Anonymous 2021-09-24 (Fri) 23:12:49 No. 19821
>>19817 Jenny is not an actual 5 year old human.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 05:10:15 No. 19824
>>19821 underage is still pedo to be fair
>>19820 nou
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 05:21:08 No. 19825
>>19824 >nou You are very obvious
NTA but
>underage is still pedo I mean it's a teenage ROBOT drawn in stylized 2D, people having the for that unironically are more porn addicted rather than pedos.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 05:48:44 No. 19826
>>19825 >NTA but NTA but you're mother
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 06:02:51 No. 19827
>>19826 >you're mother >you're Kek
NTA means Not That Anon, silly.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 06:05:58 No. 19828
>>19827 More like
Not to Add On You're Mother's Bang List Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 06:20:31 No. 19829
>>19825 >But's it stylized 2D of a 15 year old, so it's ok >most of them are just porn addicted , i swear it's not like they would jerk off to anything as usual or be pedos at the same time Aka jailbait, it's still bad.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 06:23:57 No. 19830
>>19829 >it's ok I didn't say that, I just said it's a different kind of mental illness. Quit projecting your fantasies.
>>19828 >2008 "Ur Mama" humor Kek
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 06:35:15 No. 19832
>>19830 >Quit projecting your fantasies. No, it's even canon that she is 15
From my time in /co/, it seems to be same illness or at least both at the same time there
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:05:53 No. 19835
>>19832 > it's even canon that she is 15 I mean the "sexualization" of her, most people didn't see the show for porn, and it isn't blatantly sexual either.
>it seems to be same illness or at least both at the same time there possibly.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:23:59 No. 19836
>>19835 >most people didn't see the show for porn Just like how most people don't see ben 10 or any other show with underage characters and go jerk off to them, that doesn't really changed the age. It's still jailbait
Unless you're talking about the show. then that's dumb
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:39:22 No. 19837
>>19836 A character from a CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait. Jailbait'd be if she had a sexual body design, and not literal geometric shapes.
>Unless you're talking about the show. then that's dumb Yeah I'm talking about the show?
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:43:50 No. 19839
>>19837 >CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait. But making of porn of them or jerking to them is, even when you never seen the show
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:46:24 No. 19840
>>19839 And if that is totally outside the context of the show then why does it matter?
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:52:00 No. 19842
>>19839 Yeah no shit, but that isn't the argument I made!?
>>19840 Because it's fucked up?
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 07:57:04 No. 19844
>>19837 >and not literal geometric shapes. >but it's 2d /co/fags and pornfags still would jerk to the geometric shapes
and it became something different when put them together or them as a reference ie some times a part of drawing
>>19840 >outside the context of the show it isn't, i never even said it was, if drawing of someone who is a kid then it's a draw of a kid
>>19842 >Yeah no shit, but that isn't the argument I made!? Nether was, "A character from a CHILDRENS CARTOON being A KID isn't jailbait."
I was about porn, but it cam be debated if
x show was had
x fetish by the writes or animators
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:11:56 No. 19846
>>19844 >/co/fags and pornfags still would jerk to the geometric shapes ok and?
>was about porn, but it cam be debated if x show was had x fetish by the writes or animators the animators could and have done this in cartoons of the present and past, but XJ-9 doesn't have this much.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:13:07 No. 19847
>>etc >>19840 >>19842 >>19844 >>19846 shut the fuck up already you useless rejects.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:13:25 No. 19848
>>19845 Given that it's massive numbers of references after references, not inaccurate, lel.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:14:13 No. 19849
>>19847 cry more prude, people are having fun.
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:22:38 No. 19851
>>19846 >ok and? That's the point
>>19849 You had a completely different opinion and attitude from before baiter
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 08:56:31 No. 19853
>>19851 You're bloody schizophrenic, how am I a baiter? The original point of contention is "muh gem > xj-9" and that had 0 to do with porn.
>>19852 It is a good edit
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 09:01:55 No. 19855
>>19845 >That pic and all of this sudden Jenny talk Last post i am making as not to further derail the original topic of this thread in this communist bamboo sharpening forum but oh man do i have a soft spot for this character and the threads about that show that used to exist in /co/. Good times.
>>19853 Sometimes a person just really wants to argue about something
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 09:20:01 No. 19856
>>19855 NTA
xj9 is a LQ waifu and has nothing on gem clown pussy or even xj-9's milf shortstack mom is hotter despite being 2nd worse girl Which is why you have to go back
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 09:36:18 No. 19857
>>19853 >The original point of contention is "muh gem > xj-9" Yes, spinel >/clang/ overrated jailbait waifu, which then you went off topic, strawman and now admitted you baited like the /co/fag you are, for your shit waifu because you got butthurt and didn't want to admit you been jerking off to jailbait porn in /co/.
You're proof that "XJ-9 doesn't have this much." isn't the case.
This is why anon have bad faith on here
Anonymous 2021-09-25 (Sat) 23:44:07 No. 19869
>>19829 >>But's it stylized 2D of a 15 year old, so it's ok its a robot made out of geometrical shapes, and even if its jailbait so what
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 00:27:17 No. 19871
Ooops sorry I just said it's "pedo" as a joke, didn't mean to unleash this shitstorm
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 01:38:43 No. 19873
>>19857 >Yes, spinel >/clang/ overrated jailbait waifu Cope more gemcel
>you went off topic LOL how?
>straw man no u unironically
>admitted you baited ???????
