[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1751637876710.jpeg (75.93 KB, 877x604, Gu9CrtTXAAEeFTc.jpeg)

 

What the fuck is happening in Chile and why is socialism having a comeback there. Did the working class just decide that shitlibbery and being right-wing is cringe?

Jara is literally from Boric’s cabinet, if anything she’s the shitlib continuity choice. The Chilean communists have always been center left libs, hell the socialist party in the 70s was to the right of the CPC. They’re literally why Boric is president and tailing the US dems.

>>2370115
>Boric’s cabinet
And?

File: 1751638344551.png (238.32 KB, 791x683, ClipboardImage.png)

get in quick

>>2370119
The boric government has not been socialist in the slightest

>>2370123
brother wtf are you doing, convictions have nothing to do with speculating on polls

>>2370115
Okay but being part of a coalition matters shit since she is from another party and she probably had to do concession to have her party stay in power. If she was part of Boric ideologically she would join his socdem party as well, wouldn't she

>>2370124
but that doesn't mean she isn't herself a socialist

>>2370123
fuck off opportunist

Is called a remontada.

>>2370123
get help, gambling addict

>>2370111
jara is the only leftist candidate. the others are different flavors or rightoid so the vote gets split.

if anything this shows we're fucked and some right winger will win in the 2nd round.

good

>>2370111
>ultra liberal versus less ultra liberal
I sleep.

>>2370530
good, go be useless somewhere else

File: 1752198126094.png (292.9 KB, 800x800, stardust.png)

>>2370123
I love that the next chilean election is just
>Communist
vs
<Escaped nazi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kast
>Michael Martín Kast Schindele (2 April 1924 – 9 May 2014) was a German-Chilean officer and businessman, along with being the founder of the Kast family in Chile. After Nazi Germany's defeat following the end of World War II, he settled in Chile, where many of his descendants have had important roles in Chilean politics, such as Miguel, José Antonio, Pablo and Felipe Kast.
>Rebolledo and Guzmán also wrote that Kast (along with his son Miguel) were associated with the Pinochet dictatorship's National Information Center, taking part in the capture and forced disappearance of Pedro Vargas, who had been organizing workers at Kast's business.
<Biological weapon manufacturer war criminal
>Like Kast, Matthei has a father who will pose his own challenges for his daughter. Fernando Matthei Aubel, the son of a German military officer who was trained by the US Air Force, returned to Chile after the 1973 coup to become a general. During the dictatorship, General Matthei is said to have led the programme for the testing of bacteriological weapons against political prisoners.
>His daughter, Evelyn, joined the military dictatorship government at its tail end to privatise the pension system. In 2024, The Economist said of her that she is the ‘woman who will lead Chile’s counterrevolution’. While Matthei tries to hide her extremism, she recently said that the deaths during the military dictatorship were inevitable.
https://www.ciperchile.cl/2024/03/13/el-instituto-butantan-produjo-veneno-para-que-la-dictadura-chilena-asesinara-a-opositores/

Literal cartoon villains

why must all the interesting things this year happen in november

>>2382689
Well if it happened any later it might not happen this year at all

File: 1752200290875.gif (429.46 KB, 213x201, 1446319019823.gif)

>braindead gringos once again shilling electoralism but this time its le based because its in le """third world""" and theyre using le Hammer and Sickle™
actually do some minimum amount of research before clapping like morons lol

>>2370537
>>2382679
lmfao unironically kill yourselves, jara is doing the typical radlib shit during elections time of disavowing anything that might make her seem like an "extremist"

ok

>>2370145
>she isnt like that filthy socdem boric!!!!!!!!!!
<she only had to do concessions to get accepted by the parties, making her in practice more of the same bullshit
LMAO

>If she was part of Boric ideologically she would join his socdem party as well, wouldn't she

you were a special needs kid werent you

>ablism

File: 1752200634445.gif (438.81 KB, 691x641, 1691068664351.gif)

>>2370111
Jeanette Jara went from "matapacos" to "más pacos" the moment election season started.

>>2382810
The USSR and China had and has elections, just different to how bourgoise elections go.

