[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1740260228950.jpg (5.73 KB, 176x286, Pol-Pot.jpg)

 

What's the most insane, batshit crazy, mentally unhinged, downright psychotic, delusional, extremely stupid, just plain dumb and wrong, opinions and takes you ever read here?

From the top of my head are: people supporting, unirnocally, Mao and his action or being a plain crazy Maoist, and I even read some borderline delusional and probably mentally ill people here defending, UNIRONICALLY, Pol Pot actions,

>>2163760
You are scum of the Earth for insulting our shining red sun in our hearts Pol Pot. The blinding Red shine of the sun that is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism will forever swallow you.

>>2163765
Lmao, Pol Pot was insane, totally unhinged.

>>2163767
That's just pure cope.

Anything inspired by rafiq. Like the batshit insane "we need to destroy nature because socialism is industry and the more industry you have the more socialist"

Without Mao the US would rule the entire world, you might disagree with the Sino Soviet Split or or the Cultural Revolution or making peace with the Chinese bourgeoisie but it’s paid off in a modern, sustainable China that can provide an alternative financial structure to the US. Even if it’s not socialism it’s progress and we celebrate progress here.

>>2163765
Huh? Are you typing this behind a computer? You're not in the fields working the crops? You're in fact a filthy bourgeoisie intellectual and are therefore sentenced to the worst death imaginable

>>2163778
Ecologist detected. Tell mere more about them animals bruh. I bet you're one of those guys that think humans should never leave earth and conquer the stars.

hi

File: 1740261272501.jpeg (8.85 KB, 168x300, image.jpeg)

>>2163785
I missed you

>What's the most insane, batshit crazy, mentally unhinged, downright psychotic, delusional, extremely stupid, just plain dumb and wrong, opinions and takes you ever read here?
That we should support modern Ruzzia in any way.

>>2163784
>we should destroy all nature because… le space

File: 1740261438895.jpeg (13.73 KB, 238x316, FS8cszaXEAEMQw3.jpeg)

>>2163787
He has RETVRNED

That there are literally communists here

>>2163788
That one always get me, I will never understand a unironically zigger? They always cries about something something "muh fighting against imperialism"… by killing innocent ukranians?

>>2163791
If nature gets in the way of Communism then yes. Fuck them animals.
>>2163793
Have animals ever produced a Kant or Hegel? No? Animals literally cannot even do self reflection because they lack the biology to do so? Humans are not animals

>retard thinks humans arent animals
KEK

File: 1740262366318.jpg (103.58 KB, 500x530, Who_is_the_Cutest.jpg)

>>2163805
>>2163807
I think instead of communism, pic related may be more your speed

Other than the actual Nazis that occasionally drop by here, in all the years I've posted here I think one of the worst "communist" takes I've seen on here was a guy with an Albanian flag who insisted that Trump was "at the very least a crypto communist"

File: 1740262423821.png (7.37 MB, 3072x2508, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2163810
you sir are a monkey
you can cope about it
seethe about it
mald about it
but in the end you are monke

>>2163803
Damn, NOW that a stupid delusional take right here. LMAO.

>>2163812
Monke stronger together….

>>2163818
MONKE STRONGER TOGETHER….MONKE UNITE ONE

File: 1740264797841.png (2.84 MB, 1511x2015, 1738773256634.png)


File: 1740265695158-0.jpeg (37.92 KB, 474x346, OIP (2).jpeg)

File: 1740265695158-1.png (4.25 KB, 176x200, Download.png)

>>2163803
don't care about your moral fagging
nature pleases me and thus should keep existing

>>2163760
I hear one a lot, namely the constant use of the word "zigger" by self-proclaimed trve socialists. At the risk of, god forbid, sounding like a woke libtard on leftypol.org, that word is primarily used by people who are currently defending evropa from inferior Asiatic hordes by their own understanding. It may be a bit problematic to use such language. The people who use such language desperately want to be like racists who use the word uyghur, the only thing that makes them different is the objective reality where they are the ones with less military industry.
The read settlers crowd is also dumb but they get pushback all the time already.
The ecology and animal issues people are not deranged as much as lacking perspective, but that's far from the worst thing in a world where religious fundamentalists and open and proud Nazis are running wild and making the world a worse place even when it doesn't need to be for porky profits.

>>2163778
Yeah this is kind of my pet hate from here other than the retard wreckers who constantly want to argue only like 10% of people actual proles

>>2163908
Imagine thinking that only 10% of the population is proletarian and that revolution is possible at the same time

>>2163907
Here is another example OP. This guy wants slavic proles to get thrown into a meat grinder, but gets offended by a racist joke.

>>2163784
go outside

Where do I even start?

Pt.2


Pt.3

>>2164177
>I don't believe in rights
that is like saying you don't believe in laws

File: 1740305726843.png (201.35 KB, 800x420, 1680698690279-1.png)


Bump

>>2163760
>MAO LE CRAZY CHAOS ORIENTAL
Average lifespan in China doubled under Mao.

