Just reminding you that Chinese government got butthurt by Vietnam liberating Cambodia from Khmer Rouge’s tyranny, anti-imperialism doesn’t apply for Dengoids.
>>2425667Don't know if you're Vietnamese, but if you are, or are just knowledgeable on the subject, please consider posting something in the /ita/ thread
>>2423489 where yesterday an anon asked clarification about the "boat people" situation. He quotes a wikipedia article with a clearly anti-communist tone and he obviously knows there's a bias, but I would like someone with something more specific to say about that, if possible. That said, based Vietnam for BTFO'ing Pol Pot. Even an anarchist like Chomsky says they were right for doing that. One should go Pol Pot against people actually deserving it, not random peasants and shortsighted people.
>>2425766You are social fascist revisionist brezhnevite. Pol Pot did nothing wrong
>Even an anarchist like Chomsky saysAn imperialist says something of no meaning. Every word of imperialist slander against Angkar is speaks volumes to its brilliance
>>2425753>Chinese nationalism hurt Vietnam a lot.Wrong. Vietnam lack of spine to social fascist imperialism hurt themselves most greatly. China stood for all oppressed people against social fascism
>>2428443Gaddafi - began rule in 1969
Nasser - began rule in 1954 died in 1970
Ben Gurion (lol) - proclaimed israel in 1948, also not arab or african
Sukarno - ruled 1945 to 1967 also not arab or african
Velasco - ruled 1968 to 1975 also not arab or african
Hafez - began rule in 1971
Mugabe - began rule in 1987
Kaunda - began rule in 1964
Obote - began rule in 1962/66
Pol pot - began rule in 1975
Lmao, the only one who you could possibly claim was influenced by him is Mugabe and at that point he'd already been deposed for like 10 years. Hardly someone to look to as an example of what to do. Sukarno, Ben-Gurion and Nasser were already dead before Pot even took power
>Vietnam liberating Cambodia from Khmer Rouge’s tyrannyby invading for social-imperialism and reestablishing the khmer monarchy? lmao
>BUT DA USSR DIDNT LIKE DA KHMER ROUGEbrezhnevite ussr didnt like the khmer rouge, not the stalin era ussr, in fact, the khmer rouge was one of the only states that continued to uphold stalin and mao when the rest of the world turned its back on marxism-leninism
tl:dr brezhnevite seethe. regardless of what i think of deng.
>>2428431when the people who opposed pol pot were trying to restore the monarchy?
>BUT THE CIA HELPED HIM!!castro also accepted american support and khrushchevite MLs think this was some genius move, in reality all it was was simply the US trying to piss of the USSR which was its main enemy, the USA also dropped millions of bombs on cambodia to prevent a khmer rouge takeover.
>>2428490He was only able to continue his insurgency as purely a destabilising tool of the Thai monarchist military regime
completely in bed with the CIA btw you massive retard.
>>2429198Come on, he had to give the kid a chance, and you have to give it to the kid; first and only ultraleftist revolution that ever captured the state however short and embarrassing at points their governance was at some point
Also genocide accusations bullshit, the ultraleftist kid was trying to evacuate the cities from the usual burger indiscriminate foreboding
Perfectly normal American behaviour
Kid was dealt a shit hand, and realistically for this kind of statecraft he really was too young
Only ultraleftist victory ever
>>2429203*bombing
Not foreboding, now that's an interesting autocorrect
Kind of apropos
>>2429206>the vulgar ultraleftist definitionYou'd have to define what that is, "ultraleftist" is generally a meaningless buzzword.
They did not, they sent people to collective farms and did this weird agrarian socialist/collectivist thing using forced labour.
>>2429211So you're telling me China and Vietnam have the economic base to just let everybody do as they please whenever they want?
That is essentially the definition of Full Communism, given in the Grundwisse
I'd believe it for the USA – until they ran out of government cheese, that is – but, really you think the economic base of China and Vietnam can support that level of leisure for all?
>>2429215>So you're telling me China and Vietnam have the economic base to just let everybody do as they please whenever they want?No.
>That is essentially the definition of Full Communism, given in the GrundwisseNo.
>I'd believe it for the USA – until they ran out of government cheese, that is – but, really you think the economic base of China and Vietnam can support that level of leisure for all?Communism is impossible in one country, so no.
>>2429214This video is garbage, just pokes holes in specific claims without looking at the bigger picture or any other evidence that may contradict the pre-established narrative in the creator's head.
>>2429218Communist society is not anarchy, it is highly organized, everyone knows this.
>>2429226It also ignores all evidence that may contradict it, selectively looking at sources that it can either poke holes in (there are many or sources from political groups that agree with everything it says.
>>2429227You could also cite the text you're referring to instead of acting like a smug faggot.
>>2429228That's just repeating the same argument again
>"It doesn't adress every single point that could be counter to what they're trying to say"Ie it's not holistic enough
Cope
How about you actually adress the arguments made in the video?
>>2429190of course the resident board schizo understands the world through gay little wikipedia boxes.
as much as you like to try to present yourself as le based schizo or whatever you are still just another braindead low information american. pathetic.
Unique IPs: 18