How do leftists propose to court the young white male demographic in the West? They're increasingly becoming radicalized to the right wing. They're either Trump voters, Groypers, or some form of white nationalist at this point. Liberalism clearly has no better answers than the far-right's. So what is your solution?(/pol/ tourism thread)
248 posts and 16 image replies omitted.>>2417177Not a race war or you would have done it 30 years ago.
The material conditions for it aren't going to happen the same way that the material conditions for fighting with legislature against houses being bought by corporations. The facts are that whites are complacent, getting fucked over in every which way, and sitting by it.
>Kamelo Anthonys dad saying he forgives his sons killer and denounces racism>That one cracker who killed himself over AI blackmailAll just go to show that despite everything you will always sit there in impotent rage at the change of the world, at best you will vote in pundits like Trump who will continue importing non whites into your nations because fuck you personally.
Your sons will be reliant on asian women and your daughters will fuck black men and Muslims or asians too thanks to K Pop.
You cannot convince anyone outside of a few thousand like I said. You will be relegated to anarcho communalist tribes in the forest. That's the best deal white people will get. A fitting end for your kind.
Also
>Not sure you'll like the outcomeYou said it yourself, you think communism is impossible, you say that like I'm losing out on a soldier, fuck no faggot, I don't give a fuck what you do.
White genocide is unstoppable from both me and you. Cry about it.
>>2417195who wins
gangbangers vs sheltered suburbia
>>2417209We shouldn't.
Anyone who says that communists should appeal to men or white people at this point is just a bitter loser.
>>2417083>Yes, because some will still remain due to the superiority of our nation. So you think they'll stay in a nation where they can't find a job, can't rent an apartment, can't own a home, and where some psychotic government is talking about "the purity of the white race" 24/7 because, what, we've got some fucking gay looking roman statues? People don't leave their countries, friends, and family behind because they find the architecture pretty, they do it for a material incentive: work.
>It's not. It's important for the Republican party because they're bought by corporate interests.For something that sure isn't important to you guys, you go out of your way to find ways to excuse the behavior of business; if the rent goes up you blame the immigrants over the landlord, if wages are too small you, again, blame immigrants over the rich guy paying the wages.
>Who is "you" here?The ideology based around collectivizing entire groups of people and assuming their motives sure seems to get upset if you collective them. The fact is the far-right fell head over heels with Trump, you had Richard Spencer heiling him. You don't get to say "Oh, that's not
us" when that's not a charity you extend to anyone else.
>There's no need to kill them if you've forced them to capitulate to national interests. That's just bloodshed for the sake of bloodshed. You can't even define what "the national interest" is in any consistent way. Importing tons of low-wage migrants is in "the national interest" but when it comes to
that y'all are suddenly like "Oh, there's more things important then profit!"
>By doing the right things, but yes. If Bezos began only hiring Whites I would love him.There's nothing stopping you from working in an Amazon fulfillment center today. Literally nothing. If your dream is to work for Amazon just fucking do it, it's a shitty job that doesn't pay nearly enough for the labor required.
>Why should we want to capsize the elite class? They're intelligent and industrious.Donald Trump and Elon Musk are two of the most retarded and lazy mother fuckers out there. There's literally no evidence that being rich means "intelligence".
>If we can use state power to force them to be loyal why do we need to kill or depose them?Except they already are "loyal" as far as the actual concerns of the state go. You can't define "loyalty" or "national interest" because that's ultimately just your fucking feelings.
>I fail to see the problem.Jesus how fucking cuckolded, "I'm fine having my hands ground up by industrial machinery for pennies, but I won't stand having a mexican working next to me!"
>>2416645Landlordicide
Constitutional right to have a job
Reduced workweek
No more wars
>>2416645>How do leftists propose to court the young white male demographic in the West?We can't, any "recruitment" campaign is bound to fail.
These young white men are not working class, they are petty-bourgeois. They are class enemies and should be treated as such.
>>2417279This.
Whites are fundamentally petit bourgeoisie, the prole recruitment is mostly going to be asian and latinx.
If you are triggered by that you are reactionary >>2417279>These young white menWhich ones? Because last I checked, and I may be wrong, the working class was around 80% of the US population. Even if they were miraculously all white men, there would still be more proletarian white men.
If you're talking about the ones who are actually booj sons of millionaires, then fine, dismiss them as overwhelmingly petbooj, but to pretend that's a typical young man, white or not, is overlooking a huge chunk of the working class. In a word; racial bigotry. No war but the class war.
>>2416645Men are
NOT turning right wing, it's a propaganda push from the bourgeoise
>>2417686You're a femboy hanging out in tranime spaces Moffin your opinion and social circles is not an accurate snapshot to mainstream men.
t. have lots of mainstream male friends who are all conservacucks or fascists
Unique IPs: 27