>>2163908
My hot take is that most people in the imperial core are declassed (survivors of cultural genocide, some immigrants, white women, white queers, white disabled, etc…). They're still technically working class but they were born into and indoctrinated with labor aristocracy culture.

>>2164487
What about white men?

>>2163760
anything by liberals, anarchists, and leftcoms

Anything that supports retarded shit like Settlers is usually bait thankfully, but a lot of radlib positions are held unironically and those are honestly just sad to watch.

File: 1740346597003.png (29.99 KB, 636x129, Screenshot.png)

This one is fresh >>2165101

My hot take is that the majority of people that use "white" as a euphemism for "bourgeois" and that anyone that uses it outside of generalities is showing their ass as a racist paeudo leftist.

Someone here said that communism works.

>>2165141
Reminder that the capitalist world wars alone have a death toll greater than this.

>>2165141
If someone wrote a black book of capitalism the death toll would be in the billions

>>2165180
There is a black book of capitalism released in 1998. According to it there were around 120 million victims iirc.

>>2165180
A youtuber actually did the math: it's 3.4 billions💀

File: 1740349765497.jpeg (36.58 KB, 458x509, Gkdec5ZXUAEc-EO.jpeg)

>>2164218
>these "western" Marxists have a purity fetish
>fetishizes the concept of revolution
>just like the western Marxists they despise
Pot meet kettle.

Basically anything Pasquale or leninhat ever said.

>>2164192
Not really. Some people actually just 'believe in' rights. To say you don't believe in rights doesn't mean you don't believe they are a social phenomenon, but that you don't endorse them as a practical interpretation of flimsy privileges.


>>2165274
Do tell what I've said that's so disagreeable.

>>2163760
After a revolution in the US, it should pay debt to China. What a cuck thing to say.


File: 1740398007041-1.mp4 (12.96 MB, 640x360, tankie.mp4)

Anyone using the z word can be disregarded. As such, I don't have much recollection of their statements

>>2165741
They're more kentally stable

Another fresh "socialism is when capitalism" >>2165263

>>2165752
real lassallean hours

>>2165754
How could you not get it you little shit? How could you even fucking dare to suggest that you could one day aspire to not have a boss breathing down on your neck while being stuck in a rat race for all of your sinful weistoid life?


>>2165758
Marxism thus far has been the doctrine of decolonization, anti imperialism. Those communist projects that have not focused on perpetuating the socialist project by understanding the context in which they exist and instead have tried to naively do away with commodity production have failed miserably or live in absolute toil.

To think that socialism is when you do away with commodity production is to misunderstand Marxism, to be a utopian socialist, and ultimately to be counter revolutionary. Socialism is the doctrine of the liberation of humanity. Not some instruction booklet to be assembled.

The curse of the western antirevolutionary leftist is a deep ignorance in Marxism, history, and geopolitical economy (and I realize I said the same thing three times, but you have to know your audience).

>>2165764
Was Marx trying to decolonize England? Germany? France? C'mon.
>Socialism is the doctrine of the liberation of humanity
Incorrect. Engels defines it as the doctrine of the liberation of the proletariat, and that's a big difference.
The rest of your post is correct however.

>>2165764
>tried to naively do away with commodity production have failed miserably or live in absolute toil.
Which communist project has tried that? Are you aware that the big communist project that made this glorious innovation of walking back on commodity production abolition has miserably failed?

>>2165764
>Marxism thus far has been the doctrine of decolonization
Nationalist freaks have tried to co-opt marxism since its inception. It seems this is the modern incarnation.

>To think that socialism is when you do away with commodity production is to misunderstand Marxism, to be a utopian socialist, and ultimately to be counter revolutionary. Socialism is the doctrine of the liberation of humanity.
Vague ass retard putting big words when he really wants social democracy with big man characteristics.

>>2163797
What is imperialism? You seem like a smart Marxist please teach me

>>2165840
imperialism is when amerikkka

>>2165840
Everything in existence is imperialist.
Amoeba? Imperialist.
Lion? Imperialist.
Gazelle? Imperialist.
Supernova? Imperialist.
Big Bang? Imperialist.

>>2165785
>Marx trying to do [x]
Marxism =/= Marx. Marx could've been gooning all his life for all I care.
>proletariat, not humanity
Thanks for reading my post and supporting it another Marxist author's opinion on the matter.
>>2165787
Nothing gold can stay, ponyboy. The projects that have walked it back were essentially forced to. Even the indigenist zapatistas have turned to commodity production. If you know of an example where this hasn't happened, I would like to know.
>>2165806
What zero history knowledge does to a MF.
>>2165807
Big boy didn't even do the basic reading. Give a proper critique or STFU.

