Am I the only one who thinks Maupin needs to update his book with discussion on?:
>the Tesla burnings
>the Pennsylvania governor’s house being arsoned
>the shooting of the two Israeli embassy workers in DC
>the Minnesota school shooting
>the recent shooting death of Charlie Kirk
Seems like this is a good opportunity since it furthers his argument that an American Years of Lead are already here.
>>2471159this imbecile has clearly never read Capital and has no clue on the difference between money capital and actual produced goods
how can someone talk in such a way about topics they have no understanding on without immediately dying from embarresment?
>>2471239He's just a reactionary whose job is to spoil communism "from the inside."
Same with Spaz Al Din who said "revolutionaries are conservative" and Whackson Stinkhole who said "communists don't want to abolish private property"
>>24741481. Latino.
2. The Afro-Japanese Hawai'ian that created the situation in NYC must be one of /pol/ worst nightmares. Also, he wanted to kill people at an NFL office, but got to the wrong floor and ended up killing bankers. He complained that playing gridiron football caused him brain damage and possibly his lack of orientation during the shooting vindicated that.
3. Italian. I hope at some point a shooter named Mario will emerge. That would be epic.
4. ??? Who's that? He looks like Hellraiser, tbh. Can't tell anything except he's white.
>>24742025. The guy who proved Charlie wrong seems to be of Anglo descent.
So, basically, this shooter thing proves that inter-ethnic solidarity is possible.
>>2476148I guess Caleb comes off as almost affable and not abrasive, especially if compared to Haz or actually many other political influencers. But the facade crumbled three years ago with glorious SPANKGATE and he proved to be an insufferable narcissist. I haven't followed him since, but apparently he set up his Centre for Political Innovation again.
>>2476533too much to read on the Kirk thread
can a kind soul summarise the shooter's 'iDeOlOgY' and motives please?
>>2476757the deprgoam reddit got shut down
do you think he was a hakim fan?
>The alienating, atomizing nature of today’s internet landscape has been credited as a major radicalizing force, but what is unique about the internet is not the degree of radicalization it cultivates, but rather the level of abstraction of that radicalism. For lone wolf ISIS or incel terrorists, the organic community they profess their allegiance to is immaterial compared to those of radical movements of yesteryears; the German Nazis who carried out anti-semitic violence on Kristallnacht at least lived among an “Aryan” race (even if the contours of this race was an ideological fiction), the socialist revolutionaries in 1918 still had a real connection to the Worker Councils and the labor movement (even if that movement lead to the establishment of a Social Democratic Republic, rather than direct rule by the Councils). Modern day violent radicals, who have grown up in the information age, have no such connection. What is the community of betas and virgins to the incel? There is no such community. What is the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria to the ISIS terrorist or supporter in the West? Nothing but a faraway symbolic fantasy. Not even a fantasy with a material representation in their lives … It used to be the case that violent, radical movements had the end goal of either influencing policy or taking state power themselves. Totally atomized radicalism throws such assumptions on their heads. Without intimate personal relations, and concrete goal-directed organized form, traditional methods of social control break down. Material carrots and sticks lose their value along with the dearness of life itself. Suicidal violence projected outwards is a threat that states are not, and cannot, be prepared for. It’s the only kind of violence that can fully actualize the possibility of a war of “all against all,” which was previously only hinted at in the threat of civil war.https://www.palladiummag.com/2020/03/09/do-you-feel-lonely/
>The effective disappearance (or non-appearance) of organized terrorism has gone hand-in-hand with the rise, above all in the U.S., of dramatic attempted or successful assassinations or indiscriminate public mass-murders committed by individuals usually acting alone: mad bombers such as Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski, and too many public shooters and vehicle murderers to cite by name.
>These individuals typically have a reputation for anti-social tendencies, often leave behind a manifesto or other evidence of radical political convictions and motivations of some sort, and sometimes have degrees of peripheral involvement with some political community, but act on their own initiative. These lone-wolf attacks comprise a form of terrorism and can’t be dismissed as so many senseless criminal acts committed by demented loners—but nor do they qualify as political action in the conventional sense of social action carried out collectively.
>What all this points to are cultural sensibilities that increasingly place private resort to lethal violence, and terrorism in particular, so far beyond the pale of conscionable political action as to make it the province of individuals so anomic and anti-social as to be incapable of collective action, lacking either the desire or the wherewithal in social skills, and in any case not numerous enough, to connect with like-minded others and get organized.
>Very few people will take to terrorism under present conditions. When they do, it must assume the character of an incontrovertibly and self-consciously deranged and depraved war against society and humanity in general fought by career criminals who radicalize in the demi-monde in and around prison, or wholly asocial and self-radicalized lone wolves—a prophecy already fulfilled in the now-familiar figures of disgruntled school shooters and guys who drive vans into pedestrians. These attacks arguably represent the final form of domestic terrorism, as private violence is increasingly pushed far into the margins of social life.
>The sensationalist publicity and moral panics that attend these incidents overshadows how rare they are. There can be no doubt that the decline of religious and family ties and values, and the corresponding increase in social isolation, alienation, and anomie, together with the demise of quasi-legitimate forms of interpersonal violence has inflated the incidence of these occurrences. But again, the growth potential is self-limiting in that political violence has truly fearsome growth potential to the extent that it is a form of social action carried out by people who are normal and don’t see themselves as sociopathic misanthropes, but on the contrary are motivated by heroic altruism—a quality that the anomic, alienated, and maladjusted loner lacks by definition.
>Most well-socialized people will answer the call of duty and take lives while exposing their own when instructed to do so by legitimate superiors; a varying number will take it upon themselves to fight as irregulars in such a cause when it appears lost but not hopelessly so; but infinitesimally few will resort to what their own laws and morals define as murder, and least of all to murder of a degree far more heinous than those that occur in the course of ordinary gangland disputes and romantic triangles. The last point applies no matter the extent of alienation and anomie. Alienation and anomie are only relative risk factors for what, in absolute terms, is among the rarest of rare aberrations even in these populations, indeed even in the subsets of criminal offenders within them.https://www.palladiummag.com/2018/11/16/mass-political-violence-wont-happen-in-america/ >>2479219In Wyoming they don't give a shit. That proves something I heard many years ago: they don't have electricity yet so news take days or even weeks before they reach Wyoming.
>>2479568The former governor of Arkansas and pretend husband of Hilary Rodham getting spectacularly kidnapped and then executed by the Red Guards Austin or whatever those supposed maoists showing up with guns at demos are called. He would pen a memory while in captivity about everything that went on with Jeffrey Epstein, the real inner workings of the DNC, the shit he did in the eighties for the CIA and the contras and, most important of all, all the truth about his lovely virago of a wife. Those pages will misteriously emerge more a decade later the events while a safe house of the captors would be searched by the feds. Yet, doubts about the integrity and the authenticity of the document will be a thing and many conspiracy theories will appear.
The alternative would be Obama, but he would drove the kidnappers to desperation with his vapid yet slick rhetorical abilities and they would simply let him walk away to stop listening to him.
Unique IPs: 48