/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2417141
Replacing and killing you. Frankly anyone who is serious about communism should be 300 times more worried about the deep racism in Asians, and the homophobia in Africa, we need to focus more on turning blacks gay and start pushing race mixing on Asians while letting white people die throwing a tantrum.

Is OP a chat gpt bot?

>>2417146
Good luck

>>2417148
Thx

>>2417148
Thanks but don't really need it whites are already dying.

I think OP is shitting up both his own thread here and the /usapol/ thread, there was another poster besides OP before with a different typing style.

Those are probably leftovers from the sharty spergout yesterday

>>2417152
We will never die

How high is the chance that OP is some mexican nazi

Also
>Everyone's fertility is decreasing. India is now going below replacement. Whites were the first to enter modernity and as such we will be the first to emerge from the birthrate crisis into a new society.
4 million people lower from 2000 to 2020.
It's not that the percentage is small, whites really are dying and being erased from their own nations because all of them are outbreeding asian or black.
You're chopped cracker. I will be one of the few in this board to say white genocide is real and that's a good thing, but it's 50 years too late to say "We will never die" you already are and by the end of it you won't realize it until there's barely thousands of you left, don't worry though we'll let you have forest reservations like you did to the Native Americans.

>>2417167
Okay. A race war it is then. Not sure you'll like the outcome.

>>2417177
mexican cartels vs black gangs vs…. uh… are there even young white people left

>>2417188
>wypipo are losing because they aren't in violent gangs
lmao

>>2417177
Not a race war or you would have done it 30 years ago.
The material conditions for it aren't going to happen the same way that the material conditions for fighting with legislature against houses being bought by corporations. The facts are that whites are complacent, getting fucked over in every which way, and sitting by it.
>Kamelo Anthonys dad saying he forgives his sons killer and denounces racism
>That one cracker who killed himself over AI blackmail
All just go to show that despite everything you will always sit there in impotent rage at the change of the world, at best you will vote in pundits like Trump who will continue importing non whites into your nations because fuck you personally.
Your sons will be reliant on asian women and your daughters will fuck black men and Muslims or asians too thanks to K Pop.
You cannot convince anyone outside of a few thousand like I said. You will be relegated to anarcho communalist tribes in the forest. That's the best deal white people will get. A fitting end for your kind.
Also
>Not sure you'll like the outcome
You said it yourself, you think communism is impossible, you say that like I'm losing out on a soldier, fuck no faggot, I don't give a fuck what you do.
White genocide is unstoppable from both me and you. Cry about it.

>>2417195
who wins
gangbangers vs sheltered suburbia

>>2417200
The guy who commands the actual army

1865
1917
1945
1979
Why should communists care about right wing losers?

>>2417206
The 40% Black and 50% Latino army?

>>2417209
We shouldn't.
Anyone who says that communists should appeal to men or white people at this point is just a bitter loser.

>>2417083
>Yes, because some will still remain due to the superiority of our nation.

So you think they'll stay in a nation where they can't find a job, can't rent an apartment, can't own a home, and where some psychotic government is talking about "the purity of the white race" 24/7 because, what, we've got some fucking gay looking roman statues? People don't leave their countries, friends, and family behind because they find the architecture pretty, they do it for a material incentive: work.

>It's not. It's important for the Republican party because they're bought by corporate interests.

For something that sure isn't important to you guys, you go out of your way to find ways to excuse the behavior of business; if the rent goes up you blame the immigrants over the landlord, if wages are too small you, again, blame immigrants over the rich guy paying the wages.

>Who is "you" here?

The ideology based around collectivizing entire groups of people and assuming their motives sure seems to get upset if you collective them. The fact is the far-right fell head over heels with Trump, you had Richard Spencer heiling him. You don't get to say "Oh, that's not us" when that's not a charity you extend to anyone else.

>There's no need to kill them if you've forced them to capitulate to national interests. That's just bloodshed for the sake of bloodshed.

You can't even define what "the national interest" is in any consistent way. Importing tons of low-wage migrants is in "the national interest" but when it comes to that y'all are suddenly like "Oh, there's more things important then profit!"

>By doing the right things, but yes. If Bezos began only hiring Whites I would love him.

There's nothing stopping you from working in an Amazon fulfillment center today. Literally nothing. If your dream is to work for Amazon just fucking do it, it's a shitty job that doesn't pay nearly enough for the labor required.

>Why should we want to capsize the elite class? They're intelligent and industrious.

Donald Trump and Elon Musk are two of the most retarded and lazy mother fuckers out there. There's literally no evidence that being rich means "intelligence".