>>2382819
Who are you quoting

File: 1752210046571.png (464.4 KB, 499x585, xi jinping.png)

I think Jara is good and she's gattering an amount of support never seen before for a communist in this country (actual chances of winning) in one of our most reactionary moments since 1990. This user is >>2382810 >>2382819 is salty because his generic ML/trot splinter party is not getting the attention he wants. Simply ignore him.

>>2370123
Should've got in on this, but don't know enough about Chilean politics to go all the way on Jara.

>>2382810
I'm not saying that it's good or bad that red socdems came to power. You're an idiot if you think that doing nothing rather than backing socdems against literal fucking nazis is a good idea. Like Kast and Matthei would grind you up as fuel for the rich. Do you want to be like Peru? Having a dumb cunt girl boss just massacreing people at the behest of both the west and china?
>not true socialism
Still better than pinochet nazis coming to power you utter retard.

I swear ultras would rather a fascist took power than a demsoc.

>>2383202
a fascist destablizes the present state of things, and often after a fascist or hyperreactionary regime, the response is highly revolutionary, objectively speaking it is better that fascism were to take root in a large number of countries since that'd make communism infinitely more possible than under the present liberal state of things where the crisis hasn't reached a critical point yet

>>2383228
Nazoid fingers typed this

>>2383290
it's nazoid because it sounds bad? do you think that a revolution will occur in a society which is adequately equipped with every resource, in which the proletarians have not the will to revolt, because they have all of their minimal provisions met, or will it occur in a society where brutal thugs roam the streets, causing nothing but destruction in their wake while conscripting and significantly reducing the quality of life throughout a country? answer honestly

>>2383228
This is retarded nonsense.
The first thing fascists do is cracking down on unions and leftists.

>>2383310
That's not how it works you dumbfuck. Conditions will worsen because of the falling rate of profit, not because of fascism. Fascists will just make revolution less likely because they will kill everyone who may oppose them.
You only need to look at germany, italy, spain and hungary to understand.

>>2383316
>retarded nonsense
why, because you don't like it?
>The first thing fascists do is cracking down on unions and leftists.
so do bourgeois democracies, but cracking down never stopped communists, the october revolution happened in spite of a reactionary government, liberal revolutions happened in some of the most extreme reactionary countries (like spain in 1931 and so on)
>>2383319
>That's not how it works you dumbfuck. Conditions will worsen because of the falling rate of profit, not because of fascism.
both can be true, but conditions worsen more for the average worker under fascism, which actually creates revolutions more than the rate of profit falling
>Fascists will just make revolution less likely because they will kill everyone who may oppose them.
You only need to look at germany, italy, spain and hungary to understand.
you can kill a generation of revolutionaries but it was never even effective, the communists in italy were weak even before the fascist regime, yet when it fell they were strengthened the most, the yugoslav partisans for all their problems came out the strongest despite being under one of the harshest fascist occupations in history, the only one that is accurate there is spain, but in every other case it made revolution more likely

>>2383326
> why, because you don't like it?
No, because you're illiterate. You're an utter moron if you think that a fascist state is in any way easier to organize against. You're either a falseflagging nazi or an idiot who refuses to read even the summary of an history book, as evidenced by
> which actually creates revolutions more than the rate of profit falling

>>2383341
it is unstable, is it not? it is untenable and innately creates chaos unless moderated, does it not? therefore would it not be factually accurate to say that it is more conducive to creating a proletarian revolution through sheer incompetency? you can say all you want but if you don't address that then you're just stupid

>>2383343
No because the organizers have been fucking shot. The collapse of fascist goverments in the examples you brought up came from the outside, with communists managing some success only in spite of the oppression.

>>2383346
they can't shoot every single organizer, the carnation revolution happened with no inside help, and it was one of the more oppressive regimes, what about the collapse of the argentine military dictatorship in '83? or the collapse of the greek military dictatorship in '73? i could name extremely brutal regimes and state how their absurd policies leads to their own destruction, but it doesn't really matter if you just go "you're retarded because they killed (some) left wingers"

>>2383310
>Muh acceleration will make me turn into Lenin
Glow harder

>>2383027
>Xiposting
<they're a communist because they call themselves a communist (ignore the milquetoast liberal program)
It's funny how Haztards get banned on sight but electoralist garbage is given free reign.