>>2165844
Wrong, you forgot Canada, Australia, Western Europe, Scandinavia, Japan, and their sub-imperialist allies in Israel, Saudi Arabia, India, Turkey, UAE, Kenya, Egypt, Jordan, Singapore. I am increasingly validated that I am the only serious person who has ever come to this site, and nobody else is capable of more than incoherent adderall rants and insinuating jokes like this

>>2165847
The amoeba would be imperialist if it could, most definitely counts

>Communism is the real movement that restores dignity to the working class
so true, we mvst go back to when the wholesome national bourgeoisie was treating them worke… I mean us right

>>2165854
It's a braindead criticism of illiterate people who think that the criticism of imperialism is just anti americanism. They do this because the US is behind most shenanigans, they're historically illiterate so they think it's about picking on the US. The purpose of this criticism "imperialism is when america" is to then say Russia, Iran, China, and even other more ridiculous examples like Iraq or whatever, are imperialist.

You're getting into actual theory of imperialism and sub-imperialism. Sub-imperialism has been recuperated to mean "a little imperialist", again to say that Russia, China, Iran etc are imperialists.

The underlying justification being that leftists are morally obligated to be anti-imperialist all the time wherever they see imperialism (neither NATO or Beijing), because imperialism is morally the highest sin there is. Lenin (PBUH) said so or whoever, doesn't really matter to these people.

>>2164434
>MAO LE CRAZY CHAOS ORIENTAL

This, but unironically.

>>2165840
All elite of any country has a incentive to be imperialist and expand their power, so they can fight any rivals both inside and outside, when any unironically zigger come around defending Russia invasion, sounds extremely retarded because what they are defending without knowing the right of Russia Elite to be in power and defend their fiefdom, not the rights OF the Russia People itself, go to the Ukraine war thread and you will see retarded with the idea that Russia somehow is defending against le west imperialism when the truth is the Russia elite fighting to be avoid encroachment by other elites, 99% of all wars are started by elites trying to keeping their power, if you unironically support Russian invasion then your're a retarded elite boot licker and canon folder that deserved to be sent to a war front to died for papa Putin and his cronnies.

>>2165866
Communism is simultaneously an end state that you mentioned AND the process to get there no matter how long it takes or how arduous the path is. If you think parties like the CPC embrace their national bourgeois out of anything other than regrettable pragmatism I’m sorry but you’re a social democrat at best.

>>2165840
All elite of any country has a incentive to be imperialist and expand their power, so they can fight any rivals both inside and outside, when any unironically Ayatollah-lover come around defending Iranian militarism, sounds extremely retarded because what they are defending without knowing the right of Iran Elite to be in power and defend their fiefdom, not the rights OF the Iranian People itself, go to the marxist war thread and you will see retarded with the idea that Iran somehow is defending against le west imperialism when the truth is the Iranian elite fighting to be avoid encroachment by other elites, 99% of all wars are started by elites trying to keeping their power, if you unironically support Iranian militarism then your're a retarded elite boot licker and canon folder that deserved to be sent to a war front to died for papa Ayatollah and his cronnies.

>>2165864
>they're historically illiterate so they think it's about picking on the US
I suspect it's more nefarious than that, it's an unfortunate reality that most American/Western leftists have found their way to "Socialism" as a blanket term via the liberalism that is proclaimed as just "leftism" in the west, after becoming disillusioned with the social democratic parties.

The problem is that their disillusionment almost always comes from the idealism that such parties could be doing more but are simply choosing not too for various vapid reasonings, but because social liberalism is more developed and held in higher regard in the west than most other places (or at least the west sells itself on that) it therefore suggests that despite all the ways the US/West leaves these people wanting, they nevertheless still feel like they live in the most left-wing societies to have ever existed and thus cannot comprehend why a self-proclaimed leftists wouldn't side with the west against socially conservative nations like Russia, Iran, China, etc.

Unironically, the support for western imperialism is actually quite strong amongst the western left on the basis that even if these nations end up being run by a western-controlled comprador government, that should come with more social liberalism, democracy and free speech that in turn would therefore make them more left-wing and thus a victory in the eyes of western Democratic Socialists.

That the western bourgeoisie has no interest in rocking the boat with populations that are socially conservative, don't want to risk nationalist movements coming to prominence in free elections by utilising protected free speech in favour of keeping control over their ill gotten territories as amicable as possible, is intentionally lost on such DemSocs.

>>2165921
Well said. Yeah that rings true.
>That the western bourgeoisie has no interest in rocking the boat with populations that are socially conservative, don't want to risk nationalist movements coming to prominence in free elections by utilising protected free speech in favour of keeping control over their ill gotten territories as amicable as possible, is intentionally lost on such DemSocs.
I didn't understand this paragraph. Would you mind rephrasing it?

>>2165853
The "real movement" shit is abusing a single quote that Marx said once in order to pretend that abolishment of capitalism, commody production and wage labour weren't always a core component of marxist demands and objectives. Kys cuckdem.

>>2165894
> You're against class collaboration
> You're a social democrat
Hello? Are you genuinely that dumb or did these words just randomly fall out of your mouth???

Burgerstahn could do with a good year zero the workers broadly even stretching it hard to cover renting and small business petit-bourgeois and other artisanal and other near artisinal work like gig work or only fans would be better off.

>>2167016
>abolishment of capitalism, commody production and wage labour weren't always a core component of marxist demands and objectives
The whole question is how. Not even Marx knew. He never lived to see an even moderately successful socialist insurgency. He has literally nothing of value to say as to the how, since Marx and Marxism are always about the concrete real experience informing theory.

