19915

>>19913
nah, spinel is older

>androids don’t even age either

But xj9 does.

 No.19920

>>19915
>xj9 does
Not really, she changes parts, upgrades her mind and body and learns, but that isn't the same as getting older. Robots' society is not every robot movie.

 No.19926

>>19920
>she changes parts, upgrades her mind and body and learns
nah. she just gets older In the show

>Robots' society is not every robot movie.

pls stop going off topic into something unrelated again

 No.19934

>>19926
>s*geing
ptoo
>older
She literally does not change in age at all.
>off topic
It's on topic whiner

 No.19953

>>19934
>ptoo
well it look like it was going to be shit bait like this, so i did

 No.19957

>>19953
>bait
I don't think you know the meaning of the term

 No.19959

>>19957
''Ok.''

 No.19962

>>2529
why steven universe is lib trash
>main character goes to the big bad genocidal evil
>redeems them through muh talking and muh feelings
>system mostly remains the fucking same but everything gets better because one right person just needed to go up and talk to those leaders
>nothing is changed but things somehow get better

and note the diamonds were genocidal monsters that made hilter look like a saint which is lol

 No.19964

>>19962
>redeems them through muh talking and muh feelings
This is the part people compare to Talk no Jutsu and are wrong. Naruto failed to talk down the biggest bads, the real Maadara and Kaguya and the people he would change with his words always were those that lost fights, and did not listen until then. Additionally Naruto connected to those people by appealing to something every non-noble experienced living the life of an ordinary person or as shinobi - pain, loss, helplessness and most of all hatred - things that plagued society on a structural and political level and not just feels. More importantly he'd beat them while defending or fighting for the things he cared for and loved rather than those that abandoned all attachment

Steven… doesn't have any of that and the Diamonds can not relate at all because they experienced nothing that could be relatable to the average joe-gem. Moreover they are alien as fuck, they are literally the Ootsutsuki of SU and ought to be just as sociopathic about inferior beings. I doubt that Hitler, Keitel, Goebbels and Himmler would be moved by the words of a Half-German Jew and do heel-faced turns.

So yeah, 2 different executions of the concept of talking to your enemy - one done good and the other bad

 No.19975

File: 1632823362062.jpeg (124.9 KB, 793x776, Taleb_mug.jpeg)

>>19964
i think a basic thing to take from this as well is that your bad guys need skin in the game or their redemption will be frivolous. if they are far removed from the common man, it's basically asking them to be less selfish because… it's bad okay? your good guys also need skin in the game as well, otherwise it's just facile cruel optimism garbage

i think zizek has rambled somewhere about whether its possible for the bourgeois may redeem themselves. i don't quite remember where

 No.19992

>>19975
>This
Yes
>Zizek
hmmm, I'd like to listen to him discussing that, let us know if you find it.


Unique IPs: 18

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / booru ]