>salty because his generic ML/trot splinter party is not getting the attention he wants

I'm in a union, not any irrelevant party.

>>2383202
>muh ultras
Go change your diapers retard. How about neither?

there are two types dengists, people who have read deng and people who haven't read deng.

>>2383189
>if you don't participate in electoralism then you're literally doing nothing
>fight against the lesser evil! fascism is just around the corner!

Literal twitter bot tier arguments. Glow harder faggot.

>>2370145
>but being part of a coalition matters shit since she is from another party and she probably had to do concession to have her party stay in power
How is that an argument IN FAVOR of Jara??

File: 1752241621490.jpg (66.7 KB, 679x458, 1746474931058.jpg)

>>2370158
>what the rest of the cabinet and government wants does not matter, it's the president's label what matters the most
This is like arguing with children whose idea of the world comes from Marvel movies.

>>2383371
>cabinets are picked because they're all entirely in agreement with the party line

>>2383372
If you think the president's "beliefs" or "identity" are what dictates the program much less what actually happens in a government in any fucking country then you're genuinely braindead.

File: 1752241898653.jpg (43.57 KB, 720x720, GupXxuCWcAAXelg.jpg)

A mí no se me olvida que la mesa en donde subieron a la Jeannette Jara para celebrar, en el ICAL, se la robaron al ARCIS. :)

Yankees retrasados larperos.

File: 1752242344455.jpg (39.71 KB, 750x698, 1749818525861634.jpg)

>>2370111
In 1999 Jara asked to vote for Lagos when Gladys and the "communist" party abstained in the second round, around that same time she stopped her communist militancy, supported Pavez against Gladys Marín lol.

No single communist union leader would have even met the big bosses of Chile, that's all I'm saying. Jara is not going to give a shit about us. Barbara Figueroa did the same shit with Sutil.

These "renewed" "communists" valen callampa. 🍄‍

>>2383363
i wish man, i wish

>>2383202
>>2383228
>>2383310
A real answer is that liberal reforms only aim to stabilize capitalism and help the middle class maintain their reserves just a bit longer at the expense of the proletariat. Also the fascists at least are not pretending to be communists.

File: 1752250511661.png (1.09 MB, 879x879, 1749578050894.png)

>>2383449
>First Hitler, then revolution!
Ok buddy how are you gonna build a revolution when a majority of the working class is still electoralist? The mensheviks protested electoral functions, how'd that work out for them?

no anon trust me the conditions of revolution will just happen magically

>>2383228
>and often after a fascist or hyperreactionary regime, the response is highly revolutionary
Or conservative. People seem just as likely to want stability under some Christian Democrat party after fascist radicalism.

>>2383326
>the october revolution happened in spite of a reactionary government
Didn't the October Revolution overthrow a socdem government? It was the Februrary Revolution that overthrew the Tsar.

>>2382826
what is that supposed to mean

>>2383228
so you're saying Pinochet was better than Allende for the left in this country? holy shit you're retarded

It's been a century and counting of liberals telling the proletariat to "start caring" (about their issues) and go to the polls by invoking the eternal scarecrow of "fascism" (always around the corner!), when are they going to give it up?

>>2383714
>t. german, 1933

>>2383617
The conditions of revolution are already happening. Spoilers: it's not on poll booths.

>>2383717
Yes but until you have emboldened the class consciousness of people and strengthened the revolutionary movement through electoralism you will be left with a revolution with no vanguard

>>2383716
>people invoked fascism before it even existed
>the rise of nazism wouldn't have happened if only people voted
>forgetting that social democrats (much like Jara) sided with nazis and literally murdered communists at the time
Are you actually this much of a retarded ape?

