[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1747495914756.jpeg (27.02 KB, 739x415, IMG_2262.jpeg)

 

I actually never watch anything related to him and I watch African news all the time. I swear, the moment I heard about the guy entering Moscow for a security meeting, the sheer number of articles related to this guy skyrocketed. Guys treated like he’s the second coming of Christ even if his army visibly sucks.
518 posts and 72 image replies omitted.

Ibrahim "The BBC kang in red beret" Traore, right hand mand of Burkina "The BBC" Faso. He earned his red beret by the trials of spetsnaz

>>2272783
Why zionist specifically? What does this have to do with Israel?

>>2293768
we use words here anon

I like him but what's up with all the AI slop about Traore out there? Where's it coming from?

Traore is cutting the price on medicine.

>>2294159
A few big african creators made actual videos on him and he's already very popular both continent wide and in diaspora so probably a large part of it is just youtube AI outfits out of india pumping out content that's related to what's doing well.
The nature of YT and AI is also that it's more profitable to smash out the same thing or with minor variations thousands of times than just once.
>>2294162
>Traore is cutting the price on medicine.
Thanks but that wasn't a very useful post anon, could you not have shared a article or link?
Access to essential generic medicines: Minister Kargougou announces reduction in public sale prices
The Minister of Health, Dr. Robert Kargougou, held a press conference on Monday, May 26, 2025, on the reduction in the prices of essential generic medicines. This measure applies to both public health facilities and approved private structures.

According to Minister Kargougou, these measures are in line with the vision of His Excellency, Captain Ibrahim Traoré, which is to guarantee the availability and financial accessibility of essential health products for all populations wherever they are.

During his opening statement, the Minister of Health presented the background, the process for adopting the joint decrees, and the main innovations in the measures. He notably announced the reduction in markups applied to essential generic medicines and medical consumables in public and contracted healthcare facilities.

Minister Kargougou also indicated that price reductions vary depending on the product category.

He also stated that special efforts have been made on certain strategic products, including antivenom serum, meningococcal vaccine and rabies vaccine, with a reduction. These reductions also affect vaccines administered to travelers, particularly during the pilgrimage to Mecca.

The reduction in the prices of the ACWY-135 meningococcal and yellow fever vaccines, estimated at around 241 million CFA francs per year, represents a contribution by CAMEG to the provision of healthcare to the population.

As a reminder, this initiative aims to improve citizens' financial accessibility to health products, in line with the authorities' commitment to strengthening health coverage and alleviating household expenses in a difficult economic context.
https://www.sante.gov.bf/detail?tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=1038&cHash=d304aade289c43b422c63ef3b41d0a69
also: https://fr.apanews.net/news/le-burkina-annonce-une-baisse-des-prix-des-medicaments-essentiels/

>>2294206
Among the measures announced by the minister, a reduction in commercial margins has been introduced.
District distribution depots saw their margins drop from 7.5% to 6%, while those applied in public health facilities fell from 30% to 25%.

Price-wise, the reductions range from up to 46% on tablets; 55% on injectable forms; between 1% and 20% on syrups and up to 25% for other pharmaceutical forms.
Vaccines and serums are also experiencing reductions. Antivenom serum has dropped drastically from 21,833 CFA francs to 2,000 CFA francs, a reduction of 90.84%. The yellow fever vaccine has seen a 15% reduction. The ACYW-135 meningococcal vaccine has seen a 16.62% reduction, and the rabies vaccine has seen a 72.14% reduction.

The reduction measure also comes at a time when the Central Purchasing Agency for Essential Generic Medicines (CAMEG), which became a state-owned company in March 2024, has stepped up its efforts to improve the availability of pharmaceutical products.

>>2272299
Old man is mad because old and dying. Very sad. Skibidi Toilet dubset no cap' bussin.
>t. 25 year old old man zoomer.

>>2295202
Please speak like an adult or shut the fuck up.

skibidi socialism

Why don't you skibidi get a job?

>>2295542
>Dying old man
>>2295550
Based
>>2295553
Dying old man who really hates his job.


