What's the most insane, batshit crazy, mentally unhinged, downright psychotic, delusional, extremely stupid, just plain dumb and wrong, opinions and takes you ever read here?
From the top of my head are: people supporting, unirnocally, Mao and his action or being a plain crazy Maoist, and I even read some borderline delusional and probably mentally ill people here defending, UNIRONICALLY, Pol Pot actions,
143 posts and 65 image replies omitted.>>2213682Absolute majority of jews are zionists tho
But most zionists are christians and just racist right-wingers in general
>>2163778>>2163784>>2163791>>2163803>>2197431>>2210157Nature should unironically be destroyed. Nature is full of pointless suffering that can all be prevented entirely by destroying nature and preventing future animals from being born into this hellscape.
https://benthams.substack.com/p/against-biodiversity
>In my view, the way to determine whether impacting the environment is good or not is pretty simple: you look at the impact it has on conscious beings—both humans and other animals. I don’t care intrinsically about biodiversity—I care about making lives better for individuals. Species do not have experiences, only individuals do. It is thus individuals that matter. If species A has wretched lives and gets replaced by species B who have much better lives, I think that’s an improvement.
>For example, there’s an organism called the new world screwworm that that lays magots in the flesh of their victims, causing almost incomprehensible amounts of agony as the maggots eat their way out from the inside. These worms also tend to live pretty short lives of intense suffering. So when we got rid of the new world screwworm in north America—ridding the continent of a miserable animal that reproduces by torturing other animals—I think that was a great thing! It’s possible it will turn out bad because of some weird ripple effects, but if things are as I’ve supposed, then it seems pretty great. In case you doubt my position, as you can see below, I’ve depicted it as the Chad and the alternative view as the crying angry person, so it’s very likely true.
>Lots of people don’t share this view. They think we should not intervene in nature even if intervening in nature would reduce suffering and increase well-being of animals in nature. They don’t care about how much individual animals suffer, so long as there is biodiversity—many different species—and a lush and productive environment.
>This has always struck me as an extremely strange view. Even if nature is a torment chamber for almost every being who ever lives, so long as there are many different types of beings, the view holds that all is well. I can at least sort of understand holding that biodiversity is one value among many to be preserved, but it seems completely bizarre to think that it’s the primary thing that matters about an ecosystem. If an ecosystem is “functioning” in the sense that energy is efficiently flowing across trophic layers, but this situation is very bad for almost every conscious being, why would this be a good thing? Why do we care about ecosystem health if it comes at the expense of almost everyone in the ecosystem? This would be like taking a measure of societal health that doesn’t include, even as a partial input, how well off the members of society are—but instead only cares about how diverse they are in their torment.
>There are two somewhat different versions of the view. The first holds that what matters is ecosystem health and biodiversity—how robust the ecosystem is. The second holds that humans just shouldn’t intervene in nature—that the ideal state of nature is one that we haven’t influenced. I think these are both extremely crazy. >>2226093This argument works just as well for carefully destroying the planet to ensure nothing ever lives again.
I guess i'm okay with that but still.
>>2163760The stupid fucking liberal who ruined my revolutionary marxism platonism thread.
Uphold marxism-platonism!!!!
>>2163760Off the top of my head, I would say the most absurd takes include Hazite MAGAtards saying that “Trump is Anti-Imperialist”, LGBTQIA+ are “Petit Bourgeois”, Women should be Baby factories confined to the kitchen, and that the only “Real Proletarians” are White Settler Labor Aristocrat Factory Workers and Coal Miners, while every other Proletarian (ie. Any that are Black/New Afrikan, Chicano/Mestizo, First Nations/Native American, Women, LGBTQIA+, or Service Workers) is “Lumpen” (if not a U$ White Settler) or “Petit Bourgeois” (if a U$ White Settler who is a Women, LGBTQIA+, or Service Worker), Social Democrat Bernie Bros believing that a “Leftist” candidate will ever be allowed to win the Democratic nomination, let alone the U$ Presidency, along with the related denial of the fact that the Democrats are Controlled Opposition to the Dominant Republican Party and that their is no divide in the U$ Haute Bourgeoisie (they all have common interests and give money to both “sides” of the bourgeois Democracy kabuki theatre puppet show), Dengists who believe that China is still in the Socialist Mode of Production, despite having Private Companies, Stock Exchanges, and Billionaires (they are a One-Party Social Democracy with Marxist-Leninist aesthetics, that should still be Critically supported against U$ Imperialism, with the caveat that a Maoist faction will need to seize control of the CCP in order for China to return to the Socialist Mode of Production), anyone who rejects the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist principle of Self-Determination of all Oppressed Nations (including the Internal Colonies/Oppressed Nations of New Afrika, Aztlan, the First Nations, etc. inside the U$ Prison House of Nations, whose National Liberation should be the primary focus of U$ Communists) in their own SSR or ASSR of the future Global USSR (all the SSRs and SFSRs of the future Global USSR are shown in the map I posted), anyone who believes that their is any such thing as Organized Religion being a “Progressive Leftist force” (ie. “Liberation Theology”), and the related opposition to a Cultural Revolution to destroy all vestiges of the Reactionary Capitalist Superstructure (ie. Organized Religion, Patriarchy, Sexism, Bourgeois Femininity, Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Chauvinistic Bourgeois Nationalism, Revisionism, Bourgeois Liberal Individualism, etc.), anyone who rejects that Maoist PPW is the only viable form of Communist Revolution (including rejecting that it is currently viable in the Periphery/Semi-Periphery, with the ongoing Maoist PPWs in India, the Philippines, Turkey, and Peru, proving its viability in the Periphery/Semi-Periphery), anyone who supports Infantile Adventurist Anarchist False Flag “Propaganda of the Dead” Retardation, anyone who believes that a Communist Revolution (Maoist PPW) is currently viable in the current Material Conditions of the Imperial Core (it will only be viable once World War III breaks out and/or Liberal Bourgeois Democracy is irrevocably suspended), anyone who believes that a Global Communist Revolution (World Maoist PPW) can be successful without World War III escalating into a Global Nuclear War that will destroy the entire Global Capitalist-Imperialist System, and finally anyone who rejects the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the Highest Stage of Marxism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️!
>>2285018>it's a leftcom position, not a hazite oneHazoids are leftcoms switching occasionally into socpats with commie chic. Leftcom is an ironic moniker for pretend communists, who are in actuality as much to the right of actual communists just like Trotskyists, who pretend in the same way, are.
>>2285020And communism is to the left of the social progressivism you hate and allude to as 'detached from labor, driven by moral outrage, academic theory, or online spectacle', all the while itself being a component of communism. If you oppose social progressivism, you will also oppose communism while maintaining appearances with bargain bin brown socialism and yellow socialism. How does it feel to be a fake red?
>>2226093I'm aware this is prob b&
While simultaneously enjoying the outdoors, I've developed a sort of revulsion for its inhabitants as of late. Like I wouldn't torture/harm animals myself, but the mass and incalculably extreme suffering caused by existence and the cycle of life in the animal kingdom is actually pretty fucking revolting, whether you look at things on a zoomed out level as a whole, or you get into the details, nature is genuinely harrowing.
Unique IPs: 38