[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/hobby/ - Hobby

"Our hands pass down the skills of the last generation to the next"
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

Since nobody has made a new one and people keep asking for it I made the next one.
Beginner's Health and Fitness Guide, aka "the /fit/ sticky" - http://liamrosen.com/fitness.html

Swole-Soldiers Edition

Previous threads on >>>/alt_archive/
155 posts and 39 image replies omitted.

Am considering getting back into weights.
Have done the SL 5x5 (in my teens) and BBB 5/3/1 (in my twenties).
Made some good progress with the weights using the BBB.
And for this reason could probably suggest the program.
Managed to go from "zero" to the lifts below.
Downside is it is very time consuming as far as these go.
Also never got very far with appearance (think because of calories).

Overhead 122lbs
Bench 150lbs
Squat 189lbs
Deadlift 244lbs

Am currently mostly interested in psychological factors.
Anecdotally is some of this still in appearances or would it be better to just go for aerobic exercise?
Am already skinny as a rail…

>>45544
I eat a tub or two a day. Is this too much?

>>45555
how much is a tub exactly? where you're from

>>45560
found a photo of anon.

Finally decided to count calories. I'm eating around 1800 daily but I'm not dropping weight as fast. Seems I will need to increase my c*rdio. I was trying to avoid it but now it seems that unless I want to be in a miserable calorie deficit for longer, I'll have to do more cardio.

>>45494
You'll be fine.
>>45545
If it's for psychological reasons, then maybe try one of those weights + cardio programs. Like cross fit. There's a bunch of these. Or just go to the gym, do weights then cardio. Both provide different health benefits, although there's a lot of overlap.
>>45555
Post the exact nutritional values and total grams or liters of the thing. If they're in imperialist units, translate them plz.

Just did 5x5 135lbs dead, didn't take much time.

>>45562
>Like cross fit. There's a bunch of these.
Have been warned against at least cross-fit because of injuries.

>Both provide different health benefits, although there's a lot of overlap.

Might give this a go.

>>45563
Then do it without excreting yourself too much? There are other alternatives. Circuit training I think its called too? I don't do it, so I don't know.

File: 1744993780234-0.gif (511.25 KB, 220x164, jumpstyle.gif)

File: 1744993780234-1.gif (389.94 KB, 220x124, hardstyleshuffle.gif)

Raving is the only cardio I can tolerate.

>>45563
>Just did 5x5 135lbs dead, didn't take much time.
I started DL 135lbs as a DYEL because my gym didn't have bumpers. I'm grateful I didn't murder my back being retarded like that.

>>45545
how skinny are you exactly? (height and weight) in my opinion there's nothing better than calisthenics for someone who's thin, weight lifting should come after you maxxed out calisthenics progressions.
>Anecdotally is some of this still in appearances or would it be better to just go for aerobic exercise?
what did you even mean here?

>>45562
>recommending crossfit ever
why would anyone do this?

File: 1744998983122.jpg (201.91 KB, 1024x1024, Confucian-Weights.jpg)

>>45564
>Circuit training
Don't really trust 50's routines either, but for different reasons, ha.

>>45580
>I started DL 135lbs as a DYEL because my gym didn't have bumpers
Nice.

>>45581
>how skinny are you exactly? (height and weight)
On a good day: 6'2" and 150lbs or 188cm and 68kg. BMI of 19.26 so just barely not underweight. Maybe just need GOMAD or something.

>calisthenics

Will look into it.

>what did you even mean here?

Was curious if the psychological improvements were mostly endorphins which might be best got through aerobic exercise or from appearance improvements in peoples personal experience.

>>45583
>Maybe just need GOMAD or something
depends on your objective:
health: any training at all, but nothing beats cardio + stretching
aesthetics: hypertrophy training (training hard with high intensity reaching failure between 4-12 reps, 3 sets minimum)
strength/endurance: basically the same as hypertrophy but with higher rep volume for endurance, lower for strength.
again, I'd recommend you to find a calisthenics routine, pretty much all of them work, but pick whatever you feel like and don't worry about having to start at the easiest progressions, you might think it looks ridiculous but it doesn't.

