[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

Just wanted to open a thread dedicated to the topic which I find only ever more relevant today.

While very very very far from perfect still, AI progress have been staggering over the past few years, and investments in the industry have gone through the roof, especially in countries like France, China or the US.

It is, in a way, its own new industrial revolution, a new way to automate production. Alas much like the previous one, it can only be expected from the elites that work time will stay the same, only as a mean to multiply production without any benefit to the worker (nor the environnement either as well, should that be mentioned).

But it only brings closer the idea of making work not a necessity but a liberty, by the establishment of universal income and economy wide work automation (as long as it is reliable, of course, I wouldnt hand out a psychatrist job to chatgpt or grok anytime soon, but you get the idea)

So what do you guys think ? Could this be feasable in the medium to long term ? Is it really in line with socialist ideals despite it being an opportunity for elites to turn it to the profit of economic higher ups (as it is already happening, in fact) ?

Speak your mind!

>>2399927
Another NEET thread
>>>/dead/

>Markov Chains means we can be depressed from overwork without the work part and magically still be too depressed to want to work a healthy amount.

Dubious premise. AI isn't making money yet (NVIDIA aside). So far, revenue of AI firms hasn't been a tenth of investments, see: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-haters-gui/

File: 1753232199718.jpg (64.42 KB, 750x548, max painting.jpg)

im a neet/hikki and i have found that anti work ideas work better with anarchism. communism of course is all about the workers.

Work/labor is a social and economical relationship, it's not "doing stuff" like liberals who do vibe politics think, it's just one category of productive activity and it will be abolished with private property, money, states, classes etc. with the revolutionary process.

just how braindead do you have to be to not tell the difference between wage labor and labor in the abstract lol

>>2400007
They don't want any labor, they're reactionaries

>>2399965
>ideas
ofc

>>2399927
ok what was the GET doe >>2400000

>>2399927
I'm more in favor of working hour reductions instead of UBI. i think it's still good to spread the labor burden equally among society. labor becomes seen as something like community service where you go to work 8 hours a week and do whatever the rest of the time

>>2401615
>arbeit mach frei

You have the right to be lazy when you clock out

>>2400010
You want labor and I want treats, you can just make my treats and everyone gets what they want

>rights

File: 1753493541016.jpg (20.77 KB, 500x389, 1681486105062487.jpg)

>>2399927
Lafargue's "Right to Be Lazy" is a typically petty bourgeois, endless litany of reproaches to the proletariat about making mistakes for raising slogans like "he who does not work, neither shall he eat". It is his anti-labour manifesto. Lafargue writes: "In capitalist society work is the cause of all intellectual degeneracy". Shitholes like Twitter (or this one!) teaches the opposite.


Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]