Anonymous 2021-10-15 (Fri) 18:50:13 No. 20450
>>18922 Context please? The year at least'd be nice.
>>19033 >>19035 >>19034 In regards to aircraft, hydro-fuel engines are perspective (see
>>20449 ). The energy of the atom is probably the best bet for ships, but that requires a lot of highly qualified cadres (not an impossibility with socialism's education systems).
Anonymous 2021-10-28 (Thu) 21:16:14 No. 20849
>>20848 Living in a train would get old after a week. If you ever want to try it, take the trans-siberian railway from Moscow to Beijing.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 03:22:51 No. 20868
>>20849 how much does the train make?
i mean like i said it's not something permanent
just a comfy place to live while you get to your apartment in the city
i mean it should still be comfier than trains with capitalist management
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 12:40:10 No. 20880
>>20848 Build your apartment in a shipping container, then you can put the container on a train.
Sabinyak 2021-10-30 (Sat) 02:41:17 No. 20911
>>20880 that's kinda the idea but better conditioned for housing
Anonymous 2021-11-03 (Wed) 22:11:10 No. 21010
trams are based
Sabinyak 2021-11-04 (Thu) 05:49:08 No. 21014
>>21010 anything with rails is more based than anything roads and automobiles
civilians don't need automobiles if you have an effective working railroad for public transport
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 19:40:49 No. 21016
You are very correct and I have a solution to stop climate change
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 20:42:16 No. 21022
>>21018 Well none of them are rail vehicles.
But they're pretty cool. Are they game design assets or drawing for fun?
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 20:48:46 No. 21023
I just made this for fun
>>21022 Would you like to see more
Sabinyak 2021-11-04 (Thu) 20:57:13 No. 21024
>>21016 fuck civilian roads
military ambulances for everyone
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 21:35:17 No. 21026
>>21018 >>21019 >>21020 >>21021 >>21022 >>21023 (re)Post armored vehicles in the appropriate thread(s) anon
>>1516 >>1505 Aircraft go
>>14020 Cars and trucks
>>6594 Old Cytube Admin 2021-12-01 (Wed) 03:40:37 No. 21610
I have created a trains channel on cytube.
Anonymous 2021-12-01 (Wed) 04:31:40 No. 21612
>>21610 Nice
I'm not into trains but I might watch sometime
Anonymous 2021-12-13 (Mon) 22:15:15 No. 21800
Going to be changing up the playlists this week for
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/trains I'm going to be putting up passenger train videos from Simply Railway.
I'll start with European trains this week.
If you have other recommendations for passenger train reviews or other railway ideas please let me know.
Old Cytube Admin 2021-12-14 (Tue) 02:32:01 No. 21807
>>21800 Updated.
I'll start making a burger list and Asian list.
Anonymous 2021-12-22 (Wed) 19:07:38 No. 21967
>>21943 I dunno dude, it sounds pretty cool to me, also if they won WW2 it wouldn't be an issue to fit it to the rails would it?
Anonymous 2021-12-22 (Wed) 20:19:29 No. 21968
>>21967 Nope making huge heavy trains is stupid, you need more complicated rail construction to prevent it from sinking into the ground. It's a lot cheaper to just build more tracks next to each other to spread out the load, and send more regular sized trains if you need the extra capacity. Regular trains are already as heavy as you can possibly make them while still getting away with relatively simple and cheap gravel-pileup as support material. Any heavier and you need to have proper foundations like buildings, which would be stupid expensive. There's no way you could build a bridge that could support this huge beast. It would need extra large tunnels as well, regular sized tunnels already are extremely expensive and super-slow to build. Now think about what happens if it breaks down, you can't move something this big, you have to disassemble it into smaller fragments before you can use other means to transport it into a repair facility. Even the added capacity for luxury like movie theaters and saunas seems pretty pointless in retrospect. People started building high speed trains as early as in the late sixties. Imagine investing in this monster and long before you even complete it, people say screw that thing i want small super fast trains, because i want to arrive at my destination earlier.
I think that it might even have failed entirely, because during the time they were considering building this they might not have been able to build it with low enough tolerances, making it have a lot of vibrations, turning it into a earth quake machine, that damages close by buildings.
Anonymous 2021-12-22 (Wed) 20:24:52 No. 21969
>>21968 >turning it into a earth quake machine, that damages close by buildings. /pol/ would call that "based"
Anonymous 2021-12-22 (Wed) 20:58:43 No. 21971
>>21969 And they would be right. If you can't handle trains at their widest, you don't deserve them at their narrowest.
Anonymous 2021-12-23 (Thu) 00:14:35 No. 21975
>>21943 >42 x 6 x 7 >3 m gauge This is the penis enlargement pills of the railway world
I want to see what kind of design did the wagons had on the inside, how would they fit cinemas and apartments there.
Anonymous 2021-12-25 (Sat) 08:34:28 No. 22034
>>21943 Jesus, no wonders the Nazis lost. Their heads were too far up their own asses to give a single fuck about logistics and, well, reality.
Anonymous 2021-12-25 (Sat) 12:57:38 No. 22038
>>22035 What's the point of these elevated tracks? Aren't metros usually underground?
Anonymous 2021-12-25 (Sat) 19:00:59 No. 22046
>>22038 elevated tracks are cheaper
Old Cytube Admin 2022-01-01 (Sat) 08:03:43 No. 22159
Updated Trains Playlist on cytube channel
Documentaries and info.
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/trains Let me know if you want me to add stuff.
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 07:09:11 No. 22392
>>22389 Every last village in every country.
Unique IPs: 26