Please could you clarify this point?

File: 1740510326596-0.jpg (118.79 KB, 1169x1136, Fig8aHCWQAYVmwz.jpg)

File: 1740510326596-1.jpg (50.6 KB, 864x722, Ghm41r9XcAAhCAY.jpg)

File: 1740510326596-2.jpg (45.13 KB, 803x685, Ghm41sAWAAA1dDL.jpg)

>>2165921
>The problem is that their disillusionment almost always comes from the idealism that such parties could be doing more but are simply choosing not too for various vapid reasonings
I think that's a good description. The left often positions itself as trying to influence the ruling class. I'm not even referring to people who focus on electing social democrats, but the people protesting outside the DNC who consider themselves leftists and radicals and anti-imperialists. It's like "we demand you listen to us" (but they're not listening).

>they nevertheless still feel like they live in the most left-wing societies to have ever existed and thus cannot comprehend why a self-proclaimed leftists wouldn't side with the west against socially conservative nations like Russia, Iran, China, etc.

I can understand this criticism of Western leftists who throw in with the Western camp as like a bloc, but the problem is that the Russian government also pisses these people off by funding all kinds of idiotic political slop (Tim Pool and Black Hammer were being funded by Russia) and encouraging an atmosphere of irrationalism (which I think is corrosive to the left), and communicating more generally to these people with socially liberal values that the Russian government does not like them. What else are you supposed to think?

There is what anti-imperialists who support Russia say what Russia is like, and there is what the Russian government says what Russia is like. But China doesn't do that. I'm not even talking about the gay stuff specifically, but just not actively trying to piss off the Western left and present them as an enemy in their outward-facing media channels. Why does Russia do this? It makes them look like utter jerks, and to these Western leftists like people in their own countries who don't like democracy and talk about why we need an ancap monarchy run by the techlords (who seem willing to make a deal with Putin) or whatever.

What in Russia are they going to look at and see as an alternative to their own situation? In China, they can actually see things. Unfortunately, the people in the West who see an alternative in Russia tend to be on the right. Of course, Westerners project a lot onto Russia. It's either all bad, or it's much better than it really is, or wishcast that Putin is about to say something they like rather than talking about the Middle Ages. Either way, these leftists see the Russian government as representing negative trends like their own countries which they don't like.

Now, as to why Russia does this, one reason is because the government sees influencing Western conservatives as a more fruitful method of building soft power. But I also think the Russian government wants some level of antagonism for internal political reasons. The generation that came to power after the collapse of the USSR is getting old and they need to reform and transition to a new version of Russia and hand off power to the next generation, but they can't do this kind of economic and political restructuring without a war because it's not the USSR and they can't just order things to happen (nothing will get done), the system doesn't work that way. But with the SMO, Putin can secure another term without protests, create a bloc of patriotic forces who will support him, select the people are "in" and who are "out" (power transition), and reduce the country's reliance on foreign trade (which is part of a global phenomenon), and so on.

To be fair, Putin is in a very tough situation because Russia is a madhouse and he has to keep a lot of different people happy or they'll get rid of him, and the alternative is complete and utter humiliation for Russia, which would not be good. So I don't like him, but I don't call him monke or whatever. He doesn't seem like he has a very fun job.

But I guess my point is, you can criticize the Western left for viewing Russia as a enemy, but Russia openly declares itself as their enemy. If that's the case, then people are just going to have to fight it out.

>>2164489
Depends. Some kinds of white trash don't seem labor aristocracy to me. You have to get somewhat WASPy to go full labor aristocracy.

>>2163760
The Nazis were a historically progressive tendency because they were anti-American.

bump

>>2163803
They like all other humans they depended on the wider ecosystem of the earth to live and so do we. We will depend on it until we are able to engineer planetary life support systems and we are farther than that in real life hat you rafiqoids have the capacity to to understand, what is currently happening is not the replacement of evil reactionary malthusian nature with sleek industry or whatever you retards fantasize about but the capitalist class destroying the earth's life support systems and everyone depends on and having zero thought on how humanity is going to survive after they are gone. If a person had collapsed Lung and was dying rafiqoids instead of performing 1st aide would post about how people could live without lungs if we event a portable lung replace ment that will come any day now

fuck off left anticommunist, mao's revolution was one of the most successful in history. cope and seethe more that your specific brand of trotskyism has yet to accomplish jack or shit.

Oh shit look,
ITS ELON MUSK!!!

I once saw someone argue that the rwandan genocide was class struggle and therefore good.

Marxism is, when you are against the current thing.

>comparing mao and pol pot
READ

>>2197610
>thinking someone is comparing Mao to Pot
READ AGAIN

Capitalism invented being transgender to control the rate of procreation so there aren't too many unemployed people instead of just the right amount.

MLK was deep state. Such insane take.

>>2163760
>people supporting, unirnocally, Mao and his action or being a plain crazy Maoist

>>2163766
>>2163767
No, he was just a petty bourgeois romanticist of the poor peasantry.

