<i want to blow up nothingburger gang edition
>Following a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, that resulted in 26 fatalities, India has retaliated with 'Operation Sindoor', targeting nine terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied territories. This operation marks a significant escalation in the ongoing tensions between the two nations. Pakistan, in response, has heightened its emergency measures and reported shooting down two Indian jets, intensifying the military confrontation. International reactions and calls for peace are noted, amidst growing concerns over regional stability.
552 posts and 68 image replies omitted.>>2264095yes just like the slaves in the americas
they weren't africans kidnapped and sold into slavery, they were actually whites who got more exposure to the sun at the plantation so they looked "black"
>india shills are this retarded >>2264162And you are an absolute illiterate in ideology. do yourself a favor and read what fascism is from Marxists authors, like Rosental Iudin. fuck, even the trotkyite Tom Bottomore defines it well.
>>2264207pakistan closest partner is nato as picrel illustrates.
>>2264223>July 2017Out of curiosity I got some more recent numbers from OEC World. Not trying to argue with you one way or the other, just posting what I found.
1st pic is Pakistan's exports to
2nd pic is Pakistan's imports from
>>2264227and you are an absolute retard.
>>2264229I guess 13+6.7 is lower than 16.9, in shitlibery world.
>>2264064>If anything, India is fiddling with the US, and that's why the Bangladesh coup happened, and why Pakistan is being used to attack India.Then why do exactly what they want? Why go straight to war instead of offering joint anti-terror cooperation and intelligence? Take notes from Xinjiang, India and Pakistan both put in equal funding for houses and jobs in Kashmir, terrorism gone. China can help, will do it for free. 3 billion together vs CIA terrorists who wins?
>>2264101>wasGot an example from this century? Balance of power has changed.
>>2264125Oh I get it Pakistan did something bad 50 years ago so
Israe India has a right to defend itself from the unprovoked full scale Pakistani gov led terror invasion. Thats why the Pak military jets that did Pahalgam have the daesh flag?
>>2264382I doubt it. Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism and fascism is imperialism in decay. Neither state is at the highest stage and both are net exploited by international trade as sources of cheap labor and resources stuck in dependency. India is the aggressor and Pakistan doesn't have full control of its own territory, but that doesn't mean they get to bomb Indian civvies.
Its really not that complicated and manufacturing some kind of controversy doesn't work because anti-imperialists are aligned with anti-campists on this one. If some want to call India imperialist they would be using a wrong metric that also would apply to Russia and China.
If you want to get really technical then Ukraine Saudi and Taiwan are also not imperialist or fascist because they are underdeveloped comprador proxies that fuel international monopoly while their own internal economies are not dominated by monopoly, while Israel is an edge case that is still dependent. Its not just the existence of FDI that counts but the dominance of capital export in the economy and the net balance of inflow/outflow. Ireland, Monaco, Hong Kong, Switzerland etc are tax havens not imperialist.
Actually imperialist countries would be the US, UK, Germany, France, Sweden, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Austria, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea
>>2264339all your replies to me, a whole bunch of things I never said.
and then again, no disproving on who between the two is the worst, by a greater margin.
>>2264425>no disproving on who between the two is the worstneither is worst from an internationalist perspective, but if we have to pick one its india because they are the aggressor and because their military is aligned with their government, where pakistani intelligence and military are rogue actors.
to say pakistan is worse you have to prove the government is aligned with the rogue actors funding terrorism and also that they directed the attacks in pahalgam, which there is no evidence for. the bad actor here is CIA-ISI not pakistan as a nation, and indian nationalists calling for escalation that would perpetuate the cycle of violence instead of addressing its root in poverty
>>2264449I don't think that's a qualifier to make India bad. It would not have stained the USSR, for example, one bit, to nuke to smitherins that reactionary anti-communist shithole that is known as Pakistan in the 70/80s.
>>2264449>you have to prove the government is aligned with the rogue actors funding terrorismwell, no one asked the ties between their governments and the terrorists.
but, oh boy, you gonna love this recollection of different moments where Pakistan not only sponsored and gave a safe heaven for separatist terrorist, but they hid them, claimed they were killed, and only under extreme pressure did they took some action.
https://cnimyanmar.com:8443/index.php/english-edition/28857-exposed-pakistan-s-state-sponsored-terrorism-and-its-unrepentant-admissionsbut what's best it's self-confession:
>In a rare moment of honesty, Pakistan’s former Defence Minister admitted that Pakistan "supported terrorist groups for 30 years" and did "dirty work" for geopolitical gains. He remarked, “We have been doing this dirty work for the USA for about three decades and for the West, including Britain. That was a mistake and we suffered for that. If we had not joined the war against the Soviet Union and the war after 9/11, Pakistan’s track record was unimpeachable.”people is living in Pakistan are considered heroes by the Jordanian government as heroes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirwaiz_Umar_Farooqliterally a government that has co-sponsored Palestinian annihilation, where their head/chief of state is part of the british military, like Jordan, has been cucked as a proxy state. And Pakistan doesn't do shit, don't cut ties.
The evidence is there. you don't want to see it? fine by me, but the government involvement is too deep to deny it.
>>2264529>It would not have stained the USSR, for example, one bit, to nuke to smitherins that reactionary anti-communist shithole that is known as Pakistan in the 70/80s.To massacre 60 million workers? Theres a reason Stalin didn't nuke London and New York.
>In a rare moment of honesty, Pakistan’s former Defence Minister admitted that Pakistan "supported terrorist groups for 30 years"This is not evidence of the pahalgam attack. What happened 30 years ago is not today. This "confession" is not a confession of the attack but a declaration to move away from US influence.
>considered heroes by the Jordanian governmentanother 50 year old conflict
>The evidence is there. you don't want to see it? >the government involvement is too deep to deny itrogue elements in the government that are still influenced by the CIA is evidence of American meddling not the will of the Pakistani nation or even of Pakistan bourgeoisie who want Pakistan to develop. Its a minority of warlord and intelligence types who want Pakistan to remain destitute because it benefits them financially. This is akin to mafia corruption not evidence of state policy.
All this just reminds me of people spamming the Putin Pinochet essay without understanding that the geopolitical situation of Russia has changed over the decades. Pakistan today is not Pakistan of the 1970s. 'Funding' LeT in the 90s by transferring American money to them is not evidence that they are funding LeT today or that the terror attacks are directed by the Pak gov. This is equally as retarded as blaming failed states Afghanistan and Iraq for 9/11 because the Americans destroyed their country. You want to condemn Venezuela and Brazil for eternity too because they used to be dictatorships half a century ago? Really just sounds like unhinged racism as if you think Islam is an inherently terroristic culture incapable of change. If you want to blame someone blame America. Maybe India should be a good neighbor and support Pakistan moving out of US orbit. If they want terror to stop address the source not the symptom
>>2264433poo poo pee pee
↑ these are the kind of replies you make
Unique IPs: 21