>If we can use state power to force them to be loyal why do we need to kill or depose them?

Except they already are "loyal" as far as the actual concerns of the state go. You can't define "loyalty" or "national interest" because that's ultimately just your fucking feelings.

>I fail to see the problem.

Jesus how fucking cuckolded, "I'm fine having my hands ground up by industrial machinery for pennies, but I won't stand having a mexican working next to me!"

>>2417213
Yeah, right wingers are losing so hard they run the US, most of the ME, and are poised to take control of Britain.

>>2416645
Landlordicide
Constitutional right to have a job
Reduced workweek
No more wars

>>2417248
Reform is to the left of the labour party under stirmer.
https://nitter.poast.org/Basil_TGMD/status/1952321128023671097#m

>>2417209
Are you winning son?

>>2417262
I meant to say right

>>2417253
>Reform capitalism to secure eternal bourgeois domination

-This has been a certified leftoid classic

>How do leftists propose to court the young white male demographic in the West?
<looks at my org
Having no problem with that.

>>2416645
>How do leftists propose to court the young white male demographic in the West?
We can't, any "recruitment" campaign is bound to fail.
These young white men are not working class, they are petty-bourgeois. They are class enemies and should be treated as such.

Easy. Put subliminal messages in furry pornography art.

>>2417279
This.
Whites are fundamentally petit bourgeoisie, the prole recruitment is mostly going to be asian and latinx. If you are triggered by that you are reactionary

>>2417279
>These young white men
Which ones? Because last I checked, and I may be wrong, the working class was around 80% of the US population. Even if they were miraculously all white men, there would still be more proletarian white men.

If you're talking about the ones who are actually booj sons of millionaires, then fine, dismiss them as overwhelmingly petbooj, but to pretend that's a typical young man, white or not, is overlooking a huge chunk of the working class. In a word; racial bigotry. No war but the class war.

>>2417285
>Even if they were miraculously all white men
* even if the petit booj were miraculously all white men

>>2417272
Young white men are probably more woke than not. It's the 1st/2nd/3rd generation latinxs that are chuds

>>2417285
The OP pic was used as an example of the "young white men" demographic that we need to appeal to, I was saying those people (far-right Groyper types and so on) are petty-bourgeois and that it is totally useless to try to appeal to them in any way. I was not referring to all young white men, many young white men who are working class are in fact left-wing anyways, at the very least social democrats.

>>2417136
mixed people stay winning, then

>>2417289
Ah fair enough, I forgot after reading some replies. Sorry for jumping down your throat.

>>2416687
bad bait

Imagine living with ghosts in the head

>>2417248
Woah right wingers run all the shitholes

Don’t need to.
The white race is a ruling class social control formation.

>>2417279
The biggest demo for far-right shit are not white men lol, it's mostly minorities.
Also this shit is most popular among the working classes. The western left is mostly the domain now of university educated upper-middle class professionals.

>>2417622
huh? I know rightoids that are gay or trans.

>>2417083
> By doing the right things, but yes. If Bezos began only hiring Whites I would love him.
There it is lel

>>2417628
You mean the number you pulled out of your ass?

>>2417621
From my understanding, most minorities who vote for right-wing parties in the west are voting on a single issue that effects them specifically. It's very rare for working class people to be loyal to any political party.

>>2416645
Men are NOT turning right wing, it's a propaganda push from the bourgeoise

>>2416645
Well we need to co-opt populism from the right wingers that’s one thing

>>2417628
Peter Thiel is gay, so was Mishima and before the Right went single issue on anti-trans to the point of backing radfems and "great replacers" out of contrarianism, trans people used to vote right-wing parties in the west. The racial far-right regimes of Rhodesia and Apparteid South Africa had trans healthcare, the Islamic Republic of Iran have trans healthcare and so does far-right Israel. The far-right BJP is pro-trans too and so are the smaller more insane far-right Hindu parties in Indian. China are not RW but they're pretty chudded on race while being pro-trans.
I am not doing a "queer are da real nazi" by the way. But this idea of sexual/gender minorities as inherently leftist is just ahistorical, people respond to their material situation.
>>2417658
>The absolute majority of queers are left leaning and completely immune to reactionary propaganda
In the US where the religious (christian) right is still a thing yes. When the religious right get out of the picture, like in Western Europes, queers easely vote far-right or participate in right-wing politics.

>>2417686
You're a femboy hanging out in tranime spaces Moffin your opinion and social circles is not an accurate snapshot to mainstream men.
t. have lots of mainstream male friends who are all conservacucks or fascists