>/co/fag Said by me never
>shit waifu I stated otherwise, but okay hon
>butthurt LOL sure
>"XJ-9 doesn't have this much." isn't the case Ok schizo, nice boogieman
>muh pedos Wrong board bud, that'd be /GET/
>>19871 Anon, shitstorms keep chans alive, so thanks, and good point about it.
>>19855 Based, I didn't lurk /co/ much but I did enjoy the show way back when it fist aired and the character is kinda memorable.
>>19856 NTA
>LQ waifu <making this about 'le sex' and 'vaifu' cringe
>muh gms is better They're 1 step off from being literal shit, cope more.
>you have to go back You go back, schizo.
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 06:02:29 No. 19878
>>19869 >and even if its jailbait so what >even if it's pedo porn so what pls go /co/fag
>>19873 >Anon, shitstorms keep chans alive, so thanks, and good point about it. No it really doesn't and that's not what even anon said.
>cringe >schizo try harder
>>19871 >Ooops sorry I just said it's "pedo" as a joke if true, it all stated because post saying
"nah anon was ok, to be fair" when it came to the post and then the xj9fag made bad faith bait for the rest of the time
"
It wouldn't be that ", if anon didn't made bait all day or night for anon's shit waifu and make the same points that's already been said by all lolifags
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 06:43:58 No. 19884
>>19878 >No it really doesn't <yes they do, chans thrive on conflict and arguments, that's the point of the forums. >cringe schizo You are, cope more.
NTA
>xj9fag <everyone posting the character is the same person kek
>bait still have yet to demonstrate any bait at all.
>ssame points The entire thread in the past 2 days have been pointing out that there is no specific in-show fetishization of the character and nobody brought it up until you started blasting ass about 'jailbait'. YOU are bad faith.
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 06:49:19 No. 19886
>>19884 >YOU are bad faith. nou
nah and nou
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 07:12:26 No. 19890
>>19888 Yes. :^)
>>19889 >if its pedo to fap to cubes but its' not, like at all anon
gay
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 07:14:58 No. 19891
>>19887 very rude owo
i just want to say
>>19824 then anon went off-topic about shapes and into the
it only 2d augment out of nowhere
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 21:55:56 No. 19913
>>19890 she doesn’t look anymore like a 15 yo than the su characters you fap to. androids don’t even age either
Anonymous 2021-09-26 (Sun) 22:39:33 No. 19915
>>19913 nah, spinel is older
But xj9 does.
Anonymous 2021-09-27 (Mon) 00:12:54 No. 19920
>>19915 >xj9 does Not really, she changes parts, upgrades her mind and body and learns, but that isn't the same as getting older. Robots' society is not every robot movie.
Anonymous 2021-09-27 (Mon) 03:08:46 No. 19926
>>19920 >she changes parts, upgrades her mind and body and learns nah. she just gets older In the show
pls stop going off topic into something unrelated again
Anonymous 2021-09-27 (Mon) 16:57:41 No. 19934
>>19926 >s*geing ptoo
>older She literally does not change in age at all.
>off topic It's on topic whiner
Anonymous 2021-09-27 (Mon) 23:41:22 No. 19953
>>19934 >ptoo well it look like it was going to be shit bait like this, so i did
Anonymous 2021-09-28 (Tue) 01:35:10 No. 19957
>>19953 >bait I don't think you know the meaning of the term
Anonymous 2021-09-28 (Tue) 04:13:16 No. 19962
>>2529 why steven universe is lib trash
>main character goes to the big bad genocidal evil >redeems them through muh talking and muh feelings >system mostly remains the fucking same but everything gets better because one right person just needed to go up and talk to those leaders >nothing is changed but things somehow get better and note the diamonds were genocidal monsters that made hilter look like a saint which is lol
Anonymous 2021-09-28 (Tue) 05:05:31 No. 19964
>>19962 >redeems them through muh talking and muh feelings This is the part people compare to Talk no Jutsu and are wrong. Naruto failed to talk down the biggest bads,
the real Maadara and Kaguya and the people he would change with his words always were those that lost fights, and did not listen until then. Additionally Naruto connected to those people by appealing to something every non-noble experienced living the life of an ordinary person or as shinobi - pain, loss, helplessness and most of all hatred - things that plagued society on a structural and political level and not just feels. More importantly he'd beat them while defending or fighting for the things he cared for and loved rather than those that abandoned all attachment
Steven… doesn't have any of that and the Diamonds can not relate at all because they experienced nothing that could be relatable to the average joe-gem. Moreover they are alien as fuck, they are literally the Ootsutsuki of SU and ought to be just as sociopathic about inferior beings. I doubt that Hitler, Keitel, Goebbels and Himmler would be moved by the words of a Half-German Jew and do heel-faced turns.
So yeah, 2 different executions of the concept of talking to your enemy - one done good and the other bad
Anonymous 2021-09-28 (Tue) 10:02:42 No. 19975
>>19964 i think a basic thing to take from this as well is that your bad guys need skin in the game or their redemption will be frivolous. if they are far removed from the common man, it's basically asking them to be less selfish because… it's bad okay? your good guys also need skin in the game as well, otherwise it's just facile cruel optimism garbage
i think zizek has rambled somewhere about whether its possible for the bourgeois may redeem themselves. i don't quite remember where
Anonymous 2021-09-28 (Tue) 18:39:35 No. 19992
>>19975 >This Yes
>Zizek hmmm, I'd like to listen to him discussing that, let us know if you find it.
Unique IPs: 18