>>2165902
Do you plan on defining imperialism?

>>2163760
There are people here who will call those who affirm the most basic tenets of the communist project (family abolition, proletarian internationalism, atheism, etc.) left-communists or ultras. You don't have to be a western armchair communist to have basic reading comprehension and political understanding of what a classless, moneyless, and stateless society entails.

Also, the Cultural Revolution was one of the most innovative and progressive socialist experiments in history and people who hate on Mao for muh 25 million are retards.

>>2204747

Are you retarded? marx stated that by "family abolition" he was referring to the bourgeois fetishisation of family as a tool to keep wealth locked up by grooming heirs to capital.
As for religion, the reason he disliked it was because it was being shilled as an alternative to improving the living standards of the proles, not because there was anything ontologically evil about faith.

It's just kind of obvious that you're basically just trying to be edgy, as is evidenced by your Mao gluck-gluck. Mega cringe.

>>2204747
Western sources claim like 1-10 million in a country of 700 million people; the lower bounds are less deaths than COVID in the United States.

You can get up to 30 million more easily with the Great Leap Forward, but Deng claimed it wasn't Mao's sole responsibility (and Mao wrote self-criticism after the disaster), and while the party used to attest to the figure in the Dengist period, it's now closer to 3 million (demographic loss) under Xi.

TBH we need a libernazi propaganda plank, linking liberalism (properly) to genocides like the Bengal famine, Syrian and Iraqi devastation, North Korean bombing genocide, etc…

When claiming you support Biden gets you tomatoes thrown at you, we can declare victory, because we need to fight fire with fire and have historical untruth be used against your own historical untruth.

After all, social democracy is just the moderate wing of fascism.

>>2163792
This looks like my former stepdad

>>2163803
>Have animals ever produced a Kant or Hegel?
Kant and Hegel were animals, so yes.

File: 1743732887402-0.png (90.2 KB, 1504x515, 1839784931543940.png)

File: 1743732887402-1.png (713.06 KB, 1179x1539, 173848392234910.png)

File: 1743732887402-2.png (577.69 KB, 1179x520, 1859839594304599.png)

>>2204753
Are you retarded? Your understanding of family abolition can be dismissed with just a cursory glance of the manifesto. For starters, he does not discuss bourgeois "fetishization" of family- he discusses the bourgeois family itself, the organization of kinship relations in capitalist society. Yes, his analysis of this form does include a critique of inheritance, but he doesn’t start or end there. Both the Manifesto and Engel’s study On the Origin of the Family demonstrate that the bourgeois family is a structure of patriarchy which oppresses both women and children, placing them into a property relation with the man of the household at the forefront. This extends to a critique of marriage as binding a woman to her husband, as well as a critique of the “hallowed co-relation of parents and child” where the education and relationship given to the child begins and reinforces bourgeois social norms. Of course, modern liberal society has changed some of this, as now divorce has become more common place in the First World and social reforms have somewhat muddled the gender relations that previously defined the family. This does not change the fact that the communist movement’s end is the destruction of the legal, political, and socio-economic structures that define the organization of kin that we call the family. It is not just about inheritance, it is about social coercion and the reproduction of capitalist relations on the most microscopic level.

As for religion; again, you clearly have not done your reading. The *first* line to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, presumably where you get your reasoning from, states that *the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.* No one said anything about religion being ontologically evil or any other kind of moralistic drivel, it is just the simple fact that religion is an idealistic movement that decenters the real, the material, from man. Marx's materialist criticism of religion makes of it just like any other historical and societal form of alienation– the roots of which can be studied, and will gradually be done away with in the establishment of communism. That being said, none of this is an appraisal of anti-theistic violence (which was actually denounced in the writings of both Engels and Lenin), something which I doubt anyone could defend.

Probably something I posted larping (seriously) as an anarcho-egoist while heavily under the influence

File: 1743781652627.jpeg (231.79 KB, 1125x454, 1728579725412.jpeg)

>>2164157
For your collection

I once read here a dude that genuinily defend the idea of people should be illiterate and shouldn't be force to learn to read and write. Only here you find this type of beyond retarded contrarianism just because it goes against "liberal hegemony" or "rightoid mentlaity" no matter how retarded, stupid or downright evil it is.

Sandinista and Lenin hat anons insisting it was a "tactical retreat" literally a couple hours before HTS took Damascus and Assad was on his way to Russia lol

>>2163760
>What's the most insane, batshit crazy, mentally unhinged, downright psychotic, delusional, extremely stupid, just plain dumb and wrong, opinions and takes you ever read here?
anticampism

>>2163784
Im an ecologist and i believe that thing

>>2210041
sounds like something a Twitter anarchist could also say

>>2163760
Wanting millions proles dead so your favourite capitalist country can expand its imperialist sphere of influence.

>>2210147
>you should support a imperalist war done by particular elite that doesn't care about their people because is fighting another imperialist power that you don't like


Sound extremely retarded and downright cuckish

bump

>justifying the "dogs of Xiaoping" incident
>Lucanamarca massacre denialism

File: 1743975231807.jpg (603.1 KB, 2202x2202, benito-mussolini-orig.jpg)

>>2165764
>To think that socialism is when you do away with commodity production is to misunderstand Marxism, to be a utopian socialist, and ultimately to be counter revolutionary.