>Was curious if the psychological improvements were mostly endorphins which might be best got through aerobic exercise or from appearance improvements in peoples personal experience

if you accompany your training with proper diet I reckon it's a bit of everything, your body working better and producing the right amount of hormones, cardiovascular system being able to supply your body of nutrients, and then the mental repercussions of you noticing you can move easier and are stronger, and if you look better there's that as well, yes.
not a psychiatrist though so it's just an idea.

Did 5x5 90lbs bench, and (as a test to determine a calisthenics routine) 3x8 pushups and horizontal rows. Also five sporadic pull-ups. Looking at https://nick-e.com/bwsf/ (pic related) Some of the exercises seem a little janky (looking ridiculous as you mention) but guess that's fine.

>>45586
>I'd recommend you to find a calisthenics routine
This might be good for me just because seem to seriously lack the motivation to do a full weights routine at the moment. Have just done a few lifts the last week because of posts in this thread. It's not like it used to be.

>what causes psychological improvements?

>a bit of everything.
Makes sense to me. Though doesn't help with prioritizing routines much, seem to have found one to try out anyway.

>>45588
>Though doesn't help with prioritizing routines much, seem to have found one to try out anyway.
The most important thing is probably to pick one and get started.

Welp, might actually try the completion criteria: https://nick-e.com/bwsf/#completion to see if can pass on to a more advanced program first. Think it would be close, and not easy.

>>45590
About half way through the completion criteria test. Seems like with mediocre form and not holding always holding the position between reps can manage the completion criteria. These are probably some of the most important parts so am going to say don't pass. Pull-ups were particularly bad, but my hope is there's lots of "gains" to be made in improving form.

>>45601
>>45590
Yah could only do crummy level-1 shrimp squats, and had to rest pretty much between every pull-up. This is ignoring the mediocre form on the rest of the lifts (excluding push-ups which were fine) Did all the reps and sets though.

I am a deadlift machine. I turn ćevapi into defiance of gravity.

>>45601
>>45602
yeah sounds like you've got shit form for that, remember, shit form = egolifting, do easier variations no matter how dumb you think they look, they work and it's the correct way, you'll progress out of the easier ones in no time anyway so just do them.

>>45611
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52YOsjGINSc

>>45644
>shit form = egolifting
>do easier variations
Good tips.

>>44519
>It's so hard to lose weight past a certain point though. The cravings are insane. Protein really helps in regulating that shit.
Start with fruit and vegetables to help satiate you faster.

Here is a copy of Brian Alsruhes "RPM - VERSION II - Fat Burning Program" that i bought a while ago at a start of a cut. I didn't really like it all that much but it might be of interest to someone in here.

The elevator pitch is:

"Much like the first RPM Program, this one is primarily focused on on Burning body fat, building work capacity, perfecting form & giving your beat up body a 9 week break from heavy lifting.

The entire program is performed on the clock and you will be breathing hard at the end of every 40 Minute Session."

Last year I got back into the gym after a long time not going. I did chest and ohp and the next day my shoulder hurt. I went back a few days later and did the same exercises, pushed through the discomfort in my shoulder because I figured it was just doms. For many months now my shoulder hurts off and on, seemingly without much cause. Some days it's fine, others it aches. I went to the joints doctor, who took an xray and gave me a cortisone shot and said it sounded like bursitis, not a tear, and was supposed to schedule physical therapy and a follow up but they ghosted me so I never got the physical therapy. I felt better after the shot and tried to do Stretches on my own at home. Now I'm slowly getting back into the gym and focusing on stabilization exercises but still having issues. What should I do?

>>45705
Best fat burning exercise is brisk walking for long periods of time. For more vigorous cardio, the elliptical aka cross trainer is my favorite since it's low impact, balances the muscles being exercised so less fatigue (compared to eg bike), and usually they have a heart rate sensor so it's easy to keep the heart rate steady (compared to running for example).

>>45562
>Finally decided to count calories.
how is one supposed to do that?

>>45713
You can use apps, or a notebook. You weigh your food and check the macros (protein, fat, carbs, and calories). That's it. There's nothing crazy besides that.

>>45588
Day three of the BWSF routine.
It seems to be going well.
Better form already.

>>45715
Have decided omit the core accessory work.
Read online that it's mostly for coordination, which is no doubt important.