File: 1748982119604.jpg (5.75 KB, 260x194, images.jpg)

Reading some essays by the Nigerien historian and political scientist Rahmane Idrissa. He's critical of both French neo-colonialism and the juntas, but has some interesting analysis on why and how they took power. I think most people talking about the Sahelian juntas don't know what they're talking about. BTW the coups were genuinely popular and reflect longstanding and traditional elements of Sahelian political culture, and they owe to the failure of the preceding regimes which were hardly better, but he thinks the popular enthusiasm has already faded and the shared ideology which is now sustaining them is rather delusional. I might go through several of his essays and post some notes.

>>2296374
Please do, I want to read something that isn’t pure multipolarist glazing or neoconservative condemnation

>>2284841
anti colonial national liberation should under no circumstances be falsely equated with imperialist chauvinism. Read the works of comrade Vo Nguyen Giap.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/giap/index.htm

Especially this one

https://www.marxists.org/archive/giap/works/1975/to-arm-the-revolutionary-masses/ch01.htm

Quote
>It was at a time when capitalism was passing into the stage of imperialism that Lenin set forth his famous new thesis that socialism cannot be simultaneously successful in all countries but it will first succeed in one or a certain number of countries. At the same time, with the new theory on the leadership of the proletariat in the bourgeois democratic revolution and the transition from this revolution to the proletarian revolution, Lenin and the Russian Bolshevik Party worked out the military programme of the bourgeois democratic revolution and the socialist revolution in Russia. Lenin underlined the necessity of building up the military organization of the proletariat in the new historical conditions:

Another
>Only with the birth of Marxism and the appearance of the political parties of the proletariat, which became an independent political force passing from the stage of “spontaneity” to that of “consciousness” and bringing a qualitative leap forward to the whole of the proletariat’s revolutionary struggle — only on that basis could the problem of the military organization of the exploited masses be completely solved in the military science of the proletariat. The appearance of political parties of the working class — Communist parties — on the political arena and their leading role in the revolution in various countries led to the birth of armed formations of a marked revolutionary and popular nature, born within proletarian revolution or bourgeois democratic, people’s democratic or national liberation revolutions led by the working class. Especially, since the success of the Russian October Revolution and of the revolutions in a series of other socialist countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America, there has appeared for the first time in the world a completely new type of armed forces. These are the real armed forces of the people, of the State of proletarian dictatorship — the most progressive State in the history of mankind.

>>2296430
>please give me centrism!!!!

>>2296430
His Substack is here (in French):
https://rahmane.substack.com/

His essays are very complex and attempting to sum them up will probably over-simplify things. But I'm going to break down some of the themes into categories. Here's the first part.

<Pre-Colonial structures in Sahelian societies

This is nothing extraordinary about this. The pre-colonial structures in the Sahel were similar to ancien regimes in Europe (which had aristocracies, the clergy, and the merchant bourgeoisie). There were communities variously described as "acephalous political communities" and also canton-states, which were similar to European lordships. In the latter, there was a military aristocracy, a college of priests and/or Muslim holy men, and a community of merchants (mostly organized in lineages). The head of state was occupied by the chief of the military aristocracy.

French colonization only partially changed this. The French continued to treat the people of the Sahel as subjects, not citizens, but it did introduce a civilian political elite which didn't exist before. As a result, the political history of the Sahel since then has been a conflict between these two elites: civilian and military. The civilian elite relies on the norms inherited from the French metropole. (It's common for civilian elites to urge the military to act in a "republican" way.) But there is, in fact, something endogenous to military power in the Sahel and it benefits from a longer historical memory.

<It's not a question of "if" there's going to be a coup, but when – a matter of statistical probability.

It's not a surprise when a coup happens. In Niger, there have been five coups in the past few decades, so this is not a break from the past. There have been at least 10 documented coups or coup attemps in Burkina Faso since the 1960s. That's also true for the generals and colonels currently in charge of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Traore there is in charge because he overthrew the last military officer who came to power in a coup eight months prior. It's probably only a matter of time before Traore also gets ousted by his own military. But that leads to another interesting thing about this.

<Coups are popular, and these coups were.

Idrissa calls them (literally translated from French into English) "democratic police operations." The reality is that the civil elites were themselves quite authoritarian in their attitudes too and also incompetent, partisan, and ludicrously corrupt – while also failing to resolve the serious problems, namely the security problem posed by unrelenting jihadi violence. The heads of state (more so in Mali and Niger) were unwilling and not able to be subject to impeachment, so it falls on the army to make "the last argument of the people." The military directly intervening in politics is frightening, and the soldiers will stomp you to death or throw you in prison if you oppose them, and it's a form of rule based on command. But there are popular tendencies in the Sahel that are quite favorable to this, and popular euphoria occurs in tandem with military coups.