>>2383727
>people invoked fascism before it even existed
fascism is not an ideology, but a material reality of capitalism in crisis, read fascism and social revolution

>>2383726
>class consciousness means when you think about communism
Lol you are a massive fucking retard. Class consciousness is when the proletariat associates with each other in struggle against capital, not when voting, especially not when the poorer you are the less likely you are to engage in electoralism anyway.

The proletariat is not dumb, they already realized on their own that electoralism mostly benefits the middle classes.

>>2383732
>The proletariat is not dumb
The proletariat will share in the consciousness of the bourgeoisie until the conditions are unbearable and revolution is the only necessity.

File: 1752258107053.png (56.53 KB, 520x358, 1751977818938.png)

You know we're filled with retarded libs who just repeat idiocy they saw on some tweet that sounded smart to them because every fucking thread devolves into a discussion about Fascism(tm).

>>2383729
>fascism is not an ideology, but a material reality
<this is why it can happen multiple times because I conveniently defined it in abstract liberal terms instead of as a distinct movement with its own basis and characteristics
"Capitalism in decay" is one of the most retarded and vague leftoid sloganeering ever. Fascism was a specific historical movement in response to the growing proletarian association and middle-class anxiety of the time.

>>2383738
>this is why it can happen multiple times
It can and has.
> I conveniently defined it in abstract liberal terms
No, just a definition accepted by the Comintern in the 1930s.
>Capitalism in decay
That is the shortened down, overly simplified version of what was written in Fascism and Social Revolution.

>>2383734
>still not understanding what "class consciousness" means
It's terminal.

To you morons fascism becomes an alibi for more "acceptable", "desirable", "conducive" forms of bourgeois society, yet the conclusions of any analysis of political economy and bourgeois society means that any form of it is inherently oppressive, most especially to the proletariat.

You annoying liberals are ultimately asking the working class to distinguish the pissiness between cat piss and dog piss, if it's cat piss or dog piss, when their interests lie in cleaning the piss up in the first place.

>>2383739
>erm I'm right because I'm using terms as accepted by the Comintern
>no I will not elaborate further
The absolute state of this shithole, man.

>>2383732
A lot of revolutionaries were radicalized by the Bernie ratfuck. Like it or not democracy is part of the popular political consciousness

>>2383743
>radicalized by the Bernie ratfuck
Lmao. Can you explain what the fuck this actually means in practice?

>democracy is part of the popular political consciousness

Yeah and exactly why communists are against it. Communism is not about "the masses".

>why yes I'm a "revolutionary" (I joined the DSA or some shit, no I don't actually associate with unions or strike committees) and I got "radicalized" (I still believe in the sanctity of voting and democracy) because I voted and didn't get what I wanted (petty liberal reform).

times leftypol has celebrated even a nanometre of progress: 0

>>2383744
>Can you explain what the fuck this actually means in practice?
Yeah, the left went from "six feet under" to "very small group of political cranks nobody thinks about".

>>2383744
>Communism is not about "the masses".
Undialectical and commandist hogwash, if you aren't in constant contact with """""the masses""""" you are just a larper

>>2383750
There should be no leftists until the revolution is here! Nobody should eat until everyone's full!

>>2383762
>there should be no leftists
average anti electoralist

>>2383762
>>2383763
The average anti electorialist wouldn’t have added “until the revolution”. They simply would have added a period after leftist.

>socialism
>elections
choose one
<inb4 but *out of context quote that was walked back on*
ok now link me prove that the electorlist party has underground illegal organzation

>>2383807
Liberal truth nuke

Marxists are against leftism (liberalism)

>>2383750
>>2383762
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
<ONE MORE ELECTION BRO
>ONE MORE ELECTION BRO

>>2383744
Since when are communists against democracy? Communism is the most democratic ideology there is, because it expands democracy to the workplace.

>>2383976
Me when I get my theory from Hakim and Wolff

>>2383980
Democracy ≠ bourgeois democracy

>>2383984
you'll NEVER get me to vote. EVER

>>2383984
Read Marx

>>2383993
>>2383996
TIL most communist parties aren't actually communist because they practice "democratic centralism".