>>45710
how about you actually go to the doctor and get proper treatment? I mean, if it still hurts I don't think we could help you on an image board.
how the fuck do you get ghosted by a doctor anyway

>>45712
>Best fat burning exercise
no such thing as a "bst fat burning exercise", there are exercises which burn more fat than others, but all exercises are pretty much shit when it comes to burning fat, because you only burn like 300 kcal at max effort, that's like 100g of fries (maybe 10-15 fries).
walking/running is still good cardio, and it will help you lose weight, but not by burning fat, just staying active is enough to force your body to keep the muscles active, and therefore spend more energy on maintaining them.

>>45713
just google "how to count calories", I don't think you'll find a bad guide online, it's pretty simple, it's about weighing food and checking their macros.

>>45715
>>45733
great, keep going m8.
also, I'm not familiar with that routine but don't skip core stuff, again, no matter how retarded it looks or feels, you kind of need it, and simple core exercises are needed to learn to brace since you use it for the rest of the exercises.

>>45736
I called several times to try and set up the PT appointment but they never answered or responded to my messages. I think I'm going to try and get a PT appointment on my own anyway because it seems to have regressed. I kinda want to push for an MRI to be sure nothing is torn

When doing side planks, my left side is so much weaker than my right. If I just keep doing it will it catch up or do I have to work that side harder?

>>45736
>no such thing as a "bst fat burning exercise"
Lies. Long sessions of brisk walking :P
Or just walking a ton during the day.
>>45783
Yes, but also yes. You can start on your weaker side for example, to give it a bit more push.
Planks are trash exercises for most purposes. No idea what your goals are though.

>>45784
What's wrong with planks? What are the alternatives?

>>45785
Assuming you want to grow your abs, then do weighted crunches of some sort. Planks feel horrible and the stimulus is low.
https://youtu.be/YxmTarC2R-A

>>45786
I want to address the imbalance between my left and right sides.

>>45783
Assuming it is just a muscle imbalance you can just do let's say max hold for time on the weak side first, then do the stronger side after for the same time. Over time that should even out the imbalance, or at least reduce it.

File: 1745787335861.gif (149.47 KB, 220x214, scared.gif)

>>45794
>Assuming it is just a muscle imbalance
What else could it be?

>>45795
cancer

>>45795
If you have no other weird pains or aches then honestly don't worry about it, just do the planks.


>>45783
>If I just keep doing it will it catch up or do I have to work that side harder?
if you train both sides to the weaker side's limit, it will eventually catch up, no need to work one side harder than the other.
but not with planks it won't, do ab exercises like leg raises (do regular ones and the ones that focus on obliques) and the weaker side will be the limiting factor until they catch up.

>>45784
>Long sessions of brisk walking :P
I mean, you're allowed to believe whatever you want, but I reckon my explanation was decent enough for anyone to understand.

>>45786
god I hate "dr" mike, planks are great, they're only bad if you're trying to look like a misshapen gorilla for bodybuilding competitions like him.
otherwise planks are great, it's the main exercise to build bracing strength, which if you're not a retarded bodybuilder is the most useful thing for training because you brace for literally all of the other exercises.

>>45785
well I think I answered this above.

>>45799
>I mean, you're allowed to believe whatever you want, but I reckon my explanation was decent enough for anyone to understand
Rude. In terms of fat to carb burning ratio, high intensity exercise burns carbs at a larger rate. Working on what you correctly said, walking is way easier to maintain for longer periods of time than sprinting, which means you can burn more calories. Also high intensity workouts tends to give people cravings because their carb storage is depleted. Walking does not do this, which means you can burn more calories, and not eat them all again afterwards unlike say running.
>they're only bad if you're trying to look like a misshapen gorilla for bodybuilding competitions like him.
It's really hard to achieve looking like a misshapen gorilla. Abs are not special muscles. They grow and strengthen in the same manner as other muscles. You don't hold out weights for 1 minute to grow biceps. If you want to strengthen them effectively, then weighted/resistance crunches are the way to go. Planks offer very little stimulus compared to crunches.

If you have reasons to believe otherwise, I'm happy to hear.