It's banal, but it's common to see bus and taxi drivers decorate their vehicles with images of famous military leaders. He doesn't think this kind of thing has to do with French colonialism but their traditions from their ancien regimes. And, as a matter of fact, the military doesn't move unless there's popular discontent. It's baffling to Western observers to see the "popularity" of the putsches, but that's because they literally are POPULAR putsches, responding to the wishes of the population. The fact is they've never really made a revolution that established a civil state like France did which seperated the military from politics.

<The overthrow of Gaddafi

This had a big effect and he's extremely negative about the role of the West in Libya. There's a long history as well here, and there were armed Tuareg groups who were chilling in Libya who then moved south, and there are lots of weapons that flooded into the Sahel from Gaddafi's stockpiles. Idrissa also saw Gaddafi as having a stabilizing role in the Sahel (in part by restraining the Tuaregs and funding Sufi Islam to check the radical Salafist jihadists), and was seen by Africans generally as a rare African leader who put his money where his mouth is in promoting the African cause. Nothing predisposed Africans to support Putin against NATO more than NATO precipitating the fall and murder of Gaddafi.

>>2296740
<The popular sentiment that the Sahelian juntas tapped into is a complex mixture of different sentiments from different people with different backgrounds. The hotpot of ideologies can be summed up as "sovereigntism."
This is includes 21st-century Pan-Africans, religious Muslims, Christians, and "traditionalists." And also what Idrissa calls "culturalists" which is a very small minority; i.e. Kemites, who are a strange Hotep-like cult movement which traces their descent to ancient Egypt. There are also people like Kemi Seba (he's also a Duginist) who he describes as a fascist. There are also anti-imperialist and left-nationalist intellectuals who dream of a war between Russia and the West, in which Russia destroys the West, and that will free Africa. It's like that multipolar stuff you see on this website all the time.

A related tendency is Afro-Pessimism. This really emerged in the 80s/90s and defines Africa through its historical abjection, slavery, colonialism, and the tragic consequences. "Africa is therefore a universe devastated by the hatred and greed of the world, and if the modern world is by definition hostile to Africanness, the only conceivable solution is secession from the modern world." This is like a secular equivalent of Salafism.

This doesn't mean that Francophone Africans don't have legitimate and objective grievances with France. "But sovereignists also and above all have subjective grievances, which date back at least to 1492, if not further." These subjective grievances can't be satisfied and don't lend themselves to solutions. It's basically a negative ideology, and the attraction to Russia (like in other parts of the world, including some populist rightists in the West) is more because they identify Russia as having the same enemy. People like Nigel Farage, Eric Zemmour, and Tucker Carlson also depict their countries as victims of colonization except it's through immigration. There's not a huge difference between the crowds that came out to cheer these juntas and the J6ers in Washington.

<This kind of thiking is distinct from Marxism-Leninism of the 1960s

Idrissa contrasts this "bubble" (more on this later) with a progressive project in the Sahel in the 1960s. This is complicated, but to start with, there are two competing tendencies in the Sahel, which he refers to as "self-critics" and "victims." In a Sahelian context, the "self-critics" are on the left, and the "victims" are on the right. But this is not apparent in the West, because the left is fighting their own right, which has racist and chauvinist views towards Africa, and the Western left is highly sympathetic to people who were colonized. The Western left therefore is not keen to criticize Africans because (a) they don't know much about Africa and (b) they don't want to lend ammunition to the right in their own societies and what they say about Africans. But it's not at all the case that the people who espouse this "victim" ideology which blames the West for Africa's problems are progressive in their own context.

However, in the 1960s, these tendencies were combined. There was both a real attempt in the Sahel by a coalition of trade unionists, feminists, peasants, etc. to decolonize and self-critique their own regressive legacies (feudalism, obscurantism, etc.) of the "archaic and backward" past from the point of view of societal progress through single-party states operating under the principle of democratic centralism. But this began to recede in the 1970s. Thomas Sankara was the last attempt to revive it, but he was not successful. So this basically reactionary and conservative-identitarian "victim" ideology (stemming from Afro-Pessimism) emerged out of complicated mixture of that collapse, the limited empathy of the West towards Africa, feelings of humiliation, and a real decline in development, punctuated by racist stuff said about Africans from French politicians like Nicolas Sarkozy.