>>2209836
Thank you kind anon


>Flood detected post discarded
I should setup a google drive share for the boatload of shit I have

I am not joking

Not google drive but
https://use09.thegood.cloud/s/pDAGRo5JrYNP3sz
Password: e-sti-cAzz1

>>2212568
absolute shitter of a website but it's good enough

>>2212630
Some screens are old tho. Always check the date

>>2212650
Doctors can certainly be petty bourgeois and even bourgeois. The overworked primary care doc with 2000 patients slaving away in a clinic he doesn't even own is a prole - the ones who own a chain of medispas are not.

File: 1743988409084-0.png (94.81 KB, 1040x628, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1743988409084-1.png (57.65 KB, 1807x270, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1743988409084-2.png (53.73 KB, 1749x232, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2212674
https://www.marxists.org/subject/economy/authors/pe/pe-ch15.htm
This distribution of the national income between the different classes of capitalist society can be depicted in the form of a diagram like this (the figures stand for milliards of dollars or marks, etc.):
>>2212741
>The overworked frontline grunt with 20 deployments, slaving away in wars he doesn’t even profit from, is a prole—the ones who own private mercenary firms are not.
petite-bourgeois political economiKKK deviation. false proletarianization theory. you fail to grasp the material laws of value production and distribution in capitalist society.

>>2212768
>unproductive labor
>none of the examples are unproductive
the fact that you separate rent from constant capital is a dog whistle but randomly throwing "interest" in the mix makes it too obvious. I mean, you posting from tor for a reason: mods refuse to do their job. more importantly, why are you even allowed to upload images from tor?

is everyone here mentally retarded?

>>2212781
>the fact that you separate rent from constant capital
>randomly throwing "interest" in the mix
>is everyone here mentally retarded?
right now it primarily you because you fail to grasp categories of surplus-value let alone basic marxist theory

>>2212781
mods dont let him gaslight you. he failed to demonstrate comprehension in even most basic marxist theory, let alone study theory i linked. he bad faith actor of petite-bourgeois economiKKK.

>>2212768
>comparing medicine to war profiteering
You are mentally ill.

File: 1744011292505-1.jpeg (33.46 KB, 600x600, 7cd.jpeg)


> Communist stock market

File: 1744012263950.png (116.38 KB, 1860x245, 12041240.png)

not here but you get the point

>>2213158
Yes yes, Chyna has to have interfaces to the global economy in order to drag it forward as according to the great helmsman Xi Jinping's master plan

>>2212401
nice

i was gonna say the dumbest thing ive ever heard on the entire internet is you saying that productivism is just brown fascism.

but also socialism IS when you do away with commodity production, the thing is the way you get rid of commodity production is by building the productive forces necessary for that to materially happen. you are also conflating communism as a end goal and communism as a real movement without distinguishing them. communism and socialism are interchangeable and used to refer to both the end goal and the process of achieving it.

>>2165840
>>2199832
imperialism is when the falling rate of profit under monopoly stagnation necessitates territorial expansion

I supported mao so hard he showed up at my door once and told me to stop it

Fresssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>2213518
the third-worldist to reactionary pipeline is real

>>2213519
They started as reactionaries who like communist aesthetics.

>>2213519
Accoring to the mods on matrix, the guy was posting
> "communism is not leftist"
> all jews are zionists
From a bunch of VPN IPs in other threads, so they nuked him

>>2213682
Fairly certain there's an attempt by rightoids to try and astroturf/cause trouble today judging by that and recent posts in the separatism thread (they're making a really poor attempt)

File: 1744058657219.png (805.87 KB, 720x897, mopping.png)


>>2213688
yeah i think the 'china has no bourgeoisie' guy is like that, but it could equally just be ultras trying to make their opposition seem silly

>>2213682
Absolute majority of jews are zionists tho
But most zionists are christians and just racist right-wingers in general


>>2214039
You can ask on matrix if you want

>>2213682
>> "communism is not leftist"
This is completely right. The left-right liberal shit does not apply to the real movement.

File: 1744663883792.png (48.15 KB, 515x359, 2025-04-14-22-45-12.png)

New material, extra fresh
>>>/leftypol/2223189

>>2223246
Hall of fame :)

File: 1744774173653.png (479.59 KB, 640x426, muh beauty of nature.png)

>>2163778
>>2163784
>>2163791
>>2163803
>>2197431
>>2210157
Nature should unironically be destroyed. Nature is full of pointless suffering that can all be prevented entirely by destroying nature and preventing future animals from being born into this hellscape.

https://benthams.substack.com/p/against-biodiversity

>In my view, the way to determine whether impacting the environment is good or not is pretty simple: you look at the impact it has on conscious beings—both humans and other animals. I don’t care intrinsically about biodiversity—I care about making lives better for individuals. Species do not have experiences, only individuals do. It is thus individuals that matter. If species A has wretched lives and gets replaced by species B who have much better lives, I think that’s an improvement.


