Are they earnestly developing socialism, or have they become so compromised that it's really just a future of the people's sweatshops until the US is crushed and the Vietnamese bourgeoisie is properly overthrown and oppressed?
68 posts and 14 image replies omitted.>>2361180The discourse surrounding Vietnam here is quite
interesting, especially after China and Vietnam signed the joint statement almost 2 years ago. It's looking more and more like Vietnam isn't going to be the Ukraine of Asia after all. Wonder how long before the GFVN and FULRO is taken out of cryo-stasis under Langley and we're all told them in the name of True Socialism.
>>2362149Asking people what they want to do IRL does not mean I believe words on imageboards matter. In fact it is evdience to the contrary.
>cryinganyone can make this characterization about any post. it is so lazy. actually you're the one crying and I am just stoically stating facts. (See how easy it is to stoop to this kind of rhetoric?)
>And saying you’re aiding in manufacturing consent for US invasion of ChinaNot precisely what I said. Let's revisit the full sentence in its context:
>>2361632>At best it is just whining, at worst you will be helping your capitalist government manufacture consent for warSo I am saying when people come here and say "self-described AES nations aren't really socialist" I am saying that they are whining. But if they do it in real life with a prominent platform they are manufacturing consent. So I already had built into the statement the criticism that came afterwards:
>>2361856>This would be valid if any of us went on somewhere like CNN or NYT or MSNBC, etc. not fucking leftypol lmaoThe person who said this thought I hadn't already considered that because of their uncareful reading.
and recall that I was trying to generalize this point to OP's question and wasn't even talking about china specifically. it was the misinterpreters of my initial post here
>>2361213 who made it about china and dengism without reading even though that subject was not even mentioned. Then they had the nerve to say zigger go die in a trench for putin even though that was not brought up either. There is a consistent overreactive anticipation on the part of my responders ITT: They're expecting a certain type of person to show up, and that type of person does exist but I am not them. I am making a significantly more nuanced points that has already included the critiques that my responders subsequently made without reading. Meanwhile my responders are responding to things I never said expecting I will say them when I have already said things to the contrary. Then they have the nerve to call me a debate addict while trying to perform epic owns of a position I don't have for an audience that isn't watching.
>>2362544Lel I remember when leftcoms were claiming that China was doing imperialism against Vietnamese rocks in the South China Sea just a couple of months ago.
Now Vietnam is suddenly twice as bad as China KEK
The CPV never said they reached socialism. It’s basically a red socdem country.
>>2361577To Lam is a goddamn idiot.
>>2362943Vietnam is Communist regime. cope and seethe, social democrat neoliberal.
>>2363695Wrong. Vietnam has reached socialism. Vietnam has socialist market economy. Read 2021 Political Report of the 13th National Congress of the Communist Party. You are a goddamn idiot social democrat.
>>2364304The CCP sided with US foreign policy against the USSR. Chinese imperialism temporarily allied with US imperalism to fight Soviet imperialism.
The only real communists left on the planet are the only ones who criticize all imperialism.
>>2364382The movement was severely diminished after the collapse of the Communist party in 1920s USSR. Since then, for a hundred years, the real communist movement has languished. However, thanks to the efforts of some dedicated communists, the original theory and doctrine remains intact within a real communist party like
https://www.international-communist-party.org/ and groups like
https://www.ruthlesscriticism.com/ As capitalism approaches yet another major crisis and the possibility of a third world war, there is hope for the communist movement that a real communist party can once again win over a revolutionary working class, and establish global communism.
>>2364415yeah i'm sure that being a billionaire in vietnam and in the west has the same societal implications
nevermind that most capitalist billionaires come from several generations of aristocracy or capitalist while socialist billionaires are made in one generation because of state policy. totally the same thing. i'm sure this guy has the same command of vietnamese labor power, their weal and woe, the same way bezos has; or that 'his' wealth is actually an indicator of political influence (like in amerikkka).
888-COME-THE-FUCK-ON-555
YOU ARE A FILTHY EMPIRICIST
>>2362076Nazis never said they were socialist - at least not remotely in that way as it is formulated in the Vietnamese constitution. They had their own conception, they Marx and Lenin Jews and made clear they had nothing to do with it. It made to do with Spenglerist "Prussian Socialism" based on the Volksgemeinschaft, nothing to do with the working even remotely.
It's a completely non-argument. Vietnam is a Marxist-Leninist socialist republic that firmly in control of their bourgeoisie. Plus, their opening up was mostly just a concession to the US to stop being a global pariah. They still have thousands of co-ops, state control of the heights of the economy and every Vietnamese is a guaranteed a plot of arable land (there is no corporate agriculture in Vietnam).
>>2364420>>2364421🙄 A billionaire is a billionaire dude.
>>2364425> and every Vietnamese is a guaranteed a plot of arable landPetty-bourgeois "socialism." Nobody should own land.
>>2364425>Nazis never said they were socialist - at least not remotely in that way as it is formulated in the Vietnamese constitution. They had their own conception, they Marx and Lenin Jews and made clear they had nothing to do with it. It made to do with Spenglerist "Prussian Socialism" based on the Volksgemeinschaft, nothing to do with the working even remotely. You have to understand that "Anti-Campism" as a tendency primarily exists to justify regime change from the "Left". It shouldn't be any surprise that they use the same fallacious and libelous tactics that pro-NATO liberal-nationalists use against the people's democracies of Eastern Europe.
>>2364430>>2364432Why do people still talk about a meme tendency that for all intents and purposes, exists exclusively on Haz's Discord? Has anybody even met an unironic "MAGA Communist" anywhere?
Unique IPs: 17