But under these juntas, practically everyone who Idrissa identifies as part of the self-critical tendency (which I'm assuming includes himself as well) has been exiled, imprisoned, or forced into strict and complete self-censorship. While those on the "victim" team have fgound a regime they needed, one that basically sees itself in a constant war.

<A lot of this is a self-contradictory ideological delusion

Idrissa notes that the anti-French sentiment as it's expressed by these people doesn't actually make a lot of sense if you think about it. It borders on the toxic and stupid at worst. It's quite common for example for Sahelians to claim that France is behind the jihadists who are destroying these countries, but the same people accuse France of betraying them for also saying "fuck it" and pulling out of the Sahel when they kicked them out (although the French were very offended at first). For one, all of these military officers were trained by the French army anyways, and they were also fighting the same jihadists as the French before they kicked out the French. But when French troops there were fighting the jihadists, it was a widespread belief among people that the French were only there to distribute weapons to the jihadists. This is not based on fact, but feelings, and that cannot be contradicted by facts.

But think about it from the perspective of an ordinary guy. Shit sucks. There's really murderous jihadi violence, and now there are French troops everywhere and they're rolling around in armored vehicles, shooting at people, and getting directly involved in conflicts between the locals. So what that guy understands is that the situation is unbearable, and the French – objectively speaking too – are not actually defeating the jihadists. But in the mind of that guy, he wonders, why haven't they? And that guy has a smartphone which is connected to the internet. And that's an opportunity for populists and political "speculators" to tell him ~stories~ about how the French are actually in cahoots with the jihadists as part of a conspiracy so the French can take over the country, so the solution is to get rid of the French. This comes from a social atmosphere of negative emotions: fear, resentment, distrust, and in some cases hatred. Built on the trauma and shock of what NATO – including France – did to Gaddafi.

This is not totally crazy BTW. Anti-French sentiment is quite longstanding in the Sahel, stemming quite naturally from colonial domination, French support for various coups in the decades following that, the role of French mercenaries, and the ongoing (before the coups) French military presence in the Sahel which people took to be an imposition. You can sum that up as a neocolonial framework known as "Françafrique" which aims to protect the strategic interests of France, and which in turns has constructed an image in the minds of people of a diabolical French hyperpower and the resulting hatred.

The catch is that the French are no longer a running concern here. The French have stopped giving a fuck about the Sahel. It's only Africans who haven't realized this yet. They still treat France as a devil that's responsible for all their problems. It sounds like Russiagate stuff but in the Sahel. France (and the West in particular, but especially France) is apparently behind everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) bad, but the Sahelians can just say "fuck you" to France, and France apparently can't do anything about it. France is both all-powerful and weak and the West is in decline, right? That's a contradictory ideology. But it did unite (for different reasons) people with different ideologies.

>"These beliefs are ideological. Among other things, this amounts to saying that there is nothing Westerners can do to change people's opinions. Even if they completely withdrew from the field, they would still be perceived as pulling the strings by any African who dared not follow the ideological directive. This directive is simple. It is a story that Africans tell themselves, in which the roles are distributed once and for all: Westerners (especially the French in the Sahel) are the bad guys, Africans are the good guys and the victims, and the struggle between the two has no end, unless perhaps the Russians manage to completely destroy the West."


The Western left doesn't get this because they feel solidarity and compassion for Africans, but for humanist reasons, while the feelings of these Africans are nationalist, and some are actually on the left, but others are actually on the right.

That leads to one more thing.

File: 1748994400925.jpg (115.66 KB, 686x386, hq720.jpg)

>>2296749
<This is an unsustainable bubble and it's probably going to implode
The juntas coming to power and kicking the French out is like a self-deflating balloon. Idrissa likens it to a Greek tragedy. At first, there's a trigger (which in this case is the widespread craze for security), followed by the sudden rise of hubris, and then a catastrophe. This is what's happening in the Sahel. The juntas did not change reality, but people's perception of reality.