>For example, there’s an organism called the new world screwworm that that lays magots in the flesh of their victims, causing almost incomprehensible amounts of agony as the maggots eat their way out from the inside. These worms also tend to live pretty short lives of intense suffering. So when we got rid of the new world screwworm in north America—ridding the continent of a miserable animal that reproduces by torturing other animals—I think that was a great thing! It’s possible it will turn out bad because of some weird ripple effects, but if things are as I’ve supposed, then it seems pretty great. In case you doubt my position, as you can see below, I’ve depicted it as the Chad and the alternative view as the crying angry person, so it’s very likely true.


>Lots of people don’t share this view. They think we should not intervene in nature even if intervening in nature would reduce suffering and increase well-being of animals in nature. They don’t care about how much individual animals suffer, so long as there is biodiversity—many different species—and a lush and productive environment.


>This has always struck me as an extremely strange view. Even if nature is a torment chamber for almost every being who ever lives, so long as there are many different types of beings, the view holds that all is well. I can at least sort of understand holding that biodiversity is one value among many to be preserved, but it seems completely bizarre to think that it’s the primary thing that matters about an ecosystem. If an ecosystem is “functioning” in the sense that energy is efficiently flowing across trophic layers, but this situation is very bad for almost every conscious being, why would this be a good thing? Why do we care about ecosystem health if it comes at the expense of almost everyone in the ecosystem? This would be like taking a measure of societal health that doesn’t include, even as a partial input, how well off the members of society are—but instead only cares about how diverse they are in their torment.


>There are two somewhat different versions of the view. The first holds that what matters is ecosystem health and biodiversity—how robust the ecosystem is. The second holds that humans just shouldn’t intervene in nature—that the ideal state of nature is one that we haven’t influenced. I think these are both extremely crazy.

Unironical gonzaloists make my wish i could punch through them through the screen.

Like uyghur, you're not a based MLM-gonzalo-thought fighter for the liberation of the peruvian proletariat. you're a larper and probably white.

You are so lucky we're never going to meet irl, cuz if that ever happens I'm going to beat shit out of you until beg me for mercy, faggot.

>>2214044
You are a retarded liberal. Communist China has no bourgeoisie. The exploiting class, as a class, has been eliminated. Read the Chinese Constitution.

>>2163760
Pol Pot defence is the worst take on a leader I have ever seen, as for philosophy non-accelerationist lolbertarians take the cake.

File: 1744776774365.png (320.41 KB, 726x626, ClipboardImage.png)


>nazis are historically progressive when they fight americans


>>2226380
Saw that one. Cryptopolyps are getting creative these days

File: 1745351871360-0.gif (1.42 MB, 220x141, komodo-dragon.gif)

File: 1745351871360-1.png (46.89 KB, 501x525, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2226093
I know you posted this as bait, but seriously why should I care about animals suffering? I find ecosystems fascinating. Their existence pleases me, thus they should continue existing.

>Russia is anti-imperialist
>China is not the future of socialism

>>2226093
This argument works just as well for carefully destroying the planet to ensure nothing ever lives again.
I guess i'm okay with that but still.

>>2226126
This take is the stupidest.

>>2249874
The socialist transformation of private ownership of the means of production has been completed, the system of exploitation of man by man abolished, and a socialist system established. In Communist China the exploiting class, as a class, has been eliminated.

>>2163760
gender is real and it exists

File: 1746129253137.png (17.84 KB, 521x115, 2025-05-01-00-02-16.png)

>>2249883
This thread doesn't even need screenshots anymore lmao

>>2249980
what is the soviet union circa 1922

>>2249986
mfs out here only know the nep from hyperdimension


People who post under the names Glownonymous and CPUSAnon have the stupidest takes.

File: 1746208508380.png (30.49 KB, 1317x218, ClipboardImage.png)

This is the most insane take I've ever seen here.

>>2163760
The stupid fucking liberal who ruined my revolutionary marxism platonism thread.

Uphold marxism-platonism!!!!

There's 2 posters in the /leftybritpol/ thread right now who are claiming that Black people are to blame for failure of communism in the USA, and that LGBT people can't be communists because by biological nature they are always liberals, and that anyone who disagrees with this stance is spreading idpol and NOT a socialist
Theyre also calling the Cuban and Vietnamese regimes liberal regimes for tolerating LGBT people. They demanded evidence of LGBT people being accepted in communist movements and then seethed and said it wasn't relevant when people mentioned trans fighters in the New People's Army.
Now currently they're seething about George Floyd of all things.

They've been banned for idpol before because they just constantly shit up the thread to call any tolerance of brown or gay people idpol, but they keep coming back to seethe again and again.
Ironically ID shit would be brought up far less if they weren't around to seethe.

In short, the state of the British general is just as awful as the state of irl British "communist" parties. Please fucking nuke our island.


>>2250873
You haven't been here long enough then.

