[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

In for some red terror?
15% off on selected items with promo code "SPOOKY" at shop.leftypol.org


 

REMINDER THAT PAKISTAN IS A NUCLEAR POWER
Pakistan’s military says it has killed more than 200 Taliban and other fighters in overnight border clashes, adding that 23 of its soldiers were killed and 20 were injured.
It added that its forces carried out “infrastructural damages to Taliban posts, camps, headquarters and support networks”.
Afghanistan claims it killed 58 Pakistani soldiers in the fighting.
Afghani Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi says Kabul “achieved our military objectives last night” and that its military has “paused [the fighting] from our side for the time being”.
Qatar and Saudi Arabia have expressed deep concern over the recent escalation and tensions along the border, calling for “restraint” and the need to de-escalate.
Iran said it was ready to assist in easing tensions between the two countries.

File: 1760390638848-0.png (839.73 KB, 770x962, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1760390638848-1.png (101.59 KB, 880x495, ClipboardImage.png)

The Taliban government has confirmed that it attacked Pakistani troops in multiple mountainous locations on the northern border.

A Taliban spokesman said 58 Pakistani military personnel had been killed in what it called "an act of retaliation". It claimed Pakistan had violated Afghan airspace and bombed a market inside its border on Thursday.

Pakistan has disputed that figure, saying 23 of its armed forces' members had died and claiming that "200 Taliban and affiliated terrorists have been neutralized".

Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said the Afghan attacks were "unprovoked" and civilians were fired at, warning that his country's forces would respond "with a stone for every brick".

Ok campists which side am i supposed to support, did the kremlin send the information package yet

Haven't Pakistan's intelligence agencies been quiet patrons of the Taliban for a while? What's with this border conflict?

>it's Tuesday in the Middle East

This conflict is just Pakistani Imperialim vs Taliban Imperialism

Nope. Not falling for it again. This is going to blow out like a wet firecracker in a week. Nothing Ever Happens folx

Whom must I critiKKKally suppooooort?

>>2520349
The anti-imperialist anti-american Afghanistan (Taliban) because they're fighting Pakistan which is an enemy of the AES BRICS India and the Taliban may be friendly or outright svpported by China.

>>2520379
Theres a ceasefire, I think the war is over already, Afghanistan won overnight. Nothing guarantees it won't escalate again though.

Critical support to Afghanistan, because I don't want their win streak to be beaten yet.

File: 1760393094799.png (55.8 KB, 384x128, G3AOU9naoAACB99.png)

Border war?
No.
People's war?
Yes!

>>2520349
>campist
your handler should have given you your updated instructions on disrupting anti american communist activities on leftypol agent, go read them

>>2520350
Yes but it's complicated. Pakistan's politics are really dynamic. I can never keep up with the details but there's a ton of factionalism and shifting patronage networks, and the "tribal regions" are always a big question in national politics so without being able to tell you anything substantially detailed it's at the least not surprising to see the sparks flying up there.

>>2520389
India is a fascist shithole and China backed Pakistan against them during their border conflicts a couple months ago.

um bros… get on disc.ord vc NOW we need to figure out which side we are suppoorting… our critical support will literally change the tide of this war

File: 1760394825804.jpg (85.18 KB, 715x715, v3bpmhlzemh71.jpg)

>>2520349
>>2520380
>>2520418
We support the Taliban numbnuts

>>2520350
not really, they havent been supporter of them for at least a decade, and they've grown a lot more wary of supporting islamic insurgents in general since it caused trouble in their territory

>>2520421
Taliban were funded by the CIA to overthrow socialist Afghanistan and damage the USSR. They aren't le anti-imperialist champions at all

>>2520458
Hamas also basically a Mossad/CIA psyop to undermine PLO.

>>2520412
>>2520440
Nothing further to say on my part, just wanted to say thanks for explaining anons.


uncritical support for afghanistan
>>2520349
Pakistan is the western puppet, it must perish

>>2520526
Also a Chinese one. I think? India is a fascist shithole that wants to be a big boy. So I'll support Pakistan on that alone. What's the beef between Afghanistan and Pakistan? Durand line?

>>2520416
Ah yes the fascist hindutva BJP against the … based glowing islamic republic of Pakistan? Ok

>>2520350
Purely anecdotal, but my Pakistani coworker believes that the military government is doing it at the behest of the Americans to try and counter Chinese influence. It seems plausible to me, but I can't say any more than that.

Snipe pigs, simple as.

File: 1760734511152.mp4 (1.86 MB, 478x850, VID-20251016-WA0005.mp4)

Pakistani troops gunned down some Palestine protesters. Now the people who got killed were TLP which is a schizo far-right party but still.

>On Breaking Points yesterday, we covered the grisly massacre that unfolded this week in Pakistan, as state security services gunned down an unknown but considerable number of people marching to protest against looming normalization with Israel. The segment was controversial, with critics arguing that the group in question, the TLP, is not genuinely “pro-Palestine” but is a far-right, religious extremist organization that regularly incites and carries out violence. But we noted all that in the report.


>Pakistan does not actually have a history of this sort of mass state violence, and so the military-backed government needs to normalize it if it is to become part of their weaponry in building and defending what Field Marshall Asim Munir describes privately as his end goal, “a hard state.” Authoritarian governments often target groups with the least public support first, hoping to establish a principle for how other dissent will be dealt with. In this report we document how the Pakistani military appears to be using the same tactic with the justly unpopular TLP to set the tone for how other groups may expect to be treated if they do not toe the line on their emerging Israel-Gaza policy.


>The story below, reported by Waqas Ahmed, Murtaza Hussain, and myself, describes one of the most cynical and diabolical deployments of strategic violence I’ve ever covered.

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/pakistani-security-forces-killed-anti-israel-protesters-tlp

File: 1760734922058.png (574.06 KB, 808x593, munir_trump.png)

>>2525129
Same. Sounds plausible. Asim Munir showed up at the White House over the summer. I scanned an Al Jazeera article that puts the relationship into context:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/19/trumps-pakistan-embrace-tactical-romance-or-a-new-inner-circle

But it makes sense. The Republicans in the U.S. and the Pakistani deep state / military people have a relationship that goes way back. If you look at the Pakistani military, it's a mix of Chinese and U.S. hardware, while the Indians have Russian equipment. But India also used to have a lot of British hardware, and they use French-made warplanes.

propaganda video of afghanistan ministry of defence

>>2520350
It seems to be because of attacks from TTP(Tehreek e-Taliban Pakistan) in the Pakistan-Afghan border regions. Pakistan believes the Taliban are backing them/allowing them to attack Pakistan using Afghan territory as a base which is very likely since both Taliban and TTP are hardcore Islamists. Pakistan striking Kabul on behalf of the US so they can reclaim Bagram easier seems unlikely IMO since large sections of their military are entirely Chinese-sourced, I think this is no different from Pakistan fighting with groups like the BLA(Balochistan Liberation Army), they have a lot of rural areas in which they lack complete control and have to contend with various militant separatists.


Unique IPs: 21

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]