I actually never watch anything related to him and I watch African news all the time. I swear, the moment I heard about the guy entering Moscow for a security meeting, the sheer number of articles related to this guy skyrocketed. Guys treated like he’s the second coming of Christ even if his army visibly sucks.
465 posts and 65 image replies omitted.>>2287139Lmao I’m saying Marx was clearly wrong about race and nation because the entire thread is essentially arguing this lmao
MLoids should stop being belligerent idpol obsessed retards if they don’t want people to use their own explicit defenses for capitalism against them
>>2287096we focus on marx because he wrote the book on how to use rhetoric for tricking people into giving power to fascists. if every communism just results in another authoritarian state then we must conclude that is its purpose and oppose it at every turn. liberals at least let us vote to get rid of the state its just a matter of convincing everyone we are right
>>2287104>Most of this board deserves deathwow anon dont lower yourself to the level of the commies. just because they are violent and dont respect the democratic process doesn't mean we have to be
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) >>2287264im just tired of this
>marx didn't support>oh he did?>marx was wrong>communism is overultras need to keep marx and lenin out of their mouths and say what they really mean from the beginning instead of this cowardly circle jerk bullshit. first we get people who think lenin was a revisionist but still misusing his theory of imperialism to shit on leninists despite thinking lenin was wrong in the first place. now that people quote marx over lenin they are doing it with marx and pretending like quoting him is an appeal to his authority rather then an example of his theoretical method applied in practice.
its like they dont even know anarchism exists so they adopt the most obscure cultist sect of "marxism" they can find
>>2287125Where?
>>2287123You are first of all supposed to stop evading the simple question. But really it doesn't matter what you do, as you well know.
>>2287714I answered your bad faith question by recognizing it for the radlib nonsense it is, the only person that cares about race here is you
A more deserving response to your question would be to slam a brick in your face, but obviously I can’t see you physically
>>2287789I think you are quite confused if you are not just trying to get on my nerves at this stage.
The question was precisely what you do materially, physically, in reality that makes you communist whatsoever.
I already know you don't speak or read german, that was a response to the deflection about Hitler and such nonsense you people "bring to the discussion"
>>2287065>"everything is the same and nothing that is not outerly presented as a communist event is good"This doesn't deserve so much as a response. Which I will make nonetheless here but only once (more). In the end it turned out way too long now that I got started on this line of thinking, this response to say "don't respond" but, oh well, I can maybe recycle it later.
It brings to mind the guy ("libertarian" "socialism" tendeny) that told Parenti "I don't care about the children that get fed by the revolution".
The correct response isn't even outrage but just ignoring them totally. If you are not interacting with reality as is, you are not relevant, you are not engaged in politics, by definition and by design.
Your main characteristic isn't "being communist" but arrogance, indifference and a general detachment from reality. "I don't care about poverty or reality in general even" is something that can only come from someone that is doing too well. I don't wanna be racist here but I'm gonna be. It's a particular mix of arrogance and ignorance that can only persist in a certain kind of lifestyle. And really what are you communicating. It's like entering a discussion just to announce "I don't care about that". Okay and why should we care that you don't care? The most natural action would be to leave, exit the discussion but they have something that keeps them from doing that persistently. I am unsure as to what really but it's ostensibly a need to not have the idea of communism tarnished by any association with the real world or something to that effect.
This shit was cute
when you were in your 20s when the US wasn't ramping up the war propaganda and we weren't outwardly and obviously in a cold war.
but
now you're pushing 30 now even the dimmest guy should see what the hell's up.
I am forced into agreement here with the anarchist/libertarian pope. It's better to have a world-view, (one that has some connection to what happens in reality, this world we live in) even if it happens to be a false one.
https://thetricontinental.org/newsletterissue/hunger-poverty-inequality/Anyway, Tricontinental's newsletter mentions Burkina Faso.
>>2287834> If you are not interacting with reality as is, you are not relevant, you are not engaged in politics, by definition and by design.<'s better to have a world-view, (one that has some connection to what happens in reality, this world we live in) even if it happens to be a false one.You are so close, anon, just take the 'politics are what you physically and materially do, not what you profess to believe'-Pill.
>Anyway, Tricontinental's newsletter mentions Burkina Faso.Thanks.
>>2287842That was (partly) the point.
>>2287293It's fighting Stalin with Lenin and fighting Lenin with Marx. Yes, there is nothing genuine about it. It's pure anti-communism.
>>2287834I don't know btw why I wrote US there. It's the whole of the west with the EU trying to invest trillions of euros they don't have in armaments while the US is doing business as usual, notwithstanding some bluster.
Unique IPs: 18