>>45800
>Rude
ah stop being so sensitive
>walking is way easier to maintain for longer periods of time than sprinting, which means you can burn more calories.
yes, so? it doesn't matter what you do for your workout in terms of burning fat, a professional cyclist competing for hours on end burns at most 500 kcal, no regular person trains as hard as a professional cyclist, we burn at most 300 kcal, which is negligible, what helps about working out is the fact that your body needs to spend more energy to maintain your muscles active as opposed to being atrophied and spending much less THROUGHOUT THE DAY, not during exercise, just train whatever, it'll help to lose weight.
>Also high intensity workouts tends to give people cravings because their carb storage is depleted. Walking does not do this, which means you can burn more calories, and not eat them all again afterwards unlike say running.
I don't know about this, but let's say you're right, you're not burning more calories, you'd be just eating less, but I can't confirm anyway.
>It's really hard to achieve looking like a misshapen gorilla
never said it wasn't
>Abs are not special muscles
well, first of all I never said they were different, but you're talking about hypertrophy, which is not what you should train your abs for, since they barely grow at all, if you want to get better at other excercises you need endurance in your abs, and that's what planks are good for, pay attention to how I specifically said planks don't make you gain more strength and adviced to do leg raises instead.
but no, you don't care about what I've got to say, you just make strawmen to "win an argumen" or whatever.

>>45799
Which leg raises focus on obliques? Why are they better than side planks?

Concerning abs, I found the exercise wheel to be the best tool for building core strength.

>>45803
the ones you do to the sides, windswhield wiper leg raises I think they're called, or something like that, just google "oblique leg raises".
>Why are they better than side planks?
they're not, they're just different, planks are for endurance, leg raises are for strength.

>>4580
yes, it is great, but it's rather advanced.

>>45805
obviously meant to quote >>45804

>>45710
You need to diagnose it first so you know what treatments work and which make it worst (e.g. stretching can make an inflammation worse). There's many different issues that you could have. Could be bicep tendonitis if you have pain in front of the shoulder, could be any of the rotator cuffs, could be multiple things at once.
And stop doing anything that aggravates it. Only after the pain goes away try adding one exercise at a time with lighter weight, do fewer sets with slower and controlled reps, and maybe reduce range of motion. You need to eliminate whatever caused your issue originally, which is different from what aggravates it once the issue is already there.
Overhead and bench press in particular can cause shoulder issues for many different reasons, so I would definitely stop doing those until it goes away.

>>45902
I am seeing a PT now and doing the exercises she recommends. Still havent got a diagnosis so idk. She seemed pretty sure it's not a tear. What other chest exercises could I maybe do?

>>45710
Could it be bad form? If the bench press is hitting your shoulders, you're doing it wrong and you can get hurt. You're supposed to feel it on your chest (and triceps to a lesser degree). I spent several months doing it wrong as a beginner and always wondering why my shoulders were working hard while my pecs weren't. Form is key.

>>45802
Fellow poster, I ask you to chill a bit? Perhaps its a cultural barrier because your post does read as rude. I'm just sharing my opinion, on top of yours. Why go straight to the idea that we're fighting and one of us must win a discussion? I conceded to most of what you were saying and gave further pointers. Discussion can be productive and lead to a deeper understanding, which is why I ask you to please point to my errors of thinking, it's not about winning….

As I said, low intensity cardio is easier to maintain for long periods of time than high intensity cardio. Which means you can do more and burn more calories total. Not everyone can run for 30 minutes, but many can walk for a full hour. This is what I meant. Besides the point that high intensity cardio burns more carb storages and can lead to increased cravings for the same amount of calories burnt. I think we both agree that diet and calorie restriction is more important than burning calories by cardio.
>your body needs to spend more energy to maintain your muscles active as opposed to being atrophied and spending much less THROUGHOUT THE DAY, not during exercise, just train whatever, it'll help to lose weight.
The calorie expenditure change due to increased muscle mass is relatively small. Maybe you didn't mean that, I couldn't parse your comment to be honest. I'm guessing at what it's saying.
>pay attention to how I specifically said planks don't make you gain more strength
Fair enough, because in another part you did say they aren't good for strength. However, you also said this:
<otherwise planks are great, it's the main exercise to build bracing strength
I hope you see why I responded in such a manner.


Unique IPs: 24

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]