The hubris part of the bubble occurred after the coup. This is marked by "an intense feeling of power with the conviction of being right on all counts, even though those who observe him coldly from the outside measure all his weakness and all his unreason, without however their voice tinged with pity and astonishment being able to touch him. When it is collective, it manifests itself in a public euphoria swollen with absurd vanity."

But what actually happened? Western ambassadors were being bombarded by insults. These governments ordered their military contingents to skedaddle. "Rahhhh!" Down with the occupier! And what did they do? They packed up their shit and left. Military dictatorships in Africa? Oh mah gerd we're shocked at this sudden turn of events. You don't want humanitarian aid because it's part of a conspiracy to destroy your country and we're smuggling weapons to rebels in the aid trucks? Fine. We've canceled it. You deal with it. The Americans even more than the French really don't care. (The Americans care more about Libya.) The Western governments basically did… nothing. Other than the French getting mildly offended. But they're not really shocked by manifestations of anti-French sentiment in their former colonial possessions.

And the security situation hasn't gotten better. It might have become worse. It's not like the French were solving it either.

That's when the bubble started bursting. And now it has completely burst. And among significant numbers of people, a sense of stupefaction has set in. There is talk of "resignation mode" or "let's just go." These countries are now ruled by a militaryt faction and all of those satisfied by the "victim" tendency along with various grifters, and the rest of the population has fallen back into a state of being mere "subjects" to the boots. And unfortunately for them, if it was possible to agitate against civilian leaders (as worthless as they were), that is now impossible, because these juntas resort to brute force against anyone who opposes them.

Idrissa concludes in one essay:

>In this perspective, it is not surprising that when the military finally wanted to consolidate their power, they themselves burst the bubble. Francophone intellectuals, whether they called themselves progressive, revolutionary, pan-African, or otherwise, were more or less brutally marginalized, because they are part of the civilian elite, exogenous to the old Sahelian elite system and, above all, capable, if given free rein, of resuming demands and criticisms based on the norms of the civil state. Those among them who did not submit were attacked as "stateless persons," agents of France and abroad; those who did submit were nevertheless humiliated and reduced to the state of lemons to be squeezed and thrown away, like the prime ministers of Mali and Burkina Faso. On the other hand, close ties were established with religious figures (including Christians), who encourage the population to be patient and submissive.


[…]

>No one will help the Sahelians regain their lost freedom. Westerners pretend to believe they want to have this military boot on their backs, and besides, they never really believed that the Sahelians were capable of democracy; ECOWAS is now nothing more than a figment of the imagination: it was truly defeated, mainly because it refused to fight. Today, dangers are emerging that will undermine it. The president of Guinea-Bissau expelled his delegation, which wanted to persuade him not to run for an unconstitutional third term—and he has moved closer to Putin, the patron saint of dictators. In Togo, Minister Dussey, who poses on his website as a Pan-African victim (he recently launched an anti-Western speech in which he says he is "tired" of having things imposed on him by the West, in a Togo that the said West has nevertheless left to simmer in peace in its Neronian dictatorship), wants to join the club of Sahel juntas - with, as a key, the provision of the port of LomĂ©; whetted by the same lucrative deal, Mahama, the new democratically elected president of Ghana, is courting the juntas, no doubt with the possible benefits for the ports of Accra and TĂ©ma in mind - this, in a country where a frustrated youth admires "President IB" (the dictator of Burkina) and tells itself golden stories about the military despot Jerry Rawlings.


>But that's not the end of the story. Despite their fear of the beret and the legacies of history, Sahelians have risen up against military power on several occasions, at least in Burkina Faso and Mali; and even among the military, there are "civilians," or more precisely, republicans, who remain silent or sometimes—especially in Burkina—are "purged." The discourse is changing, to the point that even the seemingly hated France is regaining sympathy. This kind of thing always heralds a shift in opinions and attitudes. If juntas don't adapt by changing course in time, a dangerous convergence could occur between increasingly expressive popular anger and the increased risks of a republican coup. After all, in the Sahel, there is never a coup without a prior stirring of public opinion—which explains a phenomenon that always astonishes foreign observers: the "popularity" of these putsches. This is because they are literally popular putsches, that is, responding to the wishes of the population; and when they are not, the population makes it known, as happened to Gilbert DiendiĂ©rĂ© in 2015. If the Republican military are currently keeping their heads down, it is because the population has not yet shown the necessary degree of discontent and anger. It is still in resignation mode: but it would be a mistake to believe that it will be there forever.