Bump

>>2251176
ive been saying for ages its the worst thread on this board. mod should just put it out of its misery at this point

>>2214114
You are the minority with that conclusion, hazoid.

>>2285014
it's a leftcom position, not a hazite one, fucking animetard go back to siberia

>>2285014
Communism is the movement for workers' self-emancipation. “Leftism” today is often detached from labor, driven by moral outrage, academic theory, or online spectacle.


File: 1748504650898.png (2.07 MB, 2224x1668, IMG_0267.png)

>>2163760
Off the top of my head, I would say the most absurd takes include Hazite MAGAtards saying that “Trump is Anti-Imperialist”, LGBTQIA+ are “Petit Bourgeois”, Women should be Baby factories confined to the kitchen, and that the only “Real Proletarians” are White Settler Labor Aristocrat Factory Workers and Coal Miners, while every other Proletarian (ie. Any that are Black/New Afrikan, Chicano/Mestizo, First Nations/Native American, Women, LGBTQIA+, or Service Workers) is “Lumpen” (if not a U$ White Settler) or “Petit Bourgeois” (if a U$ White Settler who is a Women, LGBTQIA+, or Service Worker), Social Democrat Bernie Bros believing that a “Leftist” candidate will ever be allowed to win the Democratic nomination, let alone the U$ Presidency, along with the related denial of the fact that the Democrats are Controlled Opposition to the Dominant Republican Party and that their is no divide in the U$ Haute Bourgeoisie (they all have common interests and give money to both “sides” of the bourgeois Democracy kabuki theatre puppet show), Dengists who believe that China is still in the Socialist Mode of Production, despite having Private Companies, Stock Exchanges, and Billionaires (they are a One-Party Social Democracy with Marxist-Leninist aesthetics, that should still be Critically supported against U$ Imperialism, with the caveat that a Maoist faction will need to seize control of the CCP in order for China to return to the Socialist Mode of Production), anyone who rejects the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist principle of Self-Determination of all Oppressed Nations (including the Internal Colonies/Oppressed Nations of New Afrika, Aztlan, the First Nations, etc. inside the U$ Prison House of Nations, whose National Liberation should be the primary focus of U$ Communists) in their own SSR or ASSR of the future Global USSR (all the SSRs and SFSRs of the future Global USSR are shown in the map I posted), anyone who believes that their is any such thing as Organized Religion being a “Progressive Leftist force” (ie. “Liberation Theology”), and the related opposition to a Cultural Revolution to destroy all vestiges of the Reactionary Capitalist Superstructure (ie. Organized Religion, Patriarchy, Sexism, Bourgeois Femininity, Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Chauvinistic Bourgeois Nationalism, Revisionism, Bourgeois Liberal Individualism, etc.), anyone who rejects that Maoist PPW is the only viable form of Communist Revolution (including rejecting that it is currently viable in the Periphery/Semi-Periphery, with the ongoing Maoist PPWs in India, the Philippines, Turkey, and Peru, proving its viability in the Periphery/Semi-Periphery), anyone who supports Infantile Adventurist Anarchist False Flag “Propaganda of the Dead” Retardation, anyone who believes that a Communist Revolution (Maoist PPW) is currently viable in the current Material Conditions of the Imperial Core (it will only be viable once World War III breaks out and/or Liberal Bourgeois Democracy is irrevocably suspended), anyone who believes that a Global Communist Revolution (World Maoist PPW) can be successful without World War III escalating into a Global Nuclear War that will destroy the entire Global Capitalist-Imperialist System, and finally anyone who rejects the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the Highest Stage of Marxism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

File: 1748508225980.png (630.37 KB, 1013x1012, mahito.png)

>>2285018
>it's a leftcom position, not a hazite one
Hazoids are leftcoms switching occasionally into socpats with commie chic. Leftcom is an ironic moniker for pretend communists, who are in actuality as much to the right of actual communists just like Trotskyists, who pretend in the same way, are.
>>2285020
And communism is to the left of the social progressivism you hate and allude to as 'detached from labor, driven by moral outrage, academic theory, or online spectacle', all the while itself being a component of communism. If you oppose social progressivism, you will also oppose communism while maintaining appearances with bargain bin brown socialism and yellow socialism. How does it feel to be a fake red?

I know it's quite a letdown but nothing, nothing I have ever read on this board comes close to the unhinged, schizo crap that is the anti-German current I have been confronted IRL.

File: 1748549723290.png (70.65 KB, 919x284, ClipboardImage.png)


>>2287742
>Hazoids are leftcoms switching occasionally into socpats with commie chic.
No they're almost the same as regular MLs.

>>2287742
>Hazoids are leftcoms switching occasionally into socpats with commie chic
words mean things retard

>>2226093
I'm aware this is prob b&
While simultaneously enjoying the outdoors, I've developed a sort of revulsion for its inhabitants as of late. Like I wouldn't torture/harm animals myself, but the mass and incalculably extreme suffering caused by existence and the cycle of life in the animal kingdom is actually pretty fucking revolting, whether you look at things on a zoomed out level as a whole, or you get into the details, nature is genuinely harrowing.


Unique IPs: 110

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]