>>2383202
I've seen leftcoms arguing that communists shouldn't use the term "radical" because it originally referred to Jacobinism, these people are more concerned with pointless semantic debates than actually doing anything meaningful.

>>2383997
>"democratic centralism"
semantics

Lenin viewed democracy as a flexible method of organization, not an eternal truth. He was against democracy in principle as he was for abolishing class, the state itself and their superstructure. The proof of this is in democratic method being relegated to workers councils and unions, and no essential party affairs.

>>2383202
>I swear ultras would rather a fascist took power than a demsoc.

Why did you write socdem twice?

>>2384005
what do you mean when people say radicals in 2025 they don't mean the literal French républicains radicaux? "leftist" also still means "jacobinite liberal" even d& it changed meaning in the 19th century

>>2384005
>>2384019
Silly ultras, we should call our opposition 'reds' and 'unlawful' next, that will show them.

File: 1752273032554.png (583.86 KB, 749x783, 1734681364227993.png)

Kaiser is basically like a 4chan /pol/ youtuber, Kast is an actual nazi and Mathei has always been a pinochetista.

I dont give a fuck if Jara is a lib or whatever the hell you guys thing, I'd vote for a literal inert rock over those 3 demons. I'm already poor enough with rotting teeth and unable to pay for my transhumanist shit. If one of those fascists come to power and we get austerity there's a serious chance I fucking die. Get real. You people care way too fucking much about purity or terminology nobody gives a fuck about.

>>2384048
All of this is even more ridiculous when you realize that we have right before our eyes a fucking ancap psycho as a neighbor, the example of Bolsonaro in Brazil and also whatever the shit Trump is doing.
"Elections don't matter" my ass, i still remember how some leftist ""intellectuals"" claimed that Milei was gonna govern the same way as Fernandez/Massa, now they look like clowns.

>You people care way too fucking much about purity or terminology nobody gives a fuck about.

Remember, this is leftypol. This site gathers the weirdest people of leftist ideologies as much as /pol/ does it for the right wing.

>>2384048
>>2384299
>vote to stop fascism!!!!!!!!!
get some new material ffs

File: 1752290678916.gif (31.32 KB, 638x474, 1715011046248.gif)

libs best argument is always "the other side is worse" and never explain how and if you bother to find out it turns out its just some minor differences in bourgeois policy

>>2384048
is there any possibility they actually lose to jara?

>>2383997
It took you this long to find out?

Accidentally bumped a bourgeois election circus thread, fuck.

>>2384048
>i will vote
Leftard praxis

>>2384009
Wow Lenin participating in bourgeois elections? What a cope, he was just a bourgeois larper tainted by vile el*ctoralism. He'll never do revolution!

>>2383228
Motherfucker how would you organize if you were thrown out of a plane?

third worldists telling the third world what to do again

>>2384591
>im literally lenin by voting
LOL

>>2370124
Boric's parliament is against him. He can't do much anyway.

>>2386500
LMFAO the ultimate radlib excuse. boric surely wasnt against piñera when he signed along with all the major politicians in 2019 to stop the riots :)

File: 1752436020215.png (490.02 KB, 449x401, 1660860187510.png)

>>2386500
>my heccin smol bean president wanted to change the world but the parliament won't let him :(((((((
How can you say shit like this and then still insist voting is the way? You're lying anyway, there's plenty of things a president can do on their own.

>>2384591
Bourgeois elections is when workers get to vote on trivial council/union matters

>>2385880
You're right because workers turn out in Chile is non existent. Those who vote socdem are liberals and fascists.

>>2386567
I'm not being ironic in case western radlibs think I'm on their team

>>2386507
>there's plenty of things a president can do on their own.
Depends on the country. Not sure about Chile but at least here presidency is just ceremonial position and parliament has all the power.

File: 1752455640371.jpg (47.38 KB, 828x793, GvbW-GFXkAAKcg9.jpg)

>>2384009
>>2384591
>namedropping Lenin to support electoralism

>>2386502
>>2386507
I am not even an electoralist, just pointing out Boric is in this position not because of his personal or ideological choices, but because of the parliament given to him.


Unique IPs: 49

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]