>>2296749
>>2296751
Not reading your retarded NATO cope. Nato funds jihdaists all the time the new leaser of Syria is from Al Qaeda and ISIS. The "juntas" were 100% correct to kick out the French. The western powers love blowing up secular states and replacing them with retarded islamists.

>>2296374
>Rahmane Idrissa.
>An American who got his degree from the University of Florida (LMAO) knows what's best for Africa
Kill yourself NOW

The hope is that the Sahel Confederation is the fetus of an actual Pan African government that could theoretically struggle toward socialism

>>2296762
I'm not going to argue with you about this. The objective events in reality are just going to play themselves out.

BTW, there's one more thing. To expect all of this great stuff to happen, you have to assume that these jumped-up paratroopers are capable of solving the underlying problems. I don't hold military men in such high regard. But people are being told that their problems have the origins in various external conspiracies.

>>2296767
He's not American and he has other essays written during the invasion of Iraq comparing the United States to Nazi Germany.

>>2296374
>>2296740
>>2296749
>>2296751
>>2296788
>>2296809
Before anyone takes any of these posts seriously, just know Gay Nazi is an actual fascist who is on record as an anti-communist and you can link many of his pictures he uses on /leftypol/ to fascist posts on 4chan's /k/ (same filename and writing style)

>>2296857
>actual fascist
been wondering why the fuck does he posts here

Keep making the lassaleans seethe gay nazi I love your posts

>>2296858
Fascism is a matter of everyday life. This nastiness can happen to any nation, almost no one is immune from it. The only question is how the sick people themselves treat this chronic illness of humanity.

>>2296871
that's nice sweaty. get up against the wall with your hands behind your head now
*blamblamblam*

>>2296870
>Ultras siding with fascists to make MLs mad
where have I seen this one lol

>>2296962
they're more honest than you

>>2296857
do you have a response to his points or are you just gonna sit there and spout some shit with no evidence

>>2296988
If this were real life I'd propose that we hang the gay nazi from the nearest tree, and then have a normal person repeat exactly his words, so that we can evaluate them without bias clouding our judgement.

>>2297008
he doesn't need to die but would you kindly refute his argument

>>2297009
which part is the argument he just pasted some guys blog that pretends like the fact that france funds terrorism for capital interests in target countries is some kind of unhinged conspiracy theory. yes the ongoing problems in previously french colonies are still frances fault. centuries of imperial legacy dont evaporate overnight

hes basically saying africans are too stupid to govern themselves in the typical sly insidious plausibly deniable way he downplays about every progressive movement. tbh the argument was already addressed and his response was "im not gonna argue about it"

>>2296740
>>2296749
>>2296751
thanks for sharing
i'm also a thirdie and i can relate to western leftists ignoring the internal dynamics of thirdie countries and automatically supporting whoever appears to be anti-west

WAKE ME UP WHEN IBRAHIM TRAORE LIBERATES PALESTINE

>>2297027
you made up more shit again? sick

>>2297043
im nta and im referring to his posts on the board, unless you think nato funding terrorism is "making shit up"

>>2297028
>>2296751
What has Ibrahim Traore done for Palestine?

>>2297028
me when i go and lie on the internet

File: 1749182687453-0.jpg (256.9 KB, 687x1024, cornman.jpg)

File: 1749182687453-1.png (1.61 MB, 1200x696, ClipboardImage.png)

Traore learning from cornman

Good video by a popular normie South African news guy on Traoré: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKy3tDoFYhY
<Ibrahim Traore: Africa's most important leader? (Deep dive)

>>2299785
>tomatoman
Let's see if he can imperialize Italy.

bumping the old one to prove a point to the second OP who's playing dumb

File: 1749714232584.png (2.09 MB, 1200x696, ClipboardImage.png)

because he's the best leader of Burkina Faso since Sankara

>>2314804
I'm not a Muslim from Xinjiang

>>2314802
This is an issue jannies could stop easily just by banning the kids who come here to obsessively slide instead of coddling them every time their threads get 5+ replies.

>>2314810
i know. it's funny how the reactoid's first instinct is to accuse someone of having dark skin


Unique IPs: 30

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]